Regional Collaboration for Conservation and Sustainable Utilization of Plant Genetic Resource in West
Asia and North Africa: A Case for a Regional Sustainable Network
Regional Collaboration for Conservation and Sustainable
Utilization of Plant Genetic Resource in West Asia and
North Africa
A Case for a Regional Sustainable Network
A Concept Paper
Prepared for AARINENA By
Mohamed Zehni, Ph.D.
October 2007
1
Regional Collaboration for Conservation and Sustainable Utilization of Plant Genetic Resource in West
Asia and North Africa: A Case for a Regional Sustainable Network
Preface
The primary objective of the concept paper is to make a case for the need for a regional
network for plant genetic resources and to facilitate discussion among relevant
professionals and policy-makers in the WANA Region on the steps needed to launch such
a network. It is envisaged that the next step is the convening of a consultative meeting in
2007 to develop an operational framework and timetable for the establishment of the
proposed PGR network using the concept paper as a background document. The outcome
will be presented to the General Conference of AARINENA in 20081.
This version of the Concept Paper has benefited considerably from insights and comments
from several PGR leaders and policy makers2. The following is a summary of the views
expressed:
o There was unanimous agreement on the need for a regional PGR network. It was
generally agreed that the development of the regional conservation strategy and
most importantly its implementation makes it critical to have a well functioning
coordination group to oversee its evaluation and implementation in the context of
the international development and agreements.
o Similarly, there was unanimous agreement on the functions of the network and the
areas of collaboration among the countries of the region, as proposed in the
paper. However, It was emphasised that overseeing the implementation the
WANA PGR strategy would be a critical function. An additional function is
promoting the use of the conserved genetic resources with clearer links to
breeding programmes and research.
o There were diverging views among respondents as to the suitable type/model
proposed by the paper for the network; some respondent thought that an ‘intergovernmental network’ would not be workable.
o There was a general agreement among respondents on the four basic requirements
suggested by the paper for a successful launching of the network as, namely:
governments’ endorsement, an executing agency, high- level patronage and
sponsorship. Some felt there was no need for a high level patronage.
o Instead of the above some suggested the formation of a small team of well-known
person from the region to act as "delegation of goodwill" to contact the
1
The consultative meeting is sponsored, in alphabetical order, by: AARINENA, ICARDA, IPGRI
(Bioversity)- CWANA and GFAR.
2
Sincere thanks go, in alphabetical order, to: AL- Lawati, A., Ayad, G., Chouha, M. (Ms),
Georgiou, A., Kalaily, R., Khaldoun, S. (Mrs), Laliberte, B (Ms), Maliha, N., Roozitalab, M.,
Salah Rezgui, S., Sanginov, B., Shdiefat, S. and Zahoor, A. Dr. Hamdan, Executive Secretary
of AARINENA, has supported the development of the paper and Ms Taraneh Ebrahimi,
AARINENA-RAIS Secretary, made an excellent job of presenting the draft Concept paper on
AARINENA’s website for comments.
2
Regional Collaboration for Conservation and Sustainable Utilization of Plant Genetic Resource in West
Asia and North Africa: A Case for a Regional Sustainable Network
governments and others are very helpful. In this case, sub regional balance and
appropriate mixture of backgrounds for the Team is very important.
For a more detailed account of the comments received, please see Annex 1.
Regional Collaboration for
Conservation and Sustainable Utilization of Plant Genetic
Resources in West Asia and North Africa
A Case for a Sustainable Regional Network
1.
The concept paper endeavours to make a case for the need for action at the
regional level in West Asia and North Africa Region (WANA) for strengthening plant
genetic resources. In doing so, it explores opportunities for a meaningful and sustainable
collective action and it articulates, to the extent feasible, ways and means to achieve such
collective action. The paper focuses on institutional and organisational options and
discusses in particular national responsibilities under the various options.
2.
The primary objective of the paper is to facilitate discussion at an advisory
meeting of selected country representatives from the five AARINENA subregions,
namely Mashreq, Maghreb, Nile Valley/ Red Sea, Arabian Peninsula and West Asia.
The advisory group will also include representatives from relevant international and
regional organizations (e.g. AARINENA, the Trust, BIOVERSITY, ICARDA, FAO,
ACSAD). The purpose of the advisory group is to critically review the issues paper prior
to it being widely distributed for comments.
What is the Concept paper’s approach?
3.
To facilitate the work of the advisory group but without anticipating its
conclusions, the issues paper asks questions, raises issues and to explores alternatives.
In other words, the paper will be deliberately raising questions more than providing
definite answers, but at the same time it will attempt to provide impartial analysis of
alternative courses of action with pro and con arguments for each. However, the
revised paper will eventually follow a more traditional formal format.
4.
The paper makes an extensive use of the WANA PGR Strategy3 and an early
proposal for funding the establishment of a PGR network4. The issues paper should be
seen as a first step in a process that hopefully would lead to agreement by
governments to establish a network for the conservation and sustainable utilization of
3
Towards a regional strategy for the conservation of plant genetic resources in: West Asia and North
Africa (WANA). Draft: July 2006.
4
A Proposal for the Establishment of a Plant Genetic Resources Conservation Network in the WANA
Region: Presented by AARINENA to GFAR for funding (2006).
3
Regional Collaboration for Conservation and Sustainable Utilization of Plant Genetic Resource in West
Asia and North Africa: A Case for a Regional Sustainable Network
plant genetic resources5. The review of the issues paper by the advisory group should,
therefore, pave the way for the development of a full-fledged proposal for the
consideration and endorsement by those countries agreeing to take part in the
network.
What action and why now?
5.
It will be recalled that the Global Plan of Action (GPA)6 called for action at
local, national, regional and international levels for the conservation and sustainable
utilization of plant genetic resources (PGR). The Plan was to provide a coherent
framework for in situ and ex situ conservation as well as in institution- and capacity
building. It was hoped that the Plan would contribute to creating synergies and
coordination among on-going activities and a more efficient use of available resources
and mobilization of new resources. Though some progress was achieved in
implementing the Plan, it is generally recognized that more efforts, at the national,
regional and international level, were urgently needed.
6.
Now that the International Treaty for Plant Genetic Resources for Food and
Agriculture (IT-PGRFA) is operational and its essential element of funding: the
Global Crop Diversity Trust (the Trust) is a reality, hopes are revived for promoting
an effective and efficient global arrangement for plant genetic resources in general
and for ex situ conservation, in particular. Through the Treaty, countries agreed to
establish an efficient, effective and transparent Multilateral System to facilitate access
to plant genetic resources for food and agriculture, and to share the benefits in a fair
and equitable way. The Treaty calls on countries to cooperate to promote inter alia the
development of an efficient and sustainable system of ex situ conservation.
7.
A recently developed regional conservation strategy for WANA has broadly
outlined proposals for regional collaborative arrangements and means of
strengthening coordination within and among the countries of the Region, for PGR
activities, especially ex situ conservation activities7. The further development of the
strategy depends entirely on the establishment of a well-financed and wellfunctioning regional PGR network. Thus is the current initiative to establish an
intergovernmental network as a concrete step of bringing to bear the collective
commitment, experience and aspirations of the countries of the region in this vital
field.
5
In due course the network will be open for membership also to NGOs, the private sector and other
relevant stake holders like AARINENA itself..
6
Global Plan of Action for the Conservation and Sustainable Utilization of Plant Genetic Resources for
Food and Agriculture adopted by the International Technical Conference on Plant Genetic Resources.
Leipzig, Germany 17-23 June 1996.
7
http://www.croptrust.org/documents/web/WANA-29jan07.pdf
4
Regional Collaboration for Conservation and Sustainable Utilization of Plant Genetic Resource in West
Asia and North Africa: A Case for a Regional Sustainable Network
Would a new network succeed where as the old one failed? How to avert a
history repeat?
8.
It is generally accepted that the inability of the now defunct WANANET to be
self-sustained is the main reasons for its ineffectiveness and demise. Other
contributing factors are, on one hand, weak links to breeders at national level who
saw these genebanks as ‘unnecessary’ competitors to their working collections and,
on the other, weak links to policy makers. Quite often, such initiatives are created
without the prior endorsement and commitment by the national competent policy and
decision makers, and accordingly no resources are earmarked for their activities, and
so once external support ceases, the whole enterprise falls through. Furthermore, the
poor regional coordination is, in a way, a reflection of lack of adequate national
coordination (for a brief state of PGR in the region, please see Annex 2).
9.
Given the positive development in ex situ activities as shown by the growing
number of genebanks/ national PGR programmes in WANA and the impetus
generated by the current regional conservation strategy process, it is generally agreed
that now is indeed the right time to consider the establishment of a PGR regional
network de novo: a network that is country driven, self-sustained and broad-based.
The new network should be part of AARINENA, which is the official Association
representing the region in the Global Forum for Agricultural Research (GFAR) and is
made of the agricultural research institutions in WANA that are housing the bulk of
the plant genetic resources collections in the region. Membership should be subject to
formal endorsement by the highest competent authority in the country that is seeking
membership, possibly through signing a letter/memorandum of understanding spelling
out benefits and obligations.
What the network is to do?
10.
11.
The Network should be primarily concerned with the sustainable conservation
and use of plant genetic resources for food and agriculture (PGRFA) in keeping with
the FAO International Treaty, to which the countries of the Region are formally
associated. Specifically, the Network is to be instrumental in developing [and
executing?] long-term regional strategies and frameworks for action for ex situ
conservation and use including demonstrating benefits of these ex situ collections in
terms of food and nutrition security, improving agricultural productivity, farmers
income and people’s livelihoods in accordance with the International Treaty and the
Global Plan of Action, with primary focus on activities and actions that support crops
in Annex 1 of the Treaty. The network will play an instrumental role in promoting
inter-regional cooperation on PGRFA, strengthen the region’s contribution to global
PGRFA fora and raising public awareness on the importance of PGRFA targeting
particularly National Governments and Donor Community at large.
More specifically, the network is:
o To regularly review and update the Regional Strategy
o Foster the conservation and sustainable use of PGR in the region,
5
Regional Collaboration for Conservation and Sustainable Utilization of Plant Genetic Resource in West
Asia and North Africa: A Case for a Regional Sustainable Network
o Promote the exchange of PGR scientific and technical experience and
information,
o Strengthen national PGR research capacities for providing timely and
necessary data and information to policy-makers
o Encourage the establishment of appropriate cooperative PGR research and
training programmes in accordance with identified regional, bilateral or
national needs and priorities,
o Strengthen cross-linkages between national, regional and international
research centres and organizations, including universities, through
involvement in jointly planned PGR research and training programmes, and
o Assist in the mobilization of financial and other forms of support to all efforts
aiming at strengthening PGR conservation and sustainable use for
development in the Region.
o Formulate projects and seek funding for their implementation is major area
including:
o To develop, provide and promote information systems for genebank
management,
o To assist member countries develop policy and legal capacities necessary to
implement relevant treaties and agreements such as the FAOITPGRFA and
the CBD.
o To develop a global accessional-level information system;
o To upgrade capacity and expand management options and impact at the
national level.
o To provide competitive grants programme to support evaluation of collection
o Characterization of the core collections prior to use
o For in situ conservation, I would suggest that promoting added value of the
use of landraces for farmers’ who are continuing to use them by considering
labelling the derived end products of these niche rich areas
What are the areas for collaboration?
12.
An important basis of a rationally developed regional collaboration is the
sharing of conservation activities, expertise and experience. Based on comparative
advantage, willingness to collaborate, and commitment to the cause of the Regional
strategy, countries should further discuss collaboration on well-identified and focused
activities. The Advisory Group identified five sets of broad areas for collaboration in
sharing of experience and resources to be addressed, among others, by future
arrangement for regional collaboration:
Germplasm Management
o Regeneration / multiplication
o Characterization and evaluation
o Documentation
o Utilization genetic resources
Storage/Field Facilities
o Seed Storage
o Field genebanks
6
Regional Collaboration for Conservation and Sustainable Utilization of Plant Genetic Resource in West
Asia and North Africa: A Case for a Regional Sustainable Network
o In vitro Conservation
o Multi-location evaluation of germplasm
Germplasm Movement
o Safety duplication
o Germplasm health (standards and monitoring) / safe and healthy movement of
germplasm
o Germplasm exchange and distribution of material
Capacity Building / Knowledge
o Training
o Technology transfer
o Policy and legislation
Joint Research Projects and Ventures
o Collection missions
o Joint publications/knowledge
o Regional scientific meetings
o Public awareness
What Type of Network?
13.
The Advisory Group at their 2006 meeting in Aleppo discussed at length the
type of network that is needed for the region and that would be sustainable over time.
The emerging view was that while that the overarching goal is for an all-embracing
network that deals with all aspects of plant genetic resources, it was that might not
realizable at once and, in stead, a gradual realization was thought the most tenable
approach. The various options for the establishment of a PGR network was discussed
under four major heading, as can be seen in the following section.
Institutional Orientation
14.
The first question to ask is whether the network is intended as a forum for
information and experiences exchange among the countries of the region. Or, instead,
it is seen as being an action-oriented network in addition to being a forum for
information and experience exchange. By action-oriented network, it is meant that the
network would be able to take action in several areas, inter alia, gathering information
and establishing data bases, developing case studies, formulating cooperative projects
at regional and sub-regional levels, mobilizing resources and interest, holding
seminars, meeting and training courses.
15.
Based on the above and in view of past experience, the success of the network
is conditional on it demonstrating tangible results that advance the cause of plant
genetic resources in the region. Furthermore, donors are more likely to support the
network if it were oriented towards the sustainable conservation and use of plant
genetic resources contributing to food security and wellbeing of both farmers and
consumers. For this reasons the network must be action oriented.
7
Regional Collaboration for Conservation and Sustainable Utilization of Plant Genetic Resource in West
Asia and North Africa: A Case for a Regional Sustainable Network
Institutional Organization
16.
The second question is regarding whether the network is made of individual
experts and professional acting on their personal capacities, or it is based on formal
governmental agreement spelling out clear expectation and firm commitment. No
doubt that the success of any network depends on dedicated individuals from the
member countries of the network. However, experience had shown that without the
support, both moral and financial, and commitment of the concerned authorities the
sustainability of the network is in great doubt. It is particularly true in the case of
plant genetic resources: a sector increasingly governed by international agreements
and where political as well as technical factors are intertwined. Furthermore, many
governments consider plant genetic resources a national important asset that has to be
protected and further developed in line with their policies and regulations.
17.
For the above reasons, a regional network that aims at forging collaborate
arrangements and agreements among willing countries in the region for the
conservation and sustainable use of plant genetic resources must have the
commitment and backing of the concerned governmental authorities. Experts,
professionals and policy makers may represent the mainstay of the network as long
they are assured of the backing of their authorities.
Geographical Coverage
18.
For the purpose of this exercise, an all embracing definition of the WANA
region is adopted to include 24 countries: Afghanistan, Algeria, Bahrain, Cyprus,
Egypt, Iran, Iraq, Jordan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Libya, Mauritania, Morocco, Pakistan,
Palestine Authority, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Sultanate of Oman, Syria, Sudan, Turkey,
Tunisia, United Arab Emirates and Yemen. Plant genetic resources programmes in
the Region are at different stages of development, depending on country size,
resources and on government policy. The Region is traditionally divided in subregions with common natural features and/or socio-economic conditions, but
invariably the sub-regions are affiliated under a larger grouping while they preserve
their specificity. For example, ICARDA and AARINENA have similar sub-regional
grouping under an umbrella of common goals and direction.
19.
In the light of the above, it is clear that any network for PGR must embrace all
willing countries under a common central umbrella while encouraging the
establishment of sub-regional chapters if deemed beneficial by the countries of the
sub-regions themselves. A preferred option is to start with a regional network and
gradually build sub-regional entities as conditions and resources allow. Though not all
countries are likely to join the proposed network, the door should be left open for the
widest country participation. An agreement among at least 8 founding countries
should be sufficient to trigger the establishment of the regional network.
Subject Coverage
20.
A central question here is should the network be all embracing in its coverage
of all aspects of plant genetic resources conservation and utilization or to be more
8
Regional Collaboration for Conservation and Sustainable Utilization of Plant Genetic Resource in West
Asia and North Africa: A Case for a Regional Sustainable Network
specialized network. Both models have their advantages; the former model’s merit is
in its comprehensiveness and holistic approach, while the other model may result in
more focused efforts and will be easier to manage. Both models have their
disadvantages: the former could, under the conditions of the region, to spreading
capacities too thinly while the latter could lead to proliferation of networks.
21.
In the light of the above, perhaps a compromise between the two approaches is
the best course to take. The network should be comprehensive in stating its long-term
goals and objectives and pragmatic in its implementation plans. Many circumstances
and recent developments (e.g. the Trust suggest that the network is best to start by
concentrating on ex situ aspect linking closely with users and plant breeders.
22.
A network that is primarily concerned with plant genetic resources for food
and agriculture (PGRFA) and act as an instrument in advancing long-term regional
strategy and framework for action for ex situ conservation in accordance with the
International Treaty and the Global Plan of Action.
23.
It is proposed that what was needed is an evolving action oriented
intergovernmental network starting as a central network and eventually establish subregional chapters as need may arise and interest shown by the countries of the subregion. On the same token, the network may start as subject-wise network and
gradually develop crop specific activities. The network should start with well-defined
and focused activities where members of the network can contribute to and benefit
from (ex situ is recommended as a possible good starter).
What are the requirements for successful network?
Need for Governments’ Endorsement
24.
Experience shows that it is not sufficient for a few dedicated and enthusiastic
individuals to get together and decide to establish a network encouraged by the
willingness of an organization to provide funding to get things started. Eventually
there comes a time when the organization is unable or unwilling to continue the
financial support indefinitely. The enthusiasm and dedication of individuals is
essential but it has to be backed by unambiguous endorsement by the competent
national authorities.
25.
It is suggested that such endorsement takes the form of a letter/memorandum
of understanding, which spells clearly the benefits to and obligations of the country
wishing to join the Network.
Need for an Executing Agency
26.
To avoid past shortcomings, the establishment and launching of the new
network should be orderly and professionally executed. It is suggested that an
Executing Agency/Organization be appointed by the mother organization
(ARRINENA) to undertake all operational and legal steps leading to the
establishment of the network.
9
Regional Collaboration for Conservation and Sustainable Utilization of Plant Genetic Resource in West
Asia and North Africa: A Case for a Regional Sustainable Network
27.
It is suggested that (organization to be chosen) be entrusted with the tasks of
assisting in the establishment of the new network. These include:
o Finalizing the Network’s charter and getting it approved,
o Obtaining governments endorsement,
o Calling for first inaugural meeting and handing over the responsibilities to an
elected governing body.
28.
The Executing agency should be enabled and resourced (in addition to what it
may volunteer to undertake from its own resources) to undertake the described tasks
efficiently and timely.
Need Patronage
29.
Conserving plant genetic resources for food and agriculture in the region is a
lofty cause, which should find appeal and support of eminent and highly dedicated
persons; a case for patronage at highest level possible8.
30.
It is suggested to explore the possibility of having a ‘patron’ for the cause of
establishing and supporting the strategy and the establishment of the network by some
well-known and respected personality from the region.
31.
It is, also, suggested to explore the idea of having a small team of high ranking
well known persons to act as “delegation of good will” to contact relevant authorities
and organizations, in and outside the region, to promote interest in the intended
initiative.
Need for Sponsorship
32.
The network should articulate and develop the notion of sponsorship to turn it
into an effective instrument of support, oversight and advice. It may think of technical
sponsorship (e.g. Bioversity, ICARDA, ACSAD, the Trust) and political/policy
sponsorship (FAO, GFAR and AARINENA).
With whom the network is to collaborate?
33.
Numerous international and regional organizations have traditionally played a
major role in supporting PGR activities in the region, a fact that is highly appreciated
by the countries of the region. It is hoped that they will continue to lend their
technical and financial support. The two organizations that played and continue to
play a major role in promoting PGR activities in the Region are BIOVERSITYCWANA and ICARDA. Others had also contributed to name but few: all CG centres
(particularly Bioversity, ICARDA, CIMMYT, ICRISAT, CIP, IRRI), GFAR,
ACSAD, GEF, UNDP, UNEP, FAO, JAICA, USAID, IDRC, IFAD, IDB, AFSED,
A prominent PGR leader in the region was asked whether the idea was feasible, he answered: “I think it is
possible and should be tried. I am optimistic if the ‘the patron’ and ‘core group’ are well selected as leaders who
could influence institutions and policies”.
8
10
Regional Collaboration for Conservation and Sustainable Utilization of Plant Genetic Resource in West
Asia and North Africa: A Case for a Regional Sustainable Network
ICUC, CIHEAM, OPEC, Global Crop Diversity Trust and several others. It is
important that any future network to endeavour to attract the support of these and
other sponsors, especially from outside the region such as the Nordic Countries
Genebanks as well as seeking sponsorship from major NGO or private sector entities
in the region.
What Organizational Model is best for the Network?
34.
Normally, regional networks of the type contemplated here would consist
more or less of the following:
o Central Body/Assembly/Governing Body comprising all participating
members of the network,
o Secretariat
o Elected Executive Body/ Coordinating Body
o Sub-regional Chapters
o Country Focal Points
o Committees/Technical Bodies
35.
The above is obviously is theoretical and such arrangement works only with
well-developed and advanced networks. In the case of the hoped for PGR network; it
is rather premature to envisage the organizational shape it might acquire.
36.
In the light of the above it is suggested that the final organizational shape of
the network will depend, inter alia, on the initial number of founding members and
how fast the network will grow as well how much funding it can earn and mobilize.
The members of the Central/ Governing Body of the Network should decide the final
organizational model.
What’s in a Name?
37.
The name of the network has to be selected carefully and particularly how its
acronym would sound in Arabic, the language of the great majority of the Region.
38.
It is suggested that the final name of the network shall be decided once the
scope and the main orientation of the network have been agreed on. Consideration
should be given be given to a catchy and meaningful name both in Arabic and
English.
Annex1
11
Regional Collaboration for Conservation and Sustainable Utilization of Plant Genetic Resource in West
Asia and North Africa: A Case for a Regional Sustainable Network
Comments Received on the Concept Note9
General Comments
Brigitte Laliberte: This is very interesting progress since the development of the
WANA regional strategy. You have played a key role in moving the establishment of
a regional network for PGR under AARINENA with this concept paper entitled
"WANA regional collaboration for conservation and sustainable use of PGRFA: The
case for an Intergovernmental Network". I would be pleased to provide some
feedback if appropriate. I am copying my colleagues Luigi and Jane for their
information. I think you did a wonderful job with the concept paper, which will no
doubt result in a positive development!
Ibrahim Hamdan: I will be looking forward to the good news you will receive from
the Trust. It is mainly due to your efforts and excellent work you have done so far.
Sanginboy: Thank you for sending this material to me and this is very important
issue for the regions not only WANA, by my opinion it is very important for
CWANA too. Actually, I had less time to read all the pages, I think AARIENA made
a good job. From this point I would like to know that could we Central Asian
Countries join to the network as the counterpart. As the same time I think ICARDA
could support through CACARI this network for Central Asia
Saleh Shdiefat: The following are additional general comments
o In paragraph 34, I suggest that we should have sub-networks for (Cereals,
Fruit trees and Vegetables) instead of having sub-Regional Chapters.
o We should have more specialized Network with concentrated efforts on the
sub-networks to be managed easier.
o Taking in consideration that, the other AARINENA Networks coordinators
and/or chairmen should be represented in the executive/ coordinating body or
Technical bodies/committees.
o I suggest that, there is no need for an Executing Agency, and I believe that
AARINENA Executing Secretary have the ability and responsibility to hold
this NW.
o About the Name, my suggestion is in English: “ Regional Plant Genetic
Resource Network (RPGRN)” and " ‫ ”الشبكة ااقليميمب الييدب الاالثلا مب االيك مب‬in
Arabic.
Robert Kalaily: Just I want to inform you that Lebanon is a part of PGRFA network,
which is hosted by FAO. Visit: www.pgrfa.org <http://www.pgrfa.org> to take
some idea about the database and the participating countries.
9
None of these comments and suggestions for improvement were incorporated in the text; this is
thought better left to the judgment of the advisory group
12
Regional Collaboration for Conservation and Sustainable Utilization of Plant Genetic Resource in West
Asia and North Africa: A Case for a Regional Sustainable Network
Mme Khaldoun: Following your last e-mail, concerning concept paper, I would like
to congratulate you and Dr Zehni about the tremendous work that you have done.
However, I judge the report all the phytogenetic group of INRAA judge the report
complete, that's why we want to emphasize on some point, which we consider as
important:
o The Network has to create the synergy and coordination between the
different institutions dealing in the same field in order to avoid dispersal of
resources and activities;
o To Undertake the described tasks efficiently and timely;
o We agree with the idea of including some well known and respected
personality from the region, and
o The network must to assist institutional efforts leading to develop a
national strategy and program on RPG and their conservation;
Finally, we want to reiterate our sincere congratulation about your willingness to
create that network. And we really apologize for my lateness because we were on
period of prospection, and the members of phytogenetic are out off INRAA. So we
take time to response to you.
Dr. Salah Rezgui, (Tunisia) : I would suggest that it would be much better to define
subnet-works for specific crops that will be under the umbrella of the regional
network, so that achievements could be accomplished. The other scenario is
developing scenario with regard to the activities of conservation programs. This latter
scenario may reinforce the establishment of the regional network with regard to
germplasm exchange and other operational activities. A comprehensive
memorandum of understanding of these activities should be clearly defined to realize
these activities in close relationship of the various treaties and conventions along with
the establishment of a task force to implement these activities. However funds should
be sought at least during the beginning to be self funded and sustained later through
labelling procedures, innovations etc…. and developing partnership.
This concept note is a welcomed one but implementing it seems to be a little
doubtful since it is mainly based on dedicated persons to do the job within each
country. In my view, it would be better to detail a little on the operational
aspects and real world implementation. Funding is a real problem and represents
the most important constraint to carry out these activities. Refinements of the
approach should be added so that comprehensive network components might be
implemented
Dr. George Ayad (BIOVERSITY)-CWANA: How the network will be
sustainable? The network will need to cover its own operational expenditure,
e.g. secretariat, meetings and communication costs, This may be achieved
through membership subscription as in the case of AARINENA and its sub-
13
Regional Collaboration for Conservation and Sustainable Utilization of Plant Genetic Resource in West
Asia and North Africa: A Case for a Regional Sustainable Network
networks e.g. Date Palm, Olives, Medicinal and Aromatic Plants and Water use
Efficiency.
Dr. Zahoor Ahmad (Pakistan): Dr. Zehni has floated the idea to involve the
highest competent authority for endorsement. My concern is that information
systems on PGRFA in CWANA are weak and the programs on PGRFA are at
different levels. In past, most the networks have not contributed significantly
due to commitments at individual or program levels. I do not see the
governments' endorsement will help much to make it a success. Initial efforts to
make it a success may be at program level. I think we should analyze the
situation why the networks of European countries are more successful than of
developing countries.
Responses to the questionnaire as posted on AARINENA Website
The following are ad verbatim comments- no attempt is made to refer theme to
those who made them
Responses to Question 1
In paragraphs no 5, 6 and 7, the paper asks the question: What and why action now?
The paper comes to the conclusion that further development of the strategy depends
entirely on the establishment of a well-financed and well-functioning regional PGR
network.
Question 1: Do you agree with the paper’s conclusion on the need for a PGR
network? If not Why?
o I fully agree with the establishment of the network under the umbrella of
AARINENA and fully support the arguments well put forward in the paper.
The development of the regional conservation strategy and most importantly
its implementation makes it critical to have a well functioning coordination
group to oversee its evaluation and implementation in the context of the
international development and agreements.
o I completely agree.
o Yes, I agree
o I believe the Network would facilitate the further development of the WANA
Strategy through increased partnership and collaboration among the member
countries.
o I agree on the need for a PGR network
o I agree with the conclusion to have a PGR network for the WANA region
Responses to question 2
14
Regional Collaboration for Conservation and Sustainable Utilization of Plant Genetic Resource in West
Asia and North Africa: A Case for a Regional Sustainable Network
In paragraphs no. 10 and 11 the paper asks the question: What the network is to do?
And it lists several functions for the new network:
Question 2: Do you agree with the listed functions? Would you like to add other
functions?
o Regarding the functions of the network, I agree with regularly review and
updating the strategy but most importantly overseeing its implementation
would be the critical function, which includes all the other functions listed.
May be this should be clearly stated. It might also be important to see a
stronger emphasis on promoting use of the conserved genetic resources with
clearer links to breeding programmes and research.
o I agree with all the functions. I cannot suggest anything else. I think you cover
all the aspects.
o
Modify the bullet no 9 of para 11 to read the following: to develop, provide,
promote and sustain genebank management information system
o I think the proposed functions are very relevant and complete. At the first
meeting of the Network, the proposed functions may be reviewed and
revisited.
o Yes, I agree with the listed functions. I suggest adding “ Establishment of an
Network.
o The listed tasks are agreed upon with no extra functions suggested
o Responses to question 3
In paragraph no. 12, the paper lists areas of collaboration among the countries of the
region
Question 3: Do you agree with these areas of collaboration? Are they feasible?
Do you suggest other areas for collaboration?
o I agree with the specific activities for the areas of collaboration but am
confused regarding the groupings. For example, the storage/field facilities are
separate from germplasm management. The groupings should probably be
reviewed.
o Again, I fully agree.
o
Under 5, you may wish to add joint development of genebank management
information system
o I agree with the proposed areas of collaboration
15
Regional Collaboration for Conservation and Sustainable Utilization of Plant Genetic Resource in West
Asia and North Africa: A Case for a Regional Sustainable Network
o Yes, I agree with these areas of collaboration. They are feasible and I suggest
reforming the title (3) to become “Germplasm collection and Movement”
instead of “Germplasm Movement”.
o I agree with the proposed areas and believe they are feasible
Responses to question 4
In paragraphs 13 to 23, the paper explores suitable types of Network and discuses
issues such as institutional orientation, institutional organization, geographical and
subject Coverage.
Question 4: What’s in your view the most suitable type of PGR network for the
region? Would you like to suggest other types?
o I agree with the proposals,
o I think it has to be action oriented, based on formal governmental agreement,
divided in sub-regions and focused on all aspects of plant genetic resources
giving emphasis on the most important ones,
o I fully support the idea of action-oriented network,
o We should also keep in mind that the Network' activities are proposed to be
carried out under AARINENA which is not an intergovernmental body.
Therefore all of the Network functions and areas of collaboration are solely
facilitation and consultative in nature for developing and implementing the
strategy of PGRFA in the WANA region and consequently all its
recommendations and decisions are not compulsory for the governments based
on the International Treaty. The Governing Body of the Treaty is the only
appropriate body to monitor the compliance with the Treaty and other related
issues. If we want to establish an intergovernmental Network, FAO as the
relevant international organization responsible for the International Treaty for
PGRFA should be heavily involved in the process and with consultation and
approval of the governments and active involvement of other regional
organization such as AARINENA and IARCs such as ICARDA, BI,
CIMMYT and others, the intergovernmental Network on PGR is established
with all its implications and functions. The Executive Committee is needed
with the member countries as full members to mange the Network affairs and
AARINENA, ICARDA, BI, GCDT and others including FAO could attend the
EC meeting as observers,
o My point of view, the most suitable type of PGR network for the region is the
“Institutional Organization”,
16
Regional Collaboration for Conservation and Sustainable Utilization of Plant Genetic Resource in West
Asia and North Africa: A Case for a Regional Sustainable Network
o I agree with the gradual realization in respect to aspects of PGR work. Action
oriented network is the type most useful for the needs of the region to ensure
that PGR are used to improve agricultural production and farmers livelihoods,
as indeed the policy makers need to see to be able to support the network and
make it sustainable. The network should be established among countries
'based Inter-governmental' agreement but be open for membership to NGOs,
private sector etc. subject to approval of the concerned Government. Re
geographic coverage, The 24 countries of WANA and its four sub-regions as
per AARINEA structure is agreed. However, to start with, a regional network
with founding members of 8 countries is suggested then the sub-regional
structure could follow on as more countries join in form the four sub-regions.
Responses to question 5
In paragraphs no. 24 to 32, the paper suggests, as next steps, for a successful
launching of the network the following: Governments’ Endorsement, Need for an
Executing Agency, Need for High Level Patronage and Need for Sponsorship.
Question 5: Do you agree? Would you like to add other factors?
o Section 33 and some of its content could also be linked to the areas of
collaboration sections 12 points 1-5. Regarding the sponsorship from the
Trust, we definitely foresee a very strong role for the regional network in
implementing some of the Trust activities. This may not be translated into
direct contributions to the operation of the network but to some of the
collaborative activities securing threatened crop diversity.
o I totally agree.
o
The factors covered are good enough
o I tried to define in previous section the process for the establishment of the
intergovernmental network. The government approval and the Executive
Committee or Board are required. FAO, AARINENA, GCDT, ICARDA, BI
and others mentioned could act as cosponsors to established Network.
Knowing the region, I personally don't think a High Patronage is required if
we follow the steps defined. It may also complicate the process. Formation of
a small team of well known person from the region to act as "delegation of
goodwill" to contact the governments and others are very helpful. In this case,
sub regional balance and appropriate mixture of backgrounds for the Team is
very important.
o I agree that, the next steps that needed for a successful launching of the
network are the following: Governments’ Endorsement, High Level Patronage
and Sponsorship.
o Need Government endorsement in the form of a MoU or similar instrument.
An executing agency to be selected by AARINENA to establish the network
17
Regional Collaboration for Conservation and Sustainable Utilization of Plant Genetic Resource in West
Asia and North Africa: A Case for a Regional Sustainable Network
as per the ToRs in the document. High-level patronage team is also agreed to
help represent the new network and contact high-level authorities and donors.
Correspondence with Dr Prof. Cary Fowler
In a private correspondence with Dr Cary Fowler, Executive Director of the Global Crop
Diversity Trust regarding possible areas of collaboration between the Trust and a WANA
regional PGR network, he made it clear that any contribution from the Trust would not be
“funding for holding meetings or employing staff. But it is funding to do something and
hopefully it can be used as leverage in the countries to get more national commitment”.
Dr Fowler, identified some such areas that could be eligible for contribution from the fund
as follows:
o To provide financial support to regeneration of threatened accessions in national
genebanks;
o To develop, provide and promote information systems for genebank management,
o To develop a global accessional-level information system;
o To upgrading capacity and expanding management options and impact at the
national level.
o To provide competitive grants programme to support evaluation of collections
On my part, I fully concurred and welcomed his assertion of the importance of networks,
and the Trust’s intention that much of the above will be done through the networks, which
will give them an extra tangible reason for existence and boost support to them.
Annex 2
The State of Plant Genetic Resources in the Region
The WANA region spreads over two large continents: Africa and Asia, and though
predominantly dry, it is relatively rich in plant diversity. The Region has one of the
world’s three nucleus centres of origin of agricultural crops and three Vavilovian
centres of crop diversity. Two of these centres (the Mediterranean Region and the
Near Eastern Region) are considered the centres of origin of more than 150 grown
plant species. Some ten thousand years ago, the WANA / Near East region was the
centre of domestication (origin of agriculture) for wheat, barley, lentil, forage species
and many fruit trees that still support today’s agriculture. It is estimated that the
species, which originated from this area, are feeding over 38 % of the world’s
population. Wheat alone accounts for about one-third of the global food production.
Unfortunately, the remarkable richness in genetic resources in many of the countries
of the Region is not fully tapped particularly genetic resources in the wild, which need
to be secured in the in ex situ conservation activities.
National systems and programmes for the conservation and sustainable use of plant
genetic resources in the Region are at different stages of development, depending on
country size, resources and on government policy. A number of countries in the
18
Regional Collaboration for Conservation and Sustainable Utilization of Plant Genetic Resource in West
Asia and North Africa: A Case for a Regional Sustainable Network
region (e.g. Egypt, Iran, Morocco, Pakistan and Turkey) have long history of attention
to genetic resources especially in the more systematic collecting efforts, use of
collections in crop improvement programmes and the establishment of operational
genebanks. Several other countries (e.g. Tunisia and Algeria) have recently embarked
on constructing specially equipped buildings to house ex situ collections of important
crops for their medium and long term storage and safe keep, as well as performing
other related activities of evaluation, regeneration, documentation etc. On the other
hand, several countries including Jordan, Yemen, Saudi Arabia , Oman and Libya10
have functional facilities but are aspiring to upgrade them, especially the long-term
storage facilities. In general, lack of coordination between different institutions
dealing with plant genetic resources activities is a major impediment to programme
development, and it has led to dispersal of resources and activities11.
Regional collaboration in PGR has not been very successful despite the formation in
1992 of the West Asia and North Africa Network (WANANET. Initially, the network
played an important role in strengthening national programmes by reinforcing the role
of the national plant genetic resources committees and encouraging coordination
between different institutions within each country and among programmes throughout
the region. Unfortunately, the WANANET, for a variety of reasons, is now defunct. It
is generally agreed that trying to revive the network as such may not be productive
and it is advisable to establish a new network that is sustainable and one that benefits
from learned lesson as to what caused the failure of the old network
10
Libya has inaugurated a new ex situ gene bank medium and long term seed storage facility in Tajora
in 2004.
11
A survey of twelve countries showed a wide ranging ex situ activities and revealed the existence of
rather sizable holdings of key crops in the Region of global importance. Between them, the twelve
countries hold 201 500 accessions with Iran is holding the largest total number of PGR accessions
followed by Turkey, Pakistan, Morocco, Egypt, Syria, Jordan, Yemen, Libya and Oman. Of the total
number of PGR accessions, 133025 accessions are of crops on Annex 1 of the International Treaty
representing an average of 61.1% of the total.
19