Transition from higher education to work Gender differences in employment outcomes of university graduates in Greece Dr. Maria Karamessini Panteion University of Social and Political Sciences 2009 IAFFE Annual Conference, Boston MA, June 26-28 Greece has the highest rate and largest gender gap in youth unemployment in the EU-27 University graduates – highest incidence of unemployment and temporary employment among the 20-29 year olds Greek women outstrip men in enrolments in higher education and get on average higher marks Important gender differences in labor market outcomes in the early careers of graduates Purpose: study the determinants LABOUR MARKET OUTCOMES 5-7 YEARS AFTER GRADUATION All graduates Activity rate Unemployment rate All employed Self-employment rate Dependent workers Public employment rate Full-time employment rate Permanent employment rate Wage earners receiving >1100 euros Job match with studies Job satisfaction MEN WOMEN GENDER % % GAP 90.6 5.9 91.2 7.2 -0.6 -1.3 25.4 15.6 9.8 31.7 92.1 75.7 50.3 74.0 65.1 42.3 57.7 68.3 28.0 71.3 62.7 -10.6 7.0 7.4 22.3 2.7 2.4 GENDER DIFFERENCES STUDIED Micro-data from a nation-wide survey among 13,615 university graduates from the 19982000 cohorts Logistic regression analysis – to estimate the odds, 5-7 years after graduation, of being: Active vs. inactive, employed vs. unemployed, employee or self-employed, in permanent vs. temporary employment, full vs. part-timer, well-paid vs. medium or low paid, in a job matching vs. not matching the content of studies, satisfied vs. non satisfied or indifferent from the current job Data, variables, methods (1) EXLANATORY VARIABLES a) Socio-demographic: Sex, social origin, presence/No of children b) Educational: field of study, motivation for studies at entry, grades c) Human capital accumulation during undergraduate studies (traineeship, work experience ) and after graduation (postgraduate studies, participation to ALMP scheme, age or time lapse since graduation) d) Job mobility: number of jobs held e) Employer characteristics : private/ public sector, size of firm Data, variables, methods (2) Direct effect of gender (coefficient of sex in the equation) Indirect effect of gender stemming from gender differences in the other explanatory variables except sex - Mean values (quantitative variables) - Dissimilar distributions (categorical variables) Overall gender impact = direct + indirect effect Data, variables, methods (3) DEPENDENT VARIABLES Logits Active vs. non active graduates with children graduates without children Employed vs. unemployed graduates with children graduates without children Self-employed vs. wage earner Employed in the public vs. private sector FIELD OF FIELD OF STUDY STUDYIN THE NOT IN THE EQUATION EQUATION 9.86 1.42 9.25 1.40 3.83 0.89 4.26 1.03 1.68 2.30 0.62 0.54 Results: Direct gender effect (1) DEPENDENT VARIABLES Logits Full-time vs. part-time worker graduates with children graduates without children Permanent vs. temporary worker Receiving earnings higher vs. lower than 1,100€ Job matching vs. non matching with studies Job satisfaction vs. non satisfaction/ indifference SUBJECT SUBJECT AREAS AREAS IN THE NOT IN THE EQUATION EQUATION 2.63 1.31 3.61 1.65 * 0.84 1.71 2.22 * 1.33 ** * Results: Direct gender effect (2) 1. Activity rate (GG= - 0.6 pp) Gender differences Presence of children: narrow Age: narrow Military service: widen Post-graduate studies: widen Parental income: widen Mother’s educational attainment: widen Field of studies: widen Results: indirect gender effect (1) 2. Unemployment rate (GG = -1.3 pp) Gender differences Presence of children: widen Undergraduate work experience: narrow Time lapse since graduation: no gen. dif. Number of jobs: narrow Participation to ALMP scheme: widen Traineeship during studies: narrow Field of studies: widen Results: indirect gender effect (2) 3. Self-employment rate (GG = 9.8 pp) Gender differences Presence of children: widen Age: widen Post-graduate studies: narrow Parental income: widen Father’s educational attainment: widen Field of studies: widen Results: indirect gender effect (3) 4. Public employment rate (GG = -10.6 pp) Gender differences Age: widen Grade of degree: narrow Post-graduate studies: narrow Delay in completion of studies: widen Field of studies: widen Results: indirect gender effect (4) 5. Full-time employment rate (GG = 7 pp) Gender differences Presence of children: widen Time lapse since graduation: no gend. dif. Public/ private sector: narrow Parental income: widen Field of studies: widen Results: indirect gender effect (5) 6. Permanent employment rate (GG= 7.4 pp) Gender differences Time lapse since graduation: no gend. dif. Grade of degree: narrow Number of jobs before current: narrow Time lapse between current and previous job: widen Public/ private sector and firm size: widen Post-graduate studies: widen Field of studies: widen Results: indirect gender effect (6) 7. Rate of highly paid employees (GG = 22.3 pp) Gender differences Undergraduate work experience: narrow Time lapse since graduation: no gend. dif. Post-graduate studies: widen Presence of children: narrow Public/ private sector and firm size: widen Full or part-time employment: widen Permanent or temporary employment: widen Job match or mismatch: no impact Field of studies: widen Results: indirect gender effect (7) 8. Rate of employees with jobs matching their studies (GG = 2.7 pp) Gender differences Delay in the completion of studies: narrow Scientific interest for the field of study at entry: narrow Post-graduate studies: widen Public/ private sector of employment: narrow Field of studies: widen Results: indirect gender effect (8) 9. Job satisfaction rate (GG = 2.4 pp) Gender differences Permanent or temporary employment: widen Full or part-time employment: widen Job match or mismatch: no effect Advancement perspectives in current job: widen Public or private sector of employment: narrow Grade of degree: widen Results: indirect gender effect (9)
© Copyright 2025 Paperzz