Colorectal Trauma - St. Luke`s Roosevelt Hospital Center

Colorectal Trauma
Colorectal Conference
St Luke’s-Roosevelt Hospital
Department of Surgery
Leslie Tyrie, PGY III
16 March 2006
Colorectal Anatomy


Right Colon, Left Colon, Rectum
Blood supply


Function


SMA, IMA vs.
inf. mesenteric/int. iliacs/pudendal art.
Dehydration, storage, defecation
Bacterial content


Increases as more distal to stomach
60% dry weight stool = bacteria

Intraperitoneal and
retro/extraperitoneal components

Right and left colon morbidity /
mortality outcomes the same

Colon vs. Rectum
Proximal vs. distal to
peritoneal reflection

Colorectal Trauma – Etiology


COLON
Penetrating






>85%
1/3 penetrating abdominal injuries
GSW > SW > shotgun > iatrogenic
> misc




Blunt


MVA, ped struck, falls


RECTUM
Penetrating

Multiple injuries
Majority
GSW
Impalement / straddle injuries
Iatrogenic
Foreign body
Blunt

Delayed presentation
Pelvic fractures



Scrape injuries



Disruption of pubic symphysis
Spicules
Drag over pavement s/p motorcycle
accident
Trauma to perineum
High index suspicion
Colorectal Trauma – H&P

Trauma algorithms



ABCs
History
Physical




Abdomen
Flank
Perineum
DRE – blood
Colorectal Trauma – Studies

CT SCAN



DPL




Blunt Abdominal and Penetrating Flank
Triple contrast
Abdominal trauma
Will not evaluate retroperitoneum
Bacteria / vegetable matter suggestive
FAST




Abdominal trauma
Repeatable
Non invasive
Will not evaluate retroperitoneum

Rigid Proctosigmoidoscopy

Exploratory Laparotomy
Operative Management

Options
1.
2.
3.
4.

The Question


Primary repair
Resection and anastomosis
Repair w/proximal diversion
Exteriorization
Proximal diversion of fecal stream
Prevent septic complications



Colon: anastomotic leak
Rectum: pelvic sepsis
Pelvic abscess
Grading Score for Colon Injury

AAST Colon Injury Scale (CIS)






I – serosal injury
II – single wall injury
III – < 25% wall involvement
IV – > 25% wall involvement
V – circumferential wall, vascular injury, or both
Destructive vs. Nondestructive wounds
Colon Trauma – Historical Perspective
“Ephud put forth his left hand, and took
the sword from his right thigh and
thrust it into his belly… and the dirt
came out.”
– book of Judges in the Old Testament


Suggestive of early penetrating colon
trauma
However no treatment or outcome is
discussed
Historical Perspective (cont)

American Civil War



WWI




Non operative management of penetrating abdominal wounds
Mortality 90%
Diverting colostomy is preferable in extensive wounds
Primary repair was attempted
Mortality 59%
WWII

US Surgeon General Thomas Parren Jr. mandated
colostomy for all colon injuries sustained in battle





Inexperienced war-time surgeons
High-energy, high-velocity injuries
Delay in care
Transfer soon after initial management
Mortality to 5-20%
Historical to today



After WWII…
Colostomy remained standard of care
However, civilian ≠ military trauma





Less destructive
Delay to definitive care short
Resuscitation administered quickly
Newer antibiotic prophylaxis
Postoperative supervision available
Management of Colon Injuries

Non Destructive Wounds (CIS I – III)



Stone and Fabian et al 1979
Primary repair or resection + anastomosis
Destructive wounds (CIS IV – V)

Demetriades et al 2001


no difference, or improved outcomes w/
primary repair
Patients at risk for anastomotic breakdown



Immunocompromised patients
Transfusion > 6 units
Likely increased
 Shock
 Other traumatic injury > 2
 Delay of operation



Traditionally  diverting colostomy
New data  resection + primary anastomosis
One strict contraindication, delay > 12 hrs
The Exception: Damage Control




Cold
Coagulopathic
Acidotic
Resect if needed, no
anastomosis

Planned second look
Management of Rectal Injuries

Intraperitoneal



Like colonic injuries
Primary repair
Extraperitoneal






Diversion

End vs. loop colostomy
Drainage

Closed or open drainage of presacral space

Tranverse incision anococcygeal raphe into subcutaneous tissue

Lateral dissection on each side of raphe to avoid transsection of coccygeal attachments to access
presacral space

Penrose or JP drainage
Repair

If feasible, avoid unnecessary dissection

> 1cm unless involving GU tract  then repair w/interposition patch
Distal Washout

Washout of rectal stump

No proven benefit

For highly contaminated wounds and extensive devitalization
Towards primary and definitive care w/out DDR,DW
In rare cases, APR
Considerations

Antibiotics



No proven regimen
24 hours w/2nd generation
cephalosporin is accepted
Colostomy Reversal


Traditionally 3 months
New data suggests if signs of
improvement may consider reversal
at 2 weeks


Avoid 2 – 6 weeks
BE not necessary

Unidentified rectal trauma, ongoing
symptoms
Conclusions

Colon Trauma


Primary repair, resection + primary anastomosis
Exceptions destructive injuries w/risk factors


Rectal Trauma

Intraperitoneal


Like colonic injuries
Extraperitoneal


Shock, delay to management, associated organ injury,
transfusion requirement, co-morbid disease
Diversion and presacral drainage
Antibiotics

2nd gen ceph x 24 hrs periop