Product Architecture - E

Kuliah 9 :
Product Architecture
Planning
Concept
Develop.
SystemLevel
Design
Detail
Design
Testing
And
Refinement
Production
Ramp-Up
Marketing
Design
Mfg
Other
Dira Ernawati, ST.MT
2
What is Product Architecture?
The scheme by which the functional
elements of the product are arranged
into physical chunks and by which the
physical chunks interact.
Dira Ernawati, ST.MT
3
Elements of Product Architecture
• Functional elements:
individual operations and transformations
that contribute to the overall performance of
the product.
• Physical elements:
the parts, components, and sub-assemblies
that ultimately implement the product’s
functions.
Dira Ernawati, ST.MT
4
Product Architecture
• Physical elements are typically organized into
several major building blocks: chunks
• Each chunk: a collection of components that
implement the functions of the product
• The architecture of a product: the scheme by
which the functional elements of the product are
arranged into physical chunks and by which the
chunks interact
Dira Ernawati, ST.MT
5
Modular Architecture
• chunks implement one or a few elements
• interactions between chunks are well-defined
and fundamental to the primary functions of
the product
• allows a design change in one chunk without
requiring changes to other chunks
• most modular: each functional element is
implemented by exactly one chunk
Dira Ernawati, ST.MT
6
Modular Architecture
Examples
• Xerox copier
• Personal computer
• Residential AC units
Dira Ernawati, ST.MT
7
Integral Architecture
• functional elements of the product are
implemented using more than one chunk
• a single chunk implements many elements
• interactions between chunks ill-defined, may
be incidental to the primary functions of the
products
• used with products with highest possible
performance in mind
Dira Ernawati, ST.MT
8
Integral Architecture
Examples
• High-performance transmission
• Precision-ground bearings
• Table knife
Dira Ernawati, ST.MT
9
Slot-Modular Architecture
• each interface between chunks different –
various chunks cannot be interchanged
• example: automobile radio - implements
exactly one function, but interface different
from any other components in the vehicle
Dira Ernawati, ST.MT
10
Bus-Modular Architecture
• a common bus to which chunks connect via
the same type of interface
• examples: track-lighting, shelving system
with rails, expansion card for PC
Dira Ernawati, ST.MT
11
Sectional-Modular Architecture
• all interfaces of same type, but no single
element to which all other chunks attach
• assembly built by connecting chunks to each
other via identical interfaces
• examples: piping systems, office partitions
Dira Ernawati, ST.MT
12
Implications of the Architecture
Decisions about how to divide the product into
chunks, and how much modularity, are linked
to:
• product change
• product variety
• manufacturability
• product development management
Dira Ernawati, ST.MT
13
Product Change - Motives
•
•
•
•
•
•
upgrade: technology or user needs evolve
add-ons: add to basic unit; third-party
adaptation: different use environments
wear: replace elements, extend useful life
consumption: replenish consumables
flexibility in use: configured for different u
ses
• reuse: new models from small changes
Dira Ernawati, ST.MT
14
Product Variety
Products built around modular architectures
can be more easily varied without adding
tremendous complexity to the manufacturing
systems
• example: Swatch watches - many different
hands, faces, wristbands but small selection
of movements and cases
Dira Ernawati, ST.MT
15
Manufacturability
• Product architecture directly affects the ability
of the team to design each chunk to be
produced at low cost
• One DFM strategy involves minimization of
the number of parts through component
integration, but component integration across
several chunks is difficult
• DFM must start at system-level design
Dira Ernawati, ST.MT
16
Product Development Management
Modular and integral architecture demand
different project management styles
• modular - requires very careful planning
during system-level design
• integral - less planning during system-level,
but more integration, conflict resolution,
and coordination during detail design
Dira Ernawati, ST.MT
17
Establishing the Architecture
Four-step method:
• Create a schematic of the product
• Cluster the elements of the schematic
• Create a rough geometric layout
• Identify the fundamental and incidental
interactions
Dira Ernawati, ST.MT
18
Create a Schematic
Schematic: a diagram of the team’s understanding
of the elements of the product
• physical concepts, critical components, and
functional elements
• if product is a complex system with hundreds of
functional elements, group into fewer, higher level functions to be decomposed later
Dira Ernawati, ST.MT
19
Schematic For A Wristwatch
Dira Ernawati, ST.MT
20
Cluster the Elements of the Schematic
To determine when there are advantages
to clustering, consider:
geometric integration and precision
function sharing
capabilities of vendors
similarity of design or production
technology
• localization of change
• accommodating variety
• enabling standardization
•
•
•
•
Dira Ernawati, ST.MT
21
Create a Rough Geometric Layout
Geometric layout in two- or three-dimensions
• drawings
• computer models
• physical models
• cardboard or foam
• evaluate clustering
• coordinate with industrial designers
Dira Ernawati, ST.MT
22
Identify the Fundamental and
Incidental Interactions
• fundamental: those corresponding to the lines
on the schematic that connect the chunks
together; planned
• incidental: those that arise because of the
particular physical implementation of functional
elements, or because of the geometric
arrangement of the chunks
• example: chunks creating motion may have
vibration as an incidental interaction
Dira Ernawati, ST.MT
23
Related System-Level Design Issues
The four-step method for establishing
architecture guides the early design activities,
but more detailed activities remain:
• defining secondary systems
• establishing architecture chunks
• creating detailed interface specifications
Dira Ernawati, ST.MT
24
Defining Secondary Systems
• many functional and physical elements not
shown on schematic (for simplicity)
• others may be conceived as system-level
design evolves
• examples: safety systems, power systems,
structural supports
• management issue: who takes on
responsibility for their design?
Dira Ernawati, ST.MT
25
Establishing Architecture Chunks
• some chunks of a complex system may be
complex systems themselves
• each of these may have its own architecture
- same issues, procedures apply as for the
system
Dira Ernawati, ST.MT
26
Creating Detailed Interface
Specifications
• as system-level design progresses, fundamental
interactions need more refinement
- as a result, specification of the interfaces need
to be clarified
• interfaces represent “contracts” between chunks
- often detailed in formal specification
documents
Dira Ernawati, ST.MT
27
Summary
• Product architecture: the scheme by
which functional elements are
arranged into physical chunks
• Architecture decisions have farreaching implications
•
•
•
•
product change, product variety
component standardization
product performance
product manufacturablility
Dira Ernawati, ST.MT
28
Summary (cont.)
• Key characteristic of a product architecture the degree to which it is modular or integral
• Modular architectures - those in which each
physical chunk implements a specific set of
functional elements, and has well-defined
interactions with other chunks
• Three types of modular: slot-modular,
bus-modular, sectional modular
Dira Ernawati, ST.MT
29
Summary (cont.)
Integral architectures - those in which
the implementation of functional
elements is spread across chunks,
resulting in ill-defined interactions
between chunks
Dira Ernawati, ST.MT
30
Summary (cont.)
Four-step method for establishing
product architecture:
•
•
•
•
Create a schematic of the product
Cluster the elements of the schematic
Create a rough geometric layout
Identify the fundamental and incidental
interactions
Dira Ernawati, ST.MT
31
Summary (cont.)
• Four-step method leads the team through
preliminary architectural decisions
• Subsequent system-level and detail design
activities contribute to a continuing evolution of
the architectural details
• Due to broad implications of architectural
decisions, inputs from marketing, manufacturing
and design are essential
Dira Ernawati, ST.MT
32