C. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Results from prior NSF support R. Bales, PI. The Bales group has had two recent grants covering air-snow interactions, specifically “SnowAtmosphere Transfer Function for Reversibly Deposited Chemical Species in West Antarctica” (OPP9526572; completed 8/00), and “Transfer function for photochemically produced species in Greenland snow, firn and ice” (OPP-9813311; through 4/02). This research involved making measurements of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and formaldehyde (HCHO) in the air, snow, firn and ice at Siple Dome and South Pole in Antarctica, and Summit, Greenland. The aim was to better understand the air-snow transfer of these species, and to interpret changes in concentrations of these species in ice cores. We found that surface snow acts as an excellent proxy for atmospheric concentrations of H2O2. Atmosphere-to-snow transfer of H2O2 at all three sites can be modeled by advection of surface air through the top few meters of firn and diffusion of H2O2 into and out of snow grains in response to changing atmospheric concentrations and snowpack temperatures. Firn continues to lose H2O2 to the atmosphere for at least 10-12 years (~3 m) after burial at current South Pole temperatures and accumulation rates. Losses occur over about 1-2 meters at Siple Dome owing to the warmer temperatures. HCHO is preserved in snow and firn at Siple Dome, but concentrations are lower than for South Pole, reflecting the temperature difference between the two sites. Measurements at Summit show that the top snow layers are an HCHO source. HCHO concentrations in fresh snow are higher than those in equilibrium with atmospheric concentrations, resulting in HCHO degassing in the days to weeks following snowfall. Measured bi-directional summertime H2O2 fluxes from the snowpack at Summit in June 1996 reveal a daytime H2O2 release from the surface snow reservoir and a partial re-deposition at night. The observations also provide the first direct evidence of a strong net summertime H2O2 release from the snowpack, enhancing average boundary layer H2O2 concentrations ~7-fold and the OH and HO2 concentrations by 70% and 50%, respectively, relative to that estimated from photchemical modeling in the absence of the snowpack source. Publications to result from this work include McConnell et al. [1997a, b; 1998, 2000, 2001], and Hutterli et al. [1999; 2000, 2003], Dassau et al. [2003], and Jacobi et al. [2002, 2003]. Jochen Stutz, co-PI: has not received NSF funding 1 Introduction Polar regions are among the most sensitive environments on our planet. Climate change and global air pollution have already led to considerable impact in the Arctic. The thinning of sea ice [Rothrock et al., 1999] and the decrease of its spatial extent [Parkinson et al., 1999] are indicators for change in the global climate over the past century. Arctic haze and the accumulation of mercury in arctic fish and mammals are examples of the impact of large-scale pollution transport to the arctic [MacDonald et al., 2000]. Glaciers, firn, and snow in the Arctic also provide unique records of past climate and composition of the atmosphere, and for example give insight into the past atmospheric oxidative capacity [Hutterli et al., 2002; Hutterli et al., 2001]. These records are an essential tool to validate global climate and chemistry models. The arctic is also believed to play an important role in the future development in our climate. Feedback effects through the change of sea-ice extent and snowcover have the potential to further amplify a temperature increase, such as the one already observed in the arctic [Serreze et al, 2000] over the past 35 years. It has recently become clear that the large snow-covered and sea-ice areas can influence the atmospheric composition in the Arctic and Antarctica and, most likely, on larger scales [Honrath et al., 2000a; Honrath et al., 2000b; Wagner, 1998]. The best-known examples are widespread ozone and mercury depletion events caused by a large release of reactive halogens during polar spring [Barrie et al., 1988]. The processing of nitrate absorbed on snow, releasing HONO and NO x has also been identified as an important process that can significantly influence ozone chemistry and the oxidation power of the atmosphere [Honrath et al., 2000b; Zhou et al., 2001]. Similarly the release of formaldehyde from the 1 1 snow will impact the levels of OH radicals in the atmosphere [Dassau et al., 2002; Sumner and Shepson, 1999; Sumner et al., 2002]. The sensitive response of the Arctic system to global changes in temperature and atmospheric composition, as well as the potential climate feedback mechanisms motivates the performance of accurate long-term measurements of atmospheric composition and the composition of snow and firn. The Summit Greenland Environmental Observatory (GEOSummit), located at an elevation of 3100 m on the Greenland ice sheet has been established and supported by NSF as a baseline observatory and is currently the only high altitude research site in the Arctic with a large suite of continuous atmospheric measurements. A number of core measurements are performed at GEOSummit, including meteorology, continuous ground-level ozone, carbon cycle gases (flasks), energy balance, column ozone, snow accumulation and snow chemistry (see www.geosummit.org for details). In addition a number of intensive short-term experiments have been performed there [e.g. Bottenheim et al., 2002]. Here we propose to develop a new instrument to measure the concentrations of NO2, HONO, HCHO, and halogen oxides in and above the remote artic boundary layer. The instrument will be based on fully automated remote sensing measurements by multi-axis differential optical absorption spectroscopy (MAX-DOAS) and will be built for a long-term or permanent unattended deployment at GEOSummit. Details of the instrument and the proposed work plan are presented in section 3. First we will review the scientific problems that motivate the development of the proposed instrument, followed by a discussion of the objectives of our proposal. 1.1 Influence of air-snow exchange on ice core records, atmospheric composition and global climate: The fate of several greenhouse gases is strongly coupled to the oxidation power of the atmosphere [Crutzen and Lelieveld, 2001; IPCC, 2001]. The chemistry influencing the current oxidation power, as well as its past and future development is therefore highly significant. The atmospheric oxidation power is dominated by the hydroxyl radical, OH. NO3 and halogens contribute to a lesser extent [Finlayson-Pitts and Pitts, 2000]. OH reacts with methane and some CFC’s. Its levels therefore determine the tropospheric residence time of these compounds, and thus indirectly influence global climate. OH formation in remote areas is predominantly determined by ozone levels, which through photolysis and reaction with water, produces OH directly. In addition, HCHO plays an important role through the formation of HO2, which can be cycled to OH through reactions with O3, NO, and NO3. Recent observations at Summit showed that HONO above snow is another important OH precursor in the Arctic [Yang et al., 2002; Zhou et al., 2001]. Measurements at Summit show that both HCHO and HONO are formed in the snowpack [Dassau et al., 2002; Zhou et al., 2001]. The air exchange between snow and firn and the atmosphere appears to be the dominant release mechanism of these compounds. In the case of HONO, the photolysis of nitrate (NO3-) in the snowpack has been identified as the chemical formation mechanism [Honrath et al., 2002]. The release of HONO and NOx from the snowpack not only directly influences OH levels, but is also an important mechanism for the recycling of NOx [Finlayson-Pitts and Pitts, 2000]. The release may thus have an important impact on the global NOx budget. Although HCHO is believed to be formed photochemically within the snowpack [Sumner and Shepson, 1999], the mechanism is currently unclear. The complex chemistry of ozone and OH is also strongly dependent on the levels of nitrogen oxides, which propagate the cycling of OH and HO2 as well as provide a chain termination step through the OH + NO2 reaction (although the latter may not be as important since the HNO3 deposited into the snow will be released again as HONO, forming OH again). The importance of atmospheric chemistry and the oxidation power for the global climate has led to the search of records for these properties in the past. Ice core records for a variety of reactive atmospheric species of photochemical interest have been developed (e.g. [Fuhrer et al., 1996; Sigg et al., 1992; Staffelbach et al., 1991, Wolff et al., 1995]). CO, NOx (using NO3- as proxy), CH4, HCHO and H2O2 have 2 2 all been investigated in ice Table 1: Previous observations of NO2 ,HONO and HCHO at GEOSummit. cores as a means for assessing Also shown are levels of halogen oxides in various environments changes in the state of the Mixing ratios reference atmosphere, and all are HCHO 50 – 1500 ppt [Dassau et al., 2002; Jacobi et al., photochemically linked. Ice 2002; Sumner and Shepson, 1999] core data are used to constrain HONO 2 – 20 ppt [Dibb et al., 2002] models of past atmospheric NO2 20 -75 ppt [Dibb et al., 2002] photochemistry, and assess BrO Arctic 0 – 30 ppt [Foster et al., 2001; Tuckermann et changes in the oxidation al., 1997] capacity of the atmosphere [Fitzenberger et al., 2000; [Staffelbach et al., 1991]. BrO Free trop. 1 – 2 ppt McElroy et al., 1999] Except for CH4, they are all BrO Salt 0 – 200 ppt [Hebestreit et al., 1999; Stutz et al., also impacted by postLakes 2002] depositional physical and IO 0 – 6 ppt [Alicke et al., 1999; Allan et al., chemical processes in the 2000] snowpack/firn, in ways that are, as yet, poorly understood. Although considerable progress has been made (cf. [Hutterli et al., 1999; 2003]), the air-snow transfer function for a some important reactive species has yet to be reliably defined. There have now been several measurement campaigns conducted at Summit and at Alert, Nunavut, during which NO2, HONO and HCHO were measured [Dassau et al., 2002; De Serves, 1994; Hutterli et al., 1999; Sumner and Shepson, 1999; Zhou et al., 2001]. Typical ranges of mixing ratios observed at Summit are summarized in Table 1. The values were measured during short periods of time, mostly during summer. To improve our understanding of the seasonal behavior, and to improve the quantification for long-term snow and ice records, measurements over extended periods of time are required. However, the techniques thus far employed are work-intensive and cumbersome, and thus not suitable for automated long-term operations. There is therefore a need to develop new analytical methods that can fill this gap. 1.2 Halogen Oxides and their influence on polar and global ozone and mercury levels The discovery of boundary layer ozone depletion events in the Arcitc [Barrie et al., 1988] has triggered an increased interest in atmospheric chemistry in Arctic regions. It is widely accepted today that the rapid destruction of ozone proceeds through catalytic processes involving reactive halogen species, in particular Br and BrO [Hausmann and Platt, 1994; Oltmans et al., 1989]. Reactive halogens have also recently been linked to the depletion of gaseous mercury and an increase of Hg deposition through oxidation reactions that are still poorly understood [Schroeder et al., 1998]. BrO has been observed over vast areas in the Arctic and Antarctica from satellites [Richter et al., 1998; Wagner and Platt, 1998], over salt lakes [Hebestreit et al., 1999; Stutz et al., 2002], and also in the marine boundary layer [Leser et al., 2003b], showing that the release of bromine is a widespread phenomenon. Observations also indicate that low levels of BrO may be present in the free troposphere [Fitzenberger et al., 2000; McElroy et al., 1999]. Evidence of the presence of reactive chlorine and reactive iodine has also been reported [Alicke et al., 1999; Allan et al., 2000]. It is believed that bromine is released from salt deposits on sea ice or near salt lakes, as well as on salt aerosol, by an explosion-like autocatalytic mechanism [Vogt et al., 1996]. Reactive iodine compounds (IO, OIO, etc.) are believed to originate from the photolysis of iodo-organic compounds emitted by algae in the ocean [Carpenter et al., 1999]. Table 1 gives an overview of some of the reported concentrations of halogen measurements in the atmosphere. Reactive halogens can influence the ozone budget, and thus the oxidation power of the atmosphere, on a global level, even at fairly low concentrations. A number of local observations have shown that Cl and Br levels can be high enough to influence the oxidation power of the troposphere [Foster et al., 2001]. In particular, in the arctic high levels of bromine can lead to a considerable oxidation of HCHO 3 3 and alkenes. No information on globally averaged background bromine or iodine levels is currently available. Low reactive halogen levels, in particular bromine and iodine, in the free troposphere could, however, have significant impact on the global ozone budget [McElroy et al., 1999]. Model calculations have shown that bromine concentrations in the range of 107 molec. cm-3 can severely increase the chemical loss rates of ozone. It is, however, unclear if such high background levels of reactive halogens are indeed present on a global scale and during all seasons. Most global chemistry and climate models today do not consider halogen chemistry in the free troposphere and may thus not describe the full extent of ozone chemistry. The significance of halogens for mercury chemistry has been shown in the Arctic [Schroeder et al., 1998]. As in the case of ozone, it is not clear what the impact of elevated halogen levels on mercury is on larger scales. There is thus a need to quantify the presence of reactive halogens over longer time periods to assess whether the observations in the free troposphere by [Fitzenberger et al., 2000; McElroy et al., 1999] are representative for larger temporal and spatial scales. 1.3 Monitoring future changes in Arctic and global pollution. One of the most important tasks of air quality research is to monitor a) how future global industrialization, urbanization, and other human activities will alter regional and global atmospheric composition and chemistry over the next century, and b) how this will affect atmospheric radiative forcing [Molina et al., 2001]. Remote areas, such as the Arctic and Antarctica, offer the possibility to study the response of background levels of various pollutants or their proxies to global changes in emissions. These arguments have lead to the establishment of various monitoring networks around the world (e.g. Global Atmospheric Watch). Most of these networks are concentrating on long-lived trace gases and ozone. Pollutants such as NOx or VOC’s are often not included in the suite of measurements. We know in the case of NOx that human influence has lead to an increase of global tropospheric levels over the last few centuries. This change has contributed to a doubling of global ozone levels, and thus contributed to global climate change [IPCC, 2001]. Highly accurate measurements of trace gases such as NO2 and HCHO over long time periods in remote areas can contribute significantly to the understanding of the state of our atmosphere and its future changes. While the technology to measure NO2, and HCHO exists, it is often expensive and requires operation by trained personnel. In addition, the acquisition of these instruments as well as their maintenance is, in many cases, quite expensive. Finally, most technologies today require regular (often daily) calibrations, which makes these techniques prone to uncertainties in their long-term accuracy. An additional motivation for the monitoring of global air pollution is the validation of current and future satellite instruments. Measurements from satellites have revolutionized our ability to study the global distribution and transformation of pollutants. Global measurements of NO2, HCHO, and BrO, for example, give unique insights into the distribution, chemistry, and sources of these trace gases. The performance of these new satellite instruments, however, depends crucially on the validation of the space borne instruments by ground measurements. There is thus a need for ground-based methods that allow the measurement of trace gas concentrations and columns from the ground over the lifetime of the satellite experiments. Both, the need of long-term monitoring of HCHO, NO2, and BrO, as well as validation of satellites in remote areas, contribute to the motivation of this proposal. 2 Rationale and Objectives Our predictive capability for the future state of the atmosphere relies in part on our ability to quantify air-snow-ice interactions, understand chemical processes that influence the oxidation capacity, and monitor pollutant levels in remote locations. Motivated by the fact that the Arctic is an environment sensitive to future changes in global climate and composition, there is growing scientific interest in maintaining baseline monitoring stations, such as GEOSummit. A number of previous short-term observations at GEOSummit and other locations in the arctic have shown that there is a need for continuous measurement of NO2, HONO, HCHO, and reactive halogens in the Arctic. In each of these studies the analytical methods involved a flow injection analysis type methodology, using aqueous phase 4 4 chemistry and fluorimetry for detection. These methods are not at all amenable to a harsh environment such as Summit, exhibit frequent down time, have a relatively slow response, and are subject to potential interferences. They also require regular on-site attention/maintenance. In the case of HCHO and NO2, we find that, due to their relatively short photochemical lifetime in daylight, there is a strong diel cycle, and fast measurements are necessary to capture and understand their behavior. For NO 2, the measurements have typically been conducted using photolytic conversion to NO (followed by O3 chemiluminescence determination of the NO). However, this method is subject to interferences, e.g. HONO, which in the near snowpack air at Summit can be significant. Conversion efficiencies can also be variable, leading to added analytical uncertainty. In addition, most of the analytical techniques are not easy to operate over long periods of time and an automatic operation is challenging. Motivated by the lack of long-term observations and an analytical technique suitable for automatic operation in the Arctic, we propose here to develop an instrument to monitor NO2, HONO, HCHO and the halogen oxides BrO, and IO in remote areas in the Arctic. This instrument will be deployed at GEOSummit and will serve as a first version for instruments that have the potential to become a standard system for other remote polar locations. Design criteria of the instrument are sensitive and specific measurement of these trace gases, long-term stability, and a fully automated and inexpensive operation. The instrument will be constructed to contribute to the study of the following scientific questions listed and discussed below: How does the air-snow exchange of formaldehyde impact atmospheric chemistry? How does release from and uptake into the snow-pack influence HCHO levels in firn and in ice cores? Interest in HCHO chemistry in the arctic is motivated by two separate aspects. First, HCHO is a precursor to OH radicals, which largely dominate the oxidation power of our atmosphere. Processes such as the proposed photolytic formation of HCHO in the snowpack, followed by a release into the troposphere, can have an impact on Arctic radical levels. Since this process seems to occur on other snow-covered surfaces, it may also be important outside of polar regions. However, we currently have no good quantification of this mechanism, in particular with respect to its seasonal dependence. It is also highly desirable to measure vertical profiles of HCHO to distinguish between the release of HCHO from the snow-pack and its gas-phase formation. HCHO is also an important proxy for the past oxidation power of the atmosphere in ice core and firn records. Recent success in establishing the transfer function for HCHO allows for more quantitative interpretations of ice cores [Hutterli et al., 1999; 2002]. However, two remaining critical needs are to evaluate the transfer function using year-round atmospheric measurements, and to relate ground-level measurements with those in the free troposphere. Up to now we have relied on modeling for these values. Our incomplete knowledge in both cases is partially due to the lack of specific, fast, and reliable long-term measurement capabilities. No continuous record over an entire year or longer exists. One of the main tasks of the MAX-DOAS instrument we propose to develop here is to perform measurements of the tropospheric concentration of HCHO over a time scale of one to several years. The instrument will also measure HCHO vertical profiles, which are of particular interest to relate ground level and free tropospheric concentrations. How does the formation and release of HONO and NOx influence Artic air chemistry and the NO3- levels in firn and ice? How do these processes impact the global NOx budget? HONO and NOx formation and release from the snowpack can impact OH radical levels through the photolysis of HONO and the reaction of OH with NO2. In addition, the chemistry of nitrogen oxides is strongly linked to ozone formation. The various chemical mechanisms lead to a significant influence of HONO and NOx levels on the oxidation power of the Arctic troposphere. The release of NOx and HONO from the snowpack also is a process that reverses the removal of NOx from the atmosphere through its conversion to HNO3 and the deposition of NO3-. Such a reversal can have an impact on the NOx budget on larger scales. 5 5 NO3- in ice cores is also used as a proxy for NOx. The interpretation of these records requires a better understanding of the air-snow exchange mechanisms, as well as the processes forming HONO and NOx in the firn. In contrast to HCHO, the air-snow transfer function for nitrogen species is not as clear. Conceptually, post-depositional loss of NO3- involves the same physical processes as for HCHO [Bales, 1995]; however, photochemical reactions in the near-surface snow recycle NOx to the atmosphere, complicating the interpretation of air-snow concentration relationships. Year-round atmospheric measurements will enable extending our current spring/summer understanding of these processes to the remainder of the year. It has been shown that a year-round understanding of air-snow transfer processes is needed to interpret the seasonally varying concentrations in ice cores [Bales and Wolff, 1996]. As in the case of HCHO, the database of HONO and NOx measurements in the arctic is limited to short field experiments. In addition, the wet-chemical methods employed in the past may show cross sensitivities with other trace gases, imposing a systematic error on the results. Long-term trace gas measurements that would allow a better quantification of the various processes are currently unavailable. The proposed MAX-DOAS instrument will thus contribute to a better understanding of the air-snow chemistry of HONO and NOx in the arctic by providing long-term measurements of the concentrations and vertical profiles of HONO and NO2 at GEOSummit. At what levels are halogen oxides present in the atmosphere, in particular in the free troposphere? How do these levels impact the global ozone budget and thus our climate? How do halogens impact the global mercury budget? Halogen oxides can impact tropospheric ozone and mercury levels, as is obvious in sudden polar ozone depletion events. The observation of halogens such as bromine and iodine at other locations implies that these reactive halogens could be present on a global scale at higher levels than thus far assumed. It is unlikely that halogens are directly formed at GEOSummit. However, the remote high altitude location allows access to the free remote troposphere. As several reports have indicated, bromine could be present at levels that are sufficient to significantly influence free tropospheric ozone concentrations. The monitoring of halogens in the free troposphere over an extended period of time is thus important to answer whether halogen-catalyzed ozone loss is indeed important in the free troposphere. Since halogens are also suspected to convert Hg(0) into more soluble Hg(II), the observations will also shed new light on the fate of mercury. The MAX-DOAS technique has been used successfully to measure halogen oxides such as BrO in the past [Hönninger and Platt, 2002]. However, current instruments do not have the detection limits necessary to make measurements of the low levels of halogens expected in the free troposphere. It is thus part of this project to further improve the technique and to design the next generation of MAX-DOAS systems that has improved capabilities of measuring low concentrations of halogen oxides. How will changes in anthropogenic emissions of NOx and VOC’s change the composition of the remote troposphere? How will this influence the oxidation power of the atmosphere and global climate? Only by establishing a monitoring network of fully automated and highly sensitive instruments will we be able to assess how the development of future emission and the effectiveness of abatement strategies are reflected in remote areas and in the global atmosphere. Trace gases that influence the oxidation power of the atmosphere and the chemistry of ozone are of particular significance, since they also influence various greenhouse gases such as methane and ozone. NO2 and HCHO (as a proxy for the oxidation of VOC’s) are such gases for which there are currently no simple fully automated long-term monitoring methods for remote areas. We thus propose to develop technology and methods that can be used for monitoring in remote areas and for augmenting the current baseline monitoring stations, both in polar regions and other locations. Motivated by these scientific questions, the objective of this proposal is to develop a next-generation MAX-DOAS instrument to measure a variety of trace gases in the remote Arctic atmosphere. Specifically we propose to: 6 6 Design and construct a Multi-Axis Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy (MAX-DOAS) instrument that meets the following criteria: o Detection limits of HONO, NO2, and HCHO of 10, 10, and 40 ppt respectively, and detection limits in the sub-ppt range for BrO and IO. o Long-term stability without regular calibrations. o Unattended automatic operation. o Capability to measure vertical profiles, or at least to distinguish boundary layer and free tropospheric concentrations. Develop software that allows automatic operation, self check of instrument, and remote control. Develop software that allows the near real-time analysis of spectra in the field. Validate the instrument in field campaigns at GEOSummit to assess its detection limits. Deploy instrument at GEOSummit and operate for a period of at least 3 years to: o Prove the concept and the reliability, o Contribute to answering the scientific questions posed above. We intend to link this effort with the objectives and activities of other arctic programs such as SEARCH (Study of Environmental Arctic Change). One of the four main objectives of SEARCH (http://psc.apl.washington.edu/search/) is “Long term observations to detect and monitor the environmental changes”. While not a part of SEARCH, our instrument will compliment the sea-level observations that are proposed under SEARCH. The instrument will also contribute to answering the scientific questions identified by a NSF-OPP sponsored Arctic community workshop in November 2002 [Shepson et al., 2003]. Data from the proposed instrument will be made available to the scientific community through the same means as are core measurements at GEOSummit. That is, following processing the data will be posted on the internet, and later made available through a permanent archive. The online data will also be used in educational efforts, both for the general public and in the classroom environment. 3 Research Plan The following section lays out the research approach and the proposed instrument. Before giving a more detailed description of the technical specification of the proposed MAX-DOAS instrument, the basic principles of the MAX-DOAS technique are reviewed. 3.1 The principle of Multi-axis DOAS DOAS is a well-established remote-sensing technique to measure the integrated absorption of trace gases along a light path in the atmosphere (e.g., [Geyer et al., 1999; Platt, 1994; Solomon et al., 1987; Stutz and Platt, 1997]). Concentrations can be derived by applying the Beer-Lambert law to narrow band absorbers. DOAS is an absolute spectroscopic method and calibration of the instruments is not necessary [Platt, 1994]. It is one of the most specific and sensitive techniques for NO2, HCHO, HONO, and various halogen oxides [Finlayson-Pitts and Pitts, 2000]. In the past few years a new DOAS measurement technique that collects scattered sunlight sequentially or simultaneously at various viewing elevation angles has evolved [Hönninger et al., 2003]. This multi-axis DOAS (MAX-DOAS) technique is an advancement of zenith- and off-axis measurements successfully used to study stratospheric chemistry (e.g., Solomon et al., 1987]. The spectral analysis of the absorption spectra yields the integrated concentration over the light path through the atmosphere, which is often called the slant column density S. As illustrated in Figure 1, S depends on the solar zenith angle and the telescope’s viewing angle . The slant column can be converted into the vertical column density V, by a conversion factor called air mass factor A. 7 7 3.1.1 Determination of the trace gas levels in the lower troposphere. z trace gas profile c(z) A SH The principle of MAX-DOAS is based on the fact that the scattering process most probable scattering process for solar light occurs below the tropopause [Hönninger et al., 2003] (Figure 1). The slant S column SH of an absorber in the stratosphere or upper MAX DOAS troposphere depends on the solar zenith angle SH = VH / cos (Figure 1A). In contrast, the slant column SL of an absorber in the lower troposphere depends mostly on the viewing angle trace gas profile z B S : SL = VL / sin (Figure 1B). A measured total slant column S c(z) can be expressed as linear combination of SL and SH: S() = VL / sin + VH / cos . (1) scattering process By performing measurements at a small and S at constant one can derive the tropospheric slant column by MAX DOAS SL* = S(S(, which can then be converted to VL with the tropospheric air-mass factor determined by 1/sin or a radiative transfer model. This subtraction is done Figure 1: Setup of a MAX-DOAS system. The slant column density of an spectroscopically by dividing the low elevation spectrum () absorber in the lowest km of the by the zenith spectrum (). This division also removes atmosphere changes with the the strong solar Fraunhofer absorptions in the low elevation telescope’s viewing angle. spectrum, which is an essential step for DOAS with solar light. This method was recently successfully employed to measure BrO and the thickness of the tropospheric BrO layer in the Arctic [Hönninger and Platt, 2002]. Leser et al., [2003], have estimated the total uncertainty of the simple geometric considerations to ~20%. The accuracy can be considerably improved by employing detailed radiative transfer calculations as will be explained below. L H L 3.1.2 Derivation of vertical trace gas profiles in the lower troposphere The MAX-DOAS measurements, in combination with radiative transfer calculations, also offer the exciting possibility to derive vertical concentration profiles, by taking advantage of the long light path at low elevation angles. Radiative transfer calculations show that as decreases the lower parts of the atmosphere contribute more and more to the slant column S. To derive trace gas profiles one divides the lower troposphere (we assume that the stratospheric/upper tropospheric slant column SH is already subtracted from S, see above) into n layers of height di. The ith layer contains the absorbing trace gas, for example NO2, at a concentration ci. To weigh the contribution of the ith layer to the slant column SL,k at a given viewing angle k, we introduce the so-called box air mass factor Ai,k [Friedeburg, 2003]. SL,k is determined by: n S L , k ci d i Ai , k (2) i 1 To derive the concentrations ci in each of the n layers it is sufficient to measure at n different viewing angles k (k = 1, …, n). In addition, the box air mass factors Ai,k have to be calculated by a radiative transfer model for each viewing angle and altitude. It is then possible to solve the linear equation system 2 given by the n observations of SL,k and determine the vertical concentration profile if the Ai,k are sufficiently dependent on elevation angles and height intervals, as it is the case for low altitudes. 8 8 0.2 atm. spectrum 3.1.3 Stratospheric trace gas columns 0.0 o =1 -0.2 HCHO -3 1x1020 o 0 =3 -3 -1x1015 o -3 =5 NO 2x10 2 0 o =10 10 -3 -2x10 HCHO airmass factor Simultaneous to tropospheric columns MAX-DOAS also provides stratospheric trace gas columns by using the solar zenith angle dependence (see equation 2). This method has been used for many years to study stratospheric chemistry [Solomon et al., 1987]. While the scientific objective of this proposal centers around tropospheric trace gases, the stratospheric observations, for example of O3, offer an exciting possibility to introduce real-time measurements from the Arctic into the classroom, for example when discussing stratospheric ozone chemistry. -4 3x10 05 -4 -3x10 o =90 HCHO + residual NO2 + residual residual 0 325 30 40 330 50 60335 70 340 80 solar zenith angle Wavelength (nm) 90 Figure2:3:HCHO AMF measurement for HCHO in Los the Figure lowest on 500m above GEOSummit. Angeles 11/16/03 17:20UT at =3 The lowest viewing and SZA = elevation 61. The SCDangle of has the highest AMF. The SZA 16 -2 (2.5 0.2) 10 cm is equivalent to dependence 1052 84 pptis weak. of HCHO for a boundary layer height of 400 m 3.1.4 Radiative transfer modeling By employing radiative transfer models to derive the air mass factors, the interpretation of the MAX-DOAS measurements can be considerably improved over the simple approach in equation 1. We currently use a detailed MonteCarlo radiative transfer model (TRACI = Trace Gas Radiative Monte Carlo Implementation), developed by [Friedeburg, 2003; Hönninger et al., 2003]. The model calculates radiative transfer in the atmosphere in full spherical geometry and three dimensions. Multiple Rayleigh and Mie scattering, as well as the Earth’s albedo, are taken into account. Equation 2 illustrates that, if the concentrations ci are known, the accuracy of the radiative transfer calculations can be verified. The natural choice to perform this verification is by using the visible absorptions of O2 and O4, which, in the case of O4 is simultaneously measured with NO2 by MAX-DOAS. This validation is an important aspect of MAX-DOAS and we will come back to it in section 3.2.3. 3.1.5 Preliminary results To investigate the feasibility of NO2 and HCHO measurements by MAX-DOAS, our group at UCLA has recently developed an instrument for exploratory studies of various aspects of this new method. The UCLA MAX-DOAS consists of two motorized mirrors, which can automatically collect scattered sunlight from any point in the sky, and a spectrometer-photodiode array detector (PDA) unit for spectral analysis. Figure 2 shows an example for HCHO measurement in Los Angeles at an elevation angle of 3 compared to a zenith measurement. The HCHO absorption is clearly larger than the unexplained residual of the analysis. NO2 can also be identified. Important for the extrapolation of these results to the proposed instrument is the smallest detectable absorption structure, which is typically as large or somewhat smaller than the peak-to-peak size of the residual. In our test measurements the smallest detectable differential optical density was ~410-4. This number can be lowered to 10-4 by increasing the amount of collected light, as has been shown for BrO long-path DOAS measurements in Salt Lake City [Stutz et al., 2002]. 3.2 Proposed instrument design The requirements of a long-term operation in the harsh Arctic environment, as well as the low tracegas mixing ratios in remote polar locations, such as Summit, Greenland, determine the design of the instrument proposed here. In addition, the measurement of vertical profiles enters the design considerations. Based on our exploratory measurements we propose to develop a MAX-DOAS system that measures at four fixed low-elevation angles and sequentially at = 90 using a CCD based spectrograph-detector system. 3.2.1 Choice of wavelength range and viewing geometry To obtain the best detection limits for the different trace gases, wavelength regions around the strongest absorption bands (Table 2) have to be chosen. The wavelength range to be covered thus extends from 300 – 470 nm for the targeted trace gases. Another important parameter for a MAX-DOAS 9 9 HCHO airmass factor instrument is the choice of the viewing geometry, i.e. the o =1 number of telescopes and their elevation angles. To avoid 20 problems that result from sequential elevation scanning we o =3 intend to use four telescopes each aiming at a different 15 o =5 elevation. Preliminary radiative transfer calculations for o 10 =10 GEOSummit for HCHO in the lowest 500 m of the atmosphere (Figure 3) show air mass factors of up to 22 at low viewing o 5 =90 elevation angles of = 1 compared to AMF = 3 at = 90. It should be noted here that the 90 AMF is 3, and not 1 as one 0 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 may expert, due to the high ground albedo of snow and the solar zenith angle resulting multiple scattering. The NO2 air mass factors (not shown) are even higher and reach 35 for = 1. To achieve the Figure 3: AMF for HCHO in the desired detection limits for boundary layer trace gases we lowest 500m above GEOSummit. The lowest elevation viewing angle propose to have one telescope with = 1. An additional has the highest AMF. The SZA sequentially measured telescope will be aimed at the zenith dependence is weak. ( = 90) to provide a Fraunhofer reference spectrum and to remove the stratospheric contribution to the slant column. To determine vertical trace gas profiles additional viewing elevations have to be added. The box air mass factors for a solar zenith angle of 75 at Summit are shown in Figure 4. The box air mass factors change for each viewing angle and height, which makes the solution of equation 2 possible. At ~5000 m above the top of Greenland the box air mass factors becomes equal for all elevation angles. MAX-DOAS is thus insensitive to trace gases above this altitude. However, the total columns can still be determined (see 3.1.3). Based on these preliminary results we currently favor 4 viewing angles: = 1, 3, 5, 10 and an additional 90 reference measurement. As part of this project we propose to perform more calculations to optimize this choice. This choice is a compromise between vertical resolution and measurement frequency. We anticipate a measurement frequency of less than 20 minutes for solar zenith angle smaller than 80. To maintain low noise levels, the integration times will be longer for larger solar zenith angle. 3.2.2 Instrument Setup HCHO box airmass factor Figure 5 shows a schematic of the proposed instrument. It consists of three main components: Spectrograph-detector combination, telescope and quartz-fiber transfer optics, and a controlling computer with corresponding software. The following section will specify the individual components: Spectrograph detector combination. We propose to use a combination of an imaging spectrograph with a two-dimensional charged-coupled-device detector (CCD). A fiber bundle that is arranged in four vertically separated arrays (Figure 5) will be projected on the CCD, thus simultaneously measuring four viewing 60 directions. We propose to purchase a 300 mm focal length elevation angle o 50 f/4 Czerny-Turner type spectrometer (ACTON Spectra Pro 1 o 300i) that allows the imaging of the fiber array onto the 3 40 o CCD detector. A number of adaptations have to be made 5 o 30 to this spectrograph. A thermal stabilization to 0.2 K 10 o improves the long-term stability. Additional baffles in the 90 20 spectrograph reduce stray light, which is essential for 10 accurate measurements below 350 nm, and is thus part of the development process. The spectrometer will be 0 equipped with two UV-blazed gratings of 1200 g/mm and 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 altitude [km] (agl) 300 g/mm. The first offers a better spectral resolution (~0.35 nm) and analysis statistics, but only covers ~70 nm, Figure 4: HCHO box airmass factors show thus requiring sequential measurements of HCHO and a clear dependence of elevation angle and NO2. The second grating covers 240 nm at a lower altitude below 5 km altitude 10 10 quartz fiber slit resolution of ~1 nm, and measures the entire wavelength for all trace gases. The suitability of both gratings will be determined during the test measurements, after which a decision for the final setup will be made. We chose a 2048 512 pixel thermoelectrically cooled UV enhanced back-illuminated CCD array (Princeton Instrument Spec-10: 2KBUV). The array is 6.9 mm high, allowing a high light throughput (compared to a PDA which is only 2.5 mm high). The quantum efficiency is above 50% for the desired wavelength range, and the detector noise (~3 e- rms) is far superior to the older PDA’s and much better than for most other available CCD detectors. The detector can be cooled down to -70C, reducing the dark current to negligible values. The CCD chip is permanently sealed in a vacuum chamber, eliminating the necessity of evacuating the detector on a regular basis. Both spectrograph and CCD detector only require power (~300W) to operate, and are maintenance free. The combination of imaging spectrometer – CCD detector offers many advantages over other spectrometer/detector combinations for our application. There are however, a number of challenges that need to be overcome to achieve the low residual structure and thus detection limits required in our application. The dispersion and instrument function (spectral resolution) is not adequately uniform perpendicular to the dispersion direction (along the slit direction) and the sensitivity of the CCD pixels varies over the array by 0.1 - 1%. The consequence of these two effects is that spectra measured at different vertical locations on the CCD detector, i.e. spectra 1 and 3 in Figure 5, are different. A zenith light spectrum measured on CCD position 3 (Figure 5) cannot be used as a Fraunhofer reference for a low elevation spectrum measured at position 1 (Figure 5). A division of the two spectra will not entirely remove the Fraunhofer bands, due to different instrument functions (resolutions). In addition, the pixel sensitivity variation may introduce additional structures, even if the latter is corrected by other methods, such as the measurement of a white light source. Consequently, steps have to be taken to ensure that a Fraunhofer spectrum ( = 90) is measured for each position of the CCD (see next section). Telescope and quartz-fiber transfer optics. We propose to build a 4-telescope system for the elevation angles = 1, 3, 5, and 10, each with a lens and an field of view of ~0.3. The light from these telescopes will be transferred by fiber transfer optics to the spectrograph, where 45 fibers ( 200m) will be arranged in four 1.2 mm high slits (Figure 5). The fibers also serve as depolarizers. Zenith-viewing reference spectra for all four low elevations will be measured in-between low elevation measurements. We want to stress again that the measurement of rotational axis A zenith. B Fraunhofer reference spectra with the quartz prisms telesc. mounted on fibers fiber bundles same instrument function and pixel 4 1 axis sensitivity is absolutely essential to 3 2 reach low detection limits. This 2 3 requirement outweighs the 1 4 disadvantage of making low-elevation telescopes and zenith measurements sequentially. with fiber low elev. stepper motor bundle telesc. translational stage In the unlikely case that temporal 1 change in stratospheric trace gas levels indeed pose a problem, we will 2 3 change viewing direction more electronics 4 frequently and average the respective CCD detector spectra. We propose to develop a new 1 spectrograph approach to measure Fraunhofer PC 2 references by using of a fiber 3 4 multiplexer (see below) that can also wavelength be used in future MAX-DOAS applications with 2D-CCD detectors. Figure 5: Schematics of the proposed MAX-DOAS instrument. Because the fiber multiplexer uses The fiber multiplexer is shown in A, the telescope multiplexer in B. 11 11 technology which has not been demonstrated for this application, a backup approach that requires a larger telescope assembly and is more sensitive to environmental conditions, will also be considered. Fiber multiplexer (Figure 5A). A fifth zenith-viewing telescope is added to the four low elevation telescopes. A fiber bundle, with 4 600m fibers, transfers the zenith light to the multiplexer. The fibers are arranged linearly at the multiplexer. The slightly different viewing geometry for the four fibers in the zenith telescope does not cause problems since the 90 air mass factor is insensitive to small angular variations. The fibers from the four low-elevation telescopes and from a Hg reference lamp (not shown in Figure 5A) will be arranged at the multiplexer with the same geometry parallel to each other. Opposite, an identical arranged fiber bundle will be mounted on a high accuracy computer controlled translation stage (Thorlabs VX25D, linear accuracy < 0.02 m) to align the spectrograph bundle with one of the three other bundles. The detailed construction and testing of this new multiplexer will be one of the first tasks of this proposal. We anticipate that with today’s manufacturing accuracies the transmission loss in the multiplexer of less than 20% can be achieved. The advantage of the fiber multiplexer is an entirely passive telescope assembly, which is fairly small, insensitive to low temperatures, and can be easily mounted outside. The only moving part, the translational stage, can be mounted in a thermally stable environment. This advantage justifies the effort to develop this new device. Telescope Multiplexer (Figure 5B). While we are certain that the multiplexer is technically feasible, it is a new development and unforeseen problems can occur. As alternative setup we propose a multiplexer in the telescope. This setup involves moving four quartz-prisms in front of the four telescopes with one stepper motor. However, because stepper motors need to be protected against the environment, an additional housing around the telescope is required, increasing the size of the telescope assembly. In addition, the Hg reference lamp (not shown in Figure 5B) will also have to be mounted in the telescope. Mounting the telescope assembly would thus be more difficult, and the longevity and long-term operation can pose a challenge. Computer and software. The instrument will be controlled by a standard personal computer that controls the acquisition and storage of the 2D spectra, the grating and the multiplexer. We also plan to connect a small camera to the computer to take pictures of the meteorological condition and to aid in the interpretation of the data. We will adapt existing software [Gomer et al., 1996; Stutz and Platt, 1996] for these tasks. In addition, the ability to remotely check and control the instrument at GEOSummit will be developed. Because the instrument will produce ~90 Mbyte of raw data per hour, we plan to develop software to convert the 2D spectra online into four spectra (one for each elevation angle). After the conversion, only ~300 kByte of data per hour will be sent to our lab, while the raw data can be backed up on a less regular schedule. It is important to obtain data continuously to ensure that the instrument is operational. 3.2.3 Analysis software development The underlying mathematical methods to analyze skylight DOAS spectra are well known [Stutz and Platt, 1996]. However, our experience has shown that the analysis routines need to be adapted to any new type of instrument. Current DOAS software still requires a large amount of manual operation. As part of this proposal we will thus develop software that is able to automatically perform the spectral analysis of the spectra, giving the slant column densities for each viewing elevation, together with the respective statistical errors as a result. Ultimately this software will be combined with the acquisition program to deliver slant column densities online directly after the acquisition of the spectra, reducing the time delay between measurement and data availability. An important task, and probably the main challenge for MAX-DOAS are the radiative transfer calculations. Radiative codes for this purpose are available [Hönninger et al., 2003]. The true challenge is not the code, but rather the often-unknown input data, i.e. aerosol optical properties, vertical aerosol distribution, and the presence of fog, clouds and snow. Without additional measurements of these properties, the radiative transfer calculations are inherently uncertain. However, MAX-DOAS offers the ability to validate the radiative transfer calculations by using the absorptions of O4 and O2. Today the 12 12 validation of the radiative Table 2: Wavelength regions and anticipated detection limits transfer calculations is AMF AMF det. lim. det. lim. ’ usually achieved manually, boundary free boundary free trop. 3 [nm] [10-19 and an adaptation of the layer1 trop.2 layer 3 [ppt] cm2] calculations to the observed [ppt]1 O4 and O2 columns is rarely HCHO 320 1.5 21.3 7.0 33 50 performed. This approach is NO2 440 3 37.9 5.8 9.5 25 4.5 21.3 7.0 11 18 too work-intensive for a HONO 350 345 125 21.3 7.0 0.4 0.6 long-term monitoring. We BrO 440 250 37.9 5.8 0.1 0.3 will therefore develop IO 1 calculated for the lowest 500 m above GEOSummit for SZA = 75 software that allows the observed O4 (and if needed 2 calculated for the 1000 - 5000 m above GEOSummit for SZA = 75 and = 10 O2) levels to be fed into the 3 based on the AMF difference between = 1/10 and = 90 radiative transfer calculations with the goal of optimizing the accuracy of the air mass factors and box air mass factors. In addition, we plan to use additional information, such as meteorological data and relative intensities. Two approaches appear to be feasible. A look-up table approach, which will be based on a large number of radiative transfer calculations for different conditions at GEOSummit, will be relatively fast, but is restricted to one location. Alternatively, we want to investigate whether current radiative transfer codes can be accelerated to make online calculations possible. Ultimately the goal is to have a program that can decide, based on available data, what the best input data for the radiative transfer calculations. These programs need to be extensively tested against the data. The final code that we propose to develop is the deconvolution process for the vertical trace gas profiles. The mathematical methods for solving equation 2 are available [Hoenninger et al., 2003]. The challenge is, however, to integrate the radiative transfer calculations into the calculations and the determination of the statistical errors for every trace gas profile, considering both the uncertainty of the slant columns [Stutz and Platt, 1996] and of the Box air mass factors. We anticipate that by the fourth year of the project all software components can be combined, and that the MAX-DOAS instrument will automatically calculate trace gas columns. We however, propose storing raw data and performing periodic offline tests of the accuracy of the instrument. 3.3 Anticipated performance and validation efforts The anticipated detection limits (Table 2) were calculated using the minimum detectable optical densities of 10-4 that we determined based on past DOAS applications, and the AMF and differential absorption cross sections listen in Table 2. The HCHO detection limits of ~30 ppt are sufficient to monitor this compound and to derive its vertical profile. Similarly, the detection limits for the halogen oxides are sufficient to determine whether they are present at mixing ratios above 0.5 ppt in the free troposphere. For NO2 and HONO, the detection limits are sufficient for most monitoring purposes and to distinguish lower from free tropospheric levels. However, it would be highly desirable to further improve the detection limits for these two compounds to derive vertical profiles. As part of this proposal we will therefore investigate if the residual structure of the instrument can be further reduced. If an improvement cannot be achieved through optimization of the instrument, we will average concentrations to reduce the error. To confirm the performance of the instrument we intend to compare it to other available techniques. While the schedule for field experiments in the coming years is not yet fixed, we anticipate that short field campaigns will be performed at GEOSummit during the second half of our project. We will participate in these efforts to test and validate the MAX-DOAS. 13 13 3.4 Project plan Year 1 Goal Radiative transfer calculations to determine final design of telescope Choice and purchase of detector and spectrometer Design and construction of telescope and fiber assembly Characterization and optimization of spectrograph/detector First test measurements in Los Angeles Presentation of concept and instrument at AGU conference 2 Tests and optimization of telescope at clean air site Development of software for automatic operation Construction of hardware for deployment in Greenland Deployment to GEOSummit in Summer 2006 Publication of construction details and test measurement results 3 Offline analysis of first Greenland measurements Development of online analysis software Improvement of radiative transfer software Validation of instrument in intensive field experiments Publication and presentation of initial results 4 Continued offline analysis of data Installation and testing of online analysis software in Greenland Display of online data on GEOSummit web-page Validation through participation on intensive field experiments Interpretation of measurement results Publication and presentation of results 5 Quality checks of online analysis and instrument behavior Interpretation of measurement results Publication and presentation of results We plan to present our progress and results at national meetings, for example the AGU or AMS meetings. A number of publications in peer-reviewed journals will be written starting the second year of the project. 3.5 Project Management R. Bales is currently the PI on the GEOSummit year-round measurement program (OPP-0336450), which involves deployment of instruments and measurements for a number of scientists. He also carries out science coordination for GEOSummit (OPP-9910303). As PI on the current proposal, he will integrate the DOAS instruments to be developed by Co-PI J. Stutz into the ongoing measurement program. Both UCLA and UC Merced will be involved in deployment and evaluation of the instrument, with its longterm operation falling under the core-measurement project. Both Bales and Stutz plan to use data from the instrument, both for studies of atmospheric photochemistry and for understanding the snow-atmosphere transfer for reactive species. A number of other scientists working in the Arctic are also interested in using data from the instrument (see attached letters from J. Dibb and P. Shepson). 4 Impact and benefits to society and education The change of the earth’s climate and changes in the atmospheric composition on a global scale are among the most serious environmental challenges of the future. The potential impacts for life on our planet are of great concern, and the development of strategies to mitigate global climate change is thus a priority for today’s societies. However, our current understanding of the climate system is, in many aspects, insufficient to make prediction of future development, for example by using 3D models. A 14 14 number of climate changes have manifested in the Arctic, where significant feedback mechanisms are suspected to act. It is one of the most important tasks of arctic research to quantify these feedbacks, requiring a detailed understanding of the atmospheric composition, atmosphere-snowpack interactions, and the linkage with other environmental variables. Our proposal aims to contribute to an improved understanding of the role of the Arctic in the climate system by introducing a new experimental method that may be used for regional and global monitoring networks, as well as be used in the investigation of various arctic processes that are potentially important. The new instrument at GEOSummit will contribute to detecting, understanding and modeling Arctic change. These efforts are supported by a number of community initiatives, including: i) the World Meteorological Organization’s (WMO’s) Global Atmospheric Watch (GAW); ii) SEARCH (A Study of Environmental Arctic Change), which is a science initiative with multi-agency support in the U.S.; and iii) Air-Ice Chemical Interactions (AICI), a proposed successor to the IGBP-IGAC (International Global Atmospheric Chemistry Program) Polar Air and Snow Chemistry (PASC) activity; and other proposed initiatives. Our project will provide unique continuous baseline measurements of important reactive trace gases at GEOSummit, which serve a number of scientists and individual research projects. Long-term, core measurements are part of the nations and international communities science infrastructure; this proposal provides for a improvement in that infrastructure. The international science community has chosen Summit for multidisciplinary, multi-investigator studies, significant infrastructure is in place, and a number of Arctic researchers are collaborating there. The current project builds on the ongoing atmospheric measurement program and the intermittent measurements that have been conducted over the past decade. There are at least three main broader impacts of this project that reflect the suggestions of the ACOPP (Advisory Committee for NSF’s Office of Polar Programs) (see http://www.nsf.gov/od/opp/opp_advisory/oaccrit2.htm). First and foremost, improved observational capabilities through the development of next-generation instruments enhances infrastructure for research and education. Not only the measurements, but also the continued operation of the instrument, provides critical research infrastructure for understanding and predicting Arctic change. The measurements in this proposal are of interest for scientists working in the area of Arctic atmospheric chemistry (see attached letters). Second, as a future part of the GEOSummit monitoring capabilities, the new instrument contributes to the dissemination of scientific understanding of the Arctic system. We will put considerable effort into making data and information widely available in near real time. This has thus far not been attempted for DOAS instruments, and it is therefore a focus of this project to develop the software that allows real-time analysis of DOAS observations. We anticipate that in the last years of the project the measurement results will be posted with very little delay on the GEOSummit web-page. In addition, the construction details of the instrument and the scientific results from its operation will be made available to the community and published in peer reviewed journals. Third, education of the global community is an objective of the long-term measurements, using www-available data and educational materials. As part of GEOSummit, we will encourage educationresearch linkages. For example, the PI has hosted K-12 teachers under NSF.s TEA (Teachers Experiencing Antarctica and the Arctic) program, as other scientists working at GEOSummit. Both graduate and undergraduate students will also be benefit from the data and technology provided by this proposal. J. Stutz, for example, teaches a large general education class for non-science undergraduate students at UCLA (AS2: Air Pollution). The use of real data will enhance the classroom experience for the students and expose them to state of the art research measurements. R. Bales is also very active in K12 education, serving as the lead PI for hydrology under the international GLOBE (Global Learning and Observations to Benefit the Environment) program (globe.hwr.arizona.edu), which has trained over 20,000 teachers in 12,000 schools to integrate environmental measurements and learning into their curricula. Through those connections with teachers and schools, he will take advantage of opportunities to disseminate the information developed under this proposal to them. 15 15
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz