Single Central Record FAQs (SCR) Keeping an accurate Single Central Record is an essential part of keeping children safe in education. Here are some of the frequently asked questions. I’ve looked at the guidance on Prohibition Checks, but you can’t do a check unless the person has a Teacher Reference Number. Is that right? No. It is possible to do checks for people without at TRN, but it must be done manually. This isn’t as onerous as it sounds. Could you advise about seeing TA qualifications please? I have suggested to DSLs that it’s a good idea to check their certificates too. Should their qualifications be on the Single Central Record? If someone is saying they have a qualification, they should be able to evidence it. There is no need to record the qualification on the SCR unless it was an ‘essential criteria’ on the job description. Can you please confirm the procedure if a member of staff was questioned/arrested/convicted of an offence – would we, as their employer, be automatically notified and if so by whom? In theory, you will be notified. On arrest the person gives their name and occupation. If the occupation is related to work with children, then the LADO should be informed and a strategy meeting is convened, to which the head teacher and employer is invited to attend. We have a music teacher that comes in 1 day a week for 1 hr to do music; they have been in for the last 8 months. We have not DBS checked the music teacher as we were under the impression that because she is supervised at ALL times for that 1 hour. Have we done the right thing? If the person is teaching music and is paid to do that, they are effectively a member of staff and whether supervised or not is irrelevant, as they are in regulated activity. (See Keeping Children Safe in Education (2016), page 24) If the person is not paid (a volunteer) and is supervised, then she is not in regulated activity and you cannot legally ask for a barred list check. However, although it is not legally required, it is sensible to complete an enhanced DBS check because of the regular contact with children. Our Single Central Record does not have a barred list column as I thought that it was done as part of the Enhanced DBS Check? The Single Central Record should have a column for both the enhanced DBS check and for the Barred List check (previously known as List 99). The two columns are required because they are two separate checks, but are often done together. All paid staff will need an enhanced DBS check and a Barred List check as they are in regulated activity, so you will need to record the date of the check in both columns. For people who are not in regulated activity, for example, governors, you will record the enhanced DBS check, but enter ‘n/a’ in the Barred List column. It is illegal to do a barred list check for someone who isn’t in regulated activity. How often in a school year should the prohibition checks be undertaken? There is no need to revisit the prohibition checks, either on a statutory basis or even on practical level. Misconduct by an existing employee leading to prohibition is something your school would be well aware of as the head (at least) would be involved in the prohibition hearing (and well before it). Is there a recommended time limit for how long ex-staff should stay on the Single Central Record after they have left a school? There is no statutory requirement to keep them at all. Most schools just stick them into a ‘leavers’ spreadsheet separate to the main Single Central Record, and leave them there. Do you have a template of best practise in relation the Single Central Record please; I have contacted OFSTED who have explained that the SCR was an internal matter and not something they could assist with. There is no national guidance on the format for the Single Central Record, which is why Ofsted aren’t able to give you a clear answer. What should be included on the SCR is set out in Keeping Children Safe in Education. A Single Central Record Template is available from the education advisor to help you help ensure that you are compliant with the statutory guidance. Should it be the Headteacher who signs this off regularly as compliant/accurate or should it be the DSL? It doesn’t matter who monitors the SCR. Sometimes it’s the Head, sometimes the DSL, sometimes a governor. Whoever does it though should know what they are looking for. Governors are required to be assured that the SCR is correct, so the monitoring check should be reported to governors and minuted. Does legislation, statutory guidance, regulation, require DBS checks to be renewed for existing staff, volunteers and if so at what frequency. There is no requirement to redo Enhanced DBS checks, unless there has been a break in service of more than three months. Keeping Children Safe in Education (2016) refers to this in paragraph 105. Inspecting safeguarding in early years, education and skills settings (2016) notes that it is not a requirement to request a [new] Enhanced DBS unless there are concerns about an existing member of staff’s suitability or a person moves from non-regulated to regulated activity. (see page 26) What about staff who have been employed at the school along time or are missing a reference? Schools should consider undertaking a risk assessment for historical appointments and missing references, examples of risk assessments are available on the SSE Education Safeguarding site
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz