UNIV 1212: Critical Thinking and Problem Solving
Lisa Hibbard
Section :203
Name: Safa Alsowuel
ID: 201101817
Major: Accounting
Assignment 4: Compare and Contrast Two Argument Essays (20%)
Argument Against and for Banning Smoking in Public Places
Introduction
Smoking is an important issue because it is the task of approximately 168 to 254 of
the state posed the issue to members of every country in the world (Besan,2012). The
issue of smoking in public places, including opponents of smoking bans and agree to
stop it. Consider arguments for both cases of people smokers and non-smokers. The
report talks about the arguments against smoking and attended the arguments with
smokers in public safety. Also in this report there are clarify the discrepancy between
the article and the comparison between them.
Arguments against Banning Smoking
The first article of this report was argumentative, secured the main reasons that
have their own against the ban on smoking in public places. Focus in this article is that
smokers have their rights and we should respect these rights.
First reason, analysis of the arguments against the ban essay smoke in deny
offices and other public places, has been used a lot of inaccuracies. In the first
argument, you want to put places far from work areas reserved for smokers away from
the buildings assigned to work there. Conclude from this fallacy use division to
convince the government to put it to them. But what if it was a cousin of the main
buildings remains called smoking.
Second reason, use of cause and effect is support. The reason that staff smoked in
troubled times faced by their business. Article has been used in the second argument is
questionable assumption. Everyone is facing difficult situations in this life, but 70% of
people did not use smoking as a solution (Shehab, 2010).
Third reason, Rights of human beings vary depending on the ages as they vary for
smokers and others people. In this argument has used fallacy error by mistake. Did
everyone will be sure to put out cigarettes well before the back of the main building.
Everybody has the right to be in a stable life, a reassuring.
Fourth reason, in this line of argument used the fallacy of division to pay huge sums
of money for taxes at tobacco the government paid for addicts on cigarettes to pay for
health costs. That this assumption is questionable if he wanted an addict to seek
treatment when they want to be a human being without something kill them slowly
instead of going month to hospitals and prompted government to pay the costs.
Fifth reason, it is natural that people will be afraid for their family from being
exposed to any bodily harm. This argument has been used to encourage people to
smoke and harm to children and the elderly. In this line of argument used by the
fallacy by analogy extended. In addition, used to buy alcohol or cigarettes from the
cheap supermarket there is great harm to those who buy it.
Sixth reason, in the last argument used in the fallacy of division. Because it is
assumed that if the smoking ban will go bankrupt companies that help in the
manufacture of tobacco cigarettes. Companies take money from clubs and bars. So if
urban public places will not have bars and clubs to close.
Arguments for Banning Smoking
More than 70 conference held in the world by providing a variety of images to the
world (Besan,2012). The Argument has given as much as it can provide convincing
arguments and satisfying to individuals. Most important problem is when playing a
person holding the cigarette in his hand, the risk of those around him. Here are 6
reasons in favor of that idea. In this article, the focus was on maintaining the health of
the community before anything. Because health the most important. Permission in the
article is argumentative essay. In addition it it gives examples of each pilgrimage
First reason, in the first argument used examples with inaccuracies. For example
53,000 deaths annually in the United States because of respiratory problems or lung
disease used fallacies to support its argument, which start asking for that call fallacy
start asking. Also used examples of non citations so that indicates the health of the
examples and be a reliable source. The sources are support and reliable attended
cofactor for smoking in public places.
Second reason, Smoking is dangerous, as the second talk about the bad effects of
smoking, which was produced for children. Fallacy prominent example of this is an
appeal to power anonymous. Example illustrates that there are several children
suffering from lung problems and breathing difficulties but subtracts the source
argument. The reason should give reliable and valid assumptions.
Third reason, in this argument used the analogy of a diameter of strange Add food
coloring is far from the smoke that spread from one region to other regions. Fallacy is
the assumption in the wrong analogy contain at dispersion characteristics of those who
directs his speech or argument.
Fourth reason, the fourth argument is a fallacy of hasty generalization. Smell of
smoke resulting from smoking is not only attached to the clothing. When we go out to
various places , our clothes will hold several good or foul odors. So the smell is not
the only one that is not accepted by the people.
Fifth reason, the fallacy of begging the question and said the mistaken assumption
by the assumption that happening any fire from cigarette butts. To think first on the
dangers of cigarette butts on the environment and society. Post an explanation rich
with examples at the argument helps persuade the government due to the ban of
smoking.
Sixth reason, this argument was used in the fallacy of begging the question to put
government decisions fair to all varieties of people. It is necessary to explain why the
examples to convince the government of preventing smoking. Thinking first dangers
of cigarette butts at hand community environment.
Comparison Between the Two Essay
Both arguments are trying to put good reasons and convincing. Argument agreed at a
certain point which is putting place an ad for smokers. Argument that was against
banning smoking in public places proposed to be this place away from buildings for
employees. As for the argument that was with this idea when we looked at the other
hand they increase the likelihood of fire. Both arguments also looked at the type
which is defended by smokers and non-smokers. With the idea when we will be
reduced productivity by employees smokers. And when we are with this idea will gain
prescription selfish not to think about the children or fetuses. Also the arguments
spoke about some of the types of people and not all types. For the fallacies in the
article there are a lot of assumptions of others documented. As for the second article
were poorly disguised authoritative sources for the government to do what you want
to prevent any of smoking in public places.
Contrast Between the Two Essays
There are differences in two arguments on the substance in the reasons that support
the theme. Which was the focus of the argument against the idea was to smokers and
suggest several things convenient compatibility with any type of output required of
the place in which it operates individuals. For example, in the second reason was for
difficult cases faced by the employee at his place of work and the kind of cases have
more than one solution to non-smoking. Third reason was to focus on the rights of the
smoker between people. At the fourth reason was for the health of the smoker but
what about the health of around them. As the second had been talking for smokers and
non-smokers also note the reason for the first, second and third there was a thorough
clarification on several big numbers of deaths in the United States.
For the fallacies were in complete contradiction and also different methods used. In
the first article and the second used a number of fallacies and also different from each
other. For example at the appeal to authority anonymous and hasty generalization,
begging the question.
Conclusion
This is an issue in recent years has become a hot issue circulated by members of the
community. Governments in various countries are trying to reach a satisfactory
outcome for both parties of people smoking from the mouth and nose and smokers
from the nose. In this report contains two arguments, the argument includes six
reasons with the idea of banning smoking in places. Argument the second category
consist six reasons against that idea. Reach satisfactory solutions to all the people that
we put the best solutions to satisfy half of the society or the people. Both the article
also used a lot of fallacies that make the door is not convincing for the part that speaks
about him. Use numbers without martyrdom post a removes the fact of the matter
from the negative effects of smoking.