Chapter 12 Game Theory Presented by Nahakpam 1213504 PhD Student Game Theory 1 Brief Contents • • • • Game Theory Strong or weak pig Prisoner’s Dilemma System for studying strategic behavior – Positive – Normative • Pareto Optima • Sequential Games Game Theory 2 What is Game theory? • Game theory is a study of strategic decision making. • The study of how people behave in strategic situations. • Strategic decisions are those in which each person, in deciding what actions to take, must consider how others might respond to that action. Game Theory 3 Game Theory and Economics • If the market is composed by a small number of firms, each firm must act strategically. • Each firm affects the market price changing the quantity produced. • Suppose 2 firms are producing 100 units. – If one of the firms decides to increase the production by 10 units. – The market supply will increase from 200 to 210 and the price has to drop to reach an equilibrium. • Therefore, it also affects the profits of other firms. • Each firm knows that its profit depends not only on how much it produced but also on how much the other firms produce. Game Theory 4 What is a Game? • A game is a situation where the participants’ payoffs depend not only on their decisions, but also on their rivals’ decisions. • This is called Strategic Interactions: – My optimal decisions will depend on what others do in the game. Game Theory 5 A Game • Four elements to describe a game: – players; – rules: when each player moves, what are the possible moves, what is known to each player before moving; – outcomes of the moves; – payoffs of each possible outcome: how much money each player receive for any specific outcome. Game Theory 6 Game Theory 7 Boeing-Airbus game • Boeing and Airbus have to decide whether to invest in the development of a Super Jumbo for long distance travel; • If they both develop successfully the new plane, their profits will drop by 50 millions a year; • If only one develop the Super Jumbo, it will make 80 millions a year in additional profits, whereas the profits of the other firm will drop by 30 millions a year; • If no firm develops the plane, nothing changes. Game Theory 8 Matrix Representation of BoeingAirbus game Airbus Boeing Develop Do not develop Develop -50,-50 80,-30 Do not develop -30,80 0,0 Game Theory 9 Solutions of the Games • To predict what will be the solution/outcome of the game we need some tools: – dominated and dominant strategies; – Nash equilibrium. Game Theory 10 Prisoners Dilemma Game Theory 11 Prisoners Dilemma • Tom and Mary have been arrested for possession of guns. • The police suspects that they have committed 10 bank robberies. • If nobody confesses the police, they will be jailed for 2 years. • If only one confesses, she’ll go free and her partner will be jailed for 40 years. • If they both confess, they get 16 years. Game Theory 12 Matrix Representation of Prisoners Dilemma Mary Tom Confess Do not Confess Confess 16,16 0,40 Do not Confess 40,0 2,2 Game Theory 13 We want to predict the outcome of the game Suppose that Tom decides to confess. What is the best decision for Mary? Mary Tom Confess Do not Confess Confess 16,16 0,40 Do not Confess 40,0 2,2 Game Theory 14 We want to predict the outcome of the game Suppose that Tom decides to remain silent. What is the best decision for Mary? Mary Tom Confess Do not Confess Confess 16,16 0,40 Do not Confess 40,0 2,2 Game Theory 15 Dominated and Dominant Strategy • Dominant Strategy: – a strategy that gives higher payoffs no matter what the opponent does; • Dominated Strategy: – a strategy is dominated if there exists another strategy that is dominant. • So far we have only assumed that each player is rational to determine the outcome of the game. Game Theory 16 We want to predict the outcome of the game Suppose that Mary decides to confess. What is the best decision for Tom? Mary Tom Confess Do not Confess Confess 16,16 0,40 Do not Confess 40,0 2,2 Game Theory 17 We want to predict the outcome of the game Suppose that Mary decides to remain silent. What is the best decision for Tom? Mary Tom Confess Do not Confess Confess 16,16 0,40 Do not Confess 40,0 2,2 Game Theory 18 Outcome of the Game Mary Tom Confess Do not Confess Confess 16,16 0,40 Do not Confess 40,0 2,2 Game Theory 19 No Dominant Strategies • In most games there are no dominant strategies for all players. • We cannot use this method to predict the outcome of the game. Game Theory 20 Nash Equilibrium • The decisions of the players are a Nash Equilibrium if no individual prefers a different choice. • In other words, each player is choosing the best strategy, given the strategies chosen by the other players. Game Theory 21 Nash equilibrium • Each player’s predicted strategy is the best response to the predicted strategies of other players • No incentive to deviate unilaterally • Strategically stable or self-enforcing Game Theory 22 Nash’s Theorem • Existence – Any finite game will have at least one Nash equilibrium possibly involving mixed strategies • Finding a Nash equilibrium is not easy – Not efficient from an algorithmic point of view Game Theory 23 “Battle of Sexes” or “Bach or Stravinsky” • • • • • • A couple deciding how to spend the evening Wife would like to go for a opera Husband would like to go for a boxing match Both however want to spend the time together Scope for strategic interaction No means of communication Game Theory 24 Battle of Sexes • Normal Form representation – Payoff Matrix Game Theory 25 The Copycat Game • Dot is happy as long as she is alone; Ditto is happy as long as he is with Dot. • There is no Nash equilibrium in this game. Game Theory 26 Choosing Strategies • Player choosing columns or rows • Adjusting choice • Nash equilibrium – No deviation from choice by either player forms outcome – Take other player’s behavior as given • Any outcome that survives this process of elimination is called a Nash equilibrium outcome. • An outcome is a Nash equilibrium if neither player would want to deviate from it, taking his opponent’s behavior as given. Game Theory 27 Mixed Strategies in Sports • In the international tournaments organized by the World Rock Paper Scissors Society • The best players are the least predictable players. • In Nash equilibrium, everyone plays a mixed strategy—1/3 “Rock,” 1/3 “Paper,” and 1/3 “Scissors.” Game Theory 28 Pareto Optima • An outcome is Pareto-optimal if nothing sits above it in the tree. • The tree shows that outcomes A and D are Pareto-preferred to C and B, and C is Pareto-preferred to B. • A and D are Pareto optima, because nothing sits above them in the tree. Game Theory 29 Sequential Games • Simultaneous games • Second player advantage • Oligopoly problem – Stackelberg equilibrium • Player commits to strategy • Importance of commitment Game Theory 30 Dynamic games • Sequential moves – One player moves – Second player observes and then moves • Examples – Industrial Organization – a new entering firm in the market versus an incumbent firm; a leader-follower game in quantity competition – Sequential bargaining game - two players bargain over the division of a pie of size 1 ; the players alternate in making offers – Game Tree Game Theory 31 Cournot equilibrium: A Nash equilibrium in a game where each company chooses its quantity. •The only Nash equilibrium is in the center square, where Kodak and Fuji each earn profits of $15. •But if the game is played sequentially and Kodak moves first, then Kodak announces a policy of producing 100 rolls of film. •Fuji’s best response is to produce 50, leading to the upper right-hand square. Game Theory 32 Economic applications of game theory • The study of oligopolies (industries containing only a few firms) • The study of cartels, e.g., OPEC • The study of externalities, e.g., using a common resource such as a fishery • The study of military strategies • The study of international negotiations • Bargaining Game Theory 33 Summary • Strategic situations can be represented by game matrices, – showing the outcome that results from each combination of strategies that the players can choose. • A Nash equilibrium is an outcome from which neither player would deviate, taking the other’s behavior as given. • A game can have one Nash equilibrium, no Nash equilibrium, or many Nash equilibria. Game Theory 34 Summary • A dominant strategy is a strategy that a player would want to adopt regardless of his beliefs about the other player’s strategy choice. • The Prisoner’s Dilemma is an example of a game where both players have dominant strategies. Game Theory 35 Thank you Game Theory 36
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz