Agenda
All-Monday 15 Sep
0800
Welcome - Opening remarks
All-Hands Meeting:
National updates
Bi-Weekly Status and Progress
Action Items from Sep 07 including Deferred Status and
Progress
Maturity Assessment Rework Status and Progress
Model Changes Status and Progress Change Log
1200
Lunch
1330
DoDAF Meta Model
M3
UPDM DMM
COMPLETE IDEAS - MODAF SUBJECT AREA MAPPING
If not completed, map IDEAS Subject Areas to M3.
COMPLETE IDEAS - DODAF 2.0 SUBJECT AREA MAPPING
Complete review of Subject Area mapping. Look at DM2,
compare, assess, against IDEAS model.
Review of updates with view towards meeting BORO
standards
1645
Managers
Dave
Dave
Doug
Ian and Doug
Dave
Ian
Ian
Doug
Doug
Chris
Wrap up of days activities and Adjourn
1
Draft Agenda
Modelers: Tue 16 Sep – Fri 19 Sep (Subject to Change)
Tuesday 0900 AM
Services Frameworks, Examples, etc.
Measure and Capability analysis
Tuesday 1300 PM + Wednesday 0800 AM
Services Modeling in IDEAS
Welcome and Housekeeping and recap previous day / aims for today
Look at Open Group Services Ontology, NATO Services taxonomy,
OASIS, W3C, etc.
Review
Housekeeping and recap previous day / aims for today
Need to cover business services, e.g., search and rescue, restaurant,
How does Transformation relate to Capability? Net-Centricity is
important in U.S. Transformation.
Wednesday 1300 PM
RDF Mappings
Thursday 0900 AM
Measures
Housekeeping and recap previous day / aims for today
Issue of dispositions. Continue work on Measures at the Type
level. Maybe another example that's an organizational measure (e.g.,
cost or personnel skill level).
Friday 0900 AM
Capability
Housekeeping and recap previous day / aims for today
Particularly Capability taxonomy -- how differ from Process taxonomy,
Effects, Actors? Reference NAF CV-1.
Friday 1130 AM
Wrap up of activities and Adjourn
2
Agenda
MANAGEMENT: Tuesday 16 Sep – Friday 19 Sep
Topic
EXPERIMENTATION
Description
What is the intended scope of the Experiment planned for May 2009?
Rationale
Experimentation definition required to support preparatory planning and
related work plan definition. Maybe look into CWID. Look into open
source, e.g., Eclipse
Topic
Description
Rationale
IDEAS Working Plan
Topic
Status of Exchange Mechanisms
Description
MODX, UPDM XMI, DM2 PES, IDEAS RDFS, NATO AEDM, NATO Meta
Model, …
Rationale
1. Comparison of exchange models
2. Way forward for cooperation
Topic
Release into public domain for early adoption
3
Meeting Outline
• Objectives
• Proposed Activities – Separate Modelers and
Management Sessions
• The Plan
Push Forward
• Master Schedule – Management will review:
Status
Aims
Accomplishments
4
Major Objectives Per TOR
• Deliver a specification for the exchange of architectural
documentation and artifacts between coalition partners for the
purpose of Coalition Military Operations.
• To establish an oversight mechanism to perform configuration
control activities.
• To identify and approve all key activities and milestones
required for the accomplishment of the Working Group’s goals.
• Define, agree, and implement a technical approach for IDEAS
testing.
• Evolve the high level classes with all attributes and
relationships that ensure a cohesive exchange infrastructure to
meet the major goals and objectives.
5
Current Master Schedule
6
IDEAS Model Status at start of
Sep 08 Meeting
• Foundation still well defined
• Namespace pattern sufficiently well defined for current
testing
• Still need to finalize patterns for Agent overlap with
Process, Information Element Export/Import,
Event/Trigger, Duration, and Command Relationship.
• Data for OCD being defined/incorporated/clarified.
• Common Objects well defined.
• Mapping of national terms to IDEAS terms has progressed
facilitated by the namespace pattern.
• Need to define who owns the namespace for each
organization/nation.
• Top level IDEAS context diagram created and described.
• Identified that a common upper level taxonomy will need to
be defined for a number of areas of operational data likely
to be exchanged via the IDEAS model.
7
IDEAS Model Status at start of
Sep 08 Meeting (Cont.)
•
OV-5 Activity Whole-Part
• Design complete
• Exchange experimentation:
•
OV-5 Operational Nodes Activity
• Design completed
• Exchange experimentation:
•
Started OV-4 Command Relationship
• Design sketched
•
OV-5 Information Flow
• Design completed other than cosmetic
•
Started OV-6c Event Trigger
• Design sketched (duration and causality TBD)
•
Completed IDEAS Project AV-1
•
Updated Experiment plan (GANNT chart)
8
DODAF Update
• DoDAF 2.0 being developed in four “spirals” to be
completed by Nov 08
• Analysis of requirements to support DoD’s core processes:
budgeting, acquisition, capabilities development and
integration, systems engineering, portfolio management, and
operations planning
• Spiral II release in Mar 08 included first version of
DoDAF 2.0 Conceptual Data Model
•
•
•
•
Used IDEAS Foundation
Domain derived from many sources
Working on refinement and logical model attributes
Coordinating with OMG UPDM FTF
9
Uses IDEAS
Foundation
and
Common
Patterns
10
DoDAF 2.0 Meta Model
(Version 0.1) Overview
class Class Model
Proj ects
class Proj ect
Capabilities
Type
Goal
class Serv ices
0..*
TemporalType
lead-to
TemporalType
Effect
Condition
0..*
1..*
1..*
1..*
0..*
isrealizedby
Rule
Means
Type
Cost
Type
Proj ect
Capability
directs
InterfaceType
TemporalType
CapabilityConfiguration
Activ ity
Plan
0..*
0..*
is-a-part-of
is-a-part-of
0..*
0..*
0..*
TemporalType
PerformerState
0..*
0..*
PersonnelType
Performer
Organization
System
Activ ity
0..*
ExchangeObject
TemporalType
0..*
Performer
PersonnelType
is-a-partof
Skill
ExchangeObject
Materiel
TemporalType
RealProperty
0..*
InterfaceType
TemporalType
applies-to
ExchangeObject
Performer
is-a-part-of
Skill
Standard
is-performed-by
performs
1..*
results-in
TemporalType
RealProperty
is-a-part-of
Rule
Serv iceRequirement
Serv iceImplementation
InterfaceType
TemporalType
Effect
Measure
is-a-part-of
is-a-part-of
0..*
Performer
Measure
0..*
appliesto
0..*
0..*
TemporalType
Type
Activ ity
Organization
results-in
0..*
TemporalType
TemporalType
Condition
Type
1..*
changes
realizes
0..*
TemporalType
Effect
0..*
PerformerState
TemporalType
Measure
0..*
lead-to
1..*
TemporalType
applies-to
0..*
0..*
seeksChangeTo
is-performed-under
is-part-of
results-in
Serv ices
TemporalType
is-realized-by
Vision
class Capability
is-necessary-for
System
initiates
initiatesstimulates
follow
Ev ent
meet
comply-with
Measures
result-in
ExchangeObject
Materiel
1..*
TemporalType
Condition
satisfy
Softw areServ ice
Rules
class Measure - WIP
class Rule
Type
Baseline::Measure
result-in
TemporalType
Condition
1..*
is-valid-under
NeedsSatisfactionMeasure
OrganizationalMeasure
0..*
Type
PerformanceMeasure
Rule
AdaptabilityMeasure
Cost
MaintainabilityMeasure
AccuracyPrecision
Dependability
Interoperability
Agreement
Means
Timeliness
Standard
Guidance
RateThroughput
Trustw orthiness
Constraint
Capacity
Reliability
UCORE IC-ISM-v 2::
SecurityAttributesGroup
FunctionalStandard
TechnicalStandard
Security
meet
according-to
to-meet
Performers
Obj ect Exchanges
class Performer
AbstractFeature
Type
GeoFeature
according-to
class ExhangeObj ectFlow
TemporalType
PerformerState
InterfaceType
TemporalType
Location
is at
Activ ity
1..*
Performer
2..*
0..*
is-performed-by
is-partof
System
accordingto
conduct
performs
performs
0..*
is-produced-by
0..*
0..*
0..*
TemporalType
ExchangeObj ect
Performer
InterfaceType
TemporalType
Standard
Netw ork
is-performed-by
PerformerState
1..*
Rule
TemporalType
0..*
is-consumed-by
Activ ity
accordingto
Organization
Softw areServ ice
ExchangeObject
PersonnelType
Materiel
PersonnelType
TemporalType
is-a-partof
Skill
ExchangeObject
Rule
Materiel
Standard
is-a-part-of
Data
Information
Foundation
11