Perfect Competition Perfect competition describes a market structure whose assumptions are extremely strong and highly unlikely to exist in most real-time and real-world markets. The reality is that most markets are imperfectly competitive. Nonetheless, there is some value in understanding how price, output and equilibrium is established in both the short and the long run in a market that holds true to the tough assumptions of a world of perfect competition. Economists have become more interested in pure competition partly because of the rapid growth of e-commerce as a means of buying and selling goods and services. And also because of the popularity of auctions as a rationing device for allocating scarce resources between competing ends. Basic assumptions for pure competition to exist: 1. Many small firms, each of whom produces an insignificant percentage of total market output and thus exercise no control over the ruling market price. 2. No single firm can influence the market price, or market conditions. The single firm is said to be a price taker, taking its price from the whole industry. The single firm will not increase its price independently given that it will not sell any goods at all. Neither will the rational producer lower price below the market price given that it can sell all it produces at the market price. 3. Many individual buyers, none of who has any control over the market price 4. Perfect freedom of entry and exit from the industry. Firms face no sunk costs - entry and exit from the market is feasible in the long run. This assumption ensures all firms make normal profits in the long run. 5. Homogeneous products are produced that are perfect substitutes for each other. This leads to each firms being price takers and facing a perfectly elastic demand curve for their product. 6. Perfect knowledge – consumers have readily available information about prices and products from competing suppliers and can access this at zero cost – in other words, there are few transactions costs involved in searching for the required information about prices. 7. No externalities arising from production and/or consumption, which lie outside the market. 8. Given that producers and consumers have perfect knowledge, it is assumed that they make rational decisions to maximize their self-interest consumers look to maximize their utility, and producers look to maximize their profits (produce where MC = MR). 1 9. Firms can only make normal profits in the long run, although they can make abnormal (super-normal) profits in the short run. Equilibrium under perfect competition The firm as price taker The single firm takes its price from the industry, and is, consequently, referred to as a price taker. The industry is composed of all firms in the industry and the market price is where market demand is equal to market supply. Each single firm must charge this price and cannot diverge from it. 2 Perfect Competition and Profit Maximisation • The goal of a competitive firm is to maximize profit. • This means that the firm will want to produce the quantity that maximizes the difference between total revenue and total cost. 3 • Profit maximization occurs at the quantity where marginal revenue equals marginal cost. Relationship between MR and MC • When MR > MC increase Q • When MR < MC decrease Q • When MR = MC Profit is maximized. 4 The firm’s decision regarding shut-down A shutdown refers to a short-run decision not to produce anything during a specific period of time because of current market conditions. Exit refers to a longrun decision to leave the market. The firm considers its sunk costs when deciding to exit, but ignores them when deciding whether to shut down. Sunk costs are costs that have already been committed and cannot be recovered. The firm shuts down if the revenue it gets from producing is less than the variable cost of production. Shut down if TR < VC Shut down if TR/Q < VC/Q Shut down if P < AVC The portion of the marginal-cost curve that lies above average variable cost is the competitive firm’s short-run supply curve. 5 The firm’s decision regarding exit In the long run, the firm exits if the revenue it would get from producing is less than its total cost. Exit if TR < TC Exit if TR/Q < TC/Q Exit if P < ATC The competitive firm’s long-run supply curve is the portion of its marginal-cost curve that lies above average total cost. Summary Short-Run Supply Curve The portion of its marginal cost curve that lies above average variable cost Long-Run Supply Curve The marginal cost curve above the minimum point of its average total cost curve 6 Profits and losses in perfect competition 7 Short-run equilibrium under perfect competition Under perfect competition, firms can make super-normal profits or losses. In the long run However, in the long run firms are attracted into the industry if the incumbent firms are making supernormal profits. This is because there are no barriers to entry and because there is perfect knowledge. The effect of this entry into the industry is to shift the industry supply curve to the right, which drives down price until the point where all super-normal profits are exhausted. If firms are making losses, they will leave the market as there are no exit barriers, and this will shift the industry supply to the left, which raises price and enables those left in the market to derive normal profits. 8 In the long run The super-normal profit derived by the firm in the short run acts as an incentive for new firms to enter the market, which increases industry supply and market price falls for all firms until only normal profit is made. 9 Example of an increase in demand in the short run • An increase in demand raises price and quantity in the short run. • Firms earn profits because price now exceeds average total cost. 10 11 Efficient allocation of resources Economists are concerned about the efficiency of markets, and ensuring that resources are allocated efficiently. Perfect competition is considered to be efficient because: Supernormal profits are not made by any firm in perfect competition in the long-run. MC = price, so both parties, suppliers and customers, get exactly what they want. No wasteful advertising. Firms are allocatively and productively efficient. The major assumption behind this analysis and evaluation is that firms cannot produce products cheaper if they were bigger. It assumes that there are no economies of scale available in the market. Allocative efficiency Allocative efficiency occurs when the value consumers put on the good or service equals the cost of producing the product or service. In other words, when price = marginal cost. Productive efficiency Productive efficiency occurs when output is achieved at the minimum average cost. We can see from Figure 1 below that when it is in long-run equilibrium, perfect competition achieves allocative and productive efficiency as MC = MR = AC = AR. This means that they are maximizing profits (MC = MR) but only making normal profit (AC = AR). 12 Figure 1: Long run equilibrium - perfect competition So, perfect competition looks good, but is it always so? Problems with perfect competition are: There are no reasons to do anything better, or research new products. As soon as you do, everybody else would step in and copy. Wait and let somebody else do it. Consumer has no choice. There is just one unbranded product on the market. Some economies of scale always exist. Perfect competition is not competitive in the fullest sense of the word! Barriers to entry will always exist. Even street traders will usually be required to apply for and, usually, buy a trading license. Look at economies of scale. Some are always likely to exist. Financial economies apply - the better your reputation the cheaper the loans, bulk-buying economies are there as well. Economies of scale are there, like gravity. It is up to the firm to take advantage of them. Competition encourages their application and exploitation. Perfect competition may well operate efficiently, as far as economists are concerned. The consumer, however, may get an ordinary product or service at a high price. Is it worth it? 13 Evaluation The benefits It can be argued that perfect competition will yield the following benefits: 1. Because there is perfect knowledge, there is no information failure and knowledge is shared evenly between all participants. 2. There are no barriers to entry, so existing firms cannot derive any monopoly power. 3. Only normal profits made, so producers just cover their opportunity cost. 4. There is no need to spend money on advertising, because there is perfect knowledge and firms can sell all they can produce. In addition, selling unbranded goods makes it hard to construct an effective advertising campaign. 5. There is maximum possible: o Consumer surplus o Economic welfare 6. There is maximum allocative and productive efficiency: o Equilibrium will occur where P = MC, hence allocative efficiency. o In the long run equilibrium will occur at output where MC = ATC, which is productive efficiency. 7. There is also maximum choice for consumers. 14 How realistic is the model? Very few markets or industries in the real world are perfectly competitive. For example, how homogeneous is the output of real firms, given that even the smallest of firms working in manufacturing or services try to differentiate their product. The assumption that producers and consumers act rationally is questioned by behavioural economists, who have become increasingly influential over the last decade. Numerous experiments have demonstrated that decision-making often falls well short of what could be described as perfectly rational. Decisionmaking can be biased and subject to rule of thumb ‘guidance’ when consumers and producers are faced with complex situations. Although unrealistic, it is still a useful model in two respects. Firstly, many primary and commodity markets, such as coffee and tea, exhibit many of the characteristics of perfect competition, such as the number of individual producers that exist, and their inability to influence market price. Secondly, for other markets in manufacturing and services, the model is a useful yardstick by which economists and regulators can evaluate levels of competition that exist in real markets. 15 Questions 1: Sarah’s Salmon Farm produces 1000 fish a week. The marginal cost is $30 a fish, average variable cost is $20 a fish, and the market price is $25 a fish. Is Sarah maximising profit? Explain why or why not. If Sarah is not maximising profit, to do so, will she increase or decrease the number of fish she produces in a week? 2: Trout farming is a perfectly competitive industry, and all trout farms have the same cost curves. The market price is $25 a fish. To maximise profit, each farm produces 200 fish a week. Average total cost is $20 a fish, and average variable cost is $15 a fish. Minimum average variable cost is $12 a fish. (a) If the price falls to $20 a fish will trout farms continue to produce 200 fish a week? Explain why or why not. (b) If the price falls to $12 a fish, what will the trout farmer do? 3: Tulip growing is a perfectly competitive industry, and all tulip growers have the same cost curves. The market price of tulips is $25 a bunch, and each grower maximises profit by producing 2000 bunches a week. The average total cost of producing tulips is $20 a bunch, and the average variable cost is $15 a bunch. Minimum average variable cost is $12 a bunch. (a) What is the economic profit that each grower is making in the short run? (b) What is the price at the grower’s shutdown point? (c) What is each grower’s profit at the shutdown point? 4: Explain why in a perfectly competitive market, the firm is a price taker. Why can’t the firm choose the price at which it sells its good? 5: Imagine that the restaurant industry is perfectly competitive. Joe’s Diner is always packed in the evening but rarely has a customer at lunchtime. Why doesn’t Joe’s Diner close at lunchtime – temporarily shut down? 6: When Rod Laver completed his first grand slam in tennis in 1962, all rackets were made of wood. Today, tennis players use graphite rackets. As the demand for wooden tennis rackets decreased permanently, how did the profits of the firms producing wooden tennis rackets change? As some of these firms switched to producing graphite rackets, how did their economic profits change? 7: 3M created Post-it Notes, also known as sticky notes. Soon many other firms entered the sticky note market and started to produce sticky notes. 16 (a) What was the incentive for these firms to enter the sticky note market? (b) As time goes by, do you expect more firms to enter this market? Explain why or why not? (c) Can you think of any reason why any of these firms might exit the sticky note market? 8: Cost figures for a hypothetical firm are given in the following table. Use them to answer the questions below. The firm is selling in a perfectly competitive market. Output 1 2 3 4 5 FC ($) 50 50 50 50 50 AFC VC ($) AVC 30 50 80 120 170 TC ATC MC (a) Fill in the blank columns (b) What is the minimum price needed by the firm to break even? (c) What is the shutdown price? (d) At a price of $40, what output level would the firm produce? What would its profits be? 9: What can you expect from an industry in perfect competition in the long run? What will price be? What quantity will be produced? What will be the relation between marginal cost, average cost and price? 10: Explain why a perfectly competitive firm would or would not advertise. 11: Consider this statement: ‘When marginal revenue equals marginal cost, total cost equals total revenue, and the firm makes zero profit’. Do you agree or disagree? Explain. 12: The perfectly competitive firm will sell all the quantity of output consumers will buy at the prevailing market price. Do you agree or disagree? Explain your answer. 13: Suppose the industry equilibrium price of residential housing construction is $100 per square foot and the minimum average variable cost for a residential construction contractor is $110 per square foot. What would you advise the owner of this firm to do? Explain. 17 14: Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, is lined with virtually identical motels. Summertime rates run about $100 a night. During the winter, one can find rooms for as little as $20 a night. Assume the average fixed cost of a room per night including insurance, taxes and depreciation is $50. The average guest-related cost for a room each night, including maid service and linens, is $15. Would these motels be better off renting rooms for $20 in the off-season or shutting down until summer? 15: You are considering building a Rent Your Own Storage Center. You are trying to decide whether to build 50 storage units at a total economic cost of $200000, 100 storage units at a total economic cost of $300000, or 200 storage units at a total economic cost of $700000. If you wish to survive in the long run, which size will you choose? 18
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz