Culture Group and Tourism Culture and Neighbourhood Renewal Research Project Report by: Nina Bhakri Date: 6 April 2004 Contact Officer: Nina Bhakri Telephone: 020 7034 9938 Summary: Job title: Emai l: Steering Item no: 10 Policy Officer [email protected] This report follows from the interim report presented to the Culture and Tourism Steering Group on 2 October 2003. The report completes the picture of Neighbourhood Renewal Fund (NRF) spend on culture across London during 2002/03 through using the data originally unavailable for the first interim report. The report also updates Members on progress made against the recommendations put forward in the first interim report. Recommendation It is recommended that Members note the report and agree that officers now: s: 1. Work with boroughs to identify cultural champions who could be used to promote the role of culture in regeneration. 2. Work with boroughs to identify how they can best implement the DCMS “Guidance on Integrating Community Strategies”. 3. Undertake work to identify how Cultural Strategies can be incorporated at a local strategic level through the LSP structures. Report Page 2 Background 1. This report follows from the interim report presented to the Culture and Tourism Steering Group on 2 October 2003. 2. Only data missing in the first interim report from LB Hackney, LB Newham, LB Lewisham and LB Hammersmith and Fulham is discussed here. 3. The first interim report presented a partial overview of culture projects and initiatives funded through the Neighbourhood Renewal Fund (NRF) and recommendations for more detailed follow up work. Recommendations included: The collation of data missing from the London boroughs of Newham, Lewisham and Hackney. The need to organise a workshop with London boroughs and key funding bodies to raise awareness of the role of culture in regeneration. The identification of examples of cultural projects and initiatives which have impacted on local regeneration and neighbourhood renewal strategies and are examples of good practice in integrated approaches incorporating culture and regeneration. Identifying the barriers which currently impede a closer synergy between culture and regeneration. The development of a toolkit on good practice in developing cultural projects set within a regeneration context. 4. An update on progress against each of the above recommendations is provided in this report. 5. Through using the additional data, the report adds to the existing picture of NRF culture projects presented in the first interim report. This is presented in the section” NRF spend on culture in London (NRF) boroughs across seven thematic areas”. 6. The subsequent section illustrates the innovative and good practice approaches being applied in a number of boroughs to develop and implement an integrated, strategic approach to culture and regeneration. Limitations of this report 7. This report has only used data from the Neighbourhood Renewal Fund for 2002-2003 across London NRF boroughs. The picture presented therefore is only a partial overview of the impact of culture on regeneration. There are other funding streams supporting regeneration and culture at the neighbourhood level - for example, funding from the LDA to Report Page 3 support the creative industries and funding from the National Lottery and Arts Council. 8. In undertaking the research, it was difficult to categorise and measure the quantitative impact of cultural projects within thematic priorities of the NRF. This is further compounded as the impact of cultural projects can cut across thematic categories identified for NRF spend. Progress since the interim report 9. Progress against each of the recommendations highlighted in the interim report (2 October 2003) is as follows: The need to organise a workshop with London boroughs and key funding bodies to raise awareness of the role of culture in regeneration. The ALG Culture and Tourism Steering Group held a seminar on 2 December 2003. The seminar brought together lead members and lead officers in culture and regeneration along with private sector developer Argent St George, the Department for Culture Media and Sport (DCMS) and Government Office for London (GOL) to debate current issues surrounding culture and its relation to regeneration. A report of the points raised in the seminar along with key recommendations and the potential role of the ALG in helping to drive forward the recommendations is attached in Appendix 1. The identification of examples of cultural projects and initiatives which have impacted on local regeneration and neighbourhood renewal strategies and which can illustrate examples of good practice in integrated approaches incorporating a culture and regeneration strategy. The ALG seminar and data collated for the purposes of this report have pointed to a number of cultural initiatives successfully developed in a regeneration context. Their successful impact on local, social and economic regeneration is largely due to their integrated approaches incorporating private, public, voluntary and community based partnerships and developments which arise directly from the needs of local communities and stakeholders. This report highlights successful projects and initiatives applying these concepts. Identifying the barriers which currently impede a closer synergy between culture and regeneration. Report Page 4 The ALG seminar enabled key policy and decision makers across the sectors to highlight the challenges they face in developing integrated cultural initiatives and projects in a regeneration context. The development of a toolkit on good practice for integrating cultural and community strategies. DCMS is consulting on their recently produced “Draft Guidance on integrating Cultural and Community Strategies”.1 The guidance will be presented and discussed at the ALG Culture and Tourism Steering Group meeting on the 6 April 2004. NRF spend on culture in London (NRF) boroughs across seven thematic areas 10. Appendix 3 illustrates the distribution of NRF spend on culture across all London (NRF) boroughs. Eleven per cent of total NRF allocated in 2002-2003 was spent on projects related to culture across the London (NRF) boroughs (see Appendix 2). The four largest spenders on NRF cultural activities are: LB Newham LB Tower Hamlets LB Lewisham LB Islington (34% of NRF spent on culture) (7% of NRF spent on culture) (24% of NRF spent on culture) (8% of NRF spent on culture) 11. Appendix 4 illustrates the total NRF spend on culture in proportion to total NRF allocated for each (NRF) London borough. The data shows that even in those LSPs with the largest proportion of NRF spend allocated to culture, there is still potential for further growth. 12. NRF is allocated to be spent across seven thematic areas (Housing, Education, Capacity Building, Health, Employment and Other). The report illustrates how culture contributes to these thematic areas. 13. Appendix 5 illustrates the thematic distribution of NRF spending for cultural projects and initiatives across the London (NRF) boroughs. NRF spend within each thematic priority across the London (NRF) boroughs is illustrated in the charts in Appendix 6. 14. In descending order, the areas of spend under the seven thematic areas are as follows: Guidance on integrating Cultural and Community Strategies; Produced for DCMS Local Government Team; January 2004 1 Report Page 5 i. ii. iii. iv. v. vi. vii. Housing and the Environment Education Other Capacity Building Crime Health Employment (27%) (24%) (17%) (12%) (9%) (6%) (5%) Housing and the environment 15. Projects under housing represent the greatest area of NRF cultural spend particularly by: i. ii. LB Newham LB Islington (84.6%) (11.8%) 16. The projects under this category are primarily designed to increase and improve green spaces and to make them more accessible as recreational facilities through creating amenity areas. These projects provide an important mechanism for transforming the built environment in deprived neighbourhoods and enable access to green spaces and recreational areas for a diverse range of communities. These green spaces are also important contributors to local community identity providing a local community focus for local cultural activities and crucial breathing spaces in deprived neighbourhoods. LB Newham has developed a range of environmental initiatives (led by the Culture and Community Department), which apply a community driven and cross sector approach to enable social inclusion. The youth facilities partnership – outdoor / open spaces project will use community forums to identify and develop and manage allocated funding for local outdoor facilities. Forums will also link with other services through mainstream budgets. The Beckton Schools Environment Project tackles local environmental issues through using the arts. The project will facilitate development work within and around local primary schools and residents to raise awareness of local environmental issues and their solutions. The Barrington Playing Fields initiative led by the Leisure Department will widen access to leisure facilities for young people and aim to encourage healthy lifestyles and civic responsibility through participation. The Sensory Garden Project is a multi agency project involving Sure Start and the Council. The initiative will develop a sensory garden for Sure Start clients and their families. The facility will create a safe open play area and a local community focal point. Education Report Page 6 17. Additional data under the education theme supports the points made in the first report regarding the use of community based venues such as libraries and schools in providing a focal point and gateway to education and lifelong learning. However, a number of innovative initiatives are also highlighted by the new data which illustrate projects adopting a partnership approach between cultural organisations and service sectors. LB Newham’s Creative Partnerships project for example fosters links between cultural organisations and schools. Cultural organisations will bring their expertise into schools and expose young people to cultural and creative work which will challenge their attitudes, perceptions and assumptions. Capacity Building – Promoting citizenship amongst young people and engaging young people through culture 18. Additional data highlights initiatives to re-engage young people through: Working directly with young people to identify and develop their access to community based leisure and cultural activities relevant to their needs and interests. LB Newham has identified significant barriers related to the access and participation of young people to quality leisure facilities in Newham. The “Sporting Chances for Newham’ Young People” project led by the Culture and Community Department will undertake a large marketing campaign for young people at arts and leisure facilities to increase participation amongst young people and those groups within the community whose levels of participation are significantly low. Using culturally relevant media to promote citizenship and community pride amongst young people. LB Newham has identified music as the medium which binds together diverse groups of young people. “Making Music” led by the Culture and Community Department will take music recording facilities to the people in the form of outreach work by taking existing providers to local venues. LB Newham has also used the views of young people to identify the factors which lead to anti social behaviour and the activities which could reduce rates of anti social behaviour. Consequently, the Emmanuel Youth Project linked to Connections uses music to engage young people through developing a music studio. Enhancing community cohesion amongst young people from black and ethnic minority communities through culturally relevant media. LB Newham initiative “CT links and Urban Development Music DJ” will provide positive role models for BEM young people by encouraging them to address the negative messages from Hip Hop culture. Report Page 7 LB Newham aims to strengthen community cohesion through working with local BEM organisations to plan a “community cohesion festival”. Using locally developed arts and cultural initiatives to build community cohesion through partnership. LB Newham has initiated the Youth Facilities Partnership comprised of local groups, the Council and local schools to identify local outdoor facilities which could be used by young people. LB Newham project “Stand Up, Be heard or dare to dream” will through three partner organisations take outreach sessions of singing drama and dance to local estates. Sport and neighbourhood Renewal 19. The first interim report outlined a mix of projects aimed to promote sports to: Build community and social cohesion Improve health Reduce crime 20. The additional data collated for this report shows a number of initiatives using sport these ways, as outlined below. Partnerships comprising the community and the council to increase access to local sports facilities LB Newham has initiated a number of partnerships with the Council, local community groups and agencies to develop a joined approach in identifying, developing and funding local sports facilities meeting the needs of specific groups (Sporting Chances for Newham’s Young People). The Youth Facilities Partnership will work through its community forums to identify the need for local facilities and their associated development costs. A link across councils departments will be established through mainstream budgets. Using sport as a tool to tackle cross cutting themes such as improving health, education, employment and community cohesion. The Newham Sportal will aim to improve health amongst young people by encouraging their participation in sporting and other physical activities. A range of innovative approaches will be applied by developing a specific website dedicated to this area. Culture, employment and neighbourhood renewal 21. The first interim report outlined how cultural projects have improved local economies. The additional data collated here draws attention to the potential for Report Page 8 developing local economies through growth in specific cultural sectors such as the creative industries. LB Newham in recognition of the growing number of studios, film and media services and the significant employment opportunities they are bringing to the local community has set up a creative film and media centre. LB Lewisham is developing a cluster of initiatives and specific business support to build the creative sector in Lewisham through its project “Embedding Creative Lewisham” Innovative and good practice approaches Partnership Working 22. The multi faceted nature of social exclusion requires a cohesive and integrated approach. Cross sector multi agency partnerships are important in using this approach to deliver change at the local level. 23. The additional data collated for this report has highlighted important examples of good practice in developing cultural and regeneration initiatives through integrated partnerships involving a cross sector of council services, local communities and local agencies. LB Hackney has established a Cultural Forum which is a sub partnership of its Local Strategic Partnership. The Forum has a strategic role in linking the Hackney 2020 vision into the LSP. Thus ensuring that culture is interwoven into the regeneration agenda at a corporate and strategic level. LB Newham has set up a Local Action Partnership Board dedicated to developing culture as part of the overall structure of its LSP. Public / private sector partnerships 24. The private sector plays a significant role in the physical renewal of local neighbourhoods. Development plans in the Kings Cross area illustrate how public private sector partnerships can be applied to ensure an integrated approach which is driven by the needs of all local stakeholders. LB Lewisham is developing access and support to SMEs in the creative industries sector to implement its strategy for a “Creative Lewisham”. Report Page 9 LB Newham strategic partnership is working closely with the private sector to ensure that local regeneration plans incorporate a cultural element. A community driven approach 25. Local communities are important stakeholders in their neighbourhoods. Many of the successful initiatives cited in this report and the first interim report have at their core mechanisms to understand and harness the needs of local communities and to work in close partnership with them to develop and implement jointly prepared plans, strategies, actions and projects. The public / private partnership in LB Camden is a key instrument in linking local communities to planners and decision makers at a strategic level. Consultation has been the key mechanism in understanding local needs and incorporating these into the planning process. Strategic links to culture and regeneration 26. The removal of the need for local authorities to develop local cultural strategies has the potential to weaken culture’s strategic profile, particularly within a regeneration context. There are however, notable examples of local authorities using existing tools as vehicles to mobilise culture into regeneration and community plans through Local Strategic Partnerships and the community planning processes. LB Hackney has, for example, developed a 2020 vision for Hackney which sets out priorities and actions incorporating culture and regeneration. This vision is also reflected in the borough’s Neighbourhood Renewal Strategy. Equalities Considerations 27. Future work in this area should continue to focus on promoting equality in access to cultural facilities. Recommendations 28. It is recommended that Members note the report and agree that officers now: Report Page 10 1. Work with boroughs to identify cultural champions who could be used to promote the role of culture in regeneration. 2. Work with boroughs to identify how they can best implement the DCMS “Guidance on Integrating Community Strategies”. 3. Undertake work to identify how Cultural Strategies can be incorporated at a local strategic level through the LSP structures. Background papers Guidance on integrating Cultural and Community Strategies; Produced for DCMS Local Government Team; January 2004 NRF Statements of Use (all London boroughs eligible for NRF), 2002/03 Report Page 11 Appendix 1 ALG SEMINAR: REGENERATION THROUGH CULTURE AND TOURISM 1. Summary Landmark cultural initiatives have marked the urban regeneration of our neighbourhoods, towns and cities. The impact of culture led regeneration particularly on social and economic inclusion is currently being examined and debated widely. Identifying, collecting and disseminating quantitative data on cultures impact on the regeneration and renewal agenda is of particular concern along with the tools to enable a more evident integration of culture into regeneration at a policy and strategic level. The ALG seminar on the 2 December 2003 brought together lead members and officers in culture and regeneration, along with a number of private sector developers including Argent St George, the Department for Culture Media and Sport and Government Office for London to debate the current issues surrounding culture and its relation to regeneration. This report highlights the points raised by the seminar, along with recommendations for the potential role of the ALG in helping to drive forward the agenda on regeneration through culture. 2. Background Recent years have seen a number of landmark initiatives which have transformed the physical and economic landscape of our urban areas. This development has been paralleled by a need to strengthen awareness of how and why investment in regeneration should be underpinned and shaped by the social and cultural needs of communities of people to reflect an integrated approach encompassing social, economic and physical regeneration. It is the embodiment of these principles which have been shown to ensure not only sustainable regeneration but sustainable, cohesive communities where people want to live and work, enjoy their leisure time and identify with pride. The impact and role of culture as contributing to these principles has been widely debated and has led to a strengthened call for culture to be integrated into mainstream social, economic and physical regeneration initiatives. However, despite the development of significant initiatives there is still a need to strengthen the evidence pointing to the impact of culture on the regeneration agenda. There is also a need to integrate culture into regeneration policies more evidently and to apply a holistic approach incorporating the social, economic and environmental dimensions of regeneration. This begins with the communities of Report Page 12 people who will live, work and identify with places - in essence, to develop “places for people”. 3. ALG Seminar “Regeneration Through Culture and Tourism” The ALG seminar on the 2 December 2003 provided an opportunity to bring together the private sector, local government and regional bodies to: Raise awareness of the role of culture in promoting economic and social regeneration, social inclusion and community cohesion through examples of both large-scale national iconic projects and local neighbourhood area based projects. Bring together the private and public sector to identify the key challenges in promoting greater synergy between culture, tourism and regeneration policies and strategies. Identify recommendations to enable greater synergy between culture and regeneration. 4. The Picture So Far Illustrations of landmark initiatives spanning both large-scale iconic projects down to local area based initiatives provided examples of what can be achieved through genuine partnership with the private and public sector and local communities. National impact Argent St George is one of the most successful office and mixed use developers of the 1990s and is best known for its 17 acre Brindly Place development in Birmingham. Built around two new public squares Brindly Place has been pivotal to the transformation of central Birmingham. It has won many awards and is widely regarded as an outstanding example of a traditionally master planned mixed use urban regeneration scheme. St George plc is London’s leading mixed use developer and part of the Berkley Group plc. St George is renowned for its successful partnerships with local authorities, Housing Associations and Universities to deliver a variety of affordable housing. This unique partnership has enabled “the creation of places” and quality working and living environments which have gained national and international recognition (Brindley Place- Birmingham; London International Freight Exchange; Spitafields in East London). Current work includes the regeneration of Kings Cross presenting one of the most exciting and significant development and regeneration opportunities within London, the UK and Europe. Report Page 13 Local Impact Promoting creativity and Business Enterprise through the cultural industries sector Mazorca Projects established by Dieneke Ferguson in Hackney in 1989 originally acted as a management consultancy promoting local and international cultural industries. The Hidden Art brand began life in 1994 as a small open studios event to promote the work of 43 Hackney-based designer-makers. As the UK’s design scene has flourished the demand for good design has also grown with exciting opportunities for more businesses. It has however often proved difficult for individuals and small companies to begin translating creativity into practical output without assistance. A decade on, Mazorca and Hidden Art has developed into a unique network supporting and promoting over 1,800 designer-makers, and building links across an industry characterised by highly creative people and ideas. Opportunities have been created for designer-makers for a decade through improving their access to information, encouraging the exchange of ideas and expertise and offering a platform to exhibit and sell designs to customers and enabling them to develop from sole traders into small businesses and beyond. All kinds of businesses, from contemporary design practices to traditional manufacturing firms rely on Hidden Art to help them to develop professionally and commercially. Neighbourhood Renewal and regeneration through culture The ALG, in recognition of the importance of culture in regeneration, has undertaken a preliminary analysis of how Neighbourhood Renewal funding (NRF) has been spent on culture and tourism projects. Innovative initiatives have been highlighted which illustrate the impact of arts and sports and their role, value and contribution to neighbourhood renewal, regeneration, social inclusion and community cohesion at the local level. These initiatives include for example London Borough of Camden’s re-development of estate based areas for sport and leisure facilities and improvements to pockets of open spaces on estates. A number of London boroughs have also developed programmes of local festivals and community events to celebrate diversity and cohesively bring together fragmented communities. The development of cultural quarters in Newham and Lewisham has enabled the social and economic regeneration of deprived areas. An important opportunity has also been utilised for a diverse range of agencies to work together with local communities to ensure joint working and maximised use of existing local facilities. The London Borough of Newham’s cultural work is particularly notable for substantial cross working and partnership projects developed across leisure, regeneration and education departments. Report Page 14 5. The Impact Economic This is most clearly demonstrated by the substantial growth of the creative industries and tourism sectors. The inward investment these sectors have bought to the city is now being well recognised. Creative Industries The DCMS2 established the significance of the creative industries sector and a vital component of economic regeneration through the development of creative industry clusters which incorporates sport, libraries and museums and a number of sub sectors3. DCMS signifies this as the fastest growing sector in the UK economy, generating more than £112.5 billion in revenue and accounting for 9.2% GDP and exports accounting for 9 per cent of revenue (£10.3 billion). ONS and GLA estimates quoted in the Mayor’s draft cultural strategy4 chart the growth of the Creative Industries average annual output per head of population from £1,800 in 1995 to £2,500 in 2000. The DTI5 to: analysis of the creative industries sector points to the sector as contributing 11.7% of the worlds exports of computer services 13% of the worlds publishing exports 25% of the worlds exports of works of art UK being the world’s largest exporter of books to the USA The output of the UK music industry at £4.6 billion nearly 105 of world music sales. Tourism London’s tourism industry has contributed to further significant economic growth in London. The Mayor’s Plan for Tourism 6points to 30 million tourists spending over £15 billion each year comprising 12% of Gross Domestic Product and providing over half a million full time and part time jobs in the sector. Physical A number of notable projects have succeeded in designing architecturally aesthetic living and working places for people and significantly enhanced the environmental landscape of local neighbourhoods and inner city areas. These mixed use DCMS: Creative Industries Mapping Document, 1998;2001 Advertising; Architecture; Arts; Computer Games; Crafts; Design; Fashion; Music; Publishing; Radio and TV; Video, film and photography (Source DCMS, Mapping the Creative Industries, 2001) 4 London Cultural Capital Realising the potential of a world-class city (The Mayors Draft Culture Strategy; June 2003) 5 DTI Cluster report, 2001 6 Visit London; The Mayor’s Plan for Tourism ; September 2002 2 3 Report Page 15 developments have successfully shaped dense, vibrant, distinctive urban quarters and bought local benefits thus also making lasting contributions. Examples include: Brindley Place Birmingham Piccadilly Gardens Manchester Forboury Square Reading London International Freight Exchange Alder Castle City of London 6. The key elements of good practice Argent St George – “Principles for a Human City” Argent St George principles reflect “an underlying 'humanist' philosophy or approach”. Consequently, the regeneration success of the Argent group has been built on extensive exercises seeking to build the views of local communities into the design process. The group “worked hard to understand the site, the surrounding neighbourhoods and its local communities; raise awareness about the tremendous opportunities and challenges that King’s Cross presents; put in place a clear, step-bystep process of consultation; and build a consensus behind emerging proposals and ideas.” 'Principles for a Human City' signalled Argent St George’s intention to “create a lasting new place for people, one that can continue to support successfully their changing patterns of social and economic behaviour…. a sense of place and belonging and use these as drivers for contemporary urban design.” Partnerships Making sure that development brings a range of social and economic benefits to surrounding local communities is also a key part of the Argent St George policy and an important element of sustainability. For example, the King’s Cross Central development plans to support the growth of local employment sectors; provide new jobs and training opportunities; and deliver new, high quality housing, particularly, as the nine local wards are currently amongst the most disadvantaged in London and the UK. Argent has therefore set out to work with established organisations, agencies and groups to help plan, manage and distribute some of the benefits that will accrue from a commercially viable development scheme so as to: Develop appropriate strategies; training, education Integrate the new development neighbourhoods and communities; Help meet local needs and into employment surrounding Report Page 16 Strategic links to regeneration One of the most renowned and evident examples of culture being linked to the regeneration agenda exists in the London Borough of Newham, where the cultural strategy is clearly interwoven into the regeneration strategy. Thus ensuring an approach which focuses on local communities and uses culture to help develop the local economic base through for example the development of cultural quarters and creative industries. 7. The key challenges Partnerships Local Partnerships (Local Strategic Partnerships and New Deal for Communities) are especially crucial and well placed in being able to link together local communities, key local decision and policy makers across sectors to develop solutions which meet local needs. Partnerships at this level are also best placed to strategically develop closer integrated links between culture and regeneration through for example the community planning process. Current evidence shows however that the majority of LSP structures and planning processes do not currently enable a clear cultural focus to be incorporated into the LSP planning processes thus excluding its inclusion into a regeneration agenda. Linking local community needs to large scale development initiatives Local communities must share in the success of their neighbourhoods and regeneration initiatives should have at their core the needs of their communities. The challenge still exists however to link the design and development of large scale projects to the social and economic needs of local communities and avoid the “one size fits all” approach. Developing an appropriate and integrated policy and planning framework for cultural activity The challenge still remains on how to develop and place cultural strategies within wider local strategic, policy or planning level frameworks such as for example local community Strategies and Unitary Development Plans. Consequently, the process often leads to culture projects regarded as peripheral “add ons” to mainstream regeneration policies. Although limited evidence of successful case studies does exist there is a need to develop awareness of successful strategies and tools to enable this to happen. Private sector engagement in LSPs The present under representation of the private sector on LSP structures impacts on a number of areas, primarily: Report Page 17 Establishing strengthened links between design and development of regeneration initiatives to local community needs. Enabling the development of a holistic approach incorporating social, economic and environmental dimensions. Need for quantitative impact indicators A wider recognition of the impact of culture on regeneration rests on measuring its quantitative benefits against key social and economic indicators. There is however wide spread recognition within DCMS and other key players that there is a need to develop and communicate an evidential base on cultures impact. Currently at a neighbourhood level the Neighbourhood Renewal Fund (NRF) is an important source of support both for local initiatives and the LSPs. 8. Recommendations Partnerships If LSPs are the main vehicle with the potential to lead to the greater integration of culture into local regeneration policy and planning then LSP structures and planning processes should be developed to clearly incorporate culture into local policy planning and service delivery processes. The potential for developing measurable (culture related) floor targets within the Neighbourhood Renewal Fund should also be explored. The Policy Framework The removal of the requirement on the part of local authorities to develop cultural strategies has made it more difficult to develop a clear strategic and integrated policy recognition for culture. Existing tools and planning processes should be utilised to strengthen and integrate cultures role in regeneration. Community strategies and Unitary Development Plans have proved important vehicles for a number of authorities to achieve this objective (London Borough of Croydon; London Borough of Camden). Local Public Service Agreements should be reviewed to ensure the embodiment of culture across a wider agenda. Coherent and cohesive guidance is required to link culture into regeneration through existing frameworks. Impact Indicators A quantitative evidence base is needed to clearly substantiate the social and economic contribution of culture. A framework for the type of data to be collected and the methods for its collection need to be developed. The data should provide a national, regional and local picture. The Private Sector Report Page 18 Whilst the contribution and participation of the private sector is agreed to be pivotal in attracting additional resources and comprising a base to bring together diverse partners there is still considerable variance in private sector involvement at a local level particularly on LSP structures. LSP structures should therefore be developed to encourage the contribution and participation of the private sector at a local level. Linking local communities with large scale regeneration initiatives Local relevance of large scale initiatives to the needs of local communities is important to ensure sustainability and the development of a place for people. Whilst stakeholder participation is the key to this route a cohesive policy on this needs to be developed and disseminated to ensure community needs are interwoven into design and development plans at the earliest stages. Developing London’s Creative Industries To help overcome barriers faced by London’s creative Industries in developing a stronger business skills base, the ALG could work with the sector and key funding agencies (LDA; Business Links) to develop specific funding streams and support structures to support the development and skills for the future growth of the sector. 9. The potential role of the ALG The ALG role could include: Working in conjunction with key agencies and LSPs to develop measurable impact indicators. Apply these to assess the local impact of culture on regeneration. Identify local champions for culture to promote cultural impact on local social and economic regeneration.
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz