SAMPLE SIZE ESTIMATION FOR SURVIVAL OUTCOMES IN CLUSTER-RANDOMIZED STUDIES WITH SMALL CLUSTER SIZES BIOMETRICS (JUNE 2000) AMITA K. MANATUNGA – THE ROLLINS SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH OF EMORY UNIVERSITY SHANDE CHEN – RUSH-PRESBYTEIAN-ST. LUKE’S MEDICAL CENTER PRESENTATION BY EVALYN VAERA BREIKŠS DUKE UNIVERSITY – 24 MARCH 2017 – CURRENT PROBLEMS IN BIOSTATISTICS (BIOS 900) OUTLINE Review of Survival Data Power Calculation Differences Non-CRT Sample Size Estimation Methods How CRT Changes Things Discussion of Simulation Studies WHAT IS SURVIVAL DATA? Interested in Time-to-Event outcomes rather than typical measurements We observe 𝑌𝑖𝑘 = min 𝑇𝑖𝑘 , 𝐶𝑖𝑘 and 𝛿𝑖𝑘 , where 𝑇𝑖𝑘 is the survival time, 𝐶𝑖𝑘 the censoring time, and 𝛿𝑖𝑘 the failure indicator of the ith individual in treatment arm k, a 1 indicating 𝑇𝑖𝑘 ≤ 𝐶𝑖𝑘 and a 0 otherwise. Censoring is when an individual’s survival time is not observed due to leaving the study for other reasons, including the conclusion of the study. Generally fit Cox-Proportional Hazards models using the Kaplan-Meier Product-Limit estimator to estimate the survivorship curve, that is, modeling the proportion of individuals that have not yet experienced a failure event as a function of time and other covariates. HOW POWER CALCULATIONS IN SURVIVORSHIP STUDIES DIFFER Power is a function of number of events rather than of number of sampled individuals. Our treatment effect of interest is the difference in rates of survival, that is, the hazard ratios, rather than some directly measureable difference between groups using means. Necessary sample sizes are estimated by making assumptions of the event rates. CURRENT METHODS FOR SAMPLE SIZE ESTIMATION Required number of events: 𝐸𝑣𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑠 = 𝑧𝛼/2 +𝑧𝛽 2 𝜋1 𝜋2 log 𝐻𝑅 2 , where 𝜋𝑖 is the proportion of events in treatment arm 𝑖, HR is the assumed Hazard Ratio between the two groups, and the z’s are from the standard normal distribution. Need an event rate, P(event) Work with bivariate marginal distributions 𝑃 𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑛𝑡 = 1 − (𝜋1 𝑆1 𝑇 + 𝜋2 𝑆2 𝑇 ) 𝑆𝑖 (𝑇) is the survivorship function (1-CDF), often presumed to be exponential Often historical or pilot data aids in estimating the parameter(s) of 𝑆𝑖 (𝑇), or just assume some HOW DOES CRT CHANGE THINGS? Now have clusters, naïve method involves averaging their sizes Observe 𝑌𝑖𝑗𝑘 = min 𝑇𝑖𝑗𝑘 , 𝐶𝑖𝑗𝑘 and 𝛿𝑖𝑗𝑘 , where 𝑇𝑖𝑗𝑘 is the survival time, 𝐶𝑖𝑗𝑘 the censoring time, and 𝛿𝑖𝑗𝑘 the failure indicator of the 𝑗th individual in cluster 𝑖 in treatment arm 𝑘, a 1 indicating 𝑇𝑖𝑗𝑘 ≤ 𝐶𝑖𝑗𝑘 and a 0 otherwise. Generalize to the Clayton-Oakes model 𝑆 𝑡1 , 𝑡2 = 𝑆(𝑡1 ) 1−𝜃 + 𝑆(𝑡2 ) 1−𝜃 −1 −1/(𝜃−1) 𝜃 is the measure of association between 𝑇1 and 𝑇2 . 𝜃 = 1 means 𝑇’s independent, 𝜃 → ∞ means they approach maximal (+) dependence HOW DOES CRT CHANGE THINGS? (CON’T) Asymptotic normality assumption, 𝜆’s are the hazard ratios for each treatment arm 𝑛𝑘 𝜆𝑘 − 𝜆𝑘 → 𝑁(0, Λ𝑘 ) Where Λ𝑘 = 𝑈𝑘 (𝜆𝑘 ) , Γ𝑘 𝜆𝑘 2 𝑈𝑘 𝜆𝑘 = 𝐸 1 𝜆𝑘 𝑖 𝑗 𝛿𝑖𝑗𝑘 − 𝑖 𝑗 𝑦𝑖𝑗𝑘 2 , Γ𝑘 𝜆𝑘 = 1 𝐸 𝜆2𝑘 Much algebra later, in the framework of a hypothesis test, we arrive at 𝜆1 𝑁 𝑙𝑜𝑔 𝜆2 = 𝑧𝛼 𝛾2 𝑈2 𝜆2 + 𝛾1 𝑈1 (𝜆1 ) 𝛾1 𝜆1 Γ1 𝜆1 + 𝛾2 𝜆2 Γ2 𝜆2 Where 𝑁 = 𝑛1 + 𝑛2 , Solve for 𝑁 or 𝑧𝛽 as desired. 2 1 1 1 1 + + 𝑧𝛽 2 Λ2 + 2 Λ1 𝛾1 𝛾2 𝜆2 𝜆1 𝛾1 = 𝑛1 /𝑁, 𝛾2 = 𝑛2 /𝑁. 𝑖 𝑗 𝛿𝑖𝑗𝑘 . SIMULATION STUDY DISCUSSION Compare their expected power of 90% to empirical power in simulation Numerically solved for N, then used a uniform distribution to simulate censorship and compute empirical power to detect imposed clinical difference in hazard ratios Authors used a Weibull distribution for S(T), varying shape parameter to obtain different event rates, more events = more power Overall their method is more conservative, especially with smaller cluster sizes and lower risk ratios (that is, smaller clinical differences) They chalked it up to non-normality conformity in small samples REFERENCES Manatunga, Amita K., and Shande Chen. "Sample Size Estimation for Survival Outcomes in Cluster‐Randomized Studies with Small Cluster Sizes." Biometrics 56.2 (2000): 616-621. Weaver, Mark A., PhD. "Sample Size Calculations for Survival Analysis." Family Health International. India, Goa. Web. 24 Mar. 2017. <http://www.icssc.org/Documents/AdvBiosGoa/Tab%2026.00_SurvSS.pdf>.
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz