HOPE VI: A Comparative Case Study of Mixed

University of Portland
Pilot Scholars
Political Science Undergraduate Publications,
Presentations and Projects
Political Science
Spring 2015
HOPE VI: A Comparative Case Study of Mixed
Income Public Housing Programs
Emily Raszler
University of Portland
Follow this and additional works at: http://pilotscholars.up.edu/pol_studpubs
Part of the Political Science Commons
Citation: Pilot Scholars Version (Modified MLA Style)
Raszler, Emily, "HOPE VI: A Comparative Case Study of Mixed Income Public Housing Programs" (2015). Political Science
Undergraduate Publications, Presentations and Projects. Paper 1.
http://pilotscholars.up.edu/pol_studpubs/1
This Student Project is brought to you for free and open access by the Political Science at Pilot Scholars. It has been accepted for inclusion in Political
Science Undergraduate Publications, Presentations and Projects by an authorized administrator of Pilot Scholars. For more information, please contact
[email protected].
HOPEVI
AComparativeCaseStudyofMixedIncomePublicHousingPrograms
EmilyRaszler
SeniorHonorsProject
Spring2015
Introduction
PublichousingisoneofthelongestrunningsocialservicesintheUnited
States,withahistorythatechoestheracialtensionsandmovementsofthecountry.
Withoutpublichousing,thealreadyhighlevelsofhomelessnessincitieswouldmost
likelyskyrocket.Publichousingalsofightsagainstgentrification,keepingaffordable
housingoptionswithincitieswhilerentsaroundtheprojectsskyrocket.Famously,
duringthe1980s,publichousingprojectsbecamehotspotsforgangviolenceand
drugabuse.Tofightagainstthis,theDepartmentofHousingandUrban
DevelopmentcreatedtheHOPEVIprogramtochangethewaypublichousing
worked,movingfromsmall,fullysubsidedunitstoamixed‐incomemodel.
ThispaperwillexploretwoHOPEVIfundedpublichousingredevelopment
projects,oninPortland,OregonandoneinWashington,D.C.Itwillexaminethe
effectivenessofmixedincomehousinganddeterminewhichofthetwohousing
projectswasmostsuccessful.
HistoryofpublichousingintheUnitedStates
AswithmostpublicservicesintheUnitedStates,thehistoryofpublic
housingbeginswiththeNewDeal.In1933,CongressenactedtheNational
IndustrialRecoveryAct.Withinthispieceoflegislation,TitleII,Section202created
thefirstincarnationofpublichousingbyprovidinglow‐interestloanstopublicor
privategroupsforlow‐incomehousing.In1937,theWagner‐SteagalHousingAct
solidifiedthepermanentpublichousingprogram.However,itplacedheavy
limitationsontheconstructionofhousing,cappingthecostforeachunitat$5,000.
Constructionbegan,however,andby1939therewere50,000housingunits
intendedforpublichousinguse.Supportfortheseprojectswaswidespreadasa
meanstoanendofjobcreation,athemethatresonatesthroughoutthehistoryof
publichousingintheUnitedStates.
ThepublichousingprogramcontinuedtogrowwiththeHousingActof1949.
Thislegislationwascreatedwiththegoalofa“decenthomeinadecent
environmentforeveryAmerican.”ItexpandedtheFederalHousingadministration
andfederalinvolvementinmortgageinsurance,providedtheauthorityandfunding
forslumclearanceandurbanrenewal,andinitiatedconstructionofpublichousing
withagoalof810,000units.Themodernincarnationoffederalpublichousing
policybeginsin1965withtheHousingandUrbanDevelopmentAct.Thiscreated
theDepartmentofHousingandUrbanDevelopment(HUD),acabinet‐levelwingof
thefederalgovernmentthatstillexiststoday.Thebillshiftedthefundingfrom
government‐fundedprojectstosubsidizingprivatelyconstructedlow‐income
housing.Italsocreatedtheprecursortothecurrentrentvoucherprogram.Section
23ofthelegislationallowedlocalhousingauthoritiestoplaceindividualswhowere
onwaitinglistsforpublichousinginprivatelyleasedunits.
Thecurrentvoucherprogram,knownasSection8,comesfromtheHousing
andCommunityDevelopmentActof1974.Thiscreatedsubsidiesforprivately
constructedlow‐incomehousingprojectsaswellastheverypopulartenantbased
voucherprogram.Thisprogramcoversthegapbetween25%ofthefamily’sincome
andthemarketrateoftheunit,allowinglocalhousingauthoritiestoplacefamilies
inprivatelyownedhousing.Thisprogramhasremainedsopopularthatin
Washington,DC,thelocalhousingauthorityclosedthelistin2013indefinitely
(Inglesias93).
In1989,CongressestablishedtheNationalCommissiononSeverely
DistressedPublicHousing.Thecommission’sreportfoundconditionsinseveral
publichousingprojectstobedeplorableandunfitforrenovation,letaloneliving.
FromthiscametheHousingforPeopleEverywhereprogram,morecommonly
knownasHOPEVI.Theprogramwastogivegrantsofupto$50milliontopublic
housingauthoritiesforthecompletedemolitionandreconstructionofhousing
projects.HOPEVIprojectswererequiredtoimplementmixed‐incomehousing,in
whichtheunitswouldbeacombinationofpublichousing,rentsubsidies,and
marketrate.
ThefirstgrantwasgiventotheAtlantaHousingAuthorityin1993.Since
then,96,200publichousingunitshavebeendemolishedandreplacedby107,800
neworrenovatedunits,ofwhich56,800areintendedforthelowest‐income
households.Therehavebeen254HOPEVIRevitalizationgrantsawarded,totaling
over$6.1billion.Fundingfortheprogramceasedin2010whentheObama
administrationunveiledtheChoiceneighborhoodprogramwhichaimstoprovide
cradle‐to‐graduationwraparoundservicesforfamilies.Nevertheless,theideaof
mixed‐incomehousingandtheideologiesofNewUrbanismanddefensiblespace
continuewiththenewprogram.
NewUrbanismanddefensiblespacetheory
ThenewconstructionsweretobebasedontheideologiesofNewUrbanism
anddefensiblespace.Theseideasareadeparturefromthetraditionalconceptions
ofpublichousing,fromthe“GardenCity”varietywithtwoorthreelevelbrick
buildingscenteredaroundemptygrasssquaresorthetall,monotoneapartment
buildingsofthe1960sand70sthatoftendisintegratedintotowersofsqualor.New
Urbanismisamoderndesignmovementthatpromoteswalkableneighborhoods
withwell‐tendedgreenspacesandparks.Theseneighborhoodsincludearangeof
incomes,jobtypes,residences,andcommercialspaces,withthehopethatifthe
projectlooksmorelikeanorganicurbanareaandlesslikeobviousplanned
governmenthousing,theresidentswillfeelmoreownershipandcrimerateswill
decrease.TheCongressforNewUrbanism,theorganizationthatpromotesthis
designconcept,statesintheircharter:
Weadvocatetherestructuringofpublicpolicyanddevelopmentpracticestosupportthe
followingprinciples:neighborhoodsshouldbediverseinuseandpopulation;communities
shouldbedesignedforthepedestrianandtransitaswellasthecar;citiesandtownsshould
beshapedbyphysicallydefinedanduniversallyaccessiblepublicspacesandcommunity
institutions;urbanplacesshouldbeframedbyarchitectureandlandscapedesignthat
celebratelocalhistory,climate,ecology,andbuildingpractice.
Defensiblespacetheorywasdevelopedinthe1970sbyOscarNewman,an
architectandcityplanner.Thetheoryholdsthatsincecrimerateswerehigherin
high‐riseapartmentprojectthanlow‐riseapartments,peoplefeltlesscontrolover
theirsurroundingswhenoccupiedbysomanypeople.Whenpeoplefeelmore
responsibilityandcontrolovertheirhome,theywillworktopreserveboththe
physicalspaceandthesafetyandwellbeingofthecommunity.Additionally,the
theoryholdsthat“certainfeaturesofphysicalsettings,suchasindicationof
territoryandsurveillanceopportunities,canreducecrime”(Ham‐Rowbottom117).
Researchtosupportthistheoryhashadmixedresults,sinceitisdifficulttoisolate
thevariablesthatgointoacriminal’sdecisionmaking.
ThetwograntrecipientsthatwillbeanalyzedinthispaperareNew
ColumbiainPortland,OregonandCapitolQuarterinWashington,D.C.Thesetwo
caseswerechosenbecausetheyweregrantedwithinthesameadministration,come
fromcitiesexperiencessimilargentrificationprocesses,buthadmuchdifferent
crimeanddrugbackgrounds.
NewColumbia
NewColumbiawasoriginallyColumbiaVilla,builtin1943tohousedefense
workersduringWWII.Itwasoriginallycomprisedof400unitsinalow‐density,
suburban‐styledevelopmentwith“curvilinearstreets,manytrees,andopenspace”
(Gibson).Thepublichousingprojectremainedawelcomingplacetolivethroughout
the1960s,referredtobyTheOregonianas“beautiful”(Gibson).Unfortunately,the
influenceofcrackcocaineinthe1980shadnegativeeffectsonthesafetyofthe
neighborhood,nottomentionthepublicperception.
In1993,theDepartmentofHousingandUrbanDevelopmentgrantedNew
Columbia$34millionforredevelopment.Constructionbeganin2004,although
manyresidentsdeemedtheredevelopmentunnecessary.Oneresidentquotedby
KarenGibsonfoundthatColumbiaVilla“wasn’tbad,itwasjustold”(Gibson).The
developmentwasreadyforlivingby2006andthenumberofunitshadincreased
from460to850.Thepublichousingprojectnowhasbothgovernmentsubsidized
unitsandmarketratehomes,parks,acommunitycenter,alife‐longlearningcenter,
anelementaryschool,aproducemarket,andacoffeeshop.Thesustainable
landscapingelementsmakeitoneofthemostprogressivedevelopmentsinPortland
CapitolQuarter
CapitolQuarterisatwo‐phasedevelopment,incorporatingboththeArthur
CapperprojectsandCarollsburg,formerlyacombinationoflow‐riseapartment
buildingsandtownhomeswithover700subsidizedapartments.CapitolQuarteris
oneofsevenHOPEVIprojectsinWashington,DC.Theprojectbeganin1999and
wasfinishedinthefallof2012.Theprojectoriginallywasonlyexpectedtotake3‐4
years(McKone).Itnowhas770mixedincomeunits,155publichousing,152
project‐basedvoucher,221LowIncomeHousingTaxCredit,140homeownership,
151seniorand40assistedlivingunits.Theentiredevelopment,whichincludesa
seniorresidentialbuilding,anapartmentbuildingexpectedtobefinishedin2015,
andfournewmixed‐incomeapartmentbuildings,isprojectedtohavemorethan
1,500residentialunits.ThisredevelopmentismuchlargerthanNewColumbiaand
involvesmorevariedeconomicandsocialgroups.
Redevelopmentofpublichousingisacostlyandtime‐consuming
undertaking.Sincethefirstgrantwasawardedin1992,HUDhasspentmorethan
$6billiononHOPEVIfundedprojects.WiththepopularityoftheSection8voucher
programalongwiththehistoryofdrugs,violence,andconcentratedpovertyin
subsidizedhousing,itisimportanttoquestionwhetherredevelopmentisworththe
time,effort,andmoney.Additionally,itwouldbemuchlessexpensivetoredevelop
theprojectsintomany‐unit,high‐densitydevelopmentssimilartothosein
WashingtonD.C.Ifthegoalweretohouseasmanypeopleaspossible,smallerunits
inmorecompactbuildingswouldbetheobviouschoice.
Ismixed‐incomehousingasuccessfulmodelforpublichousing?Isitworth
thecost,relocationofresidents,andinabilitytohousealloriginalresidents?
Additionally,betweenthetwocasestudies,whichwasmoresuccessful?Toanswer
thesequestions,Iwilllookatcrime,employment,andpovertyratesbeforeandafter
redevelopment.Iwillassessfromanecdotalevidencewhetherthepublicperception
oftheprojectsispositivelyaffectedafterredevelopment.Betweenthetwocases,I
willcomparereturnrateoforiginalresidentsaswellasnumberofmarketrateunits
soldtoassesswhethertheprojectsareseenasdesirablelivingsituations.
Findingsanddiscussion
Thesuccessofapublichousingprojectdependsonamultitudeofdifferent
factors,thusisolatingwheresuccessisderivedfromisadifficultfeat.However,
someaspectsoftheprojectsmayprovidecluestothestandardoflivingofits
residents.TheeffectivenessoftheHOPEVIprogramitselfhasmoreclearwaysto
gaugeeffectiveness.
Costofredevelopment
TheCapitolQuarterprojectwasinitiallygranted$34.9millionthroughHOPE
VIforredevelopmentin2001.Withadditionsfromprivateandpublicinvestors,the
grantgrewtoover$750million,makingitoneofthelargestredevelopmentprojects
inthecountry(Cisneros48).Incorporatingprivateinvestorsgrewthesizeofthe
projectbutalsolengthenedthetimetocompletion.TheprograminPortlandwas
giventhesameamountfromHUD,butadditionalinvestmentsgrewthebudgetto
only$150million.Thisisamuchsmallerredevelopmentinsizeandscope.New
Columbia’s850unitscostapproximately$176,500perunitwhileinDC,perunit
costwas$500,000.However,whilebothprojectsincludeacommunitycenter,
parks,andotherservices,CapitolQuarteralsoincludesaschoolandaseniorcenter
(withtheaccompanyingmedicalnecessities).
Relocationandreturnofresidents
RelocationofresidentsatCaptiolQuarterbeganin2003,withthe
expectationtoreturnin2006.Mostresidenceswerenotreadyformove‐inuntil
2012.Manyresidentswererelocatedforthedurationoftheredevelopmentand
chosenottoreturntotheirprevioushomesbecauseithadsimplytakentoolong
(Popkin).CapitolQuarterboaststhatitisthefirstHOPEVIredevelopmentinthe
countrytoprovideone‐for‐onereplacementofdemolishedpublichousingunits,
althoughthisstatementdoesnotentirelyringtrue.Whilethenumberofhousing
unitshasincreased,thenumberoffullysubsidizedpublichousingunitshas
decreased.ThisleavesformerresidentstorelyontheoversaturatedSection8
voucherprogramtobeabletomovebacktotheirhome.
InPortland,thesituationisthesame.Whilethenumberofunitsincreased
from400to850,only560aresubsidizedandofthose,only267ofthosearepublic
housing.Thisprovesfrustratingfortenantswhowishtoreturnonlytofindthere
arenotenoughunits,ortheymustpayahigherratethantheywerebefore.
Relocationisespeciallydifficultonfamilies.InPortland,46%offamilieshad
tochangeschoolsonerelocated(Gibson17).InWashington,DC,thisnumberis
nearlyimpossibletotracksincetheschoolsystemisalotterysystemandmost
studentsdonotattendtheirneighborhoodschool.InPortland,astudydoneby
KarenGibsonaskedrelocatedresidentsofNewColumbiaabouttheirabilitytopay
rentintheirnewhomesthroughtheSection8program,andwhileonly9%saidno,
24%werenotsure.Section8isalsomuchlessstablehousingandfamiliesmightbe
requiredtomovemorethanonce.Only38%offamiliessaidtheywouldwantto
returntoNewColumbiaaftertheredevelopmentwasfinished,citingstability,
specificallywithchangingschools.Anotherlesstangibleissuewithrelocationisthe
lossofcommunity.ThisisespeciallyimportantinPortland,whichis
overwhelminglywhite.TheAfricanAmericancommunitiesinNorthandNortheast
Portlandhavetightbondsandmovingawayfromthatcanbedetrimentalto
standardofliving.
Residentsthatdidnotwanttoreturnofferedreasonsincludingcrimerates
andtheperception.OneresidenttoldGibsonshedidnotwanttogobackbecause
“overallmychildrenarehappiernow‐‐‐theynolongergetteasedorputdown
becauseofwheretheylive”(Gibson19).Otherscitedsimplythatmovingisdifficult
andcostly.Overall,Gibsonfoundthatthoseresidentswhowererelocatedtoa
neighborhoodtheydesiredwerethemostsatisfiedwiththerelocationprocess.
Marketrateunits
NewColumbiareportsthatallmarketrateunitshavebeensold(Popkin).
CapitolQuarterreportsthattheyonlyhavetwomarketrateunitsthathavenotbeen
sold,howevertwooftheapartmentbuildingsinthedevelopmentthatinclude
marketrateunitshavenotfinishedconstruction.Thisshowsthatresidentsinboth
citiesfindthedevelopmentssuitableplacestolive.
CrimeRatesandPovertyLevels
OnJune30th,2014,amanwasshotandkilledinNewColumbia.Thiswasthe
firstmurderintheneighborhoodsince1994.Afterthecrackcocaineepidemicofthe
1980s,NorthPortlandsawagradualdecreaseincrimeuntil2012,whentherewere
63gangrelatedviolentcrimes.Thatnumberincreasedto116in2013(Gibson).This
uptickincrimeechoestherestofPortlandbutstillhasresidentsconcerned.In
Washington,DC,crimehasdecreasedalloverthecityinthelast20years.
PerceptionsofcrimeinCapitolQuartershowthatithasdecreased;“Twenty‐two
(22)percentreportedthattheareawasmuchsafer,andanother44percent
reportedthatitwassomewhatsafer.One‐thirdofneighborhoodresidentssaidthat
neighborhoodcrimewasunchanged.”In2000,61%ofresidentsatArthur
Capper/Carollsburgwerebelowthepovertylevel(CrimeIncident).In2010,therate
wasdownto50%,whichisstillveryhigh.InNewColumbia,thepovertyratein
2010was43%,onlya1%increasesince2000(Gibson).
Conclusion
Withthosestatisticsinmind,itishardtoconcludewhetherornotmixed
incomehousingisaneffectivemodelforpublichousing.Inthelongterm,itmay
leadtobetterupkeepofthedevelopmentssincemorerevenueiscominginand
thereismoreincentiveformaintenance.Thecrimeratesinbothprojectsseemto
echothecrimeratesofthegreatercity,whichwillmostlikelycontinue.Forthe
amountofmoneythatisspentontheseprograms,itseemsasthoughtheprivate
investmentthatgreatlyboostedbothredevelopments’budgetshadthegreatest
effect.ThistacticshouldbefurtherexploredandusedbyHUD.Moreresearchon
mixedincomehousingprojectssuchasNewColumbiaandCapitolQuartershould
bedonetoseeiftheeconomicdiversityhasalastingeffectonthecrimeand
employmentratesofresidents.
Asforthecomparisonbetweenthetwoprojects,basedontheamountof
moneyspentperunitandthelengthoftimebetweendemolitionandreinstatement
offormerresidents,NewColumbiawasamoreeffectiveproject.Thesmaller
redevelopmentwasperhapsakeyinthiscase.WhilecrimeratesinWashington,DC
havedecreased,thesenseofcommunityinPortlandisstronger.AstheHOPEVI
programmovesintotheChoiceNeighborhoodprogram,afocusonrelocation
services,one‐for‐onereplacementoffullysubsidizedunits,andshorter
redevelopmenttimeswillmakeforthemostsuccessfulprojects.
AnnotatedBibliography
VonHoffman,Alexander."HistoryLessonsforToday’sHousingPolicyThePolitical
ProcessesofMakingLow‐IncomeHousingPolicy."(n.d.):n.pag.Print
VonHoffmanrelatesthelatestmajorchangeinhousingpolicytothecreation
offederalhousing,drawingcomparisonsandcontrastsintermsoftheeconomicand
politicallandscapes.Thetoneofthearticlesuggestsitwaswrittenbyastudent,and
thusthereliabilitymustbequestioned.
Popkin,SusanJ.,BruceKatz,MaryK.Cunningham,KarenD.Brown,Jeremy
Gustafson,andMargaryA.Turner.ADecadeofHOPEVI:ResearchFindings
andPolicyChallenges.ADecadeofHOPE.UrbanInstitute,May2004.Web.
20Feb.2015.
ThisisaveryeducationalsourcethatevaluatestheentireHOPEVIprogram.
Thecontributor’sconclusionisthattheprogramisinfactsucceedingandwhileno
solutionisperfect,HOPEVIisthemosteffectiveprogramtothisdate.Fundedbythe
UrbanInstituteandtheBrookingsInstitute,twowell‐respectedthinktanks,this
articlecanbetrustedtobereliableandnon‐biased.
Levy,Diane,andMarkWoolley."RelocationIsNotEnoughEmploymentBarriers
amongHOPEVIFamilies."MetropolitanHousingandCommunitiesCenter.
UrbanInstitute,4June2007.Web.23Feb.2015.
AnotherarticlefromtheUrbanInstitute.Thissourcediscussesemployment
barriersthatfamiliesfacewhenlivinginpublichousing,suchaspoorhealthanda
historyofunemployment.Themethodologyusedincomingtotheseconclusionsis
clearlyoutlinedandthesponsoroftheresearchisatrustedsource.
Gallagher,Megan,andBeataBajaj."MovingOn:BenefitsandChallengesofHOPEVI
forChildren."MetropolitanHousingandCommunitiesCenter.Urban
Institute,4June2007.Web.23Feb.2015.
Thissourceisadditionalresearchfromthesamepublicationasabove.The
authorssuggestthatthevoucherprogramcanhavepositiveaffectsforchildrenand
teensbymovingthemintoareaswithmorestablefamilies,whileothersmaynever
feelacceptedbytheirpeersfromadifferentsocialclass.
Cahill,Meagan,SamanthaS.Lowry,andP.Mitchell.Downey.Movin'Out:Crime
DisplacementandHUD'sHOPEVIInitiative.Washington,D.C.:Urban
Institute,JusticePolicyCenter,2011.ResearchReport.UrbanInstitute,2001.
Web.24Feb.2015.
Thissourceaddressesthequestionofwhethercrimeistrulyloweredbythe
HOPEVIprogramorsimplymovedtootherpartsofthecity.Thisisanotherarticle
fromthereputableUrbanInstitute.
McInelly,Mary."TransportationReformattheScaleoftheBlock,theStreet,andthe
Building."2006CNUTransportationSummit.UrbanDesign,2006.Web.24
Feb.2015.
Thisisareportpresentedatatransportationconferencethatdiscussesthe
effectivenessoftransportationreformattheNewColumbiaHOPEVIsitein
Portland,OR.Theauthorconcludesthatthereformshavebeeneffective.Sincethe
workwaspresentedatUniversityofColoradoBoulder,itcanbeconcludedthatitis
ascholarlyworkandthusreliable.
Cisneros,Henry,andLoraEngdahl.FromDespairtoHope:HopeVIandtheNew
PromiseofPublicHousinginAmerica'sCities.Washington,D.C.:Brookings
Institution,2010.Print.
ThisbookevaluatesallHopeVIprograms,includingNewColumbiain
Portland,OregonandArthurCapperinWashington,D.C.Itisathorough
investigationoftheprogramandit’sprosandcons.TheBrookingsInstituteisa
well‐respectedsourceforsocialsciencescholarlywork.
CommitteeonGovernmentReform,UnitedStatesCongress.PublicHousing
Management:DothePublicHousingAuthoritiesHavetheFlexibilityThey
NeedtoMeettheChangingDemandsofthe21stCentury?:Hearing.N.p.:
DIANE,2006.Print.
Thisisaprimarydocumentthatisarecordofacongressionalhearingon
PublicHousingAuthoritiesandtheHOPEVIprogram.Itprovidesinsightintothe
relationshipbetweentheDepartmentofHousingandUrbandevelopmentandthe
localauthorities.
McKone,Jonna."OldD.C.HousingProjectsGiveWayToNew."WAMU88.5.
AmericanUniversityRadio,8June2012.Web.26Feb.2015.
ThissourceisaradiostoryontheArthurCapperHOPEVIdevelopmentin
Washington,D.C.Itoutlinesthecostsandbenefitsoftheprogram,especiallythe
displacementofpeopleduringtheredevelopmenttime.
"CrimeIncidentDataforSelectedHOPEVISitesinMilwaukee,Wisconsin,2002‐
2010,andWashington,DC,2000‐2009(ICPSR29981)."CrimeIncidentData
forSelectedHOPEVISitesinMilwaukee,Wisconsin,2002‐2010,and
Washington,DC,2000‐2009.InstituteforSocialResearch,Universityof
Michigan,2006.Web.26Feb.2015.
ThissourcecontainscrimeincidentdatafortheArthurCapperdevelopment
inWashington,D.C.ThisinformationishelpfulinconcludingwhethertheHOPEVI
programiseffectiveinreducingcrimerates.Theresearchwasdonewith
cooperationfromtheDepartmentofJustice,andsotheaccuracyofthedatacanbe
trusted.
Hackworth,Jason.TheNeoliberalCity:Governance,Ideology,andDevelopmentin
AmericanUrbanism.N.p.:CornellUP,2013.Print.
HackworthoutlinesthebasictenetsoftheNewUrbanismconceptincity
design.NewUrbanismwashighlyinfluentialinthedesignandimplementationof
theHOPEVIdevelopments,withitsfocusonwidestreets,greenways,separate
buildings,andcommunityspaces.
Jacobs,Jane.TheDeathandLifeofGreatAmericanCities.Vintage,1992.Print.
Thisbookwasoriginallywrittenin1972andisconsideredthemost
prominentworkoncityorganizationandthesociologyofneighborhoodsafetyand
communitycreation.Theauthorproposesthatthemoreownershipresidentsfeel
overtheirneighborhood,thelesscrimewilloccur.Spacesmustbeopenandvisible
bymanydifferentsightlinesfromprivateresidences.Traditionandrootsina
neighborhoodareimportanttocommunitycreationaswell
UnitedStates.DepartmentofHousingandUrbanDevelopment.National
CommissiononSeverelyDistressedPublicHousing.TheFinalReport.
Washingotn,D.C.:HUDLibrary,1992.DepartmentofHousingandUrban
Development.Web.2Apr.2015.
ThisistheinitialreportdonebytheNationalCommissiononSeverely
DistressedPublicHousingthatpromptedtheDepartmentofHousingandUrban
DevelopmenttocreatetheHOPEVIprogram.Theyfoundthatthemajorityof
familieslivinginthe86,000unitsofpublichousingsufferedinphysical,emotional,
social,andeconomicdistress.
Jacob,BrianA."PublicHousingVouchers,AndStudentAchievement:EvidenceFrom
PublicHousingDemolitionsInChicago,"AmericanEconomicReview,2004.
Web.1Apr.2015.
ThisstudycommissionedbytheNationalBureauofEconomicResearch
foundthatchildreninpublichousingcomparedtothosewhousethevoucher
programtorelocatetodifferentneighborhoodshavethesameeducational
achievements.Thisisgoodnewsforthepublichousingprogramsbecauseit
supportstheideathatpublichousingcanstillbeapositiveprogram,ifotheraspects
areimproved.
UnitedStates.DepartmentofHousingandUrbanDevelopment.FY2010Budget:
RoadMapforTransformation.DepartmentofHousingandUrban
Development,2010.Web.2Apr.2015.
2010wastheyearthattheHOPEVIprogramchangedtotheChoice
Neighborhoodprogram.ChoiceNeighborhoodsbuildonthefundingstructureof
HOPEVItoincludeothersocialservices,includingeducation,healthcare,and
employmentservices.
Rothstein,Richard."RaceandPublicHousing:RevisitingtheFederalRole."
EconomicPolicyInstitute.N.p.,17Dec.2012.Web.02Apr.2015.
ThisarticlefortheEconomicPolicyInstituteunpackstheracialhistoryof
publichousingintheUnitedStates,specificallytheisolationofAfricanAmericans
sincethe1960sbroughtwhitefamiliesouttothesuburbs.Rothsteinarguesthat“de
facto”segregationbroughtaboutbymarketanddemographicforcesisamyth.He
arguesthatitisinsteadapurposefulproductofpublicpolicy.
Iglesias,Tim,andRochelleE.Lento."AffordableHousing:AnIntimateHistory."The
LegalGuidetoAffordableHousingDevelopment.Chicago,IL:AmericanBar
Association,2011.N.pag.Print.
ThisarticleisanotherhelpfulhistoryofaffordablehousingintheUnited
States,givinglegalandeconomicexplanationsforthedevelopmentofthepublic
housingprogram.Itexplainsthedifferentactorsintheprocess,includingthe
DepartmentofHousingandUrbanDevelopment,nonprofits,andpreservation
efforts.Theauthorarguesthatwhileotherdomesticissuessuchashealthcare,
energy,transportation,andeducationarewidelydiscussedinthenational
conversation,publichousingisavoidedbecausemostAmericansarewellhoused.
Thusithasbeenasecondarygoalinbothpolicydevelopmentandfunding.
Ham‐Rowbottom,KathleenA.,RobertGifford,andKellyT.Shaw."Defensiblespace
theoryandthepolice:assessingthevulnerabilityofresidencestoburglary."
JournalofEnvironmentalPsychology19.2(1999):117‐129.
Thisisastudyofdefensiblespacetheory,firstintroducedbyOscar
Newmann.HOPEVIprojectsuseddefensiblespacetheoryasabasisfortheirdesign
concepts,inordertoreducecrimeandincreaseasenseofcommunity.Thetwo
territorialfactorsthetheoryproposesareactualandsymbolicbarriers,actualbeing
physicalbarrierstoaccessandsymbolicbeingcharacteristicsofahomethat
indicatepersonalproperty.Thissignalstothecriminalthatthehomeownerscare
aboutthepropertyandarepreparedtodefendit.Thestudyfoundthatactual
barriers,tracesofoccupancy,androadsurveillabilityprotectedthemostagainst
burglary.
Gibson,Karen."ColumbiaVilla(NewColumbia)."TheOregonEncyclopedia.A
ProjectoftheOregonHistoricalSociety,n.d.Web.22Apr.2015.
Dr.GibsonisaprofessoratPortlandStateUniversitywhohasdoneextensive
researchonpublichousing,specificallyNewColumbia.Thisisaresearchprojectshe
didconcerningtherelocationoffamiliesintheColumbiaVilladevelopment.