MiraiBio’s MasterPlex™ QT Webinar Series “The Calculations” © MiraiBio Inc., 2004 Preliminary Questions 1. Is this web seminar being recorded so I or others can view it at our convenience? 2. Will I be able to get copies of the slides after the presentation? 3. Will I be able to ask questions to the speaker(s)? 4. Where can I get a demo/trial copy of the software? www.miraibio.com/products/cat_liquidarrays/view_masterplex/sub_qtdownload/ © MiraiBio Inc., 2004 2003 MasterPlex QT 2.0 Advance Topics Allan T. Minn © MiraiBio Inc., 2004 Overview I. General Calibration Process. II. Interpolation, Background Subtraction & Interpretation of Results. III. Heteroscadascity & Weighting. IV. Treating Standard Replicates. © MiraiBio Inc., 2004 2003 General Calibration Process • To interpolate unknowns from a set of known standard values. • Generally accepted models are 4 and 5 parameter logistics curves. • Extrapolation is possible but use with caution. © MiraiBio Inc., 2004 2003 Review on 4PL curve • In order to understand the calculation process one should be familiar with the curve model used to represent standard data. • Therefore, we shall review on the basic of 4PL curve. © MiraiBio Inc., 2004 2003 Anatomy of 4PL curve D B MFI Based on the standard data given, A is the MFI value that gives 0.0 concentration! A C MFI = 0.0, Conc. = 0.0 © MiraiBio Inc., 2004 2003 Concentrations Parameter C D B MFI A Concentrations © MiraiBio Inc., 2004 2003 C Anatomy of 5PL curve • 5PL curve is identical to 4PL except the extra asymmetry correction parameter E. • In this model upper and lower part of the standard curve need not be symmetric anymore. • 5PL model fits asymmetric standard data better. Next “Interpolation & Background Subtraction.” © MiraiBio Inc., 2004 2003 Interpolation & Background Subtraction • Interpolation is a process of using a standard data to read unknown values. In this section we will cover some of the most commonly asked questions. Why are there negative MFI values? Why are negative MFI values giving positive concentration results. What does MFI < Concentration or MFI > Concentration means? How come some concentration values has out of range notation while others that are even lower or higher concentration get calculated properly? © MiraiBio Inc., 2004 2003 Background Subtraction MFI Concentrations © MiraiBio Inc., 2004 2003 When is the data “Out of Range?” • There are two different “Out of Range” scenarios. • The first scenario is when an MFI value is out of “Standard Range” where “Standard Range” is defined between the highest and lowest standard points. • The second condition is when MFI value falls out of an equation model’s calculable range. © MiraiBio Inc., 2004 2003 Out of Range Notations MFI > D D MFI Std-max Std-min Extrapolation Conc. > Std-max Extrapolation Conc. < Std-min Interpolation A MFI < A © MiraiBio Inc., 2004 2003 Concentrations Why can’t MFI<A be calculated? MFI > D MFI If Y < A or Y > D, then the second equation is reduced to C * ( some negative number )^(1/B) MFI < A © MiraiBio Inc., 2004 2003 This is not mathematically possible and therefore Y (MFI) values less than A or greater than D is regarded to be out of equation range. Concentrations Why is extrapolation dangerous? A slight change in Y(MFI) will result in a huge jump in concentration. MFI Concentrations © MiraiBio Inc., 2004 2003 Out of range notations MFI MFI Conc. > 21560.6 > Std-Max’s MFI>MAX Concentration Concentration for this sample cannot be calculated because it is out of equation model range. The best conclusion we can make about this sample is that it is lower than the concentration for the lowest standard point. Std-Min Horizontal lines A and D are called asymptotes meaning, the curve will never reach or intersect these lines. Therefore, it is not possible to extrapolate the overall maximum and minimum concentration from this curve. MFI < 13.5 Conc. < Std-Min’sMFI<MIN Concentration © MiraiBio Inc., 2004 2003 Std-Max Concentrations What is Heteroscedasticity? • Nonconstant variability also called heteroscedasticity arises in almost all fields. • Chemical and Biochemical assays are no exceptions. • In assays, measurement errors increase as concentrations get higher and therefore the variability of a measurement is not constant. © MiraiBio Inc., 2004 2003 Residual Plot Residual Plot IL-10 Standard-0 1,600 1,500 1,400 1,300 1,200 1,100 1,000 900 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 -100 -200 -300 -400 -500 -600 -700 -800 -900 -1,000 -1,100 -1,200 -1,300 -1,400 -1,500 -1,600 H1 G1 F1 E1 D1 Pre d i cte d Co n ce n tra ti o n © MiraiBio Inc., 2004 2003 C1 B1 A1 4.572 1.187 4.572 0.72 4.572 0.953 4.572 0.488 4.572 1.187 4.572 0.72 13.717 -0.986 13.717 2.311 13.717 -1.205 13.717 1.428 13.717 2.753 13.717 0.988 41.152 12.732 41.152 -11.856 41.152 5.471 41.152 -2.296 41.152 4.832 41.152 9.418 123.457 10.249 123.457 -18.121 123.457 12.42 123.457 -2.724 123.457 1.976 123.457 -0.536 370.37 -9.002 370.37 -31.213 370.37 -11.672 370.37 -23.088 370.37 -3.678 370.37 -39.393 1,111.111 93.933 1,111.111 -26.704 1,111.111 49.106 1,111.111 20.571 1,111.111 67.211 1,111.111 48.194 3,333.333 -195.452 3,333.333 -267.791 3,333.333 -33.057 Residuals are difference between expected concentrations and calculated concentrations. The higher the residual the further the standard curve is away from the sample. Funnel or wedge shape residual plots usually indicate nonconstant variability. Visual representation of Residuals Predicted Predicted concentration concentration Expected Expected concentration concentration get Residuals Residuals get as larger larger as concentration concentration increases. increases. © MiraiBio Inc., 2004 2003 Why is this important? • Curve fitting algorithms used to analyze assay data are based on probability theories. • One of those theories assumes that all data points are measured the same way. • This means all data points are assumed to have similar measurement errors. • During curve fitting all standard samples are given equal freedom to influence the curve. • The only problem is that those points with higher errors (variance) are given the same freedom as those that are more accurate. • So those points pull the curve to their ways leaving more accurate points near the lower end relatively further from the curve causing lack of sensitivities in lower part of the curve or concentration. © MiraiBio Inc., 2004 2003 How to deal with it. • One way to counterbalance nonconstant variability is to make them constant again. • To do this weights are assigned to each standard sample data point. • These weights are designed to approximate the way measurement errors are distributed. • By applying weighting, points in lower concentration are given more influence on the curve again. © MiraiBio Inc., 2004 2003 Weighting Algorithms • There are five different ways to assign weights. • 1/Y2 - Minimizes residuals (errors) based on relative • • • • © MiraiBio Inc., 2004 2003 MFI values. 1/Y - This algorithm is useful if you know errors follows Poisson distribution. 1/X - Minimizes residuals based on their concentration values. Gives more weights to left part of the graph. 1/X2 - Similar to above. 1/Stdev2 - If you know the exact error distribution and standard deviation for each point you can use this algorithm. Disadvantage of Weighting • In practice, we almost never know the exact values of the weights. • That is because we almost never know the nature (distribution) of the errors. • So we have to guess these weights. • And results are as good as this initial guess. © MiraiBio Inc., 2004 2003 Results of weighting % Recovery = ( Calculated / Expected ) x 100 • Above is the comparison between weighted and nonweighted analysis. • The last three columns on the right were produced by weighting. • The accuracy increases dramatically at the very low end without sacrificing over all accuracy of the curve. • Also, QT 2.0 has more overall accuracy than previous version 1.2. © MiraiBio Inc., 2004 2003 References • • • • • Weighted Least Square Regression, http://www.itl.nist.gov/div898/handbook/pmd/section1/pmd143.htm General Information for regression data analysis, http://www.curvefit.com Transformation and Weighting in Regression, Carroll & Ruppert (1988) Intuitive Biostatistics, Harvey Motulsky (1995) Numerical Recipes in C, 2nd Edition, Press, Vetterling, Teukolsky, Flannery, (1992) © MiraiBio Inc., 2004 2003 Thank You For Your Time & Participation Today! To reply this webcast (Available 3/17/04) www.miraibio.com/tech/cat_webex/ To Contact MiraiBio 1-800-624-6176 For copies of today’s presentation email [email protected] Further “Calculation” Information © MiraiBio Inc., 2004 2003 [email protected] Questions & Answers © MiraiBio Inc., 2004 Thank You Again! © MiraiBio Inc., 2004
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz