THE GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN AND ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING HOL 6704.10 Leadership in Organizations Class Sessions: Tuesdays 6:10pm-8:00pm (January 12, 2015 to April 27, 2015) - TBD Location: Foggy Bottom Campus, Washington DC (Main Campus) Room: Gelman Library Room 609 - TBD Instructor: Dr. Michael Pobát Office Address: Suite 216, 2134 G Street, NW, Washington DC, 20052 Email: [email protected] (best way to contact me) Phone: 703-860-4990 (h), 703-863-4990 (c) Course Overview: The purpose of this course is to help students appreciate current approaches to leadership in organizations. There are many theories about leaders and leadership. For ease of consumption, the theories are organized into four major categories of approaches reflecting what they address regarding: the leader as an individual; the relationship between leaders and followers; leadership as an organizational process; and leadership as an emergent, interactive dynamic. The course also explores approaches to leadership development and briefly addresses issues related to leadership research. Finally, the course provides an opportunity for each class member either reflect on their leadershiprelated experiences and focus their future leadership development activities into a 1-year personal leadership development plan, or reflect on the leadership development needs of their organization and prepare a 1-year leadership development plan for the organization as a whole or a business unit or sub-group within the organization. Relevant readings, out-of-class observations, and exercise completion will precede class time. Class time will largely be led by class members who will have the opportunity to practice the use of co-leadership and shared leadership in facilitating class sessions, as these practices are particularly relevant to leadership in contemporary organizational settings. Faculty will help focus class sessions, facilitate understanding of the various approaches to leadership, and provide feedback on class assignments. Course Learning Objectives: By the conclusion of this course, each class member should be able to: 1. Discuss the major approaches to leadership and the basic challenges involved in leadership research. Achievement of this objective is assessed mainly via course requirements 1, 2 and 5. 2. Recognize the relationship between leadership and organizational culture & change. Achievement of this objective is assessed mainly via course requirements 1, 3 and 5. GWU – Leadership in Organizations – Fall 2015 1 3. Apply principles of co and shared leadership to group learning. Achievement of this objective is assessed mainly via course requirements 1and 2. 4. Criticize different approaches to leadership by yourself and others as practiced in organizational settings. Achievement of this objective is assessed mainly via course requirements 3 and 4. 5. Prepare a leadership development plan. Achievement of this objective is assessed via course requirement 4. Required Text: Northouse, Peter G. (2009). Leadership theory and practice. 6th ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage. ISBN-13: 978-1452203409 - ISBN-10: 1452203407 (Feb 2, 2012) Other Required Reading (posted on Blackboard): In the order to be read: 1. Westberg, J. & Jason, H. (1996). Coleading small groups. In J. Westberg & H. Jason, Fostering learning in small groups: A practical guide (pp. 110-123). New York: Springer. PLEASE NOTE: THIS CHAPTER IS FROM A BOOK WRITTEN FOR THOSE IN THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS BUT THE CONTENT IS GENERIC. 2. Fletcher, J. & Kaufer, K. (2003). Shared leadership. In C. Pearce & J. Conger (Eds.), Shared leadership (pp. 21-47). Thousand Oaks: Sage. 3. Houghton, J., Neck, C. & Manz, C. (2003). Self-leadership and superleadership. In C. Pearce & J. Conger (Eds.), Shared leadership (pp. 123-140). Thousand Oaks: Sage. 4. Cherniss, G. (2001). Emotional intelligence and organizational effectiveness. In C. Cherniss & D. Goleman (Eds.), The emotionally-intelligent workplace (pp. 3-12). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. 5. Goleman, D. (2001). An EI-based theory of performance. In C. Cherniss & D. Goleman (Eds.), The emotionally-intelligent workplace (pp. 27-44). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. 6. Kellerman, B. (2007). What every leader needs to know about followers. Harvard Business Review, December, 84-91. 7. Schein, E. H. (2004). The concept of organizational culture: why bother?. In Organizational culture and leadership (pp. 1-23). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. 8. Schein, E. H. (2004). How leaders embed and transmit culture. In Organizational culture and leadership (pp. 245-271). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. 9. Snowden, D. & Boone, M. (2007). A leader’s framework for decision-making. Harvard Business Review, November, 69-76. GWU – Leadership in Organizations – Fall 2015 2 10.Wheatley, M. (2006). Searching for simpler ways to lead organizations. In Leadership and the new science: discovering order in a chaotic world (pp. 3-15). San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler. 11. Wheatley, M. (2006). The real world. In Leadership and the new science: discovering order in a chaotic world (pp. 169-186). San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler. 12. Uhl-Bien, M., Marion, R. & McKelvey, B. (2007). Complexity leadership theory: shifting leadership from the industrial age to the knowledge era. Leadership Quarterly, 18, 298-318. 13. Yukl, G. (2006). Developing leadership skills. In Leadership in organizations (pp. 386-415). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. 14. Hrivnak, G., Reichard, R. & Riggio, R. (2009). A framework for leadership development. In S. Armstrong & C. Fukami (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of management learning, education and development (pp. 456-475). Thousand Oaks: Sage. 15. Antonakis, J., Schriesheim, C., Donovan, J., Gopalakrishna-Pillai, K., Pellegrini, E. & Rossomme, J. (2004). Methods for studying leadership. In J. Antonakis, A. Cianciolo & R. Sternberg (Eds.), The nature of leadership (pp. 48-70). Thousand Oaks: Sage. Course Requirements, Deadlines, and Grading Values: The course requirements include both individual and group work: Assignment Assignment Number 1 Class Participation: Individual Percentage of Grade 20% 2 Class Co and Shared Leadership: Group 25% 3 Leadership Observation Reports: Individual 30% 4 Leadership Development Plan: Individual Either…… A Personal Leadership Development Plan OR An Organizational Leadership Development Plan 25% ALL GWU – Leadership in Organizations – Fall 2015 100% 3 1. Class Participation Ongoing: 20% Participation and involvement in class is essential to individual learning and effectiveness. Class members are expected to read all assigned material as scheduled and be prepared to discuss and/or demonstrate what you have learned. Those who miss more than two class sessions will not be given credit for this course. It is therefore critical that if you miss a session due to an emergency, please contact the instructor as soon as possible. However, if you are unable to attend a class, or part of it, please arrange for a “buddy” to take notes for you, collect handouts, and brief you on classroom activities. You will then submit a 3-page review of the readings assigned for this class, including a summary of the class discussion. Evaluation: In order to help you understand my expectations of excellence in class participation, below are some criteria that will be used to determine your final participation grade: 1) Attend all classes regularly; 2) Came to all classes on time and did not leave before end of the class; 3) Submitted all class assignments on time; 4) Demonstrate that background material was read by asking thought-provoking questions, raising interesting issues, exhibiting creative ideas and presenting integrative solutions; 5) Demonstrated positive attitude toward learning; 6) Showed respect to classmates and the instructor; and 7) Took initiative in participating and completing new activities. 2. Class Co and Shared Leadership Sessions 4-12: 25% Class members will co-lead the class discussion on a leadership topic or theory set. The session should use the assigned reading material in a manner consistent with good adult learning practices and small group work, and represent a shared concept of leading the class among all those present. The content should build on the main points of the assigned readings by including a 1-page critical review for each of 3 empirical studies and 1 measurement tool (4 pages total) selected by the co-leaders and related to the selected topic/theories. If a measurement tool cannot be located, then a 1-page critique how the topic was explored in the 3 empirical studies should be prepared. The empirical studies can be focused on a particular segment of the population, situation, or industry if desired. The other class members are not expected to read the empirical studies or review the measurement tool, but to benefit from the critiques. Evaluation: The following criteria will be used to evaluate your work: 1) Your session will be planned for a 1-hour presentation; 2) Plan for an additional 15 minutes for discussion; 3) Submit the following at least 1-week prior to the presentation session: a. The agenda for the session, with activities and times delineated b. The class handout summarizing the major points of the topic/theories and the 4 pages of critiques, with citations. (One class session prior to these discussions will be devoted to a discussion of article and measurement tool sourcing and critiquing). GWU – Leadership in Organizations – Fall 2015 4 3. Leadership Observation Reports A. One of: Sessions 4-8 or 11-13: 15% and B. Session 10: 15% A. Throughout the course duration, each class member will observe leadership in their workplace and retain notes of their observations. Applicable approaches to leadership should be identified, along with your own reactions and any of the actions you subsequently took. Class members will report on their observations in the reverse order they complete assignment #2. The report should be a brief (5 minutes), oral, and address: what I saw; how I reacted; what I did and how I understand it all vis a vis the approaches to leadership we have been studying, including relevant theories/models. A written bullet-point synopsis should be provided to the instructor. Oral and written reports should maintain individual anonymity. To assist with this, it is recommended that as various leadership approaches are considered in class, class members develop a list of the behaviors/factors to be observed with a brief definition and a space to record notes about the observation, your reaction and your response. B. All class members will observe and report on a specific instance of a leader embedding culture. The report should be brief (5 minutes), oral, and address: what the leaders did to embed culture, how others reacted, and why it was effective. A written bullet-point synopsis should be provided to the instructor. Oral and written reports should maintain individual anonymity. The person observed does not have to be in a formal position of authority. Evaluation: The following criteria will be used to evaluate your work: 1) Approaches to leadership are clearly defined; 2) You are fully prepared for your 5-minute oral leadership report; 3) Submit a written bullet-point leadership synopsis; 4) You are fully prepared for your 2-minute oral embedded culture report; 5) Submit a written bullet-point embedded culture synopsis; 6) You actively participate in class discussions 4. Leadership Development Plan Draft: Session 14; Final: Session 15: 25% Each class member will prepare a 1-year Leadership Development Plan EITHER for themselves personally, or for their organization (or business unit within the organization). The plan should be based on reflection of current leadership practices and identify actions to be taken to enhance future leadership practices. The course instructor will provide ungraded feedback on draft plans if desired. A 10-minute synopsis of the plan will be orally presented at the last class. Evaluation: The following criteria will be used to evaluate your work: 1) Your leadership plan is well-thought out; 2) Your plan reflects future leadership practices; 3) You are fully prepared for your 10-minute oral leadership development report. GWU – Leadership in Organizations – Fall 2015 5 Grading Criteria Emails/Blackboard will be used to communicate your individual grades in each assignment. To determine your grade in the course, simply add up the points. The final course grade will be determined on the following point distribution. Please note that scores falling below 70 points will receive a grade of “F.” Grade A AB+ B Score Range 95-100 90-94 87-89 83-86 Grade BC+ C C- Score Range 80-82 77-79 73-76 70-72 If you want to increase your chances of earning an “A,” pay close attention to the quality of your writing. Superior writing and facilitation skills certainly can help you to earn a better grade. The degree to which you provide authoritative support in your discussion can also improve your chances of earning an “A.” Please refer to the readings to support your analysis in an assignment. Since you will be expected to conduct research, use relevant articles from scholarly journals in Gelman library’s electronic databases as additional sources of information. An example of exceeding expectations is when you consistently take the initiative to seek out and reference such work to help make and strengthen your contributions to the class. In addition, you should look for opportunities to incorporate the reading from previous courses into your assignments. Following these suggestions can go a long way in helping you to earn and “A” for the course. While I make concerted efforts to maintain error-free records, you are responsible for regularly double-checking the accuracy of your marks. In case of a mistake, please email me as soon as possible. Retain copies of returned assignments, which can be referred to in case of confusion. Academic Integrity Standards of academic conduct are set forth in the GW “Code of Academic Integrity” (see http://www.gwu.edu~ntegrity/code.html). By registering, you have acknowledged your awareness of the Academic Integrity Code, and you are obliged to become familiar with your rights and responsibilities as defined by the Code. Violations of the Academic Integrity Code will not be treated lightly, and disciplinary action will be taken. In order to encourage your commitment to academic integrity, please print and sign the following statement at the end of every assignment you submit, “I (your name), affirm that I have completed this assignment/examination in accordance with the Code of Academic Integrity.” Disability Accommodation If you have a disability that will require accommodations in class, register with GWU’s Disability Support Services (office Tel: 202-994-8250) and inform me. Please allow a reasonable length of time for the necessary accommodations to be arranged. For additional information, please refer to: http://gwired.gwu.edu/dss/. GWU – Leadership in Organizations – Fall 2015 6 Writing Help If you need help with writing, use one of the following websites: GW Website on Literature Reviews: http://www.gwu.edu/~litrev/ Purdue University’s Writing Laboratory: http://owl.english.purdue.edu/ APA Style Workshop: http://owl.english.purdue.edu/workshops/hypertext/apa/index.html American Psychological Association (APA): http://apa.org The Writing Center – The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill: http://www.unc.edu/depts/wcweb/ Note: there are lots of good handouts on writing. There is a section on APA style at: Handouts and Links: http://tutor.oit.unc.edu/campus/wc/wclibrary.nsf?opendatabase Class Expectations 1. In terms of your performance in this class, my expectations are very high and I expect outstanding work from all of you. 2. I reserve the right to downgrade or refuse to accept late assignments and papers. 3. Any grade appeal must be made within one week after the grade is sent or uploaded. Appeals after that period may not be entertained. 4. All students are expected to be respectful and courteous to other colleagues and instructor. This includes turning off cell phones and pagers before class. 5. You are expected to exercise a high level of etiquette and professionalism in this class. Avoid improper class behaviors. For example, repeatedly missing class, continuously arriving late to class and submitting work late, leaving class early and in a noisy manner, talking throughout the lecture, snoozing or sleeping, checking emails on laptops, demonstrating a lack of respect for the instructor and peers and anything that may be disruptive to me and/or your colleagues in class. 6. Regular lateness in coming to class or checking emails or surfing the Internet may result in downgrading of your participation grade or refusal to enter the class (or both). Good Luck and Enjoy the Course!! Bibliography Some sources for a general overview of leadership: Antonakis, J., Cianciolo, A. & Sternberg, R. (2004). The nature of leadership Thousand Oaks: Sage. Kouzes, J.M. & Posner, B. Z. (2006). A leader’s legacy. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. McKenna, M. K. & Pugno, P. A. (2005). Physicians as leaders: who, how and why now? Cambridge: Radcliffe. GWU – Leadership in Organizations – Fall 2015 7 Nahavandi, A. (2009). The art and science of leadership (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education. Sashkin, M. & Sashkin, M.G. (2003). Leadership that matters. San Francisco: BerrettKoehler. Wheatley, M. (2006). Leadership and the new science: discovering order in a chaotic world. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler. Yukl, G. (2006). Leadership in organizations (6th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: PrenticeHall. Some relevant leadership journals: Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies Leadership and Organizational Development Journal Leadership Leadership Quarterly GWU – Leadership in Organizations – Fall 2015 8 Session and Date Session 1 Sep 13, 2015 Session 2 Sep 20, 2015 Session 3 Sep 27, 2015 Session 4 Oct 03, 2015 Session 5 Oct 10, 2015 Session 6 Feb 17, 2015 Session 7 Oct 24, 2015 Session 8 Oct 03, 2015 Session 9 Oct 09 – 14 Session 10 Oct 17, 2015 Session 11 Oct 24, 2015 Session 12 Oct 31, 2015 Session 13 Nov 07, 2015 Session 14 Nov 14, 2015 Session 15 Nov 21, 2015 HOL 6704.10 Tentative Class Schedule Topics for Discussion Readings & Assignments Due the Co/shared leadership content is in italics Day of Class Class experiences with leadership Course overview and organization Syllabus review Topic/theory selections for assignment #2 Definitions of leadership Northouse: Chapter 1 Meaning of co-leading & shared leadership Articles #1-3 Effective small group learning Searching leadership literature Leadership Development Articles 13 & 14 Observing leaders and leadership (prep for Assignment #3) The Leader as an Individual I: Northouse: Chapter 2 Trait approach and emotional intelligence Articles #4 and 5 Assignment #2 for Team #1 The Leader as an Individual II: Northouse: Chapters 3 and 4 Skills and style approaches Assignment #2 for Team #2 The Leader-Follower Relationship I: Northouse: Chapters 5 and 7 Situational approach, path-goal theory Assignment #2 for Team #3 The Leader-Follower Relationship II: Northouse: Chapter 8 Leader-member exchange theory, Article #6 followership Assignment #2 for Team #4 Leadership as an Organizational Process I: Northouse: Chapters 9 and 10 Transformational leadership, authentic Assignment #2 for Team #5 leadership Break Leadership as an Organizational Process II: Culture and its embedment Leadership as an Emergent, Interactive Dynamic I: Contingency theory, decision-making Leadership as an Emergent, Interactive Dynamic II: Chaos and complexity theory Women and Leadership Servant and Ethical Leadership Ethical Leadership Leadership Development Plan presentations Course summary GWU – Leadership in Organizations – Fall 2015 Articles: #7 and 8 Assignment #3B Assignment #2 for Team #6 Northouse: Chapter 6 Article #9 Assignment #2 for Team #7 Articles #10-12 Northouse: Chapter 14 Assignment #2 for Team #8 Assignment #2 for Team #9 Draft Assignment # 4 (written) Article #15 Assignment #2 for Team #10 Assignment #2 for Team #11 Final Assignment #4 (oral and written) 9 A disclaimer: The course schedule and evaluation criteria are subject to change at my discretion. You will be notified in advance if changes are made. Professor Michael Pobát – BIO Dr. Michael Pobát is currently a Management Solution Architect with L-3 Communications, National Security Solutions Division providing innovative management approaches in response to multimillion dollar Intelligence Community and Department of Defense Business opportunities. He proudly served on active duty in the U.S. Navy for 11 years as an Electronic Warfare (EW) Technician serving on 3 cruisers and attaining the rank of EW Chief. He graduated from Illinois State University with a BS in Business (1984), received his MBA from Marymount University (1986) and his doctorate in domestic/global management from The George Washington University (2012). Working at the Pentagon, he was the ship self defense action officer for the Assistant Secretary of the Navy and then in 2003 became President of AKCITA LLC, a privately owned consulting company. He is also an adjunct professor at Marymount University and The George Washington University teaching business essentials, strategy, and leadership. GWU – Leadership in Organizations – Fall 2015 10
© Copyright 2025 Paperzz