Donor coordination and effectiveness of aid to agriculture Effectiveness in Aid to Agriculture Czech action to strengthen food security Glopolis / FoRS Seminar, Prague, 18 February 2009 Christoph Langenkamp, task leader agricultural and rural policy Secretariat of the Global Donor Platform for Rural Development www.donorplatform.org [email protected] Global Donor Platform for Rural Development • A network of 30 donors, international finance institutions and development agencies, formed in 2003; • Common vision that agricultural and rural development (ARD) plays important role in poverty reduction; • Members are committed to achieve increased and more effective aid for ARD, centred on smallholder agriculture; • Proposed Platform outputs: Coherent and evidence-based advocacy in support of increased and more effective aid in ARD; Enhanced capacity of member agencies to deliver more effective support for ARD (knowledge management) 2 Context • When addressing aid: development is the prerogative of sovereign nations; 3 Context • When addressing aid: development is the prerogative of sovereign nations; • Aid allocation in ARD declined; International ODA to agriculture, forestry, fishing 1983 - 2007 (constant prices 2006) 25000 35% 30% 20000 15000 20% ODA % total ODA 10000 15% 10% 5000 5% 0 0% 19 83 19 84 19 85 19 86 19 87 19 88 19 89 19 90 19 91 19 92 19 93 19 94 19 95 19 96 19 97 19 98 19 99 20 00 20 01 20 02 20 03 20 04 20 05 20 06 20 07 million US$ 25% 4 Context • When addressing aid: development is the prerogative of sovereign nations; • Aid allocation in ARD declined; • Aid fragmentation increased; Average number of donors per recipient county, region and decade 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Latin America and Caribbean Middle East and North Africa other Asia and Oceania South and Sentral Asia Sub-Saharan Africa 19601969 19701979 19801989 19901999 20002006 2006 5 Context • When addressing aid: development is the prerogative of sovereign nations; • Aid allocation in ARD declined; • Aid fragmentation increased; • Aid architecture and modalities are increasingly complex 6 Paris Partnership Commitments • Developing countries exercise leadership over their development policies and plans (ownership); • Donors base their support on countries’ development strategies and systems (alignment); • Donors co-ordinate their activities and minimise the cost of delivering aid (harmonisation); • Developing countries and donors orient their activities to achieve the desired results (managing for results); • Donors and developing countries are accountable to each other for progress in managing aid better and in achieving development results (mutual accountability); 7 Sectoral issues of the Paris Declaration The agricultural sector: • is private sector led with limited role of the state; • includes a wide range of stakeholders (civil society, rural organisations, private sector); • is cross-Ministerial and institutionally complex; • the challenges and needs are heterogeneous and are country/region-specific. 8 Agricultural sector experiences implementing Paris Declaration • Ownership: Joint Assistance Strategies (JAS) existing but weak capacity and involvement of rural stakeholders. Lack of integration of national policy with sector and local strategies. • Alignment: Currently with government policies and systems but new approaches and models may require working outside government. • Harmonisation: PBAs and SWAps existing but still too many approaches and no real incentives; at times too complex. • Mutual Accountability: SWAps, MoUs and Financing Agreements existing but broader stakeholder involvement and clearer norms required. • Managing for Results: Concepts (outcomes, results and indicators) and processes (M&E systems, capacity assessment and stakeholders) still rather weak & undefined. 9 Key points of the Accra Agenda for Action (AAA) Organised along three major challenges: Ownership, partnerships and results • Concrete steps on predictability, transparency, use of country systems, untying, division of labour. • Progress on fragile states, conditionality. • Significant change in the nature of the relationship between donors and partners – accountability and trust. 10 Key issues for effective ARD policies & strategies • Strengthened and more inclusive ownership (farmers & farmers’ organisations, rural CSOs, private sector) of policies/strategies & implementation/monitoring; - Capacity development for all stakeholders; - Coherent and “good enough” policies and strategies at national, sectoral and decentralised levels; - South-south learning networks, communities of practice. • Development of cost-effective results management and improvement of methodology and progress indicators in results-monitoring for ARD. 11 Donor issues for effective aid in ARD In addition: • Alignment and increased use of country systems, incl. support to regional mechanisms (e.g. CAADP); • Realistic PBAs (see Platform study, EC guide); • Strengthen partnerships (global, regional, national); • Finalise Joint Principles for donors; • Division of labour; • Support incentives for aid effectiveness for ARD; • Regard “Right to Food”, WDR 2008, OECD, IAASTD… 12 Thank you And please visit: www.donorplatform.org 13 header • text 14 Key points of the AAA (cont.) • Ownership, country-level policy dialogue on development (§13) • Capacity development (§14) • Country systems (§15) • Reducing aid fragmentation (§17) • Recognition of role of all development partners (§19) • Civil society (§20) • Managing for results and incentives (§23) • Accountability for results (§24 & 26b) 15
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz