Vodcasts in the Classroom Presented by Amina Ghannam and Sarah Thomas George Mason University Technology for Learning Symposium Arlington Public Schools Thursday, July 26, 2012 BIOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION Amina Ghannam • Current doctoral student at George Mason University – Research areas: Special Education/Education Policy – Dissertation topic: Inclusion practices for Special Education students • Special Education Resource Teacher, Loudon County • Believes in the importance of using technology, from simple processes to the more complex BIOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION Sarah Thomas • Current doctoral student at George Mason University – Research area: International Education – Dissertation topic: Technological strategies to facilitate Second Language Acquisition in English Language Learners • English Language Arts/Technology Coordinator, Prince Georges County • Believes in the use of technology to reach a generation of digital natives INTRODUCTION • Nine million ELLs in the United States today, projections rise to 17 million by 2020 (Ruiz, Kabler, and Sugarman, 2011; White and Gillard, 2011). • Teacher certification requirements differ greatly among states. – many educators do not receive preparation in the areas of culturally responsive pedagogy, second language acquisition, and instructional technology. INTRODUCTION • Katz (2003) : “the constant challenge facing [language] teachers is to create a sense of belonging, a community, despite very real differences in their students’ L2 proficiency (p. 131).” • Multiple levels of English language proficiency present in one classroom. INTRODUCTION • Problem Statement: Langman and Fies (2010): minority students in the United States, particularly English Language Learners (ELLs), lag behind their peers in terms of mathematics and science achievement. • As the number of ELLs grows, this issue has gained importance within the American educational system. • Purpose: to highlight a selected of strategies that educators may find useful in delivering instruction, particularly concerning special education and ELL students. THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK • Sociocultural learning – students are able to present their ideas, presenting different points of view – teachers support and scaffold student discourse (Mortimer, 2003). THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK • Ladson-Billings’ (1992) culturally relevant teaching – pedagogy of opposition that recognizes and celebrates African and African American culture – later expanded definition to other minority youth – sharing of power in the classroom equally between teachers and students THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK • Digital natives and immigrants (Prensky, 2001) – digital natives: the ‘net generation, capable of using technologies and far more accustomed to them than previous generations – digital immigrants: everyone else – technology shock: psychological reactions to unfamiliar technologies; similar to culture shock VODCASTS • Technology can facilitate achievement among students – differentiation – motivation/engagement – new opportunities for discourse TECHNOLOGY-INFUSED SOLUTIONS • Kim (2011): Podcasting and blogging – Podcasting (2004): “Internet-based radio shows or other audio programs available for download over the Internet to be played through a computer and on MP3 players such as the iPod (p. 633).” – The process: • record – Audacity (PC, Mac) – GarageBand (Mac) • share – email/DropBox – Podomatic – Soundcloud • Example TECHNOLOGY-INFUSED SOLUTIONS • Podcasting (cont’d) – vodcasting: video-on-demand + “casting” – similar process • record – via camera (flip, digital, web, etc. • edit – iMovie (Mac) – Final Cut (Mac) – Windows Movie Maker (PC) • share • Example TECHNOLOGY-INFUSED SOLUTIONS • Podcasting (cont’d) • Vodcasting = beneficial in the digital storytelling process • Vodcasts and Podcasts also available on iTunes U • CAVEAT: Copyright law • Free resource: Voicethread.com – Example CONCLUSION • Technology can be used to meet the needs of all students, including Special Education students and English Language Learners. • Don’t be afraid to experiment with technology use in your classrooms. – Productive lessons can be replicated in the future; “failed” lessons can always be tweaked and retried. – As White and Gillard advise, “if an ELL student finishes an assignment, or has 5-10 minutes of free time, he or she could spend that time immersed in one of the interactive technology-based learning environments (p. 2).” CONCLUSION • “The biggest risk in life is not taking one at all.” • The same can be said about instructional technology use in the classroom. QUESTIONS? REFERENCES Bang, H., Suarez-Orozco, C., Pakes, J., & O'Connor, E. (2009). The importance of homework in determining immigrant students' grades in schools in the USA context. Educational Research, 51(1), 1-25. Carhill, A., Suarez-Orozco, C., & Paez, M. (2008). Explaining English language proficiency among adolescent immigrant students. American educational research journal, 45(4), 1155-1179. Green, T. (2005). Using technology to help English language students develop language skills: a home and school connection. Multicultural education. Winter 2006. Vol. 13. No 2. pp. 56-59 Hope, J. (2008). "One day we had to run": The development of the refugee identity in children's literature and its function in education. Children's literature in education, 39(4), 295-304. Katz, S. (2003). Near-native speakers in the foreign-language classroom: The case of Haitian immigrant students. Kim, D. (2011). Incorporating podcasting and blogging into a core task for ESOL teacher candidates. Computers & education. 56(2011) 632-641. Ladson-Billings, G. (1992). Reading between the lines and beyond the pages: A culturally relevant approach to literacy teaching. Theory into practice, 31(4), 312-20. REFERENCES Langman, J. & Fies, C. (2010). Classroom response system-mediated science learning with English language learners. Language and education. Vol. 24, No. 2, March 2010, 81-99. Lee, L. (2009). Promoting intercultural exchanges with blogs and podcasting: a study of Spanish-American telecollaboration. Computer assisted language learning. Vol. 22, No. 5, December 2009, 425-443. Meskill, C. & Mossop, J. (1997) Technologies use with ESL learners in New York State: Preliminary report. Office of Educational Research and Improvement, Washington, D.C. Oikonomidoy, E. (2010). Zooming into the school narratives of refugee students. Multicultural perspectives, 12(2), 74-80. Paez, M. (2009). Predictors of English-language proficiency among immigrant youth. Bilingual research journal, 32(2), 168-187. Ruiz, M., Kabler, B., & Sugarman, M. (2011). Understanding the plight of immigrant and refugee students. Communique, 39(5), 1. Rosell-Aguilar, F. (2007). Top of the pods – in search of a podcasting “pedagogy” for language learning. Computer assisted language learning. Vol. 20, No. 5, December 2007, p. 471-492. REFERENCES Solano-Flores, G., & Li, M. (2006). The use of generalizability (G) theory in the testing of linguistic minorities. Educational measurement: Issues and practice, 25(1), 13-22. South, J. B., Gabbitas, B., & Merrill, P. (2008). Designing video narratives to contextualize content for ESL learners: a design process case study. Interactive learning environments. Vol. 16, No. 3, December 2008, 231-243. Sox, A. & Rubinstein-Avila, E. (2009). WebQuests for English-Language Learners: Essential elements for design. Journal of adolescent & adult literacy. September 2009. pp. 39-48 Suarez-Orozco, C., Bang, H., & Onaga, M. (2010). Contributions to variations in academic trajectories amongst recent immigrant youth. International journal of behavioral development, 34(6), 500-510. White, E. L. & Gillard, S. (2011). Technology-based literacy instruction for English Language Learners. Journal of college teaching & learning. June 2011. Volume 8, Number 6. Whitling, J., & Granoff, S. (2010). The effects of multimedia input on comprehension of a short story. The electronic journal for English as a second language. September 2010 – Volume 14, Number 2. CONTACT INFORMATION Amina Ghannam George Mason University [email protected] Sarah Thomas George Mason University [email protected]
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz