Technological Strategies to Meet the Diverse Needs of

Vodcasts in the Classroom
Presented by Amina Ghannam
and Sarah Thomas
George Mason University
Technology for Learning Symposium
Arlington Public Schools
Thursday, July 26, 2012
BIOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION
Amina Ghannam
• Current doctoral student at George Mason University
– Research areas: Special Education/Education Policy
– Dissertation topic: Inclusion practices for Special Education students
• Special Education Resource Teacher, Loudon County
• Believes in the importance of using technology, from simple
processes to the more complex
BIOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION
Sarah Thomas
• Current doctoral student at George Mason University
– Research area: International Education
– Dissertation topic: Technological strategies to facilitate Second
Language Acquisition in English Language Learners
• English Language Arts/Technology Coordinator, Prince
Georges County
• Believes in the use of technology to reach a generation of
digital natives
INTRODUCTION
• Nine million ELLs in the United States today, projections rise to
17 million by 2020 (Ruiz, Kabler, and Sugarman, 2011; White
and Gillard, 2011).
• Teacher certification requirements differ greatly among states.
– many educators do not receive preparation in the areas of
culturally responsive pedagogy, second language
acquisition, and instructional technology.
INTRODUCTION
• Katz (2003) : “the constant challenge facing
[language] teachers is to create a sense of
belonging, a community, despite very real
differences in their students’ L2 proficiency (p. 131).”
• Multiple levels of English language proficiency
present in one classroom.
INTRODUCTION
• Problem Statement: Langman and Fies (2010): minority students
in the United States, particularly English Language Learners
(ELLs), lag behind their peers in terms of mathematics and science
achievement.
• As the number of ELLs grows, this issue has gained importance
within the American educational system.
• Purpose: to highlight a selected of strategies that educators may
find useful in delivering instruction, particularly concerning special
education and ELL students.
THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
• Sociocultural learning
– students are able to present their ideas, presenting
different points of view
– teachers support and scaffold student discourse
(Mortimer, 2003).
THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
• Ladson-Billings’ (1992) culturally relevant teaching
– pedagogy of opposition that recognizes and celebrates
African and African American culture
– later expanded definition to other minority youth
– sharing of power in the classroom equally between
teachers and students
THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
• Digital natives and immigrants (Prensky, 2001)
– digital natives: the ‘net generation, capable of using
technologies and far more accustomed to them than
previous generations
– digital immigrants: everyone else
– technology shock: psychological reactions to unfamiliar
technologies; similar to culture shock
VODCASTS
• Technology can facilitate achievement among
students
– differentiation
– motivation/engagement
– new opportunities for discourse
TECHNOLOGY-INFUSED SOLUTIONS
•
Kim (2011): Podcasting and blogging
– Podcasting (2004): “Internet-based radio shows or other audio programs available for download over
the Internet to be played through a computer and on MP3 players such as the iPod (p. 633).”
– The process:
• record
– Audacity (PC, Mac)
– GarageBand (Mac)
• share
– email/DropBox
– Podomatic
– Soundcloud
• Example
TECHNOLOGY-INFUSED SOLUTIONS
•
Podcasting (cont’d)
– vodcasting: video-on-demand + “casting”
– similar process
• record
– via camera (flip, digital, web, etc.
• edit
– iMovie (Mac)
– Final Cut (Mac)
– Windows Movie Maker (PC)
• share
• Example
TECHNOLOGY-INFUSED SOLUTIONS
• Podcasting (cont’d)
• Vodcasting = beneficial in the digital storytelling
process
• Vodcasts and Podcasts also available on iTunes U
• CAVEAT: Copyright law
• Free resource: Voicethread.com
– Example
CONCLUSION
• Technology can be used to meet the needs of all students, including
Special Education students and English Language Learners.
• Don’t be afraid to experiment with technology use in your classrooms.
– Productive lessons can be replicated in the future; “failed” lessons can
always be tweaked and retried.
– As White and Gillard advise, “if an ELL student finishes an
assignment, or has 5-10 minutes of free time, he or she could spend
that time immersed in one of the interactive technology-based learning
environments (p. 2).”
CONCLUSION
• “The biggest risk in life is not taking one at all.”
• The same can be said about instructional
technology use in the classroom.
QUESTIONS?
REFERENCES
Bang, H., Suarez-Orozco, C., Pakes, J., & O'Connor, E. (2009). The importance of homework in determining immigrant students' grades in schools in the
USA context. Educational Research, 51(1), 1-25.
Carhill, A., Suarez-Orozco, C., & Paez, M. (2008). Explaining English language proficiency among adolescent immigrant students. American educational
research journal, 45(4), 1155-1179.
Green, T. (2005). Using technology to help English language students develop language skills: a home and school connection. Multicultural education.
Winter 2006. Vol. 13. No 2. pp. 56-59
Hope, J. (2008). "One day we had to run": The development of the refugee identity in children's literature and its function in education. Children's
literature in education, 39(4), 295-304.
Katz, S. (2003). Near-native speakers in the foreign-language classroom: The case of Haitian immigrant students.
Kim, D. (2011). Incorporating podcasting and blogging into a core task for ESOL teacher candidates. Computers & education. 56(2011) 632-641.
Ladson-Billings, G. (1992). Reading between the lines and beyond the pages: A culturally relevant approach to literacy teaching. Theory into practice,
31(4), 312-20.
REFERENCES
Langman, J. & Fies, C. (2010). Classroom response system-mediated science learning with English language learners. Language and education. Vol.
24, No. 2, March 2010, 81-99.
Lee, L. (2009). Promoting intercultural exchanges with blogs and podcasting: a study of Spanish-American telecollaboration. Computer assisted
language learning. Vol. 22, No. 5, December 2009, 425-443.
Meskill, C. & Mossop, J. (1997) Technologies use with ESL learners in New York State: Preliminary report. Office of Educational Research and
Improvement, Washington, D.C.
Oikonomidoy, E. (2010). Zooming into the school narratives of refugee students. Multicultural perspectives, 12(2), 74-80.
Paez, M. (2009). Predictors of English-language proficiency among immigrant youth. Bilingual research journal, 32(2), 168-187.
Ruiz, M., Kabler, B., & Sugarman, M. (2011). Understanding the plight of immigrant and refugee students. Communique, 39(5), 1.
Rosell-Aguilar, F. (2007). Top of the pods – in search of a podcasting “pedagogy” for language learning. Computer assisted language learning. Vol. 20,
No. 5, December 2007, p. 471-492.
REFERENCES
Solano-Flores, G., & Li, M. (2006). The use of generalizability (G) theory in the testing of linguistic minorities. Educational measurement: Issues and
practice, 25(1), 13-22.
South, J. B., Gabbitas, B., & Merrill, P. (2008). Designing video narratives to contextualize content for ESL learners: a design process case study.
Interactive learning environments. Vol. 16, No. 3, December 2008, 231-243.
Sox, A. & Rubinstein-Avila, E. (2009). WebQuests for English-Language Learners: Essential elements for design. Journal of adolescent & adult literacy.
September 2009. pp. 39-48
Suarez-Orozco, C., Bang, H., & Onaga, M. (2010). Contributions to variations in academic trajectories amongst recent immigrant youth. International
journal of behavioral development, 34(6), 500-510.
White, E. L. & Gillard, S. (2011). Technology-based literacy instruction for English Language Learners. Journal of college teaching & learning. June
2011. Volume 8, Number 6.
Whitling, J., & Granoff, S. (2010). The effects of multimedia input on comprehension of a short story. The electronic journal for English as a second
language. September 2010 – Volume 14, Number 2.
CONTACT INFORMATION
Amina Ghannam
George Mason University
[email protected]
Sarah Thomas
George Mason University
[email protected]