Supreme Court of Canada 301 Wellington Street Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0J1 (Re): Case #285649 Plaintiff’s Name: Kathy Lipton Testimony: “I may look healthy and active now, but I have a terminal illness that will kill me within five years. My death will be painful and will surely rob me of my dignity, as I will no longer be able to provide even the most basic care for myself. It’s not fair that I should have to die this way when there is a solution that will allow me to keep my dignity and escape the pain waiting for me. Age: 38 From: Gander, Newfoundland Defendant’s Name: Anita Addison Position: Attorney General, Newfoundland From: St. John’s, Newfoundland Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms being challenged in the testimony: □ Fundamental Freedoms □ freedom of conscience and religion □ freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of communication □ freedom of peaceful assembly □ freedom of association Democratic Rights Mobility Rights Legal Rights Equality Rights Official Languages of Canada Minority Language Educational Rights □ Enforcement Specific evidence in the testimony to support that being the charter challenge: □ □ □ □ □ □ I should be able to choose when and how my life will come to an end. When I feel that I can no longer live with the pain and indignity of my condition, I want to have a doctor assist me in ending my life. This is my body and my life, and I should be allowed to do what I feel is necessary for me.” Testimony: “While Ms. Lipton finds herself in an unfortunate situation, the province of Newfoundland cannot allow one of its doctors to help her end her life prematurely. The Criminal Code of Canada is clear, one person may not help another person commit suicide. We must follow the letter of the law and deny Ms. Lipton her request.” What type of right is this? □ □ □ Collective rights Individual rights Both Evidence from the testimony that supports your selection above: Is this a violation of the plaintiff’s Charter rights? □ □ Yes No If this is a violation, is it a reasonable limit that can be justified in a free and democratic society? □ □ Yes No What evidence do you have that suggests it is or is not? Why? List some possible solutions to this charter case: Which one was chosen? Record how each judge voted: _________________ □ Yes/□ No The Supreme Court must come to a decision on which solution will be chosen. Why? _________________ □ Yes/□ No _________________ □ Yes/□ No _________________ □ Yes/□ No _________________ □ Yes/□ No Press Release: The media is asking for your written statement on the decision. In 100 words or less, describe what decision the court made, why it made it and why you personally agree or disagree with it.
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz