IPv6 Research Highlights IGF in Hyderabad December 3-6, 2008 Presentation by IPv6 Research Group 2008 DiploFoundation’s Internet Governance Capacity Building Programme Research Questions 1. 2. 3. 4. What economic, developmental and technical issues concern IPv6 transition? Who are the global, regional and national players in IPv6? What is happening concerning IPv6 in research participants’ countries? What recommendations can be passed on to governments concerning IPv6? Methodology First part of research concerning transition issues and global players was done through secondary research. National research to find out status in participants’ countries was done through primary research using a questionnaire. The research was done by a group through a wiki platform, where text was produced collaboratively. Introduction What is IPv6, and do we really need it? What is IPv6? IPv6 is a new version of IP, also known as IPng (Next Generation) It is a new system of addressing for the Internet, and allows for 2 ^ 128 addresses This protocol will replace IPv4, which has been the protocol since the Internet became established and allows for 2 ^ 32 addresses Need for IPv6 IPv4 is the protocol that has been used on the Internet since its inception. This protocol did not anticipate: Exhaustion Need for more robust security Need for less complex configuration Hence IPv4 is pending exhaustion IANA reports only 15% unallocated addresses Experts warn of possible exhaustion dates, 2010 – 2011 The need for more addresses, and thus IPv6 is therefore unavoidable Current Uptake of IPv6 Although IPv4 exhaustion is clear, the current uptake is still slow Most current uptake is in Europe and Asia Pacific Reasons for slow uptake: Governments are not taking the lead in IPv6 uptake; small organisations are Lack of IPv6 expertise Lack of transit support Main Advantages of IPv6 IPv6 has many advantages, added incentives to its adoption. We mention a few: Larger address space Stateless and stateful address configuration Security Autoconfiguration New opportunities… IPv6 Transition What are the technical, economic and developmental aspects of the transition? Technical Issues There is need for hardware and software to be able to support IPv6 technically. The following should be addressed: All operating systems must support IPv6 All network gadgets must support IPv6 There must be technical expertise to handle installation and maintenance of IPv6 networks Networks must be ready to handle both IPv4 and IPv6, especially for transition period Economic Issues IPv6 transition, like any major change, comes with financial implications. The following questions need to be addressed so that IPv6 does not become a last minute urgent financial burden. Here are some of the things that can be done now: Evaluating all network hardware, taking an inventory of those that cannot be upgraded to IPv6 Evaluating software as well, OS, and applicationsSpecify minimum requirements for new hardware and software Include IPv6 in current organisation training programmes Evaluate cost needs for client side hardware and software Development Issues IPv6 will certainly have implications on development, especially the digital divide Increased number of IP addresses allows for more people to be connected, thus, having a positive impact on the digital divide Allows for development and deployment of new technologies which developing countries can take advantage of IPv6 Main Players Who are the main players in this field, globally, regionally and nationally? Global Players ICANN Ratified global policy for IPv6 allocation in 2006 Has set IPv6 adoption as a key priority in its strategic plan IETF Is working on IPv6 standards in different areas: IPv6 over low power WPAN IPv6 maintenance IP over DVB … Global Players (cont’d) ITU Organises and hosts IPv6 workshops Brings awareness to those countries who are less developed in Internet to promote IPv6 development OECD Has exhorted governments to be aware of imminent depletion of IPv4 International agencies,such as UN agencies Involved in capacity building and policy development Regional Players Regional registries are the main players when it comes to IPv6 issues. They are involved in different ways: Afrinic Raising awareness, training, supplying IPv6 addresses APNIC Introduced IPv6 transit exchange, passed resolutions underlining critical importance of IPv6 to future success of the Internet, allocating IPv6 addresses Regional Players (cont’d) ARIN Educating community on need for IPv6, supplying IPv6 addresses LACNIC Supplying IPv6 addresses, training (IPv6 tour), raising awareness RIPE NCC Already supplying IPv6 addresses Regional Players (cont’d) Regional Organisations, involved with policy development and capacity building: CITEL Caribbean Telecommunications Union (CTU) … Regional Industry Associations, also involved with capacity building, such as CANTO (Caribbean) National Players Governments Those that are taking a lead role in migrating to IPv6 are seeing success in their countries In a position to regulate incoming equipment to be IPv6 compatible ISPs Are strategic in providing support to all clients with IPv6 NGOs Are instrumental in persuading public and private sector to transition to IPv6 and creating awareness on the same National Case Studies What is happening in different countries? Brazil No IPv6 national policy yet Have an Internet steering committee called CGIbr 21 members 9 government, 4 NGOs, 4 private sector Initiatives in the country concerning IPV6: Adoption of IPv6 in government networks Training Raising awareness Making recommendations concerning technical issues in IPv6 Kenya National IPv6 policy for Kenya will be out in the first quarter of 2009 for public consultation Has taken a lead role in demonstrating the urgent need for IPv6 Has jointly organised IPv6 trainings Kenya joined the IPv6 forum in 2008 Universities are being targeted to start using this technology Uganda No specific national policy regarding IPv6; government taking a “wait and see” approach No clear process towards developing a policy However, government involved in organising IPv6 training in the country The country overall shows limited awareness/perceived urgency to the issue A private sector does not see the current need for IPv6, and does not have anywhere to connect if it did. It also plans to “wait and see” An NGO which once tried IPv6 said it had to turn it off due to technical problems Employees working for a number of organisations in Uganda have undergone IPv6 training Uruguay In 2001 the RAU (Uruguayan Academic Network) jointly with the SECIU (registry of the ccTLD.UY) started to implement IPv6 for study and research ANTEL, the state telecom operator, is prepared to offer its clients IPv6 for their services One of the biggest hurdles is the lack of knowledgeable staff, and the cost of the insfrastructure upgrade The private sector is quite reluctant to adopt IPv6; lack of users’ demand A national IPv6 task force was created to promote a massive IPv6 adoption, coordinate actions and prepare policies with the stakeholders to accomplish a good and broad IPv6 transition. Some multi-stakeholder actions were taken to organise a national IPv6 workshop this year (SECIU, ANTEL, UY6TF,LACNIC), it convened more than 80 techies. Trinidad and Tobago No current national policy on IPv6 Contributing to development of a Caribbean Internet Governance Policy Framework in which IPv6 transition is recommended (2009 target) Minimal local usage of IPv6 at present (mainly for testing and experience) Relatively low national Internet penetration resulting in low ISP urgency for transition Major ISPs expected to develop transition plans in 2009 Recommendations • Governments should be at the forefront of demonstrating the need for IPv6 by transitioning to IPv6 in their own networks • ISPs should provide IPv6 transit for all clients • Organisations should make sure that all purchases of new equipment and software is IPv6-compatible Organisations should incorporate IPv6 training in their current training programmes • • Governments and organisations should make maximum use of efforts by global and regional players to provide IPv6 training Thank you for your attention About this Research The research was carried out as part of the Research Phase of DiploFoundation’s Internet Governance Capacity Building Programme 2008. Participants: Atnafseged Zeleke - Switzerland Didier Kasole – DR Congo Fabio Marinho – Brazil Komi Gbedeh Attiogbe – Togo Judith Okite – Kenya Milton Aineruhanga – Uganda Nicolas Antoniello – Uruguay Nigel Cassimire – Trinidad and Tobago Ruth Puente – Uruguay Ulemu Nyasulu (tutor) – Malawi
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz