1 BA 7302- STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT UNIT – 3: STRATEGIES THE GENERIC STRATEGIC ALTERNATIVE Corporate-level strategies involve top management and address issues of concern to the entire organization. Business-level strategies deal with major business units or divisions of the corporate portfolio. Business-level strategies are generally developed by upper and middle-level managers and are intended to help the organization achieve its corporate strategies and tactics to beat the competition. Functional strategies address problems commonly faced by lower level managers and deal with strategies for the major organizational functions (e.g., marketing, finance, and production) considered relevant for achieving the business strategies and supporting the corporate-level strategy Corporate Level strategies (Corporate strategies) Corporate strategies are basically about the choice of direction that the firm adopts in order to achieve its objectives. They are basically about decision related to; allocating resources among the different businesses of a firm transferring resources from one set of businesses to others, and managing and nurturing a portfolio of businesses revolve These decisions are taken so that the overall corporate objectives are achieved. Corporate strategies help to exercise the choice of the direction that an organisation adopts. Strategic Management/Unit: 2 – Dr.P.Mohanraj, Associate Professor/MBA/Chettinad Tech. 2 Strategic alternatives (Grand strategies) A corporation’s directional strategy is composed of three general orientations and which are around the question of whether to continue or change the business or improve the efficiency and effectiveness with which the firm achieves its corporate objectives. There are four grand strategic alternatives (According to Glueck) 1. Expansion/ Growth strategies 2. Stability strategies 3. Retrenchment strategies and 4. Combination (of these three) strategies These four grand strategic alternatives are further divided as follows; 1. Expansion/ Growth strategies/ Intensification strategies a) Expansion through concentration b) Expansion through integration c) Expansion through diversification d) Expansion through co-operation e) Expansion through inter-nationalisation f) Expansion through digitalisation 2. Stability strategies a) No change strategies b) Pause/proceed with caution strategies c) Profit strategies d) Endgame e) Harvest 3. Retrenchment strategies and a) Turnaround strategies b) Disinvestment strategies (Sell-out) c) Liquidation strategies (Bankruptcy) 4. Combination (of these three) strategies/Mixed/ Hybrid strategies a) Simultaneous combination b) Sequential combination c) Combination of simultaneous and sequential strategies Strategic Management/Unit: 2 – Dr.P.Mohanraj, Associate Professor/MBA/Chettinad Tech. 3 1. Expansion Strategies (Growth/ Intensification strategies) An organisation aims at high growth by substantially broadening the scope of one or more of its businesses in terms of their respective customer groups, customer functions and alternative technologies in order to improve its overall performance. Ex.: A chocolate manufacturer expands its customer group to include middle-aged and old persons to its existing customers comprising children and adolescents. 2. Stability strategies It involves continuing the current activities without any significant change in direction. An organisation attempts an incremental improvement of its performance by marginally changing one or more of its businesses in terms of their respective customers group, customer functions and alternative technologies. Ex.: A Steel company modernizes its plant to improve efficiency and productivity 3. Retrenchment strategies The organisation contraction (reducing) of its activities through a substantial reduction or elimination of the scope of one or more of its businesses in terms of their respective customer groups, customer functions and alternative technologies in order to improve its overall performance. Retrenchment involves total or partial withdrawal from a customer group, customer function or use of an alternative technology. Ex.: A corporate hospital decides to focus only on specialty treatment by reducing its commitment to general cases. 4. Combination strategies (Mixed/ Hybrid strategies) Combination strategies are a mixture of stability, expansion or retrenchment strategies, applied either simultaneously (at the same time in different businesses) or sequentially (at different times in the same business). Multi-business organisations as most large and medium Indian companies are now have to follow multiple strategies either sequentially or simultaneously. Ex.: ITC Ltd. is a diversified conglomerate having varied corporate portfolio consisting of FMCG, hotels, paper boards and packaging, agribusiness and IT. Sub – Strategies of Corporate/Grand strategies 1. Expansion Strategies (Growth/ Intensification/Focus/ specialization strategies) a) Concentration strategies It involves converging (join) resources in one or more of a firm’s businesses in terms of their respective customer needs, customer functions, or alternative technologies. In which concentration of resources on those product lines, which have growth potential. In other words Strategic Management/Unit: 2 – Dr.P.Mohanraj, Associate Professor/MBA/Chettinad Tech. 4 the ‘stick to the knitting’ strategies, i.e., A firm that is familiar with an industry would naturally like to invest more in known businesses rather than in unknown ones. Ex.: Bajaj Auto has consistently concentrated on two and three wheelers since the last several years as it finds it to be a high growth and attractive industry to invest it. b) Integration strategies Integration means combining activities related to the present activity of a firm. A company attempts to widen the scope of its business definition in such a manner that it results in serving the same set of customers. i. Horizontal Integration – When an organisation takes up the same type of products at the same level of production or marketing process. It expands geographically by buying a competitor’s business, to increase the market share. It does not take the organisation beyond its existing business and still remains in the same industry, serving the same markets through existing products. A firm achieves horizontal growth by expanding its operation into other geographical locations and/or by increasing the range of products and services offered same type of customers. ii. Vertical Integration – Vertical integration occurs when a company produces its own inputs or disposes of its own outputs. It may be backward or forward integration. Backward integration refers to performing a function previously provided by a supplier. Forward integration means performing a function previously provided by a retailer. That is taking over a functions previously provided by a supplier or by a distributor/retailer. Ex.: 1. Backward Vertical Integration (BVI) – TV manufacturer started to making its own TV picture tube. Ex.: 2. Forward Vertical Integration (FVI) – A steel manufacturer can take to making steel utensils (vessels). c) Diversification strategies A substantial (considerable) changes in business definition in terms of customer functions, customer groups or alternative technologies of one or more of a firm’s businesses. It involves a simultaneous departure from current business, familiar products and familiar markets. i. Concentric (Related) Diversification – The firm enters into a new business activity, which is linked to a company’s existing business activity by commonality between one or more components of each activity’s value chain. The linkages are based on manufacturing, marketing and technological commonalities. The risk is considered to be less when the diversification is related to the current business. ii. Conglomerate (unrelated diversification) – A firm enters into a new business area that has no obvious connection with any of the existing business. The new business/ product are unrelated to process/ technology/functions of existing business. In simple words, diversifying into an industry unrelated to its current one. Strategic Management/Unit: 2 – Dr.P.Mohanraj, Associate Professor/MBA/Chettinad Tech. 5 d) Internationalization strategies In which, the organisations market their products or services beyond the domestic or national market. For doing so, an organisation would have to assess the international environment, evaluate its own capabilities and devise strategies to enter foreign market. e) Co-operative strategies Corporate strategies could take into account the possibility of mutual co-operation with competitors, at the same time competing with them so that the market potential could expand. The term co-operation’ expresses the idea of simultaneous competition and co-operation among rival firms for mutual benefit. Types of Co-operative strategies i. Mergers and acquisitions (or takeovers) ii. Joint ventures – Independent firm created by at least two other firms iii. Strategic alliances (Partnership b/w firms whereby their resources, capabilities and core competencies are combined to pursue mutual interest to develop). f) Digitalisation Strategies Organisations have adopted computerization to a considerable degree and computers have become an integral part of the organisation and inevitable part of its information system. Organisations using Computerization, Electronisation, Digitisation, networking and telecommunication components are termed as digitalized enterprises and the process are called digitalisation. 2. Stability strategies a) No change strategies – With a predictable and certain external environment and stable organisational environment, an organisation decides to continue with its present strategy. b) Pause/proceed with caution strategies – It is a tactics used by organisations that wish to test the ground (market) before moving ahead with a full-fledged corporate strategy. (To understand the market reaction, moving with few sample products). It is a deliberate and conscious attempt to make incremental improvement till the environment changes. c) Profit strategies – An organisation may assess the situation and assume that its problems are short-lived and will adopt some measures (Cost cutting, disinvestment, raise prices, increase productivity, etc.,) till then the organisation regain its profitability called profit strategies. d) Endgame – This when an organisation decides to remain in a sinking business in order to reap benefits from the retirement of competition from the field. e) Harvest – The organisation decides to sell (harvest) it’s older technology and go with the new one. Strategic Management/Unit: 2 – Dr.P.Mohanraj, Associate Professor/MBA/Chettinad Tech. 6 3. Retrenchment strategies and a) Turnaround strategies – improvement of operational efficiency and is probably most appropriate when a company’s problems are constant but not yet critical. Here emphasis is laid on improving internal efficiency. (Ex. The existing management team withdraws temporarily and specialists are employed to do the job). b) Disinvestment strategies (Sell-out/Divestiture/cutback) – The sale or liquidation of a portion of a business, or major division or SUB. c) Liquidation strategies (Bankruptcy) – Closing down an organisation and selling its assets. 4. Combination (of these three) strategies/Mixed/ Hybrid strategies i. Simultaneous combination – Applied a mixture of stability, expansion or retrenchment strategies at the same time in different businesses. ii. Sequential combination - Applied a mixture of stability, expansion or retrenchment strategies at different times in the same business. iii. Combination of simultaneous and sequential strategies BUSINESS STRATEGIES/ BUSINESS-LEVEL STRATEGIES Business strategies are the course of action adopted by an organisation for each of its business separately, to serve identified customer groups and provide value to the customer by satisfaction of their needs. In the process, the organisation uses its competencies to gain, sustain and enhance its strategic or competitive advantage. Business strategies focus on improving the competitive position of a company’s products/ services within the specific industry, which the firm serves. Dere. F. Abell’s three dimensions on which business strategies to be concentrated a. Customer needs (What is to be satisfied) b. Customer groups (Segment to be satisfied) c. Distinctive competencies (How the needs are satisfied). Competitive scope: The breadth of an organisation’s target within the industry. By the breadth of an organisation’s target is meant the range of products, distribution channels, types of buyers, the geographical areas served and the array of related industries in which the firm would also compete. Strategic Management/Unit: 2 – Dr.P.Mohanraj, Associate Professor/MBA/Chettinad Tech. 7 Three generic Business strategies – Classification of Business strategies/ Competitive strategies 1. Cost Leadership strategy (Low cost/ broad target) 2. Differentiation (Differentiation/ broad target) 3. Focus (Lower cost or differentiation/ narrow target) 1. Cost Leadership strategy (Low cost/ broad target) In which a large business produces at the lowest cost possible, no frills (additions) products and services for a large market with a relatively elastic demand. Organisations, which adopt cost leadership strategy, try to produce goods/services at a lower cost than other competitors and try to outperform others. Competitive Scope Porter’s generic business strategies Broad target Cost Leadership Narrow target Focused cost leadership Low cost products/services Differentiation Focused differentiation Differentiated products/ services Competitive Advantage Features a. The cost leader charge lower price than immediate competitors and achieve higher profit than competitors. b. When competition increases with price reduction, cost leader maintain the competitive forces and make profit. c. Lower level of product differentiation d. Cost leader ignores market segments and aims at limited amount of market segmentation e. Low cost strategy implies tight production controls and rigorous use of budgets to control production process, etc. Strategic Management/Unit: 2 – Dr.P.Mohanraj, Associate Professor/MBA/Chettinad Tech. 8 Advantages a. Low cost serves as a barrier to entry for new entrants and they are not able to match the leader’s costs/price. b. Arrival of substitutes can be managed by price reduction c. Intense rivalry is avoided due to cost advantage d. Powerful buyers and powerful suppliers have less influences due to large purchases by cost leaders. Disadvantages a. Competitors may imitate this cost reduction strategy b. Arrival of new low cost technology may be a threat c. Obsolescence of technology may be a risk to cost leaders. 2. Differentiation (Differentiation/ broad target) Wherein a larger business produces and markets to the entire industry products that can be readily distinguished from those of competitors. Companies following this differentiation strategy create products which are perceived as unique by customers, and they charged premium price, which is above industry average. Features a. Firms which adopt differentiation strategy, try to differentiate itself along as many dimensions as possible b. High level of product differentiation is pursued as a competitive advantage and it is achieved in terms of quality, innovation and customer responsiveness. Advantages a. Differentiation develops brand loyalty and its safeguards from competitors b. Powerful buyers and powerful sellers are less threat due to offering unique product c. Difficult to imitate by competitors d. Differentiation and brand loyalty also serve as an entry barrier. Disadvantages a. Need to spend much for R&D b. Obsolescence on technology or model leads to loss c. This type of customers switching easily 3. Focus strategy Strategic Management/Unit: 2 – Dr.P.Mohanraj, Associate Professor/MBA/Chettinad Tech. 9 This strategy tries to serve the needs of a limited customer groups or segment. A focused company pays attention to serve a particular market niche, which may be defined geographically, by type of customer, or by segment of product line. Focus business strategies essentially rely on either cost leadership or differentiation, but cater to a narrow segment of the total market. Therefore, focus strategies are niche strategies. The most commonly used bases for identifying customer groups are the demographic characteristics (age, gender, income, occupation, etc.), geographical segmentation (rural, urban, South India/ North India) or life style (traditional/ modern). Features i. A focus firm may adopt low cost or differentiation approach ii. If adopts low cost approach, concentrates on small volume iii. If adopts differentiation approach, concentrates on few segments iv. It will serve niche segments instead of the whole market v. Focusing the market where the cost leaders and differentiators are operating vi. There is some type of uniqueness in the segment based on geographical, demographic or life style vii. There are specialized requirement for the product viii. The major players in the industry are not interested in the niche Advantages a. A focused company is safeguarded from competitors till rivals copy the product b. Customer loyalty is developed in the market niche c. It allows the company to stay close to the customer and responds to changing needs Disadvantages a. Due to small volume, the production costs often exceeds b. Powerful suppliers are threat to a focused company c. Once focused on narrow market, it is difficult to move to next segment d. Niches are often transient (temporary) Strategic Management/Unit: 2 – Dr.P.Mohanraj, Associate Professor/MBA/Chettinad Tech. 10 STRATEGY IN THE GLOBAL ENVIRONMENT In which, the organisations market their products or services beyond the domestic or national market. For doing so, an organisation would have to assess the international environment, evaluate its own capabilities and devise strategies to enter foreign market. Distinctive competencies It refers to a set of unique strengths, which enable a company to attain superior quality, efficiency, innovation and customer responsiveness in the overseas market. Those distinctive competencies enable a company to lower the costs of production or to differentiation and go for premium pricing. A specific ability is possessed by a particular organisation exclusively or relatively in large measure, it is called a distinctive competence. Competitive pressures Companies, which perform global business operations, are expected to two types of competitive pressures: a. Pressure for cost reduction – Demand on a firm to minimise its unit costs. By doing so, the firm tries to derive full benefits from economies of scale and location economies. b. Pressure for local responsiveness – Companies to come-out with differentiated products reflecting the buyer’s tastes and preferences. International strategies/ Strategy in Global environment According to Bartlett and Ghoshal, there are four types of International strategies, such as: 1. International strategy 3. Global strategy 2. Multi-domestic strategy 4. Transnational strategy The suitability of the above strategy is determined by the extent of pressures on cost reduction and local responsiveness. 1. International strategy Transferring products and services to foreign markets, where those products and services are not available. In this strategy, the international firms, by maintaining a tight control over its overseas operations, offers standardized products & services in different countries, with little or no differences. Strategic Management/Unit: 2 – Dr.P.Mohanraj, Associate Professor/MBA/Chettinad Tech. 11 2. Multi-domestic strategy Firms following this strategy, customize their products and services according to the local conditions operating in the different countries. It leads to a high-cost structure with more differentiations matching with local market preferences (the country at which it operates). High – Centralized production 4 Strategies for Global competition Global Strategy Low Decentralised Cost pressure Transnational Strategy Centralized production Low cost – Standardized product (No differentiation) Centralized production Low cost – Customized product (Differentiation) International Strategy Multi-domestic strategy Decentralized production High cost – Standardized product (No differentiation) Decentralized production High cost – Customized product (Differentiation) Low – Standardized product Pressure of Local Responsiveness High – Customized product 3. Global strategy Global firms focusing on low-cost structure and concentrating the production of standardized products and services at a few favourable locations around the world. These products and services are offered in an undifferentiated manner in all countries the global firm operates in , usually at competitive prices. 4. Transnational strategy Firm adopts this strategy, follows a combined approach of low-cost and high local responsiveness (Offering differentiated products as per local taste & preferences) of their products and services. Bartlett and Ghoshal opine that this is possibly the only viable strategy in a competitive world. Strategic Management/Unit: 2 – Dr.P.Mohanraj, Associate Professor/MBA/Chettinad Tech. 12 International Entry modes When a firm adopts one or more of the international strategies, should decide about the entry mode. Mode of entry means the manner in which the firm would commence its international operations. 1. Export Entry modes Under these modes, the firm produces in the home country and markets in the overseas markets. a. Direct exports – Do not involve home-country intermediaries and marketing is done either through a direct agent/distributor or through a direct branch/subsidiary in the overseas market. b. Indirect exports – Involve intermediaries in the home country, who are responsible for exporting the firm’s products. 2. Contractual Entry modes These modes are non-equity associations between an international company and a company or any other legal entity in the overseas markets. a. Licensing – It is an arrangement where the international company transfers knowledge, technology, patent, etc. for a limited period of time, to an overseas entity, in return for some form of payment, usually a royalty payment. b. Franchising – It involves the right to use a business format, usually a brand name, in the overseas market, in return for the franchiser receiving some form of payment. c. Other forms – Technical agreements (for technology transfers), service contracts (for technical support or expertise provision), contract manufacturing, production sharing, turnkey operations, build-operate-transfer (BOT) arrangements, etc. 3. Investment entry modes It involves ownership of production units in the overseas market, based on some form of equity investment or direct foreign investment. a. Joint venture and Strategic alliances – It involves a co-operative partnership between two or more firms, with financial interests as the basis of co-operation. b. Independent venture or wholly subsidiaries – In which the parent international company holds 100% equity and is in full control. Disadvantages of international strategies 1. Higher risk – It is too risky compared to a firm operates in domestically. These risks are related to uncertainty in the economic and political environment of the host countries. 2. Difficulty in managing cultural diversity – International firms face challenges of managing cultural diversity within (through employees) and outside (through customers/ intermediaries). Strategic Management/Unit: 2 – Dr.P.Mohanraj, Associate Professor/MBA/Chettinad Tech. 13 3. High bureaucratic costs – International operations need co-ordination between the home office and the foreign operations and subsidiaries. These result in higher bureaucratic costs of coordination and communication. 4. Higher distribution costs – Firms operating internationally using home advantages, will not setup manufacturing facilities abroad, and then it increases distribution costs. 5. Trade barriers – Possibility of trade barriers in the form of tariff, pricing restrictions, different standards or local content requirements. STRATEGIC ALLIANCE According to Mehta and Samanta, Strategic alliances are, ‘Co-operation between two or more independent firms involving, shared control and continuing contributions by all partners for mutual benefit’. Three necessary and characteristics 1. Two or more firms joined together to pursue a set of agreed goals, but remain independent 2. The partner firms share the benefits of the alliance and control over the performance of assigned tasks 3. The partner firms contribute on a continuing basis, in one or more key strategic areas, such as technology, product and so forth. Reasons for strategic alliances The primary reason for strategic alliances is to enhance their organisational capabilities and thereby gain competitive or strategic advantage and to gain more profit by using the latest technology and making optimum utilisation of resources. Walter, Peters and Dess list several reasons as follows: 1. Entering new markets A company has a successful product may wish to look for new markets and doing so on one’s own capabilities may be difficult. It will be better to enter into a partnership with a local firm which understands the markets better. 2. Reducing manufacturing costs Strategic alliances are used to pool resources to gain economies of scale and make better utilisation of resources in order to reduce manufacturing costs. Strategic Management/Unit: 2 – Dr.P.Mohanraj, Associate Professor/MBA/Chettinad Tech. 14 3. Developing and diffusing (spread) technology Strategic alliances are used to develop technological capabilities and make use of technical expertise of two or more firms. It accelerate product introduction and overcome legal and trade barriers. 4. To bring complementary skills 5. To reduce political risks 6. To achieve competitive advantage 7. To set technological standards. Pitfalls in Strategic alliances 1. Lack of trust, misunderstanding and commitment among partners 2. Conflicting goals and interests 3. Inadequate preparation for entering into partnership 4. Hasty implementation of plans 5. Focusing more on mutual benefits 6. Dynamic nature of external conditions Examples a. Blue star has entered into a strategic alliance with the Italian company ISA, for providing super market and food refrigeration solutions. b. IDBI and Andhra bank, aim to increase their automate teller machine reach. Following this alliance, the customers of both IDBI and Andhra bank are able to use the services currently. c. SBI and Bajaj Tempo manufacture tied up for promoting agricultural mechanization and Agricultural loans. BUILDING AND RESTRUCTURING THE CORPORATION There are various methods for the firms to enter into a new business and restructure the existing one, such as; 1. Start-up route In this route, the business is started from beginning by building facilities, purchasing equipments, recruiting employees, opening up distribution outlet and so on. Problems in this method Chance of delay in market entry Entry barriers of product differentiation, investment, set-up intermediaries are difficult Cost overruns may affect competitive advantage Take several years to generate profits Strategic Management/Unit: 2 – Dr.P.Mohanraj, Associate Professor/MBA/Chettinad Tech. 15 Advantages Firm can control final quality of the product Can reduce the cost of production and price in future Chance to get Govt. concessions 2. Acquisition Acquisition is a form of merger whereby one company purchases another, often with a combination of cash and stock. It involves purchasing an established company, complete with all facilities, equipment and personnel. It facilitates quick expansion. 3. Joint venture It is a long term contractual agreement between two or more parties, to undertake mutually beneficial economic activities, exercise joint control and contribute equity and share in the profits or losses of the entity. 4. Merger It involves fusion (combine) of two or more companies into one company. In merger, two different firms from the same group combine to form a new company or two different firms from totally outside come together to form a new entity. In which a firm combine with another firm through an exchange of stock. 5. Takeover A portion or a whole firm is acquired by another firm so that the acquiring firm exercises control over the affairs of the taken over firm. If the management accepts the takeover is considered to be a smooth takeover and if the management resists it is called hostile takeover. RESTRUCTURING It involves strategies for reducing the scope of the firm by exiting from unprofitable business. Restructuring also called downsizing, rightsizing or de-layering involves reducing the size of the firm in terms of number of employees, number of divisions or units and number of hierarchical levels in the firm’s organisational structure. In simple words, “Diversified firms divested (disassociated) to concentrate on core businesses”. It involves an organisation refocusing on its primary business in order to reduce the organizations’ risk profile. Reasons for restructuring 1. Declining performance of over diversified firms due to over cost and inefficiency 2. The diversified firms faces hyper competition from new firms on core business area, so the forced to concentrate on core area than diversified one 3. The innovation in management processes and strategy has reduced. Strategic Management/Unit: 2 – Dr.P.Mohanraj, Associate Professor/MBA/Chettinad Tech. 16 Leveraged Buyouts (LOB) It refers to a restructuring action, whereby the management of the company and/or an external party buys all of the assets of the business, largely financed with debt, and thus makes the company private. STRATEGIC ANALYSIS AND CHOICE Strategic Choice The decision to select from among the grand strategies considered the strategy which will best meet the enterprise’s objectives. This decision involves, focusing on a few alternatives, considering the selection factors, evaluating the alternatives against these criteria and making actual choice. Process of Strategic choice Objective factors 1 . Focusing on strate gic alte rnative s 2 . Analysing the strate gic alte rnative s by conside ring two factors 3. Evaluating strategic alternatives Subje ctive factors 4. Strategic choice/ Choosing from among the Strategic alternatives Process of Strategic choice STEP -1: Focusing on Strategic alternatives The aim of focusing on a few strategic alternatives is to narrow down the choice to a manageable number of feasible strategies. A decision maker would, in practice, limit the choice to a few alternatives which are relevant and feasible. This can be done through GAP analysis. Focusing on alternatives could be done by visualizing the future state and working backwards. By analysing the difference between the projected and desired performance, a gap could be found. Strategic Management/Unit: 2 – Dr.P.Mohanraj, Associate Professor/MBA/Chettinad Tech. 17 Gap analysis for focussing on Strategic alternatives Desired Performance Performance Gap Performance Present Performance Time T1 T2 The above diagram shows how gap analysis works. How wide or narrow the gap is, its importance and the possibility of it being reduced, influence the focus on alternatives. Where the gap is narrow, stability strategies would be a feasible alternative If the gap is large, due to expected environmental opportunities, expansion strategies are more likely. If it is large, due to expected bad performance, retrenchment strategies may be more suitable. Where multiple reasons are responsible for the gap, combination strategies are likely. STEP -2: Analysing the strategic alternatives Narrowing down the strategic choice should lead to a few feasible alternatives. These alternatives have to be subjected to a thorough analysis on the basis of selection factors. The selection factors are broadly divided into two groups: The objective and the subjective factors. Objective factors are based on analytical techniques and data used to facilitate a strategic choice. One of the examples of objective factor is Market share, expressed as a percentage of the total market share of a company in an industry. Subjective factors are based on one’s personal judgement, collective or descriptive factors. An example of a subjective factor is the perception of the Top management people regarding the prospects of the business in the next 2-3 years. The alternatives that are generated in the first step are analysed on the basis of these selection factors. Strategic Management/Unit: 2 – Dr.P.Mohanraj, Associate Professor/MBA/Chettinad Tech. 18 I. Tools and techniques for strategic analysis (Objective factors) There are many tools and techniques available to perform strategic analysis. It is done at two levels. Corporate level strategic analysis focuses on techniques for analysing businesses under the same corporate umbrella, which is done as Corporate Portfolio analysis/ Portfolio analysis (Based on objective factors). Where as, Business level strategic analysis focuses on individual business from the perspective of the industry to which each of those businesses belong (Based on Subjective factors). A. Corporate portfolio analysis (Portfolio analysis) It is a set of techniques that help strategists in taking strategic decisions with regards to allocation of resources among multi-business firms under one corporate umbrella. (For example; A diversified company may decide to divert resources from its most profitable business to more prospective one to optimize its resources. A business portfolio is the collection of Strategic Business Units (SBUs) that makes up a corporation. The aim of Portfolio analysis is i. Analyse its current business portfolio and decide which SBUs should receive more or less investment ii. Develop growth strategies for adding new products and business to the portfolio iii. Decide which businesses or products should no longer be retained. There are a number of techniques are available, such as, 1. Boston Consulting Group (BCG) matrix or Product portfolio 2. General Electric’s Nine cell 3. Corporate parenting analysis B. Other analysis 4. SWOT analysis 5. Industry analysis 6. PLC analysis 7. Environmental Threat and Opportunity Profile (ETOP) 8. Organisational Capability Profile (OCP) 9. Strategic Advantage Profile (SAP) 10. Mc Kinsey’s 7s Framework Strategic Management/Unit: 2 – Dr.P.Mohanraj, Associate Professor/MBA/Chettinad Tech. 19 A. Corporate portfolio analysis (Portfolio analysis) 1. BCG Growth-Share Matrix Companies that are large enough to be organized into strategic business units face the challenge of allocating resources among those units. In the early 1970's the Boston Consulting Group developed a model for managing a portfolio of different business units (or major product lines). The BCG growth-share matrix displays the various business units on a graph of the market growth rate vs. market share relative to competitors: BCG Growth-Share Matrix Resources are allocated to business units according to where they are situated on the grid as follows: Cash Cow - a business unit that has a large market share in a mature, slow growing industry. Cash cows require little investment and generate cash that can be used to invest in other business units. Star - a business unit that has a large market share in a fast growing industry. Stars may generate cash, but because the market is growing rapidly they require investment to maintain their lead. If successful, a star will become a cash cow when its industry matures. Strategic Management/Unit: 2 – Dr.P.Mohanraj, Associate Professor/MBA/Chettinad Tech. 20 Question Mark (or Problem Child) - a business unit that has a small market share in a high growth market. These business units require resources to grow market share, but whether they will succeed and become stars is unknown. Dog - a business unit that has a small market share in a mature industry. A dog may not require substantial cash, but it ties up capital that could better be deployed elsewhere. Unless a dog has some other strategic purpose, it should be liquidated if there is little prospect for it to gain market share. There are typically four different strategies to apply: Build Market Share: Make further investments (for example, to maintain Star status, or to turn a Question Mark into a Star). Hold: Maintain the status quo (do nothing). Harvest: Reduce the investment (enjoy positive cash flow and maximize profits from a Star or a Cash Cow). Divest: For example, get rid of the Dogs, and use the capital you receive to invest in Stars and Question Marks. The BCG matrix provides a framework for allocating resources among different business units and allows one to compare many business units at a glance. However, the approach has received some negative criticism for the following reasons: The link between market share and profitability is questionable since increasing market share can be very expensive. The approach may overemphasize high growth, since it ignores the potential of declining markets. The model considers market growth rate to be a given. In practice the firm may be able to grow the market. Strategic Management/Unit: 2 – Dr.P.Mohanraj, Associate Professor/MBA/Chettinad Tech. 21 2. GE / McKinsey 9 cell Matrix In consulting engagements with General Electric in the 1970's, McKinsey & Company developed a nine-cell portfolio matrix as a tool for screening GE's large portfolio of strategic business units (SBU). This business screen became known as the GE/McKinsey Matrix and is shown below: Grow – Business units that fall under grow attract high investment. Firms may go for product differentiation or Cost leadership. Huge cash is generated in this phase. Market leaders exist in this phase. Hold – Business units that fall under hold phase attract moderate investment. Market segmentation, Market penetration, imitation strategies are adopted in this phase. Followers exist in this phase. Harvest - Business units that fall under this phase are unattractive. Low priority is given in these business units. Strategies like divestment, Diversification, mergers are adopted in this phase. GE / McKinsey Nine Cell Matrix Industry attractiveness Business Unit Strength High Medium Low Strong Average Weak Grow Grow Hold Grow Hold Harvest Hold Harvest Harvest The GE / McKinsey matrix is similar to the BCG growth-share matrix in that it maps strategic business units on a grid of the industry and the SBU's position in the industry. The GE matrix however, attempts to improve upon the BCG matrix in the following two ways: The GE matrix generalizes the axes as "Industry Attractiveness" and "Business Unit Strength" whereas the BCG matrix uses the market growth rate as a proxy for industry attractiveness and relative market share as a proxy for the strength of the business unit. The GE matrix has nine cells vs. four cells in the BCG matrix. Strategic Management/Unit: 2 – Dr.P.Mohanraj, Associate Professor/MBA/Chettinad Tech. 22 Industry attractiveness and business unit strength are calculated by first identifying criteria for each, determining the value of each parameter in the criteria, and multiplying that value by a weighting factor. The result is a quantitative measure of industry attractiveness and the business unit's relative performance in that industry. Industry Attractiveness The vertical axis of the GE / McKinsey matrix is industry attractiveness, which is determined by factors such as the following: Market growth rate Market size Demand variability Industry profitability Industry rivalry Global opportunities Macro environmental factors Each factor is assigned a weighting that is appropriate for the industry. The industry attractiveness then is calculated as follows: Industry attractiveness = factor value1 x factor weighting1 + factor value2 x factor weighting2 + factor valueN x factor weightingN Business Unit Strength The horizontal axis of the GE / McKinsey matrix is the strength of the business unit. Some factors that can be used to determine business unit strength include: Relative market share Ability to compete on price and quality Knowledge of customer and market Competitive strength and weakness Profit margins Technological capabilities Caliber of management The business unit strength index can be calculated by multiplying the estimated value of each factor by the factor's weighting, as done for industry attractiveness. Plotting the Information Each business unit can be portrayed as a circle plotted on the matrix, with the information conveyed as follows: Market size is represented by the size of the circle. Strategic Management/Unit: 2 – Dr.P.Mohanraj, Associate Professor/MBA/Chettinad Tech. 23 Market share is shown by using the circle as a pie chart. The expected future position of the circle is portrayed by means of an arrow. The following is an example of such a representation: The shading of the above circle indicates a 38% market share for the strategic business unit. The arrow in the upward left direction indicates that the business unit is projected to gain strength relative to competitors, and that the business unit is in an industry that is projected to become more attractive. The tip of the arrow indicates the future position of the center point of the circle. Strategic Implications Resource allocation recommendations can be made to grow, hold, or harvest a strategic business unit based on its position on the matrix as follows: Grow strong business units in attractive industries, average business units in attractive industries, and strong business units in average industries. Hold average businesses in average industries, strong businesses in weak industries, and weak business in attractive industries. Harvest weak business units in unattractive industries, average business units in unattractive industries, and weak business units in average industries. There are strategy variations within these three groups. For example, within the harvest group the firm would be inclined to quickly divest itself of a weak business in an unattractive industry, whereas it might perform a phased harvest of an average business unit in the same industry. 1. Corporate parenting analysis Campbell, Goold and Alexander proposed the concept of corporate parenting to consider the role of the corporate headquarters in managing a set of businesses in a portfolio. A diversified corporations or a multi-business company is often manages and develops the individual businesses in terms resources and capabilities is called Corporate parenting. In multi business company’s corporate parenting enables the headquarters to focus on core competencies and tries to create value among various business units by establishing relationship and a good fit between needs and opportunities of units and resources and capabilities within the firm. Patenting fit matrix Patenting fit matrix summarizes the various judgements regarding corporate/ business unit for the corporation as a whole. This matrix emphasies their fit with the corporate parent fit. Strategic Management/Unit: 2 – Dr.P.Mohanraj, Associate Professor/MBA/Chettinad Tech. 24 This matrix composes of 2 dimensions: Positive contributions that the parent can make and the negative effects the parent can make. The combination of these two dimensions creates 5 different positions. a) Heartland Businesses b) Edge-of-Heartland Businesses c) Ballast Businesses d) Alien Territory Businesses e) Value Trap Businesses Strategic Management/Unit: 2 – Dr.P.Mohanraj, Associate Professor/MBA/Chettinad Tech. 25 Heartland Businesses: Heartland Businesses should be at the heart of the corporation’s future. These Heartland Businesses have opportunities for improvement by the parent, and the parent understands their critical success factors well. These businesses should have priority for all corporate activities. Edge-of-Heartland Businesses: In these businesses some parenting characteristics fit the business, but other do not. The parent may not have all the characteristics needed by a unit, or the parent may not really understand all of the unit’s strategic factors. E.g.: a unit in this area may be very strong in creating its own image through advertising – a critical success factor in its industry. The corporate may however not have this strength and tends to leave this to its advertising agency. If the parent forced the unit to abandon its own creative efforts in favor of using the corporation’s favorite ad agency, the unit may struggle. Such business units are likely to consume much of the parent’s attention, as the parent tries to understand them better and transform them into Heartland Businesses Ballast Businesses: Ballast Businesses fit very comfortably with the parent corporation but contain very few opportunities to be improved by the parent. Like cash cows may be important sources of stability and earnings. But if environmental changes, ballast could move to alien territory. Therefore corporate decision makers should consider divesting this unit as soon as they can get a price that exceeds the expected value of future cash flows. E.g.: IBM’s mainframe business Strategic Management/Unit: 2 – Dr.P.Mohanraj, Associate Professor/MBA/Chettinad Tech. 26 Alien Territory Businesses: Alien Territory Businesses have little opportunities to be improved by the corporate parent, and a misfit exists between the parenting characteristics and the units’ strategic factors. There is little potential for value creation but high potential for value destruction on the part of the parent. The corporation must divest this unit while it still has value Value Trap Businesses: Value Trap Businesses fit well with parenting opportunities, but they are a misfit with the parent’s understanding of the units’ CSF. This is where the corporate headquarters can make its biggest error. It mistakes what it sees as opportunities for ways to improve the business units’ profitability or competitive position. E.g.: To make the unit a world-class manufacturer (because the parent has world-class manufacturing skills) it may not notice that the unit is primarily successful because of its unique product development and niche marketing expertise. B. Other Analysis 2. SWOT Analysis SWOT is an acronym for Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats. A SWOT analysis, also called situational analysis, is a very useful tool that managers use in order to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses in an organization’s internal environment and the opportunities and threats in its external environment. A scan of the internal and external environment is a crucial part of the strategic planning process, which is being covered by SWOT analysis. It is used to evaluate the Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats involved in a project or in a business venture. The analysis involves identifying the purpose of the business venture or project and recognizing the internal and external factors that are favorable and unfavorable to achieve that goal. This method is being developed by Albert Humphrey, who led a convention at Stanford University in the 1960s and 1970s using data from Fortune 500 companies. 1. Strengths: Internal attributes those are helpful to the organization to achieving its objective and Uniqueness of the business or department that give it an advantage over others. 2. Weaknesses: Internal attributes that is harmful to the organization to achieving its objective. These are characteristics that place the firm at a disadvantage relative to its peers. 3. Opportunities: External factors that help the organization achieve its objective. These are the external factors that will boost the sales or profitability of the organisation. Strategic Management/Unit: 2 – Dr.P.Mohanraj, Associate Professor/MBA/Chettinad Tech. 27 4. Threats: External factors those are harmful to the organization to achieving its objective. These external elements in the environment could cause trouble for the business. The internal factors may be viewed as strengths or weaknesses depending upon their impact on the organization's objectives. What may represent strengths with respect to one objective may be weaknesses for another objective. Identification of SWOTs is essential because subsequent steps in the process of planning for achievement of the selected objective may be derived from the SWOTs. SWOT analysis is a tool for auditing an organization and its environment. It is the first stage of planning and helps to focus on key issues. The SWOT Matrix A firm should not necessarily pursue the more lucrative (profitable) opportunities. Rather, it may have a better chance at developing a competitive advantage by identifying a fit between the firm's strengths and upcoming opportunities. In some cases, the firm can overcome a weakness in order to prepare itself to pursue a compelling opportunity. To develop strategies that take into account the SWOT profile, a matrix of these factors can be constructed. The SWOT matrix (also known as a TOWS Matrix) is shown below: Strategic Management/Unit: 2 – Dr.P.Mohanraj, Associate Professor/MBA/Chettinad Tech. 28 SWOT / TOWS Matrix Opportunities Threats Strengths Weaknesses S-O strategies W-O strategies S-T strategies W-T strategies S-O strategies pursue opportunities that are a good fit to the company's strengths. W-O strategies overcome weaknesses to pursue opportunities. S-T strategies identify ways that the firm can use its strengths to reduce its vulnerability to external threats. W-T strategies establish a defensive plan to prevent the firm's weaknesses from making it highly susceptible to external threats. 3. Industry Analysis Michael E.Porter has made immense contribution in the development of the ideas of industry and competitor analysis and their relevance to the formulation of competitive strategies. A model has been proposed consisting of five competitive forces – threat of new entrants, rivalry among competitor, bargaining power of suppliers, bargaining power of buyers and threat of substitute products – that determine the intensity of industry competition and profitability. Michael Porter’s Five Forces The stronger each of these forces restricts the established companies (existing) to raise prices and earn greater profits. The strong competitive force can be regarded as a threat because it depresses profits. A weak competitive force can be viewed as an opportunity because it allows a company to earn greater profits. The task facing managers is to recognize how changes in the five forces give rise to new opportunities and threats and to formulate appropriate strategic responses. Strategic Management/Unit: 2 – Dr.P.Mohanraj, Associate Professor/MBA/Chettinad Tech. 29 1. Threat of Potential entrants (New entrants) The Entry of potential competitors to an industry is a threat to the profitability of established players. The new entrants bring in new capacity, substantial resources and aggressiveness to gain market share. The established companies try to discourage potential competitors from entering to an industry by raising height of barriers. 2. Bargaining power of suppliers Suppliers enjoy bargaining power by raising the price or reduce the quality of purchased goods and services and thereby reduce the profitability of the company. 3. Bargaining power of buyers Buyers are threat when the force the companies to - Charge low price - Demand higher quality - Demand better service According to Porter the buyers are powerful in the following circumstances o Suppliers are more in numbers o Buyers buy in large quantity o More numbers of alternative suppliers – o Cost of changing supplier is not much o Supplier depends buyer for big order o Purchased item is not important o Buyer can able to produce the product o Buyer uses the threat of vertical integration as a measure for forcing down prices. Strategic Management/Unit: 2 – Dr.P.Mohanraj, Associate Professor/MBA/Chettinad Tech. 30 4. Substitute product Substitutes are those products, which satisfy similar needs though appear to be different. According to Porter, Substitute products limit the potential returns of any industry by placing a ceiling on price, firms in the industry can charge. The existence of close substitutes is a threat, by limiting the price and profitability of a company. 5. Rivalry among existing players When the intensity of rivalry is weak among established players within an industry, companies can raise prices and earn greater profits. If the rivalry is strong among the players, price competition and price war will be possible and it will reduce the profit margin. Reasons for strong rivalry among established companies: o Industry competitive structure o Demand conditions o The height of exit barriers in the industry. 4. Product Life Cycle (PLC) A new product passes through set of stages known as product life cycle. Product life cycle applies to both brand and category of products. Its time period vary from product to product. Modern product life cycles are becoming shorter and shorter as products in mature stages are being renewed by market segmentation and product differentiation. Companies always attempt to maximize the profit and revenues over the entire life cycle of a product. In order to achieving the desired level of profit, the introduction of the new product at the proper time is crucial. If new product is appealing to consumer and no stiff competition is out there, company can charge high prices and earn high profits. Stages of Product Life Cycle Product life cycle comprises four stages: 1. Introduction stage 2. Growth stage 3. Maturity stage 4. Decline stage Strategic Management/Unit: 2 – Dr.P.Mohanraj, Associate Professor/MBA/Chettinad Tech. 31 Product Life Cycle (PLC) 1. Introduction stage Product is introduced in the market with intention to build a clear identity and heavy promotion is done for maximum awareness. Before actual offering of the product to customers, product passes through product development, involves prototype and market tests. Companies incur more costs in this phase and also bear additional cost for distribution. On the other hand, there are a few customers at this stage, means low sales volume. So, during introductory stage company’s profits shows a negative figure because of huge cost but low sales volume. At introduction stage, the company core focus is on establishing a market and arising demand for the product. So, the impact on marketing mix is as follows: Product Branding, Quality level and intellectual property and protections are obtained to stimulate consumers for the entire product category. Product is under more consideration, as first impression is the last impression. Price High(skim) pricing is used for making high profits with intention to cover initial cost in a short period and low pricing is used to penetrate and gain the market share. company choice of pricing strategy depends on their goals. Place Distribution at this stage is usually selective and scattered. Promotion At introductory stage, promotion is done with intention to build brand awareness. Strategic Management/Unit: 2 – Dr.P.Mohanraj, Associate Professor/MBA/Chettinad Tech. 32 Samples/trials are provided that is fruitful in attracting early adopters and potential customers. Promotional programs are more essential in this phase. It is as much important as to produce the product because it positions the product. 2. Growth Stage In this stage, company’s sales and profits starts increasing and competition also begin to increase. The product becomes well recognized at this stage and some of the buyers repeat the purchase patterns. During this stage, firms focus on brand preference and gaining market share. It is market acceptance stage. But due to competition, company invest more in advertisement to convince customers so profits may decline near the end of growth stage. Affect on 4 P’s of marketing is as under: Product Along with maintaining the existing quality, new features and improvements in product quality may be done. All this is done to compete and maintain the market share. Price Price is maintained or may increase as company gets high demand at low competition or it may be reduced to grasp more customers. Distribution Distribution becomes more significant with the increase demand and acceptability of product. More channels are added for intensive distribution in order to meet increasing demand. On the other hand resellers start getting interested in the product, so trade discounts are also minimal. Promotion At growth stage, promotion is increased. When acceptability of product increases, more efforts are made for brand preference and loyalty. 3. Maturity stage At maturity stage, brand awareness is strong so sale continues to grow but at a declining rate as compared to past. At this stage, there are more competitors with the same products. So, companies defend the market share and extending product life cycle, rather than making the profits, By offering sales promotions to encourage retailer to give more shelf space to the product than that of competitors. At this stage usually loyal customers make purchases. Marketing mix decisions include: Strategic Management/Unit: 2 – Dr.P.Mohanraj, Associate Professor/MBA/Chettinad Tech. 33 Product At maturity stage, companies add features and modify the product in order to compete in market and differentiate the product from competition. At this stage, it is best way to get dominance over competitors and increase market share. Price Because of intense competition, at maturity stage, price is reduced in order to compete. It attracts the price conscious segment and retains the customers. Distribution New channels are added to face intense competition and incentives are offered to retailers to get shelf preference over competitors. Promotion Promotion is done in order to create product differentiation and loyalty. Incentives are also offered to attract more customers. 4. Decline stage Decline in sales, change in trends and unfavorable economic conditions explain decline stage. At this stage market becomes saturated so sales declines. It may also be due technical obsolescence or customer taste has been changed. At decline stage company has three options: a) Maintain the product, Reduce cost and finding new uses of product. b) Harvest the product by reducing marketing cost and continue offering the product to loyal niche until zero profit. c) Discontinue the product when there’s no profit or a successor is available. Selling out to competitors who want to keep the product. At declining stage, marketing mix decisions depends on company’s strategy. For example, if company want to harvest, the product will remain same and price will be reduced. In case of liquidation, supply will be reduced dramatically. Limitations of Product Life Cycle (PLC) Product life cycle is criticized that it has no empirical support and it is not fruitful in special cases. Different products have different properties so their life cycle also varies. It shows that product life cycle is not best tool to predict the sales. Sometimes managerial decisions affect the life of products in this case Product Life Cycle is not playing any role. Product life cycle is very fruitful for larger firms and corporations but it is not hundred percent accurate tools to predict the life cycle and sales of products in all the situations Strategic Management/Unit: 2 – Dr.P.Mohanraj, Associate Professor/MBA/Chettinad Tech. 34 Environment Threat and Opportunity Profile (ETOP) Meaning of Environmental Scanning: Environmental scanning can be defined as the process by which organizations monitor their relevant environment to identify opportunities and threats affecting their business for the purpose of taking strategic decisions. Appraising the Environment: In order to draw a clear picture of what opportunities and threats are faced by the organization at a given time. It is necessary to appraise the environment. This is done by being aware of the factors that affect environmental appraisal identifying the environmental factors and structuring the results of this environmental appraisal. Structuring Environmental Appraisal: The identification of environmental issues is helpful in structuring the environmental appraisal so that the strategists have a good idea of where the environmental opportunities and threats lie. There are many techniques to structure the environmental appraisal. One such technique suggested by Glueck is that preparing an ETOP for an organization. The preparation of an ETOP involves dividing the environment into different sectors and then analyzing the impact of each sector on the organization. Environment threat and opportunity profile (ETOP) for a bicycle company S.No 1 2 Environmental Nature of Impact sector Economic Market Up Arrow Horizontal Arrow Impact of each sector Growing affluence (wealth/ richness) among urban consumers Rising disposable incomes and living standards Organized sector a virtual oligopoly with four major manufacturers, buyers critical and better informed overall industry growth rate not encouraging unsaturated Demand Strategic Management/Unit: 2 – Dr.P.Mohanraj, Associate Professor/MBA/Chettinad Tech. 35 3 International Down arrow 4 Supplier Horizontal arrow traditional distribution systems Global imports growing but India‟s share shrinking Major importers are the US and EU but India exports mainly to Africa Mostly ancillaries and associated companies Up Arrow indicates Favorable Impact Down Arrow indicates unfavorable Impact Horizontal Arrow indicates Neutral Impact The preparation of an ETOP provides a clear picture to the strategists about which sectors and the different factors in each sector have a favorable impact on the organization. By the means of an ETOP, the organization knows where it stands with respect to its environment. Obviously, such an understanding can be of a great help to an organization in formulating appropriate strategies to take advantage of the opportunities and counter the threats in its environment. Meaning of organizational Appraisal: The purpose of organizational appraisal is to determine the organizational capability in terms of strengths and weaknesses that lie in different functional areas. This is necessary since the strengths and weaknesses have to be matched with the environmental opportunities and threats for strategy formulation to take place. Strategic Advantage Profile (SAP) A SAP can also be prepared directly when students analyses cases during classroom learning, without making a detailed OCP. An SAP provides a picture of the more critical areas which can have a relationship with the strategic picture of the firm in the future. The SAP presented in the following table clearly shows that strengths and weaknesses in Strategic Management/Unit: 2 – Dr.P.Mohanraj, Associate Professor/MBA/Chettinad Tech. 36 different functional areas. Strategic Advantage Profile for a bicycle company S.No. Capability Factor Nature of Impact Down Arrow 1. Finance 2 Marketing Horizontal Arrow 3 Operational Up arrow 4 Personnel Horizontal arrow 5 General management Up arrow Competitive strengths or weaknesses High cost of capital, reserves and surplus position unsatisfactory Sever competition in industry, company’s position secure at present Plant and machinery in excellent condition Quality of managers and workers comparable with that in competitor companies High quality and experienced top management generally adopts a proactive stance with regards to decision-making Up Arrow indicates Strength Down Arrow indicates Weaknesses Horizontal Arrow indicates Neutral Organizational Capability Profile (OCP) The organizational capability profile is drawn in the form of a chart. The strategists are required to systematically assess the various functional areas and subjectively assign values to the different functional capability factors and sub factors, along a scale ranging from values of -5 to +5 Summarized form of OCP Capability Factors Weakness -5 Financial Capability Sources of fund Usage of fund Management of funds Marketing capability factors Product related Price- related Promotion related Integrative and systematic Operations capability factors Strategic Management/Unit: 2 – Dr.P.Mohanraj, Associate Professor/MBA/Chettinad Tech. Normal 0 Strength +5 37 Production system Operations and control system R&D system Personnel capability factors Personnel system Employee characteristics Industrial relations General management capability factors General management system External relations Organisational climate After completion of the chart, the strategists are in a position to assess the relative strengths and weaknesses of an organisation in each of the six functional areas and identify the gaps that need to be corrected or opportunities that could be used. The preparation of an OCP provides a convenient method to determine the relative priorities of an organisation on its competitors, its vulnerability (impact) to outside influences, the factors that support or pose threats to its existence and its overall capability to compete in a given industry. 10. McKinsey’s 7S Model This was created by the consulting company McKinsey and company in the early 1980s. Since then it has been widely used by practitioners and academics alike in analyzing hundreds of organizations. The Paper explains each of the seven components of the model and the links between them.. The McKinsey 7S model was named after a consulting company, McKinsey and company, which has conducted applied research in business and industry. All of the authors worked as consultants at McKinsey and company, in the 1980s, they used the model to analyze over 70 large organizations. The McKinsey 7S Framework was created as a recognizable and easily remembered model in business. The seven variables, which the authors terms “levers”, all begin with the letter “S” needed to be considered and strategy is usually successful when all the elements in the 7s frame work fit into or support the strategy. Successful implementation of a strategy depends on the right alignment of all the seven elements. When 7 elements are in good alignment, an organisation is poised and energized. Strategic Management/Unit: 2 – Dr.P.Mohanraj, Associate Professor/MBA/Chettinad Tech. 38 Structure System Strategy Shared values Style Skills Staff Description of 7Ss: Strategy: Strategy is the plan of action an organization prepares in response to, or anticipation of changes in its external environment. The broad framework for the allocation of a firm’s scarce resources, over time, to reach identified goals. Structure: The way the organisation’s units relate to each other in accomplishing the successful implementation of strategic; centralized, functional divisions, decentralsied, matrix, network, holding, etc. Business needs to be organized in a specific form of shape that is generally referred to as organizational structure. Organizations are structured in a variety of ways, dependent on their objectives and culture. Systems: Every organization has some systems or internal processes to support and implement the strategy and run day-to-day affairs. For example, a company may follow a particular process for recruitment. Style/culture: All organizations have their own distinct culture and management style. It includes the dominant values, beliefs and norms which develop over time and become relatively enduring features of the organizational life. Strategic Management/Unit: 2 – Dr.P.Mohanraj, Associate Professor/MBA/Chettinad Tech. 39 Staff: Organizations are made up of humans and it’s the people who make the real difference to the success of the organization in the increasingly knowledge-based society. The importance of human resources has thus got the central position in the strategy of the organization, away from the traditional model of capital and land. Shared Values/super ordinate Goals: All members of the organization share some common fundamental ideas or guiding concepts around which the business is built. This may be to make money or to achieve excellence in a particular field. Skills: Distinctive capabilities of personnel of the organisation. Potential skills of the members of the organisation The seven components described above are normally categorized as soft and hard components: Hard components Soft components Hard components are: Easy to identify Strategy Structure Systems Soft components are: - Difficult to describe Shared values Style Staff Skills II. Tools and techniques - Subjective factors There are six types of subjective factors as given below; a) Considerations for governmental policies b) Perception of critical success factors (CSFs) and distinctive competencies c) Commitment to past strategic actions d) Strategist’s decision styles and attitude to risk e) Internal political consideration f) Timing and competitor considerations a) Considerations for governmental policies Government policies have a significant impact on the choice of strategic alternatives. The Expansion, Growth or retrenchment types of corporate strategies can only be feasible if the government policies act as a major subjective factor in screening alternatives. Strategic Management/Unit: 2 – Dr.P.Mohanraj, Associate Professor/MBA/Chettinad Tech. 40 b) Perception of critical success factors (CSFs) and distinctive competencies CSF referred as strategic factors or key factors for success, are those which are crucial for organisational success. (Example: Low cost of production/ Ensured raw material supply, quality of after sale service) CSFs and Distinctive competencies are important issues in alternative choices and there must be a match exists between these two. c) Commitment to past strategic actions The strategic choice is more likely to be for those alternatives which arise out of past strategic actions. Generally, strategists choosing the strategic alternatives which are closely relating to existing one. Only under pressing circumstances and threat from the environment does the company move or forced to move, away from its existing position. d) Strategist’s decision styles and attitude to risk The decision style adopted by strategists, particularly by the chief executive officer (CEO) and their attitude to risk is a determining subjective factor in strategic choice. e) Internal political consideration It means that the strategists’ interrelationship and power structure and balance. A dominant CEO is able to affect strategic choice, where the CEO is perceived as weak, the interest groups affect the choice process. f) Timing and competitor considerations The time element and competitor consideration is another set of important subjective factors that influence strategic choice. STEP -3: Evaluating strategic alternatives Selection factors (Objective & Subjective) are the criteria on the basis of which a final choice of strategy has to be made. Evaluation of strategic alternatives basically involves bringing together the analysis done on the basis of the objective and subjective factors. Each of the alternatives is evaluated for its capability to help the organisation achieve its objectives. STEP -4: Choosing from among the Strategic alternatives The final step is, therefore, of making the strategic choice. One or more strategies have to be chosen for implementation. Besides the chosen strategies, some contingency strategies would also have to be formulated. Strategic Management/Unit: 2 – Dr.P.Mohanraj, Associate Professor/MBA/Chettinad Tech. 41 Balanced scorecard (BSC) The Balanced Scorecard measures organizational performance using financial and nonfinancial measurements in four perspectives: financial, customer, internal process, and learning and growth. It provides the opportunity to select metrics that are a balanced mix of both financial and non-financial measures important to the sustainability of the business. A "balanced scorecard"- a set of measures that gives top managers a fast but comprehensive view of the business. The balanced scorecard includes financial measures that tell the results of actions already taken. And it complements the financial measures with operational measures on customer satisfaction, internal processes, and the organization's innovation and improvement activities-operational measures that are the drivers of future financial performance. The balanced scorecard allows managers to look at the business from four important perspectives. It provides answers to four basic questions: • How do customers see us? (customer perspective) • What must we excel at? (internal business perspective) • Can we continue to improve and create value? (Innovation and learning perspective) • How do we look to shareholders? (financial perspective) Design of a balanced scorecard ultimately is about the identification of a small number of financial and non-financial measures and attaching targets to them, so that when they are reviewed it is possible to determine whether current performance 'meets expectations'. The idea behind this is that by alerting managers to areas where performance deviates from expectations, they can be encouraged to focus their attention on these areas, and hopefully as a result trigger improved performance within the part of the organization they lead. The four perspectives The method proposed by Kaplan and Norton was based on the use of three non-financial topic areas as prompts to aid the identification of non-financial measures in addition to one looking at financial. Four "perspectives" were proposed: Financial: encourages the identification of a few relevant high-level financial measures. In particular, designers were encouraged to choose measures that helped inform the answer to the question "How do we look to shareholders?" Customer: encourages the identification of measures that answer the question "How do customers see us?" Internal business processes: encourages the identification of measures that answer the question "What must we excel at?" Learning and growth: encourages the identification of measures that answer the question "How can we continue to improve, create value and innovate?". Strategic Management/Unit: 2 – Dr.P.Mohanraj, Associate Professor/MBA/Chettinad Tech. 42 Strategic Management/Unit: 2 – Dr.P.Mohanraj, Associate Professor/MBA/Chettinad Tech. 43 The balanced scorecard suggests that we view the organization from four perspectives, and to develop metrics, collect data and analyze it relative to each of these perspectives: The Financial Perspective Kaplan and Norton do not disregard the traditional need for financial data. Timely and accurate funding data will always be a priority, and managers will do whatever necessary to provide it. In fact, often there is more than enough handling and processing of financial data. With the implementation of a corporate database, it is hoped that more of the processing can be centralized and automated. But the point is that the current emphasis on financials leads to the "unbalanced" situation with regard to other perspectives. There is perhaps a need to include additional financial-related data, such as risk assessment and cost-benefit data, in this category. The Customer Perspective Recent management philosophy has shown an increasing realization of the importance of customer focus and customer satisfaction in any business. These are leading indicators: if customers are not satisfied, they will eventually find other suppliers that will meet their needs. Poor performance from this perspective is thus a leading indicator of future decline, even though the current financial picture may look good. In developing metrics for satisfaction, customers should be analyzed in terms of kinds of customers and the kinds of processes for which we are providing a product or service to those customer groups. The Business Process Perspective This perspective refers to internal business processes. Metrics based on this perspective allow the managers to know how well their business is running, and whether its products and services conform to customer requirements (the mission). These metrics have to be carefully designed by those who know these processes most intimately; with our unique missions these are not something that can be developed by outside consultants. The Learning & Growth Perspective This perspective includes employee training and corporate cultural attitudes related to both individual and corporate self-improvement. In a knowledge-worker organization, people -the only repository of knowledge -- are the main resource. In the current climate of rapid technological change, it is becoming necessary for knowledge workers to be in a continuous learning mode. Metrics can be put into place to guide managers in focusing training funds where they can help the most. In any case, learning and growth constitute the essential foundation for success of any knowledge-worker organization. Kaplan and Norton emphasize that 'learning' is more than 'training'; it also includes things like mentors and tutors within the organization, as well as that ease of communication among workers that allows them to readily get help on a problem when it is needed. It also includes technological tools; what the Baldrige criteria call "high performance work systems." Strategic Management/Unit: 2 – Dr.P.Mohanraj, Associate Professor/MBA/Chettinad Tech. 44 Strategic Management/Unit: 2 – Dr.P.Mohanraj, Associate Professor/MBA/Chettinad Tech.
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz