November 3, 2016 Strategic Considerations in Asserting or Challenging Patents in the Biologic/Biosimilar Space A. The BPCIA Statute and What it Amends • Public Health Service Act 42 U.S.C. § 262 o “351(k)” – biosimilar application requirement o “351(l)” – patent exchanges procedures • Patent Statutes 35 U.S.C. § 271 o 271(e)(2)(c) – new artificial act of infringement 2 The BPCIA Patent Dance l(2)(A) Biosimilar files Application Biosimilar Application accepted by FDA 20 days l(3)(A) Biosimilar provides confidential info to RPS 60 days l(4)(A) & (B) RPS & Biosimilar negotiate final list of patents to litigate yes Agreement Reached 60 days Biosimilar provides RPS with patent list and detailed invalidity statement l(3)(C) 15 days no 30 days l(6)(A) RPS provides patent list to Biosimilar l(3)(B)(i) & (ii) RPS provides Biosimilar with detailed statement re infringement/validity 60 days Biosimilar identifies number of patents that can be asserted l(5)(A) 5 days Simultaneous exchange of patent lists RPS files complaint l(5)(B) 30 days RPS files complaint Potential Litigation 3 l(6)(B) IPR Overview 4 IPR vs. Patent Dance IPR Patent Dance ~8 Months 5 IPR vs. Patent Dance vs District Court Litigation IPR Patent Dance ~8 Months District Court Litigation 36 Months* 6 Biologics patents challenged in IPR 7 BioPharma IPR Filings Steadily Increase IPRs Filed in TC1600 200 186 180 160 151 140 125 120 100 80 60 44 40 20 0 2013 2014 2015 Source: LexMachina, data current as of 10/25/2016; projecting 186 IPRs in TC1600 at year end 8 2016 YTD Technology Breakdown by USPTO Tech Center (2013Present) Chemical 6% Bio/Pharma 9% Mechanical/Business Method 26% Electrical/Computer 59% Source: LexMachina, data current as of 10/23/2016; Design Patents make up <1% of remaining petitions 9 BioPharma by the Numbers • 60% of biopharma AIA petitions instituted • The other 40% were either denied or settled before institution • Settlement rate of about 30% • 15% settled before PTAB issued a decision on institution • FY2015 institution rates for IPR (all tech centers v. biopharma) All IPRs Granted 336 (25.2%) Denied Granted in Part BioPharma IPRs 16 (17.8%) 426 (32.0%) 568 (42.7%) 46 (51.1%) 10 28 (31.1%) BioPharma IPR Status • 506 total biopharma IPR petitions filed since 2013* 14, 7% 99, 20% 24, 12% Open (post-institution) 69, 33% 91, 18% 207, 41% 32, 15% Joined to Other Trial Settled (post-institution) Patent Owner Disclaimed FWD 108, 21% 68, 33% Settled/Dismissed (pre-institution) Open (pre-institution) Instituted Denied Institution Source: LexMachina, data current as of 10/25/2016; *1 petition in which patent owner disclaimed pre-institution 11 FWD Outcomes – BioPharma IPRs (2013-2016) • 69 petitions filed since 2013 have reached a Final Written Decision All Claims Amended, 2, 3% All Claims Upheld, 29, 42% All Claims Unpatentable, 34, 49% Mixed Claim Findings, 4, 6% Source: LexMachina, data current as of 10/25/2016; 12 Contact Fish & Richardson Download the presentation and access other valuable materials at www.fishlifesciences.com Contact us with your questions and comments. Chad Shear Principal Fish & Richardson [email protected] 858-678-4730 Dorothy Whelan Principal Fish & Richardson [email protected] 612-337-2509 Leslie Robbins Guest Panelist Vice President, Intellectual Property Coherus Biosciences, Inc. Michael Kane Principal Fish & Richardson [email protected] 612-337-2502 13
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz