Transition Team Agenda and Minutes Aug. 17, 2016 4:00pm – 5:30pm EGC – 7th Floor Invitees: Henry Roman, Mark Ajluni, Rob Gould, Cal Hosman, Don Gilmore, Bart Muller, Dori Claunch, Adam Barnett, Sarah Marks, Ellen Rehmar, Nicole Covington, Melissa Capozza, Dennis Wolfard, Steve Ruetz, Chuck Carpenter, Chris Kampe, Michelle Berge, Ric Aparicio Attended: Scribe: Nicole Covington Guests: Absent: Tentative: Topic I. Review Agenda II. Informational Items III. Top Performing High Growth Options for 11/1/2016 payment. What can we communicate to teachers Hard to Staff changes: It was agreed that the limitation of 1.0 FTE payment each month for Hard to Staff was to remain in place for a savings of 45FTE (45 X $2550= $114,750). What happens with partial FTES. Suggested guidance: Starting the 2016-17 school year, teachers and SSP’s earning Hard to Staff will be limited to a payout equal to or less than their full time equivalency (FTE).” PDU summer payments. DPS will pay PDU’s over the summer for those that were awarded PDUs in June. We will need to discuss a plan moving forward. Lead Time Roman 2 mins Barnett 30 mins 10 mins 15 mins Adam 2 mins Henry 2 mins Adam 5 mins Action Items Vote: Approve Recommendation to the Negotiation Team on TP/HG payments. Approve 5/17 meeting minutes: Schedule next Transition Team Meeting: September 5/17/2016 Minutes: Adam reviewed the April minutes. Not enough members present for a vote. Trust board requires a recommendation next week on the proposed plan to meet budget requirements for ProComp funding. Henry shared that there is a concern from teachers that DPS compensation is not keeping up with the cost of living in Denver and asked if the general fund will need to contribute more. Stated that DPS is not keeping up with inflation and other school districts. Trust Board requires that a plan be outlined. Additional meetings will take place to identify if there are other solutions. If no agreement can be made in negotiations then the Transition team will review again prior to execution of the default. We didn’t have a quorum in our April meeting. We’d like to propose that the Transition Team vote on the following language: The ProComp Trust board has indicated that it will not likely approve a FY16/17 budget with a deficit greater than $9,590,022 for a strategy to eliminate the annual budget deficit over a three-year period. In order to meet this goal, the FY 2016/17 budget must decrease expected expenditures by $4,376,711. The Transition Team agrees to accomplish this reduction through the following means: The budget cuts will be accomplished by setting the cut points for Top Performing and High Growth at levels that would result in the necessary budget reductions. If the transition team votes to approve a different process at a later date that results in the same outcome it’s not precluded from doing so. The Transition Team makes the following recommendation to the bargaining teams: — Eliminate the Exceeds Expectation incentive starting with the 2015-16 school year and until we renegotiate ProComp 3.0. — For the 2015-16 school year, the Top Performing and High Growth incentives shall be combined into one incentive (for fall 2016 payout). The bargaining teams should authorize the ProComp Transition Team to work with the Department of Accountability, Research, and Evaluation (ARE) to develop a methodology to identify schools that are eligible for the combined incentive. In order to accomplish the budget reductions required by the ProComp Trust Board, the budget for the combined incentive shall the amount necessary to achieve the budget reductions recommended by the Trust Board. The value of the incentive for a 1.0FTE teacher shall be set by the Transition Team by dividing the budget for the incentive by the number of FTE who will be paid the incentive. This new incentive will remain in place until we renegotiate ProComp 3.0. Transition team voted on approving budget cut points to hit the budget and to eliminate exceeds expectations for the 2015/16 school year. There was a unanimous vote to approve the recommendation to the trust board. Mark Arseneau presented a proposal for Psych interns to receive compensation for PDU’s- Proposed that Psych interns can participate in PDU as an intern and bank it for a later increase. All interns were required to complete a PDU. The recommendation from the Transition Team is that the employee should be in ProComp to earn a PDU. August ProComp Update: (to current hard to staff employees only) Hard to Staff: In March of 2016, The ProComp Transition team comprised of members from DCTA and DPS administration voted and approved the following change to Hard to Staff payments: “Starting the 2016-17 school year, teachers and SSP’s earning Hard to Staff will be limited to a payout equal to or less than their full time equivalency (FTE).” This change will take effect September 1st, 2016. Prior to the 2016-17 school year, teachers and SSP’s were able to earn multiple Hard to Staff awards. For example: if their position was a secondary math teacher in an ELA-S classroom, they received the Hard to Staff for both secondary math and ELA-S. Moving forward they would only receive one Hard to Staff Payout ($2550.44) Example: Steve works 40 hours a week (1.0FTE) as a secondary math teacher in an ELA-S classroom. Steve would be eligible for 1 full hard to staff payout as he is 1.0FTE. Example: Darren works 20 hours a week (.5FTE) as a secondary math teacher in an ELA-S classroom. Darren would be eligible for .5FTE payout for hard to staff. Example: Martha is an Audiologist working 20 hours per week (.5FTE) at DPS. She also is assigned to kids in a center program at .25FTE. Martha would receive .5FTE payout for Hard to staff.
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz