0 20 40 60 80 100 % R esp onses UIS Academic Unit Review

UIS Academic Unit Review Survey AY 14-15
Level of Engagement
Dept
AAURFAC
100
% Responses
80
83.3
73.7
60
40
20
26.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
16.7
0
Not engaged at all Not very engaged Somewhat engaged
Very engaged
UIS Academic Unit Review Survey AY 14-15
Experience with Overall Academic Unit Review Process
Dept
AAURFAC
% Responses
100
80
60
40
45.0
20
50.0
30.0
20.0 16.7
16.7
5.0 16.7
0
Poor
Fair
Good
Excellent
UIS Academic Unit Review Survey AY 14-15
Perceived Fairness of AAURFAC/Academic Unit Review (AUR)
Process*
Dept
AAURFAC
% Responses
100
80
60
40
50.0
45.0
20
20.0
0.0
0.0
10.0
50.0
25.0
0
Very unfair
Somewhat unfair
Somewhat fair
Very fair
*Depts responded re: AUR process, AAURFAC members responded re: AAURFAC process.
Department:
Individual Contribution to Analysis
AAURFAC:
Individual Contribution to Analysis
16.7
30.0
70.0
Not as much as I
would have liked
Not as much as I
would have liked
As much as I would
have liked
As much as I would
have liked
83.3
Q4
Q4
Department:
Perceptions of Process Timeline
AAURFAC:
Perceptions of Process Timeline
5.3
42.1
52.6
Don't know
Don't know
Not enough time
Not enough time
Enough time
Enough time
100.0
Q20
Q19
UIS Academic Unit Review Survey AY 14-15
Perceived Usefulness of Dashboard Metrics
Dept
100
AAURFAC
% Responses
80
60
40
20
5.8
0.0
30.0
16.7
60.0
50.0
5.0
33.3
0
Not useful at all
Not very useful
Somewhat useful
Very useful
Q6
UIS Academic Unit Review Survey AY 14-15
Perceived Usefulness of Spark Line Graphs
Dept
100
AAURFAC
% Responses
80
60
40
20
20.0
16.7
30.0
0.0
40.0
50.0
10.0
33.3
0
Not useful at all
Not very useful
Somewhat useful
Very useful
Q9
UIS Academic Unit Review Survey AY 14-15
Perceived Usefulness of Bar Graphs
Dept
AAURFAC
100
% Responses
80
60
40
20
5.0
16.7
25.0
0.0
45.0
33.3
25.0
50.0
0
Not useful at all
Q11
Not very useful
Somewhat useful
Very useful
UIS Academic Unit Review Survey AY 14-15
Confidence in Understanding Dashboard Metrics
Dept
100
AAURFAC
% Responses
80
60
40
20
0.0
0.0
5.0
0.0
35.0
16.7
60.0
83.3
0
Not at all confident Not very confident Somewhat confident
Very confident
Q7
UIS Academic Unit Review Survey AY 14-15
Confidence in Understanding Spark Line Graphs
Dept
AAURFAC
100
% Responses
80
60
40
20
10.0
0.0
5.0
0.0
25.0
33.3
60.0
66.7
0
Not at all confident Not very confident Somewhat confident
Very confident
Q8
UIS Academic Unit Review Survey AY 14-15
Confidence in Understanding Bar Graphs
Dept
AAURFAC
100
% Responses
80
60
40
20
0.0
0.0
5.0
0.0
20.0
33.3
75.0
66.7
0
Not at all confident Not very confident Somewhat confident
Q10
Very confident
UIS Academic Unit Review Survey AY 14-15
Perceived Usefulness of U of I Metrics
Dept
AAURFAC
Usefulness*
13
11
9
7
5
3
1
*Reversed raw data so most useful = 13
Q12
UIS Academic Unit Review Survey AY 14-15
Perceived Usefulness of UIS Metrics
Dept
AAURFAC
Usefulness*
4
3
2
1
0
Utilization
Bill Hours
*Reversed raw data so most useful = 4.
Q133
1/d
Revenue
Seat count
UIS Academic Unit Review Survey AY 14-15
Perceived Importance of Qualitative Issues to Department Review
Process
0
2
4
6
8
Securing external internship opportunities for majors
Online versus on-campus courses
Governance/administrative service responsibilities
General education/service course responsibilities
Program accreditation/certification requirements
Faculty research/scholarship responsibilities
Retaining well-qualified faculty or staff
Employment opportunities for program graduates
Recruiting students to major/program(s)
Recruiting well-qualified faculty or staff
Mean Ranking*
*Raw data reversed so most important = 10
Q15
10
Department Views: Flexibility in Reporting (Department Action Plan)
16.7
5.6
AAURFAC Views: Flexibility in Reporting (Department Action Plan)
Not enough
flexibility
33.3
Too much
flexibility
Too much
flexibility
66.7
Right amount of
flexibility
77.8
Q17
Not enough
flexibility
Right amount of
flexibility
Q15
AAURFAC Views: Flexibility in Review Process (Dean's Form)
Department Views: Flexibility in Review Process (Dean's Form)
31.6
Not enough
flexibility
Not enough
flexibility
16.7
Too much
flexibility
52.6
15.8
Too much
flexibility
Right amount of
flexibility
Q18
Right amount of
flexibility
83.3
Q16
Department Views: Helpfulness of Dean's Form in Understanding Resource Allocation Priorities AAURFAC Views: Helpfulness of Dean's Form in Understanding Resource Allocation Priorities Not helpful at all
Not helpful at all
Not very helpful
Not very helpful
21.1
31.6
31.6
Q19
50.0
Somewhat
helpful
15.8
Very helpful
50.0
Somewhat
helpful
Very helpful
Q17