Applying Change Theory to Co-Curricular Program Review WASC Academic Resource Conference Margaret Leary, [email protected] April 20, 2017 USD Context ● Private, Catholic ● 5,711 Undergraduate ● 2,797 Graduate ● Student Affairs Division ○ Typical student affairs units ○ About half is auxiliary services (2014) Student Affairs Unit Review process 1. 2. Scope Unit Review 3. External Review 4. Decision-making & implementation a. Self-Study i. Mission, values, planning, & outcomes alignment ii. Unit overview iii. Stakeholder feedback iv. Cost analysis v. Benchmark vi. Assessment summary vii. Program viability viii. Key findings & draft unit recommendations ix. Action plan a. b. c. Off-site review On-site review Report a. Cross-unit action plan http://www.sandiego.edu/student-affairs/resources/assessment/ unit-review.php Change Strategies 1. Widespread conversations 2. Cross-departmental teams 3. Staff training 4. Outsiders and their ideas 5. Concrete ideas and guiding documents 6. Public presentations First-Order Second-Order 1. Institutional 1. Cultural 2. Evolutionary 2. Social Cognition 3. Scientific-Management 3. Political Cultural Theories ● Enduring, irrational, erratic, and dynamic (Simsek & Louis, 1994) ● Values, beliefs, traditions (Schein, 2010) Social Cognition Theories ● Sensemaking, Weick (1995) ● Focus on the individual (Martin, 2002) Political Theories ● ● ● ● Interests, Conflict, Power Morgan (2006) Bolman and Deal (2003) Poole & Van de Ven, 2004) Lessons Learned Outcomes 1. Cycle 1: Reorganization, reallocation of Change 1. resources 2. Cycle 2: Refocus on CCLOs, Consultant long-term 2. - Student Lifecycle Management 3. Don’t have all units on board Challenging, complex, circular, and Requires multifaceted understanding of change 3. The process needs to adapt References Bolman, L. G., & Deal, T. E. (2003). Reframing organizations: Artistry, choice, and leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Eckel, P. D., & Kezar, A., (2003). Key strategies for making new institutional sense. Higher Education Policy, 16, 39-53. Kezar, A. (2014). How colleges change: Understanding, leading, and enacting change. New York, NY: Routledge. Martin, J. (2002). Organizational culture: Mapping the terrain. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Morgan, G. (2006). Images of organization. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Poole, M. S., & Van de Ven, A. H. (2004). Handbook of organizational change and innovation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational culture and leadership. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons. Simsek, H., & Louis, K. S. (1994). Organizational change as paradigm shift: Analysis of the change process in a large, public university. The Journal of Higher Education, 65(6), 670-695). Weick, K. E. (1976). Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(1), 1-19.
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz