Group Cohesion When considering team success it is often said that a winning team is more cohesive. What does this mean? Does a group cohesion help develop a successful team or does initial success in turn create group cohesion? Big debate but certainly evidence to support the statement that there is a positive correlation between success and cohesion. Defining Cohesion “A continuously changing (dynamic) process which is shown by the tendency of a group to stay together to in order to achieve certain instrumental objectives, targets or goals or for the satisfaction of its members” (Carron et al, 1998) Why are individuals motivated to stay together as a group? Attractiveness of the group (desire to be involved, values membership). The benefits they can gain from it (increased recognition). Task Cohesion What is a task? Interactive and co-active tasks. Give examples. Interactive (rugby, football, baketball). Co-active (rowing, swimming, relays) Developed into concepts of task and social cohesion. Task cohesion relates to how well the team works together to achieve common targets, i.e. win the league. The level of desire to win and be the best is directly linked to their level of group effort and teamwork. Social cohesion Relates to how much the members of the team like each other and integrate socially. Do teams need both task and social cohesion in order to be successful? Is one more effective than the other for developing success? Key terms Cohesion The dynamic forces that cause a team to stick together. Task Cohesion Found in a group that is bound together in a drive to achieve a common objective. Social Cohesion Found in any group that is bound together by social bonds, social attractiveness and relationships. Cohesion elements Carron proposed cohesiveness is founded of four elements. Individual attractions to the group-task (how much a team member is involved with the group’s task). Individual attractions to the group-social (how a team member feels about their personal social interactions with the group). Group integration- task (how much a team member feels that the group is focussed and unified in pursuit of an objective). Group integration –social (how much a team member thinks the group is unified socially. Carron’s antecedents to the development of group cohesion Antecedents (what must be present before cohesion can be fully developed). Environmental factors E.g. group size, age Personal factors E.g. Gender, similarity to the group Leadership-based factors E.g. style, team-leader relationship Team-based factors E.g. Focus on task, stability, ability, productivity Strategies for to achieve cohesion and therefore success Open communication Goalsetting Agreed norms Role clarity and acceptance Evidence personal contributions Reward individual contribution Consensus and commitment to all goals Team meetings to resolve conflict Use of formal and informal leaders within group. Create identity and togetherness E.g. kit, rituals, etc Encourage self sacrifice
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz