Navigating the CFPB's Exam and Enforcement Process October 22, 2016 Presented by Lucy Morris Partner Erik Kosa Associate Hudson Cook, LLP Agenda • CFPB Examination-Enforcement Life Cycle • CFPB Exams – What’s Happening on the Ground • Tips for Preparing for and Responding to Exams • Tips for Preparing for and Handling Enforcement Actions CFPB Exam-Enforcement Life Cycle CFPB’s law enforcement approach to exams • • • • • • • Dodd-Frank Act and CFPB mandate CFPB structure and leadership Supervision risk prioritization process Investigative approach to exams PARR and ARC processes Follow-on enforcement investigations and actions Rinse and repeat CFPB Law Enforcement Exams Issues on the Ground • Examiner reliance on unverified consumer complaints and isolated information to find and refer law violations • The perils of self-reporting to examiners • MRA (Matters Requiring Attention) follow-up reviews • CFPB priority to enforce its orders and requirements • Navigating parallel supervisory and enforcement actions Different perspectives - examiners vs. enforcement staff: • Exams look forward (How should you fix any problems identified during exam?) • Enforcement looks backward (What did you do and how should you be punished for it?) • You need to juggle the demands of both. CFPB Exams Often Give Rise to Enforcement Actions Common Issues for Small-Dollar Lenders: – Advertising UDAAP – Collections practices • Ex: (Recent case with $7.5 million in restitution + $3 million in penalties for lender’s debt collection practices) – TILA disclosures – EFTA authorizations – ECOA Adverse Action Notices CFPB Law Enforcement Exams Prepare for Exams with Enforcement Lens • Conduct mock exam/readiness reviews and take corrective actions before exam • Manage examiners’ requests, questions, and preliminary findings during exam • Pay heightened attention to PARR letters after on-site review • Follow-up and correct exam issues promptly and in advance of next exam CFPB Law Enforcement Exams In addition, • Be ready to handle the exam itself by staffing appropriately • There is no attorney-client privilege in exams • You cannot start thinking about compliance only after you’ve received an exam notice or a CID Expect the Unexpected • The CFPB is always trying new tactics • It is possible to be sued without any exam or investigation. – Ex: CFPB recently sued 5 Arizona title lenders with no prior notice. So You’ve Been Sued . . . Administrative Proceeding or Court Action o Type of available relief is the same regardless of forum (15 U.S.C. 1055) o Bureau Considerations Speed and Discovery? Fraud? TRO, asset freeze, or other extraordinary relief? Civil and criminal contempt options Coordination with other government or private actions? Settlement? Special Problem: Litigating in the CFPB’s Administrative Tribunal • Timing – The pace is fast • • • • 14 days after service – You must respond to the Notice of Charges 20 days after service – Scheduling Conference Streamlined Discovery 300 Days from Notice of Charges to Recommended Decision • Federal Rules of Evidence do not apply • No statute of limitations for UDAAP? Individual Liability: Small Dollar Lenders Need to Think About It This issue surprises people who think the corporate form will always protect them (it won’t) • In the recent Integrity Advance case, the CFPB sought to hold the CEO liable along with the company for allegedly misrepresenting cost of loans, and the ALJ agreed. • ALJ held that individuals can be liable without intent to deceive, and evidence of knowledge of and involvement in company’s practices is enough. • ALJ Recommendation: Integrity Advance CEO jointly and severally liable for $38,164,153.31 in restitution for deception claim, an additional $115,024.50 for unfairness claim, and a $5,437,000 civil penalty Lucy Morris Hudson Cook, LLP 1909 K Street, NW 4th Floor Washington, DC 20006 (202) 327-9710 [email protected] Erik Kosa Hudson Cook, LLP 1909 K Street, NW 4th Floor Washington, DC 20006 (202) 715-2007 [email protected]
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz