USDA, APHIS, PPQ Center for Plant Health Science and Technology Plant Epidemiology and Risk Analysis Laboratory (PERAL) Who is PERAL? • Federal employees – Director and 7 Team Leaders – 26 analysts – 6 support (admin, techs, reference) • Cooperators – 4 NCSU research assistants – 1 NC State employee – 1-4 visiting scientists The Plant Epidemiology and Risk Analysis Laboratory (PERAL) IT Support C. McArthur ISO Support Director R. Griffin T. Dileone Editor Admin. Support A. Mize A. Kennedy O. Larson M. Dirani Q-37 G. Cave E. Sutker B. Randall-Schadel J. Smith L. Fowler Q-56 K. Lakin F. Mehdizadegan C. Hurt L. Ferguson H. Meissner R. Olive Analyst (Vacant) Pathway Organism M. Hennessey W. Bailey N. Liquido B. Caton T. Culliney Y. Takeuchi L. Brown K. Colpetzer A. Koop A. Lemay L. Millar M. Zlotina Export S. Redlin E. Imai C.Devorshak H. Hartzog A. Neeley E. Spicer A. Auclair Tech (Vacant-North) GIS B. Spears R. Magarey S. Scott D. Borchert G. Fowler N. McCullum B. Nietschke Virtual teams: Africa Initiatives Biosurveillance Core Training CPHST/Workbench CRA Fruit Flies GPDD Hawaii Info. Management -- Military Pathway -- NAPPO/Standards -- NPAG -- PAS -- Pathway Analysis Guidelines -- Performance Evaluation -- Pest Prioritization -- Q-37 Strategies -- Regulatory Curriculum -- Review -- Risk Mngt -- RPPL -- Safety --Soybean Rust --Sudden Oak Death --Weeds Notes: Cooperators are shown in italics Five vacancies outstanding for GS-9/11 analysts in October 2004 Where is PERAL? • CPHST HQ in Raleigh, North Carolina – Director and 6 Team Leaders – 27 Analysts; 6 Technicians and support • Riverdale, Maryland – Chair of the New Pest Advisory Group (NPAG) – 1 Team Leader; 2 Analysts; 1 Technician • Honolulu, Hawaii – 1 Risk management specialist What does PERAL do? • Identify risks: Gaps in protection Inconsistencies Mitigation options • Prioritize risks • Compare risks • Support risk-based decision-making import regulatory policies export market access domestic and emergency programs • Capacity building internal external Distribution of Total PRA Resources by Type of Analysis (2003) GIS 8% Strategic 8% Emergency 9% R&D 1% Other/Special 9% Pathways 10% Q-56 30% NPAG/Organisms 18% Risk Mgmt. 1% Q-37 6% Productivity 2003 ≈ ≈ ≈ ≈ ≈ 40 commodity assessments (plants, f&v) 10 organism assessments 60 new pest (NPAG) assessments 9 pathway and operational assessments 12 collaborative assessments Database mgmt. (GPDD, RABID, BATS, Internet surveillance) Capacity building and standard setting (Africa (various), China, Colombia, Guatemala, Thailand, and IPPC, NAPPO) Prioritization of Work • Deputy Administrator of PPQ • PPQ Phytosanitary Issues Management Team (PIM) • APHIS Trade Support Team (TST) • CPHST Summary Status of Q-56 Backlog (number of requests) In Progress 131 No information 179 Sufficient information 44 Total = 410 Insufficient information 56 April 2004 Seed Corn / China • Proposed joint PRAs in 2000 • Arthropod, pathogen, and weed lists were prepared by the US • Pioneer and Dennis McGee involved • AQSIQ dropped the initiative PRA / Brazil • Brazil requires PRAs for all authorizations after 1997 • Regs and operations revised • Proved impractical for many commodities • “New” entry status negotiated for many commodities – others awaiting PRA Plant Epidemiology and Risk Analysis Laboratory (PERAL) 1017 Main Campus Drive, Suite 1550 Raleigh, North Carolina USA 27606-5202 Tel: +1-919-855-7523 Fax: +1-919-855-7595 http://www.cphst.org
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz