Cayman Court makes first fair value determination in

Corporate Responsibility
Locations
Contact Us
English
Back
o
Cayman Court makes first fair value
determination in merger dispute
1 September 2015
First published by Appleby in September 2015
The Cayman Islands legislature introduced the statutory merger and consolidation regime which
Locations
Cayman Islands
is now found in Part XVI of the Companies Law (2013 Revision) in May 2009. Since then, the
regime has been widely used to effect mergers and consolidations, but until very recently the
disputes which had arisen between shareholders dissenting from the merger or consolidation
and the companies involved as to the fair value of the dissenters’ shares had all been settled
out of Court.
The reluctance to proceed to trial was perhaps, in part, due to uncertainty as to how the
Cayman Court would approach the task of determining the fair value of the dissenters’ shares, if
it was called upon to do so. Much of this uncertainty has been removed by the recent judgment
of the Cayman Islands Grand Court in In the matter of Integra Group (Jones J, 28 August 2015).
The Court in Integra accepted, quoting from an article entitled Dissenting Shareholders’ Appraisal
Rights in Cayman Islands Mergers and Consolidations which the authors published in The M&A
Lawyer (Oct. 2014, Vol. 18, Issue 9), that:
“Fair value is the value to the shareholder of his proportionate share of the business as a
going concern, save where it is worth less on a net assets (i.e. liquidated) basis as at the
merger date: ex hypothesi the shareholder has bought into the company as a going concern,
not in anticipation of participating in a liquidation, and it follows that, when he elects to dissent
from a merger or consolidation brought about at the behest of the majority, he is thereafter
deprived of his proportionate share of an active enterprise and is entitled to be compensated
for it. In determining the measure of such compensation, the Court should be guided by the
following considerations:
1.1 Fair value does not include any premium for forcible taking (i.e. expropriation of the
shares).
1.2 It is neither appropriate nor permissible to apply a minority discount when making the
Practice Areas
Corporate
Dispute Resolution
h
x
f
t
Experts Involved
Tony
Heaver-Wren
Simon
Raftopoulos
Partner
Partner
Cayman Islands
Cayman Islands
f
Tony Heaver-Wren
f
d +1 345 814 2732
Andrew Jackson
Associate
Cayman Islands
f
Simon Raftopoulos
Andrew Jackson
d +1 345 814 2738
d +1 345 814 2748
f
Subscribe
Subscribe to Appleby's insights
Related Articles
APPLEBY PROFESSIONALS
CLINCH TWO ICSA AWARDS
Appleby snapped up two awards at the ICSA
Jersey Awards 2015. Marie Nuth (Regional
Compliance Manager, Europe) was presented
with the ‘Risk and Compliance Award’, and
Administrator, Chandelle Newcombe was named
‘Administrator of the Year’.
Appleby advised China Orient on
HK$560m loan facility and
subscription of convertible bonds
Appleby Advised China Orient on HK$560m
Loan Facility and Subscription of Convertible
Bonds
Appleby recruits 'stellar' trust expert
in Jersey
APPLEBY RECRUITS ‘STELLAR’ TRUST
EXPERT IN JERSEY
Services
Sectors
Explore
Careers
Corporate
Dispute Resolution
Private Client & Trusts
Property
Regulatory
Banking & Financial Services
eGaming
Energy & Natural Resources
Funds & Investment Services
Insurance & Reinsurance
Private Equity
Science & Technology
Transport & Logistics
About
Corporate Responsibility
Contact
News & Insights
Press Office
Subscribe
Current Vacancies
Fiduciary Services
Estera
2017 Appleby Global Group Services Limited. All
rights reserved.
Legal Notices
Cookies
Sitemap
b
a
e