Using Tabletop Exercises - Northwest Center for Public Health

Using Tabletop Exercises
Everything You Need to Know
... and More
Carl Osaki, MSPH, RS
Northwest Center for Public Health
Practice, Clinical Associate Professor
Department of Environmental &
Occupational Health Sciences,
SPHCM, University of Washington
Objectives
 Describe the value and use of tabletop
exercises to prepare for public health
emergencies
 List 10 suggestions for conducting or
facilitating a successful tabletop exercise
 Discuss how to evaluate your agency’s
readiness for conducting a tabletop exercise
Overview
 Define a tabletop exercise
 Describe the purpose and objectives of
tabletops
 Discuss who uses tabletops and why
 Describe issues typically raised through
tabletops
 Discuss how to consider appropriate
tabletops and where to find them
 Suggest issues to consider in designing or
conducting your own tabletop
Poll: Your Experiences I
Have you participated in a tabletop exercise?
Yes
No
Enter your answer in the
feedback poll
(on left side of screen)
If yes, tell us over the phone:
What was the most significant
problem you experienced as a
participant in the process?
Your Experiences II
Have you facilitated a tabletop exercise?
Yes
No
If yes, type your answer into the
text chat window:
What was your most significant
challenge in facilitating the tabletop?
What is a Tabletop?
 Hypothetical scenario (story) depicting a
large-scale public health emergency
 A facilitator leads the group (players) in
identifying responses to a series of
incidents in the scenario
 Low stress, no right or wrong answer
 Examines the adequacy of the plans,
policies and procedures in place
– (e.g., gaps, duplications, confusion, and the key
decision makers’ understanding of the plans)
 Debriefing to discuss next steps
Types of Tabletops
Basic: players respond to scenario as it unfolds,
can be a mix of different disciplines, not
necessarily key decision makers. More oriented to
learning, rather than evaluation of current system
Advanced: players in own role as defined by the
emergency response plan; typically those that
would be involved in decision making; identifies
gaps, inconsistencies, or duplications in policies,
plans, or procedures
Who Uses Tabletops in Public Health?
 PH Agencies
(local, state, tribal)
 Schools/PH Institutes
(summer institutes, classroom)
 Local emergency response agencies
 Professional disciplines
(MDs, nurses, veterinarians,
environmental health specialists,
epidemiologists, etc)
What are Typical Tabletop Objectives?
 Identify the policy issues associated with a public heath
emergency
 Identify gaps in local preparedness
 Discuss measures that can be performed at the local level
 Promote interagency collaboration & coordination
 Recognize the roles of public officials
 Identify training needs
 Demonstrate a teaching tool
 Evaluate self-reported assessment
Putting Tabletops in Context
Discussion-based exercises
 Orientation
 Tabletop
Operation-based exercises
 Drill
 Functional
 Full-Scale
Where Do I Find Tabletops?
NWCPHP
PH Preparedness Training Centers
Private firms
ASPH
NACCHO
Your Experiences III
Have you designed a tabletop exercise?
Yes
No
If yes, tell us over the phone:
What resources/tools did you use
to help design the tabletop?
How Do I Design My Own Tabletop?
NW Center BT Tabletop with
instructions
Homeland Security Web site
NACCHO BT Create
Time to design: (20 to 40 hours)
What issues are raised through tabletops?
 Communication (vertical, horizontal, news media)
 Resources (manpower, material, technical
assistance)
 Data (collection, analysis, mgmt, communicating)
 Coordination (chain of command, leadership)
 Legal (medical, criminal, quarantine,
confidentiality)
 Systems (interagency protocols, surveillance, ICS)
 Mental health (public fears, responders – stress)
Successful Tabletops
Top 10 Things to Consider:
 Facilitator
 Jargon
 Audience
 Recorder
 Burn-out
 Debriefing
 Materials
 Group size
 Reality
 Group composition
How do I determine the success of a tabletop?
 Evaluation through debriefing
– The exercise (objectives met)
– The preparedness plan (policies
identified, in place, and practiced)
 After-Action Report
 Development of work plan
Q&A