Item #1 Trace element loads in urbanized watersheds and the potential for treatment of NPS loads Lester McKee Sources Pathways and Loadings Workgroup May 22nd 2007 San Francisco Estuary Institute 1 Item #1 History 2000 – 2002: Study design and location developed and recommended by SPLWG WY 2003: CEP ($150k) WY 2004: RMP and CEP ($50k+75k) WY 2005: RMP, USACE/SCVWD, SCVURPPP ($50k + $100k + $23k) San Francisco Estuary Institute 2 Item #1 Impetus May 15th 2006 WG meeting. Members asked about the trace metals data for Guadalupe and remarked they did not remember it being reported – Lester responded that there was three years of data and that we only reported it once (year 2). Mike C asked what inter-annual variability might look like for contaminants other than Hg. Lester said that he thinks the Hg in the Guadalupe River would be more variable than sediment but he cannot say for other metals or the organics. Mike suggests that Lester do the analysis for the others. WG agreed it would be informative. Nov 13th WG meeting. “Try to write future reports so that there is a better connection to management alternatives as an endpoint” San Francisco Estuary Institute 3 Item #1 Sampling Location Area: 414 km2 4th largest watershed (8.4%) 178 km2, upstream from reservoirs leaving 236 km2 of which >78% is urban land use Population: 486,500 (7.2% of Bay Area) Highest elevation: Loma Prieta (1,155 m) Precipitation varies from 300-1,100mm and falls during winter (Nov-April: 89%) Annual Q: 0.42-241 Mm3 or approximately 1-640mm San Francisco Estuary Institute 4 Item #1 Sampling Methods USGS flow gage 11169025 at Hwy 101 adjacent to SJ Airport Sampling based on hypothesis that SSC is a surrogate for predicting TE concentrations FTS Ltd. DTS 12 turbidity probe with wiper Water samples collected using D74 or DH48 and analyzed for SSC and GS LOESS regression used to generate continuous 15-minute SSC Water samples collected during floods using D95 and analyzed for total Ag, As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb, and Zn San Francisco Estuary Institute 5 Item #1 QA/QC All samples run through the RMP QA/QC program 2, 3. Silver concentrations in these batches were considered marginally acceptable as the matrix spike and duplicate recoveries were within the data quality objectives. 4. These samples were not rejected because the matrix spike and duplicate recoveries were within the data quality objectives and more importantly they were not anomalous with respect to SSC San Francisco Estuary Institute 6 Item #1 Loads Estimation Linear interpolation when storms are well samples Stratified regression estimator during other storms depending on the predominant source of runoff based on rainfall and runoff gauging information from further up the watershed: Used “lower watershed urban” regression when water from there Used “upper watershed non-urban” regression when water from there Base flow: used upper watershed regression but choice made little difference to the annual loads estimation San Francisco Estuary Institute 7 Item #1 Error Analysis Errors accounted for during loads estimation were: flow (10%) SSC (2%) SSC-Turbidity regressions (2%) Interpolation / SSC-trace element specific regressions: Ag: 23% As: 31% Cd: 13% Cr: 13% Cu: 10% Ni: 13% Pb: 7% Zn: 14% Ag: 46% As: 4.9% Cd: 13% Cr: 7.3% Cu: 4.3% Ni: 6.2% Pb: 3.6% Zn: 2.3% The total estimated errors for loads calculations were: The mean coefficient of variation (CV) of duplicate field samples was: We did not include an error for variation in the cross section because this was accounted for within the USGS SSC records SSC: 10% Ag: 52% As: 33% Cd: 21% Cr: 18% Cu: 15% Ni: 17% Pb: 13% Zn: 17% Note, that we have found no other papers that have quantified errors in loads calculations, yet clearly, claims of loads variation between years may not be valid San Francisco Estuary Institute 8 Item #1 Results – Precipitation and Runoff 30-year average (July 1st, 1976 - June 30th, 2005): 388 mm and a coefficient of variation (CV) of 0.39 WY 2003: 100% WY 2004: 90% WY 2005: 164% WY 2006: 150% Storms were generally of low magnitude and duration with the exception of five storms (December 19th 2002; November 9th 2003; December 21st, 2003; December 27th, 2004; October 26th, 2004) Runoff similar (MAR = 57.4 Mm3): WY 2003: 106% WY 2004: 92% WY 2005: 128% WY 2006: 221% San Francisco Estuary Institute 9 Item #1 Results – Concentration Statistics San Francisco Estuary Institute 10 Item #1 Results – Concentration Scatter Plots San Francisco Estuary Institute 11 Item #1 Results – Concentrations San Francisco Estuary Institute 12 Item #1 Correlation Analysis As Cd Cr Cu Ni Cd 0.49** Cr 0.01 -0.04 Cu 0.33* 0.80** 0.08 Ni 0.01 -0.07 0.91** 0.02 Pb 0.30* 0.79** 0.04 0.83** -0.05 Zn 0.39* 0.84** 0.06 0.91** -0.03 *p<0.01 **p<0.001 Pb 1 1 1 1 1 0.93** Groups: 1. Ag 2. As 3. Pb, Zn, Cd, Cu 4. Cr, Ni San Francisco Estuary Institute 13 Item #1 Daily Loads San Francisco Estuary Institute 14 Item #1 Annual Wet Season Loads San Francisco Estuary Institute 15 Item #1 Guadalupe versus the World (Peer-reviewed Literature) Ag – Hardly ever reported, Guadalupe similar As – Reported previously in 9 urban watersheds, Guadalupe similar Cd – Reported previously in 19 urban watersheds, Guadalupe similar – but time trend in world literature Cr – Reported previously in 29 urban watersheds, Guadalupe greater except 2 industrial watersheds Cu – Reported previously in 34 urban watersheds, Guadalupe similar Ni – Reported previously in 20 urban watersheds, Guadalupe greater except 1 industrial watershed and 1 high density residential watershed – but time trend evident Pb – Reported previously in 39 urban watersheds, Guadalupe similar – but time trend in world literature Zn – Reported previously in 29 urban watersheds, Guadalupe similar San Francisco Estuary Institute 16 Item #1 Cadmium 1000 Cd (µg/L) 100 10 2 R = 0.0269 1 0.1 R2 = 0.0069 0.01 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 2 Area (km ) 1000 Cd (µg/L) 100 10 2 R = 0.4154 1 0.1 2 R = 0.4762 0.01 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 Year San Francisco Estuary Institute 17 Item #1 Chromium 10000 Cr (µg/L) 1000 R2 = 0.0629 100 10 1 R2 = 0.3359 0.1 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 2 Area (km ) Guadalupe 10000 Cr (µg/L) 1000 R2 = 0.0619 100 10 R2 = 0.0022 1 0.1 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 Year San Francisco Estuary Institute 18 Item #1 Nickel 1000 Ni (µg/L) 100 R2 = 0.0954 10 R2 = 0.2802 1 0.1 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 Area (km 2) Guadalupe 1000 Ni (µg/L) 100 R2 = 0.3918 10 R2 = 0.0006 1 0.1 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 Year San Francisco Estuary Institute 19 Item #1 Lead 100000 Pb (µg/L) 10000 1000 R2 = 0.0298 100 10 R2 = 0.1528 1 0.1 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 Area (km 2) Lee and Bang, 2000 – Korea Choe et al., 2002 Buffleben et al., 2002 100000 Pb (µg/L) 10000 1000 100 R2 = 0.459 10 R2 = 0.1454 1 0.1 0.01 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 Year San Francisco Estuary Institute 20 Item #1 Mahler et al., 2006. Trends in metals in urban and reference lake sediments across the United States, 1970-2001 (ET&C 25, 1698-1709) Cd decreased by 29% Cr decreased by 15% Ni decreased by 22% Pb decreased by 46% San Francisco Estuary Institute 21 Item #1 Treatment Potential? A. B. C. D. 1st storm only 1st storm and largest flood All rising stage Peak shaving San Francisco Estuary Institute 22
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz