DEWNR are considered a key stakeholder in relation to the trail strategy and are working with the Council to ensure
the best outcomes for regional bio-diversity and sustainable trail development.
DEWNR key Conservation Parks in the Hills include (see map);
• Mt. George Conservation Park
• Horsnell Gully Conservation Park
• Cleland Conservation Park
• Mount Lofty Botanic Gardens
• The Knoll Conservation Park
• Montacute Conservation Park
Each of these parks has an individual Park Management Plan which will be upheld and supported by the trail
strategy. In areas of high bio-diversity value, the trail will seek to deliberately avoid connections or disrupt road side
vegetation. Land of low biodiversity value will be considered good choices for trail alignments, particularly for high
impact activities.
The strategy has prioritised the use of public land for trail development and sought to link existing recreational
facilities, schools and retail centres together. In some cases identified in the maps below, a trail alignment on
private land may offer better gradients, access or connections. In this case the opportunity has been identified only
as an option for Council to explore. This is particularly relevant in relation to the rail corridor between Crafters and
Balhannah. To co-locate a shared use trail along the existing train route would offer good gradients and the most
direct link between townships. In some sections, significant engineering works would be required to make this
feasible and in other sections the land may be too narrow and require a complimentary verge route, however is
identified for further exploration.
Adelaide Hills 20 Year Trail Strategy & Action Plan | Draft | 2013
26
[
Parra Wirra RP
Hale CP
Warren CP
Cromer CP
Anstey Hill RP
Cudlee Creek CP
Porter Scrub CP
Black Hill CP
Montacute CP
Morialta CP
Kenneth Stirling CP
Charleston CP
Horsnell Gully CP Giles CP
Greenhill CP
Kenneth Stirling CP
Clealand CP
Kenneth Stirling CP
Mount George CP
Belair NP
Mark Oliphant CP
Mylor CP
Scott
Creek CP
0
2½
5
10
15
Kilometers
Figure 7: DEWNR Land Ownership Map
27
5. Community Views
The key to the trail strategy’s success will be community support. Recognising this, draft design principles and a
draft mapping document were sent out for public consultation. Overall, there was much interest and support for trail
development in the Hills from both locals and visitors. There was particular support for linkages between townships
and between existing trail assets. There were some specific concerns raised regarding environmental impacts,
safety and land ownership which will be explored below.
The draft design principles and maps were promoted to the community for feedback through;
a) the Council website,
b) posters (200) in local shops,
c) flyers (4000) at Tour Down Under events (Stirling and Lobethal stages), Crush festival at Hahndorf, local markets (including Uraidla, Mount Pleasant and Stirling), Australia Day celebrations at Ashton, Mylor, Gumeracha and Woodside,
d) information and maps sent via email and hardcopy to peak bodies, State Government, Schools and community groups, and,
e) a notice in the Courier newspaper.
The methods for collecting feedback included;
• An online survey (327 responses)
• Written feedback to Council staff (75 responses)
• Discussions and input at workshops from Council staff, peak bodies, State Government and the community (5 workshops with approximately 60 attendees overall)
Promotion at community events was designed to gain feedback from locals (e.g. Australia Day celebrations).
Consultation promotion at larger events like the Tour Down Under was to gain feedback from visitors to the Hills
(SA based, interstate or international). Some lessons learnt from this process was that internet based methods of
feedback were difficult for those that do not have web access. Documents should also be split into smaller sections
to allow for faster and easier downloading. The community also commented that timeframes for consultation felt
rushed, particularly for those working full time. This led to the consultation timeframe being extended and more
workshops put on for the community to attend.
The stakeholders that provided input and feedback on the trail strategy to date through workshops and written
correspondence include;
Internal
• Elected Members
• Adelaide Hills Council Staff
Peak Body
• Bike SA
• International Mountain Biking Association (IMBA) – Australia
• South Australian Mountain Biking Association (SAMBA)
• Horse SA
• Orienteering SA
• Adelaide Hills Tourism
State Government
• Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources
• SA Water
• Adelaide & Mount Lofty Regions Natural Resource Management Board
Adelaide Hills 20 Year Trail Strategy & Action Plan | Draft | 2013
28
Community Groups
• Friends of the Heysen Trail and Other Walking Trails
• Aldgate Valley Landcare Group
• Kersbrook Residents Association
• Upper Sturt Reaches Landcare
• Minimal Disturbance Bushcare
• Mt Torrens and District Community Association
• Friends of Scott Creek Conservation Park
• Bushcare
• Friends of Moors Road
• Sixth Creek Landcare Group
• Teringie Resident Association
• Lobethal Community Association
• Lenswood & Forreston Community Association
• The Adelaide Trail Horse Riding Club
• North East Hills Environmental Conservation Association
• Friends of Mark Oliphant Conservation Park
• South Australian Recreational Trails Inc.
• SA Trail Running Committee
Many landowners with a particular interest or concern also attended workshops and provided written feedback to
Council staff. All input was gratefully received and has been useful in the development of the strategy. This document
outlines a framework for trail development within the Hills. The trail alignments presented in this document are
provided as potential routes only. Implementation of the trail strategy will be considered on a section by section
basis, based on resources available to Council, risk management, fire and environmental assessments, further
5.1 Consultation & Feedback
community consultation and in accordance with relevant approvals and legislation.
Consultation provided a range of information and local knowledge to help guide the strategy. The below graph
summarises the feedback provided to the AHC as part of the consultation process. Of the responses received
through the online survey, 44% of responses were from Hills residents. A majority of survey respondents were in
age brackets between 30-60+. This may be due to the Hills demographic and/or attendance profile at targeted
events. The largest response age bracket was 60+. This is significant when considering interest in trail use. Seniors
are increasingly interested in walking as a recreational activity, and this age group is a growing proportion of the
Hills demographic.
“The idea of developing better trails is a really good one, we see increasing numbers of people in our age group (over
60) who like this concept. As we get older, (we) want to keep being fit and healthy, I believe that we will use trails
more.”
25.1% of respondents work in the Hills. This is important when considering commuting habits and the benefits of
linking townships with trails. It is unlikely trails would be used by people travelling to the hills for work.
29
Walking and Running in the Hills
Walking and running were the most popular activities reported, with a majority of respondents walking or running
for recreation and leisure, for fitness and to commute. The SA Trail Running Committee applauded the Council for
developing a strategic plan related to trails and made a number of suggestions to improve the draft, some of these
include:
• Give major (and minor) trails a name
• Signpost regularly, particularly at intersections of other trails
• Include information boards for historic locations or sites of aboriginal significance
• More loops could be created for running by utilising both proposed and existing trails in conservation parks
• Support for new trails in unused road reserves
• Toilet facilities are important
• Indicate trail users
• Would like to discuss the possibility of undertaking regular trail maintenance
Cycling in the Hills
Cycling was the second most popular activity reported with a focus on recreation and leisure and fitness. 45
respondents reported cycling for commuting purposes, higher than walking and running.
“I’m really glad to hear about this. Adelaide Hills is a great place to cycle, is one of the reasons I live where I live. At
the moment for cyclists wanting to explore the hills, you are more or less forced onto the main roads and they are
often busy with cars, and that puts people off. Would be great to have alternatives to meander around.”
Horse Riding in the Hills
There was a limited response from horse riders, a majority of the survey respondents (304) do not ride a horse
in the Hills. For those that do, the focus was for recreation and leisure above fitness. Many respondents provided
comments about horse riding in the Hills, and expressed concerns for the safety of horses but also for the impacts
horses have on trails and surrounding vegetation. Horse SA were represented at all the workshops and provided a
detailed list of feedback on the trail alignments which were valuable.
Adelaide Hills 20 Year Trail Strategy & Action Plan | Draft | 2013
30
“One of the challenges to our hobby is the lack of good trail riding and the dangers associated with speeding traffic
along roads. Horse riding has changed greatly over the last 30 years due to increase in traffic and population.”
“Horses are very rough on the hills environment. They bring weeds with their manure, and their hoofs can cause
enormous damage (particularly when the soil is damp).”
Existing Trail Facilities in the Hills
74.3% of respondents reported using a designated trail for their chosen activity. There are many well used and
loved trails in the Adelaide Hills namely, the Heysen Trail, Amy Gillett Trail, Waterfall Gully, Pioneer Women’s Trail,
Cleland and Mount Lofty Trails. There was a general trend towards the use of a designated trail mainly for safety
concerns using existing roads. Respondents said they felt “very safe” or “reasonably safe but careful” on designated
trails. Many concerns were raised about the lack of connectivity and loops, and shared use behaviour by other trail
users, and/or illegal trail use e.g. bikes on walking tracks, dogs off leash. Overall, respondents felt less safe using
roads and footpaths. Many concerns were voiced about vehicle speeds, lack of footpath facilities and the seemingly
constant conflicts between road users, mainly road cyclists and vehicles. There were many near miss and road rage
stories between walkers/cyclists and car drivers.
Connecting Townships
An overwhelming positive response was received to the suggestion of more off-road, well signed trails between
townships, 79.4%. Another 11.1% had very specific concerns about trail development for example the impact on
bio-diversity and therefore would only use trails if land-use and environmental protection was well thought-out,
including provisions to reduce the spread of phytophthora. Concerns were also raised about shared use and the
interaction between user groups.
“What a fabulous lifestyle and visitor amenity this would be. More people out enjoying nature more often,”
“It depends on whether the trails interfere with the efforts my community has made to restore and maintain
biodiversity. I would not use a trail that impacts on high diversity areas and I strongly oppose bikes and horses
using such trails.”
“With younger children we would love some off-road interesting trails! I do not feel safe taking them on the
roads.”
The Draft Mapping Document
Most respondents (196) said that no other destinations/townships are sought and that the draft covered the main
tourist destinations and populated townships. Some improvements were suggested to the alignment based on
local knowledge. When asked in the future, what activities respondents would like to use the trail for, walking was
most popular 71.5% next to cycling 62.3%. Other activities listed of interest but not priorities are horse riding, skate
boarding, bird watching, dog walking, rollerblading and gophers. There were concerns raised that trails sometimes
are, and could be used in the future for motorised trail bikes and that this activity needs more policing. There were
some specific areas of concern for locals related to environmental protection and biodiversity. These include the
areas of Aldgate, Cherryville and Scott Creek. Revised trail alignments have taken these concerns into consideration
and input from community members has assisted the development of the trail strategy.
“It would make it cheaper and better to live in the hills giving people a better option of transport.”
31
Planning and Priorities
When asked to rank the importance of trail alignments, trails for recreation and leisure were most popular, followed
by trails for fitness, trails between townships, to parks and attractions and lastly to schools and shops. Particular
town to town priorities were identified through consultation these include trails to connect Hahndorf and Verdun, and
Lenswood with Forest Range. Uraidla and Summertown were identified by survey respondents as having very few
facilities for walking. There was also strong support voiced from the Mount Torrens community for more trail facilities
around the township. Links were also requested to Onkaparinga and Tea Tree Gully.
Adelaide Hills 20 Year Trail Strategy & Action Plan | Draft | 2013
32
From bordering Local Councils, the City of Tea Tree Gully are currently working on a trail plan and are interested
in potential links to the AHC. Campbelltown City Council are also interested in developing further links from Norton
Summit to Magill and Teringie. These links have the potential to feed into the Magill Urban Village Precinct Master
Plan.
The mountain biking community expressed support for the draft plan and identified a current lack of connectivity
between existing mountain bike facilities e.g. Cudlee Creek Forest Reserve and Eagle Mountain Bike Park. IMBA
suggested a link between these two facilities (by extending the Mawson Trail) could form an ‘epic’ half-day or full
day mountain bike experience.
The Blackwood/Belair and District Community Association were impressed with the planning and the long term
strategy. They commended Council on a considered approach that would not result in piece-meal trails.
Design Considerations
Respondents provided a host of suggestions for trail design considerations, this section of the survey became a
Pandora’s box of ideas. There were some key themes that were reiterated and these include;
• Shared use trail design for walking and cycling were popular.
• Clear and legible signage is vital.
• Lighting would be acceptable close to townships only (to avoid light pollution) and that lighting and signage could
utilise solar and LED technology.
• Community revegetation projects or similar could occur on the verges of trails.
• At road intersections, speed limits should be considered and reduced to improve safety.
• Universal access was important to the community, particularly around and between townships. Trails further away
from towns could be used for more adventure type trail activities.
• Providing extended verges along existing roads was suggested as a way to minimise impacts of trails on the
natural environment. This can be considered when road width allows and road-side vegetation is of low biodiversity
quality. This is in contrast to a number of other respondents who requested a more natural trail experience e.g. in
the bush.
• Loop designs are desirable as they provide for a range of fitness levels.
• Park and ride facilities at Stirling, Verdun and Mount Torrens.
• Look to utilise existing railway corridors to align trails making the most of good gradients.
• Support for fewer trails if that means the trail assets are maintained to a high standard over time.
• Consider facilities along the trail e.g. water re-fill stations, outdoor fitness stations and toilets. A composting toilet
was suggested similar to the New Zealand Parks model.29
“Universal access needs to be considered for people with prams, wheelchairs and other walking aids.”
Biodiversity
There was overwhelming support for the strategy to protect and enhance the Hills environment and biodiversity. An
environmental design principle was suggested to make this a strong part of the strategy, which has been developed
by Council staff (see Chapter 2.6 Principles). Some community members and groups were concerned that the
environmental impacts of new trails had not been well considered. The Hills environment is the main reason that
attracts people to live in the Hills and make it an inviting/interesting place for visitors.
29
Suggested toilet design – NZ model http://www.norskifibreglass.co.nz/wilderness.html
33
Trails that do not protect and enhance the Hills environment and biodiversity would not be supported by the
community. Particular consideration, research and consultation with DEWNR are needed in relation to:
• Natural asset identification
• Minimisation of weed carrying and spread of phytophthora
• Droppings from horse and dogs on/near trails and the spread of weeds
Opportunities to protect sensitive Hills environments included:
• Identify sensitive areas and utilise poor quality biodiversity areas for trails
• Environmental risk management for any new potential trail site
• Signage and education about local flora and fauna
• Signage and education about the phytophthora virus and ways to manage the risk to local environments (even an
incentive scheme for those that use cleaning stations)
• Facilities for shoe/bike cleaning along trails
• Quality trail maintenance and erosion control
• Clear rules about pet access and waste management
• Waste management along trails
• Increased environmental stewardship through the engagement with the community on environmental themes and
related volunteer programs.
“Include provisions for retention and redevelopment of native bushland plan. This is not only sensible for developing
natural resilience (and therefore sustainable communities), but will also contribute to the beauty (the spiritual
connection) and the value (commercial connection) of the trails”.
The North East Hills Environmental Conservation Association are supportive of trail extensions providing that the
building and maintaining of trails does not conflict with their objectives and they are,
a) Maintain and where necessary enhance the quality of the natural environment of the North East Hills
b) Conserve local and regional bio-diversity on public and private land, including but not restricted to threatened species. The protection of water quality and water catchments, the conservation of road, stone, water and other reserves and roadside vegetation.
c) Protect indigenous wildlife, natural features and sites of scientific and aesthetic interest and to work for the conservation of these sites.
The Association also expressed that physical signage cannot be replaced by GPS technology.
DEWNR supports the principle of utilising existing trails to reduce potential environmental impacts and aid overall
management of trail assets. Environmental risk management is an ongoing and evolving conversation between
the Council and DEWNR with enthusiasm and goodwill from both groups to work together to deliver long term,
environmentally sound outcomes across the 20 Year Trail Strategy.
Adelaide Hills 20 Year Trail Strategy & Action Plan | Draft | 2013
34
Safety
The safety of trail users was a key theme throughout consultation. There were a number of useful suggestions for
improving safety and these include:
• Fire risk management, close trails on high risk days
• Access for emergency service vehicles
• Code of conduct for trail users to improve behaviour and overall safety of shared use trails
• Signage to alert trail users of risks, including snake bite risk
• Consider slowing speed limits at intersections
• Quality maintenance standard and allocation of budget to support this
• Well understood grading system for trails for varied fitness levels
There were concerns raised by land owners that privacy and security of homes needs to be considered in the
strategy. Lack of mobile phone range though the Hills was also raised as a concern as this could impact on calls to
emergency services and web based information/maps.
Economics and Tourism
There was much interest generated by the concept of trail tourism and the potential for economic benefits associated
with trails in the Hills. A strong branding position and signage strategy for trails in the Hills was supported with
identified links to the new state brand and Adelaide Hills Tourism campaigns. Bike SA encouraged the Council
to look at 2-3 day trail experiences for visitors with a destination focus. There were concerns that web based
information may not be successful due to limited internet access in the Hills. There were also concerns from the
about funding commitments from Council for such a long term trail strategy and the need for a strong investment
plan to explore a range of possible funding sources (see Chapter 7.3 Sustainability Framework).
The community expressed a range of ideas for tourism offers including signage along the Pioneer Women’s
Trail featuring important women in Hills history. Specific environmental education programs for a range of age
groups including primary school, high school, university student research sites and specific tours e.g. Hills bird
watching, orchid identification etc. Friends of the Heysen trail expressed an interest in working with the Council on
the promotion of walking experiences in the Hills and a collaborative approach to signage. The South Australian
Recreational Trails Inc expressed great interest in the strategy and links to the Lavender Trail.
“This is a fantastic opportunity to create an iconic trail network that will have global appeal and bolster small
business and tourism to the Adelaide Hills.”
“Don’t be cheap, spend money to get this right, Adelaide Hills are one of the best tourists assets and natural/
historical regions SA has.”
Trail tourism is a great opportunity for the Hills and widely supported by the community, peak bodies and State
Government involved in consultation.
35
6. Trail Strategy
It is clear that no one-fit-all trail solution will be suitable for the Hills due to its unique and sensitive environment,
gradients, narrow roads and existing land use. Well considered trail development that protects and enhances
biodiversity, provides opportunity for tourism and improves safety is likely to be popular and well used by residents
and visitors.
To achieve a balanced approach, five trail zones have been established across the AHC. These zones respond to
existing site conditions, biodiversity requirements, land uses and tourism offerings. The approach is opportunistic,
positioning the Hills with five unique trail experiences to explore as loops while providing links between townships
and existing trail assets for locals to improve connectivity. This is particulalry important between Crafers, the Amy
Gillett Trail and Hahndorf, to provide a gateway to the Hills.
Each zone guides the most appropriate trail activity in each area. This is not to say that trail experiences and tourism
offerings may not be similar in other areas of the Hills but that these zones can provide a place to start for visitors.
Hills Face Escape
Moderate to difficult trails best suited for walking to escape the city and provide scenic lookouts with a focus on
environmental education.
Adventure Nuts
Trails for outdoor adventure and challenges, most suited for hiking, horse riding and mountain biking with variable
terrain and surface treatments. Destinations include Kersbrook trails, Cudlee Creek, the Mawson Trail, the Lobethal
brewery and markets.
Arts & Produce
Easy to moderate trails most suited for walking and cycling for exploring arts and produce in townships. Destinations
include the Adelaide Hills Sculpture Trail, Uradila and Summmertown market gardens, the Uraidla produce market,
and cafes at Woodside.
Liquid Gold
Easy to moderate trails most suited for walking or cycling to visit wineries, to taste local reds and whites. Destinations
include Maxamillians Winery and Restaurant, Hahndorf Hill Winery, The Lane Vineyard, Somerled Wines, Shaw &
Smith Winery, Glenhurst Wines, Bastian West Wines and Nepenthe Wines.
One with Nature
Easy to moderate trails best suited to walking with a focus on environmental education and witnessing nature.
Destinations include the Mark Oliphant Conservation Park and Scott Creek Conservation Park.
East-West Connector
Easy trails for commuting best suited for walking and cycling through populated townships and linking to Hahndorf.
Destinations include boutique shops and resturants of Stirling, Aldgate and Bridgewater.
Other key considerations to come from the consultation include:
• The issue of motorised trail bikes in parks or on designated walking or cycling trails. In the future Council should consider a location for this type of activity (well away from trails).
• An adventure playground near Mount Torrens linked to the trail strategy would provide an additional tourism offering and provide an outlet for local young people.
• Landowners raised concerns about privacy regarding new trail development. Council can increase landowners privacy concerns by offering to plant vegetation buffers or erect fencing to come to reasonable outcome for all parties.
• Some landowners were so supportive of the draft principles that they have offered their property for trail use. These offers are greatly valued and have been considered for the strategy.
Adelaide Hills 20 Year Trail Strategy & Action Plan | Draft | 2013
36
Hills Face Escape
Moderate to challenging
trails to escape the
city and provide scenic
lookouts with a focus on
environmental education.
Adventure Nuts
Trails for outdoor
adventure and
challenges.
East-West Connector
Easy trails for commuting
through populated
townships and linking to
Hahndorf.
Arts & Produce
Easy to moderate trails
for exploring arts and
produce in townships.
Liquid Gold
Easy to moderate trails
to visit wineries and taste
local reds and whites.
One with Nature
Easy to moderate
trails with a focus on
environmental education
and witnessing nature.
37
[
Kersbrook
Mount Pleasant
Forreston
Inglewood
Gumeracha
Birdwood
Cudlee Creek
Paracombe
Mount Torrens
Lobethal
Charleston
Lenswood
Norton Summit
Basket Range
Ashton
Woodside
Uraidla
Summertown
Carey Gully
Piccadilly
Oakbank
Crafers
Bridgewater
Verdun
Stirling
Aldgate
Heathfield
Hahndorf
Mylor
Ironbank
Scott Creek
Bradbury
0
2½
5
10
Mount Barker
15
Kilometers
Adelaide Hills 20 Year Trail Strategy & Action Plan | Draft | 2013
38
[
Legend
Adelaide Hills 20 Year Trail Strategy
Trail Opportunities to Investigate
Kersbrook Fitness Trail - Proposed
Heysen Trail
Mawson Trail
Kidman Trail
Amy Gillett Trail
Amy Gillett Trail - Extension
Mount Crawford Forest Reserve Trail
Kersbrook Trail
[
Mt Lofty Walking Trail
Anstey Hill Recreation Park Trail
Yurrebilla Trail
Pioneer Womens Trail
Kenton Valley Ambience Walk
Black Hill Conservation Park Trail
Mount Crawford Forest Cudlee Creek
Adelaide Hills Trail Strategy
[
Morialta Walks
Laverder Federation Trail - Tungkillo Loop
Legend
Ashton Shape-Up Trail
Adelaide Hills 20 Year Trail Strategy
Crafers Bikeway
Trail Opportunities to Investigate
Crafers to Stirling Trail
Kersbrook Fitness Trail - Proposed
Crafters Mt Lofty Summit Trail
Mount Lofty Trail
Legend
Heysen Trail
Mawson Trail
Cleland Conservation Park Trail
Kidman Trail
Eagle MTB Park Trail
Amy Gillett Trail
Stirling Linear Park Trail
Amy Gillett Trail - Extension
Aldgate Valley Nature Walk
Mount Crawford Forest Reserve Trail
Scott Creek Conservation Park Trail
Kersbrook Trail
Tom Roberts Trail
Mt Lofty Walking Trail
Craigburn
Anstey Hill Recreation Park Trail
Tom Roberts
Lynton
Trail Trail
Yurrebilla Trail
Council Boundary
Conservation
Park
Pioneer Womens Trail
Conservation
Parks
Council
Boundary
Kenton Valley Ambience Walk
Ovals
Ovals
Black Hill Conservation Park Trail
Reserves
Reserves
Mount Crawford Forest Cudlee Creek
Primary Education/Child Care
Morialta Walks
Adelaide Hills 20 Year Trail Strategy
Trail Opportunities to Investigate
Heysen Trail
Aldgate Valley Nature Walk
Scott Creek Conservation Park Trails
Stirling Linear Park Trail
0
Laverder Federation Trail - Tungkillo Loop
2½
5
High10
Schools
15
Kilometers
Ashton Shape-Up Trail
Crafers Bikeway
Crafers to Stirling Trail
Crafters Mt Lofty Summit Trail
39
Trail Zones
The Barossa Council
City of Playford
City of
Tea Tree Gully
Hills Face Escape
Walking Trails
Medium - Challenging
Adventure Nuts
Shared Use Walking &
Cyling Trails
Easy - Moderate
- Challenging
City of
Campbelltown
Mid Murray
District Council
City of
Burnside
Arts & Produce
Shared Use Walking &
Cyling Trails
Easy - Moderate
City of
Mitcham
Liquid Gold
Shared Use Walking &
Cyling Trails
Easy - Moderate
East-West Connector
Shared Use Walking &
Cyling Trails
Easy - Moderate
One with Nature
Walking Trails
Easy - Medium - Challenging
Mount Barker
District Council
City of
Onkaparinga
Adelaide Hills 20 Year Trail Strategy & Action Plan | Draft | 2013
40
Intended Trail Use
(subject to available width, site conditions & community consultation)
The Barossa Council
City of Playford
Walking
City of
Tea Tree Gully
Shared Use
City of
Campbelltown
Mid Murray
District Council
City of
Burnside
City of
Mitcham
Shared Use
High amenity for
frequent use
Walking
Mount Barker
District Council
City of
Onkaparinga
41
Adelaide Hills 20 Year Trail Strategy & Action Plan | Draft | 2013
42
[
Map Legend
Kersbrook
Mount Pleasant
Forreston
Inglewood
Birdwood
Gumeracha
Map 6.2.4
Cudlee Creek
Paracombe
Mount Torrens
Map 6.2.3
Map 6.1.1
Map 6.2.2
Lobethal
Charleston
Lenswood
Norton Summit
Basket Range
Ashton
Woodside
Map
6.2.1
Uraidla
Summertown
Carey Gully
Piccadilly
Oakbank
Map 6.3.1
Crafers
Map 6.3.2
Bridgewater
Verdun
Stirling
Aldgate
Heathfield
Hahndorf
Mylor
Map 6.5.1
Ironbank
Scott Creek
Bradbury
Mount Barker
Map 6.4.1
Map 6.6.1
0
2½
5
10
15
Kilometers
43
6.1 Hills Face Escape
The Hills face is the geographical boundary between the Hills and the Adelaide Plains. It is an area of significant
natural beauty, with views to the sea. There are already a significant amount of trails through the Hills Face Escape
zone these include, the Ansley Hill Recreation Park, the Mount Lofty trail network, Black Hill Conservation Park
walks, Morialta walks (very popular with beautiful water falls), Yurrebilla Trail, Heysen Trail and the Mawson Trail
as it takes trail users from the end of the River Torrens Linear Park through the Hills face zone towards Lobethal.
As there is already an extensive amount of trails through this area and high quality bio-diversity, the approach
of the strategy is simply to look at making meaningful connections between existing assets. One gap was found
between Ansley Hill Recreation Park, just outside Council boundary and the start of the Mount Lofty Trail network
in Paracombe. It is suggested for a trail to be made along Paracombe Road, making good the existing verge for
walking, to connect both trails and provide access to the Hills from the City of Tea Tree Gully. This link allows trail
users to access an entire network of existing trails to the north and the east.
Map Legend
Map 6.2.4
Map 6.2.3
Map 6.1.1
Map 6.2.2
Map 6.3.1
Map 6.5.1
Map 6.2.1
Map 6.3.2
Map 6.4.1
Map 6.6.1
Adelaide Hills 20 Year Trail Strategy & Action Plan | Draft | 2013
44
[
Map 6.1.1
Houghton Primary
School
Ansley Hill
Recreation Park
Par
aco
mb
Link to existing
Mt Lofty Walking
Trail
eR
d
Make good existing
footpath
Paracombe Primary
School
Link to existing
Ansley Hill Recreation
Park Trails
Kangaroo Creek
Reservoir
Montacute
Conservation Park
Black Hill
Conservation Park
Legend
Adelaide Hills 20 Year Trail Strategy
Trail Opportunities to Investigate
Heysen Trail
Wetland Reserve
Mawson Trail
Yurrebilla Trail
Black Hill Conservation Park Trail
Mt Lofty Walking Trail
Anstey Hill Recreation Park Trail
Morialta Walks
Council Boundary
Conservation Park
Reserves
Ovals
Primary Education/Child Care
0
½
1
2
3
Kilometers
High School
© OpenStreetMap (and) contributors, CC-BY-SA
45
6
.
T
h
l
2
e
e
A
n
a
g
d
a
v
e
v
e
i
e
(
B
e
i
s
n
t
r
c
e
l
y
.
g
i
l
l
T
f
R
a
n
l
i
v
i
m
i
c
t
s
y
f
t
e
l
r
o
l
c
i
w
l
i
e
t
s
c
r
e
t
u
t
t
i
n
l
i
a
p
e
T
a
i
n
r
h
e
b
a
w
s
i
t
o
r
t
g
g
o
v
e
,
o
n
h
u
a
n
p
i
t
o
r
o
h
f
r
e
o
e
c
s
e
r
b
e
v
s
P
s
r
e
w
.
b
t
e
l
a
y
s
i
o
M
u
d
v
n
t
e
a
l
g
d
h
e
a
n
s
o
.
n
e
e
s
s
a
n
l
l
e
r
r
t
e
e
i
h
a
v
v
i
T
t
e
e
l
t
t
s
u
d
s
a
,
i
s
s
f
e
f
a
e
G
o
a
n
g
i
N
w
t
n
y
h
w
i
i
e
e
f
p
t
r
n
f
m
c
y
o
o
A
h
u
z
y
a
e
w
o
s
t
f
t
t
e
c
h
)
e
i
h
t
d
h
t
f
u
r
o
o
n
N
a
e
d
i
e
w
n
e
v
s
e
H
r
a
e
a
p
u
r
r
r
o
v
t
o
u
y
k
n
f
e
l
d
v
h
d
r
u
d
t
w
d
A
s
e
o
t
a
e
t
t
h
w
y
e
a
g
r
o
h
.
e
n
t
G
h
e
s
d
r
s
e
t
o
o
d
a
w
n
h
d
o
L
o
o
e
r
a
l
b
u
l
v
i
e
i
s
i
n
e
h
b
t
l
l
t
e
t
l
p
i
l
l
l
k
t
n
t
.
l
s
i
u
w
r
a
r
o
n
u
i
n
l
s
d
i
t
n
g
i
v
l
a
n
b
t
d
l
t
o
i
i
r
s
i
d
e
e
n
e
a
w
s
a
e
i
s
u
r
v
e
e
o
t
o
u
l
i
r
r
n
c
r
o
p
e
h
a
o
a
e
e
v
d
o
h
b
v
f
u
t
s
d
o
o
m
a
a
s
t
e
r
h
p
a
h
t
k
o
e
t
w
l
o
r
k
e
o
l
g
n
a
r
e
r
N
r
d
e
W
a
i
f
)
e
o
v
f
s
c
n
o
o
w
n
s
r
s
o
a
e
i
a
o
a
s
i
d
o
r
a
b
R
t
t
a
m
a
d
h
P
A
e
n
B
d
t
y
t
a
T
w
u
l
e
M
e
e
d
t
k
o
V
G
i
e
M
n
w
t
r
w
a
s
c
C
n
t
h
a
e
(
n
c
l
e
s
e
a
a
l
l
e
r
n
d
i
K
m
i
a
i
e
e
t
u
t
h
u
a
C
e
o
T
e
d
s
o
y
r
n
u
W
e
c
a
d
,
l
e
k
e
l
l
T
e
n
r
a
.
i
o
a
v
e
t
r
h
e
l
s
b
e
h
l
i
s
s
b
r
b
r
d
L
v
x
e
e
e
e
e
K
d
v
n
l
e
e
l
r
s
q
(
w
i
s
u
n
e
g
r
g
y
e
a
s
t
n
e
d
K
d
a
e
s
n
t
t
h
o
e
n
V
y
o
a
f
f
l
e
l
e
r
y
G
w
i
o
d
t
l
f
h
c
r
o
u
e
r
u
i
r
s
e
e
)
a
d
f
b
o
o
r
u
t
a
a
s
c
h
c
a
r
e
e
s
s
d
G
t
u
s
o
l
e
t
a
r
n
a
d
i
l
.
.
A
T
n
h
u
e
s
m
b
e
e
u
s
r
o
e
f
o
u
f
t
n
h
m
e
a
s
d
e
e
u
r
n
o
m
a
d
a
r
d
e
e
s
r
o
e
r
a
v
d
e
s
s
h
h
a
v
a
v
e
e
b
n
o
t
e
e
h
a
n
d
q
D
E
t
r
W
a
T
i
o
N
l
w
s
a
R
a
r
d
f
r
s
o
e
u
L
o
e
n
b
d
d
e
t
t
h
a
b
a
c
h
e
i
k
y
r
t
e
o
t
w
f
n
r
s
o
h
m
i
a
p
,
b
p
i
a
r
o
t
G
i
d
c
i
u
v
l
e
a
r
r
l
s
i
y
t
y
p
w
i
l
t
h
e
r
a
s
p
n
e
u
c
m
t
b
i
v
e
e
.
r
T
o
h
f
e
y
o
M
u
o
t
h
u
i
n
n
t
t
e
T
o
r
M
r
e
a
r
s
p
e
t
L
n
e
s
c
d
e
g
i
e
n
o
n
m
B
M
m
u
X
n
i
t
y
a
r
e
v
e
r
y
k
e
e
n
t
o
s
e
M
p
6
.
1
.
a
p
6
.
5
.
a
p
6
.
3
.
a
p
6
.
2
.
a
m
e
r
a
c
h
a
|
L
o
b
e
t
h
a
l
R
o
a
e
l
a
i
d
e
H
i
l
l
s
2
0
Y
e
a
r
T
r
a
i
l
S
.
2
.
6
.
2
.
4
3
a
p
6
.
3
.
a
p
6
.
2
.
1
2
d
M
d
6
p
1
M
A
p
a
1
M
u
e
2
M
G
r
1
M
M
o
d
a
M
m
.
M
M
e
t
r
a
t
e
g
y
&
A
c
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
|
D
r
a
f
t
|
2
0
1
3
a
p
6
.
6
.
a
p
6
.
4
.
1
1
4
6
[
M
a
p
6
.
2
.
1
L
A
i
n
m
k
t
b
o
i
K
e
n
e
n
c
t
e
o
n
V
a
W
l
a
l
l
e
y
k
P
o
r
t
e
r
S
c
r
u
b
L
C
o
n
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
P
a
r
i
n
k
t
o
a
M
w
s
o
n
T
r
a
i
l
k
B
er
r
y
Hi
@
O
l
d
M
o
u
n
t
R
o
a
d
l
l R
oad
U
L
i
n
k
t
o
M
a
w
s
o
n
T
r
a
i
n
m
a
d
e
R
o
a
d
l
@
M
U
n
m
a
d
e
R
o
a
t
T
o
r
r
e
n
s
d
H
o
t
e
l
R
L
o
b
e
t
h
a
l
B
u
s
h
l
a
n
d
L
P
a
r
i
n
k
t
o
M
a
w
s
o
n
T
r
a
i
l
k
d
@
n
S pr i
U
n
m
a
S
R
L
i
L
o
n
k
t
b
e
o
M
t
h
a
a
l
w
L
s
o
t
u
h
n
e
T
r
r
e
n
a
i
S
e
p
r
R
i
o
n
g
a
d
h
e
a
R
d
d
r
i
n
i
t
y
L
u
t
h
e
r
e
n
s
S
L
e
d
T
i
d
c
h
o
o
l
w
l
c
h
o
o
l
n
e
J
u
n
g
f
e
r
R
d
ß
c
h
a
l
g
e
l
@
L
o
L
o
b
e
t
h
a
l
C
l
M
i
n
m
e
a
@
L
i
n
k
t
o
m
A
y
i
G
l
l
e
t
t
T
r
a
i
l
@
b
e
t
h
a
i
l
l
@
a
F
i
r
y
l
a
n
d
V
i
l
l
a
g
e
B
e
l
l
s
p
r
i
n
g
R
d
l
w
k
o
a
l
y
n
L
e
wi
h
C
a
r
l
e
s
t
o
n
s
R
C
o
n
e
s
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
P
a
r
k
d
d
R
k
l
l
i
s
n
d
G
o
R
d
L
f
e
e
g
e
n
d
r
f
P
L
i
n
k
t
o
A
m
y
i
G
l
l
e
t
n
H
T
r
a
i
f
e
i
t
r
r
i
s
o
R
d
l
a
A
d
T
e
r
l
a
i
a
i
l
d
e
O
p
H
p
i
o
l
r
l
t
s
2
u
n
0
i
t
Y
i
e
e
a
s
t
r
T
o
I
n
r
a
v
i
e
l
S
s
t
t
i
g
r
a
a
t
t
e
g
y
e
t
P
f
i
z
e
r
s
R
d
H
N
a
u
g
h
e
y
s
e
n
T
r
a
i
l
t
o
n
R
d
R
d
M
a
w
s
o
n
T
r
a
i
l
e
R
i
d
g
A
m
y
G
i
l
l
e
t
t
T
r
a
i
l
A
m
y
G
i
l
l
e
t
t
T
r
a
i
l
@
a
B
r
r
i
s
t
e
r
s
B
l
o
c
k
i
W
n
e
s
K
e
C
n
t
o
o
u
n
o
n
s
e
s
n
V
c
i
a
l
l
B
l
o
e
y
u
n
A
n
E
m
d
a
x
b
r
i
t
e
e
n
n
s
c
i
o
e
n
W
a
l
k
y
@
C
T
o
m
i
c
h
i
W
n
e
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
P
a
r
k
s
@
B
M
T
X
r
a
c
k
R
O
v
e
a
P
r
i
r
l
m
v
e
s
s
a
r
y
E
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n
C
/
h
i
l
C
d
a
r
e
@
H
0
½
1
2
3
K
i
l
o
m
e
t
e
r
i
h
g
S
c
h
o
o
l
s
©
O
p
e
n
S
t
r
e
e
t
M
a
p
(
a
n
d
)
c
o
n
t
r
i
b
u
t
o
r
s
,
4
C
7
C
–
B
Y
–
S
A
ghead
[
M
a
p
6
.
2
.
2
a
i
C
h
a
i
n
o
f
P
n
o
d
s
f
r
r
p
o
i
r
w
v
,
a
o
t
e
l
n
l
a
n
y
f
e
d
a
c
s
o
i
b
u
l
l
e
d
N
b
C
h
a
i
n
o
f
o
P
n
d
s
W
i
n
e
e
s
u
e
d
s
@
@
G
u
m
S
k
a
t
e
@
F
e
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
@
P
a
r
k
B
u
G
m
c
S
h
e
o
r
o
a
c
h
a
P
r
i
m
a
r
i
g
R
o
c
k
i
n
g
H
o
r
s
e
y
l
R
l
e
d
y
l
V
a
t
e
R
e
t
a
r
a
i
f
r
p
r
r
o
i
w
v
,
a
t
o
n
e
l
l
a
y
f
n
e
d
a
c
s
o
i
b
u
l
l
e
d
N
b
K
e
n
t
n
o
V
a
l
l
e
e
u
s
e
d
y
@
G
O
o
l
f
C
o
u
r
s
e
’
D
e
a
R
d
L
n
i
k
t
m
A
b
i
o
e
K
n
e
c
n
t
e
o
n
W
V
a
l
a
l
l
e
y
k
d
L
a
n
g
l
e
y
R
d
R
k
i
L
n
k
t
o
K
e
n
t
o
n
e
e
a
V
l
l
e
y
A
m
b
i
e
n
c
e
r
C
a
W
l
k
x
o
F
P
C
o
o
n
r
s
t
e
r
e
r
S
a
v
t
c
i
r
o
u
n
b
P
a
r
k
Be
r
r
K
y
e
n
t
o
n
V
a
l
l
e
y
G
u
n
C
l
u
b
Hi
@
l
l
R
oa
d
C
C
o
u
n
d
s
l
e
r
e
e
v
C
a
t
r
i
e
o
e
n
k
P
a
r
k
U
n
m
a
d
e
R
o
a
d
@
C
a
r
P
a
r
k
L
o
b
e
t
h
a
l
P
B
a
u
r
s
h
l
a
n
d
k
@
M
i
l
l
e
r
R
d
L
i
L
o
n
k
b
t
e
o
t
M
h
a
a
l
s
w
L
u
t
o
h
n
e
T
r
e
r
n
a
i
S
l
c
h
o
o
l
e
J
u
n
g
f
e
r
R
d
ñ
c
h
a
l
n
g
e
l
@
L
i
n
k
t
o
M
a
w
s
o
n
T
r
a
i
l
L
i
n
k
t
o
A
m
y
G
i
l
l
e
t
t
T
r
a
i
@
@
@
0
½
1
2
3
K
i
l
o
m
e
t
e
r
s
©
A
d
e
l
a
i
d
e
H
i
l
l
s
2
0
Y
e
a
r
T
r
a
i
l
S
t
r
a
t
e
g
y
&
A
c
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
|
D
r
a
f
t
|
2
0
1
3
O
p
e
n
S
t
r
e
e
t
M
a
p
(
a
n
d
)
c
o
n
t
r
i
b
u
t
o
r
s
,
4
C
8
C
°
B
Y
°
S
A
l
B
e
G
r
r
u
y
H
m
e
i
r
l
a
l
R
c
d
h
a
m
L
o
b
e
t
h
a
l
R
o
a
d
m
V
e
r
y
n
a
r
r
o
w
K
e
n
t
o
n
V
a
l
l
e
y
G
o
M
l
f
a
C
o
p
u
L
r
e
s
e
g
e
n
d
M
L
e
g
e
n
M
M
A
d
e
l
d
a
r
H
a
e
H
l
i
l
T
O
p
p
o
e
s
t
2
u
0
n
t
r
y
e
a
e
t
i
r
T
o
I
r
n
v
a
S
t
t
i
r
e
t
s
g
s
T
r
a
t
i
e
g
a
e
n
t
T
o
o
u
M
t
L
n
n
p
6
.
1
.
a
r
V
t
a
M
a
p
6
.
2
.
l
el
y
A
m
b
e
n
c
e
o
n
a
w
d
f
F
o
e
r
W
l
k
t
r
n
a
l
R
e
a
p
6
.
3
.
1
v
s
r
e
l
T
r
a
i
a
p
6
.
5
.
1
c
l
B
o
u
n
T
d
r
a
v
e
r
e
v
s
O
o
.
2
.
1
r
n
P
a
p
6
.
3
.
2
k
i
a
r
s
l
a
s
M
P
m
r
H
6
e
r
v
t
a
p
i
y
a
e
s
a
l
M
n
3
k
e
s
g
i
i
o
.
a
M
u
2
e
M
y
f
o
.
a
W
i
r
t
6
2
i
C
o
p
1
y
l
s
M
R
.
a
M
C
6
i
n
a
C
p
l
o
w
l
Y
i
n
s
a
l
i
i
e
M
K
a
d
y
i
g
a
h
E
d
u
c
r
S
t
a
c
h
o
o
o
n
i
/
C
h
dl
i
C
a
p
6
.
4
.
1
e
a
r
l
i
M
a
p
6
.
6
.
1
4
9
2
.
4
[
M
a
p
6
.
2
.
3
@
C
B
i
M
r
d
u
w
s
o
e
o
u
d
M
o
t
o
o
o
b
r
a
a
W
i
n
e
s
r
m
l
e
S
t
B
l
L
O
L
i
T
n
r
k
a
t
i
o
t
M
L
o
f
t
l
i
v
e
d
i
n
k
t
o
A
m
y
G
i
l
l
t
e
t
T
r
a
i
l
a
y
l
o
c
k
s
R
d
@
B
l
o
c
k
s
R
d
B
i
S
M
A
n
g
u
s
C
r
e
e
k
R
r
d
c
u
w
h
e
l
o
o
l
o
o
e
r
d
P
r
i
m
a
r
y
l
s
R
d
M
d
c
V
i
t
t
i
e
s
L
i
n
k
t
o
a
M
w
s
o
n
T
r
a
i
L
U
n
m
a
d
e
R
i
n
k
t
o
M
a
w
s
o
n
T
r
a
i
i
n
k
t
o
M
a
i
n
k
t
o
M
a
w
s
o
n
T
r
s
w
o
n
T
r
a
i
l
d
l
L
L
d
o
a
L
R
l
a
i
i
n
k
t
o
A
m
y
G
i
l
l
e
t
t
T
r
i
a
l
l
O
l
d
M
o
u
n
t
R
d
L
i
T
r
n
k
a
t
i
o
M
a
w
s
o
d
n
l
a
d
U
n
m
e
R
o
a
@
d
d R
hea
ng
0
½
1
2
3
K
i
l
o
m
e
t
e
r
s
Sp r i
©
A
d
e
l
a
i
d
e
H
i
l
l
s
2
0
Y
e
a
r
T
r
a
i
l
S
t
r
a
t
e
g
y
&
A
c
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
|
D
r
a
f
t
|
2
0
1
3
O
p
e
n
S
t
r
e
e
t
M
a
p
(
a
n
d
)
c
o
n
t
r
i
b
u
t
o
r
s
,
5
C
0
C
¾
B
Y
¾
S
A