ERA-NET
supported
within FP7
SOLAR-ERA.NET Transnational Calls:
PV3 and CSP3
Common Scientific / Technical Evaluation Form
(to be filled in by the expert)
Acronym / Project short title:
Project full title:
Proposal number:
Evaluator:
Evaluation summary
Please carry out the evaluation on the following pages and summarise your results here. Comments
for the scientific evaluation criteria should reflect the quality of the proposal as submitted by the
proposers.
Criterion
Potential impact and transnational value
Scientific and technological excellence
Quality and efficiency of the implementation and the management
Total (max 15)*
Additional summarising comments:
Score*
Scores: 0 – not addressed; 1 – poor; 2 – fair; 3 – good; 4 – very good; 5 – excellent.
Some of the funding agencies apply a minimum threshold value of 10 points (out of 15), i.e. full
proposals that do not achieve an average score of 10 points in total are not funded by the respective
funding agencies.
Page 1 of 2
ERA-NET
supported
within FP7
Criterion 1: Potential impact and transnational value:
- Contribution to the expected impacts on the European / international level / Solar Europe Industry
Initiative
- Appropriateness of measures for the dissemination and / or exploitation of transnational project
results and management of intellectual property
- Clear definition and high value for national / regional subprojects (for national / regional evaluators
only) and added value through transnational cooperation
Comments:
Score (max 5):
Criterion 2: Scientific and technological excellence:
- Soundness of concept and quality of the objectives
- Advances beyond the current state of the art
- Quality and effectiveness of the scientific / technological methodology and associated work plan
Comments:
Score (max 5):
Criterion 3: Quality and efficiency of the implementation and the management:
- Appropriateness of the management structure and procedures
- Quality and relevant experience of the individual participants
- Quality of industrial leadership
- Quality of the consortium as a whole (including complementarity, balance)
- Appropriateness of the allocation and justification of the resources to be committed (budget, staff,
equipment)
Comments:
Score (max 5):
Page 2 of 2