Warehouse Receipt Financing in Cotton by: Mr. B.S. Sivakumar, Executive VP & Business Head – Agri Business Group Overview of Cotton Sector Need for Warehouse Receipt Finance Enablers for WRF Kotak Bank’s Model of WRF Overview of Cotton Sector Need for Warehouse Receipt Finance Enablers for WRF Kotak Bank’s Model of WRF Contribution of Cotton to Economy • Estimated labor force directly involved in production in the world is more than 100 mn • Produced in 130 countries & traded in as many as 170 countries • India is the China 2nd largest producer after • Largest employer in India State Gujarat Maharashtra AP Punjab MP Haryana Loose lint Rajasthan Karnataka Tamil Nadu Others GRAND TOTAL % Production 36% 20% 15% 7% 7% 5% 4% 3% 3% 2% 1% 100% Positive Cotton Scenario World Cotton Production • Estimated output is 322 lakh bales in the year 2008-09 • Yield per hectare is also estimated to increase from 472 KGs in 2005 to 591 KGs in 2009 Millions of 480 lb Bales 40.00 35.00 30.00 25.00 20.00 15.00 10.00 5.00 0.00 2005 China Production US 2008 Pakistan Others 600 300 250 Kgs Per Hectare Lakh Bales India 2007 Yield 350 200 150 100 500 400 300 200 100 50 0 2006 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 0 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2009* 85 80 75 Prices 70 65 Price movement & seasonality 60 55 50 45 40 Aug Sep Oct Nov 2004-05 Months Jan Feb USA China Dec Feb 2005-06 Mar Apr 2006-07 Mar Apr Sowing May Jul Aug Growth Oct Nov Dec Harvest Growth Sowing Stocking period Mar Sep Harvest Growth Harvest Feb Jul Jun Sowing Jan Jun 2007-08 May Sowing Pak India Jan Harvest Growth Harvest Funds Utilization Pattern Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Off Season Ginning Oct Nov Dec Overview of Cotton Sector Need for Warehouse Receipt Finance Enablers for WRF Kotak Bank’s Model of WRF What is the need for WRF for cotton industry? • Leverage the strength of stocks by using it as primary collateral • Risk is de-linked from balance sheet to underlying commodity • Structured pricing (interest rate) is more attractive than normal WC or STL • Finance available in tranches aligned with stock build-up schedule • Repayment schedule aligned with actual usage • Better price discovery for the borrower as well as main link in the value chain – the farmer Benefits for the Bank • As opposed to standard credit facilities where exposure is on the balance sheet WRF helps: Externalize the credit risk Commoditize the transaction Exposure on balance sheet is de-linked Relevant even to new entities without track records Win-win situation for borrower & lender as well as the farmer Overview of Cotton Sector Need for Warehouse Receipt Finance Enablers for WRF Kotak Bank’s Model of WRF Enablers for WRF • Legal Status of WR Negotiability of WR Credibility of WR (especially issued by private warehouses to be enhanced) Secure electronic WRs • Storage Infrastructure Accreditation & acceptability of warehouses • Counter party risk on warehouse Registration / permission for private warehouses Regular inspection & quality monitoring by independent body Enablers for WRF • Quality Control Credible mechanism to grade, measure / weigh Standardization of quality & quantity of stocks during storage • Market Information Availability of real time information on commodity prices, crop forecasting Dissemination of information to stakeholders Price risk management Enablers for WRF • Protecting rights of stakeholders Performance guarantees Reliable insurance cover in the event of property or stock damage Lien marking & control of stocks Exit/liquidation guidelines • Public Private Partnership Private management of infra such as warehouses Funds to private parties for development of public infrastructure Constraints for Cotton WRF • Limited availability of large warehouses suitable for cotton warehousing • Shelf life of cotton ranges from 6 months to 1 year Quality degradation with yellowing of cotton bales • Lack of sufficient local infrastructure to ascertain quality of cotton bales & staple length Requires lab testing that may delay funding after delivery Opportunities Exist too… • Price fluctuation 20% price variation within a year. • Quality of cotton Production of long staple cotton has increased from 39% in 2005 to 77% in 2008 Reduced chances of mixing staple lengths in the bales • Funding opportunity based on underlying commodity Consolidation of ginners has not resulted in improvement in balance sheet Easier to avail WRF on basis of cotton stocks Mills have only exploited the WRF facilities to a limited extent Overview of Cotton Sector Need for Warehouse Receipt Finance Enablers for WRF Kotak Bank’s Model of WRF Kotak Bank’s Model 1.Traders/Farmers deposit commodity in Kotak approved warehouse in consultation with RM Borrower 4. Kotak Bank on receipt of the same Transfer fund to the borrowers account. CM Kotak Bank Sales / Credit Monitoring 3. Disbursement document set faxed /couriered by RM 2.CMA checks quality & quantity of stock. THANK YOU Demat Warehouse Receipts • Limitations of physical WRs Risk of forgery / loss / theft Handling physical certificates • Benefits of Demat WRs Convenience in pledge - benefit to producers, warehouses & banks Convenient settlement on commodity exchanges Risks of using paper avoided However the cost of dematting and the additional warehousing costs of a dematerialised commodity is deterrent for the product.
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz