Pupil premium strategy statement West Didsbury CE Primary
1. Summary information
School
West Didsbury CE Primary
Academic Year
2015-16
2016-17
Total PP budget
£3960
£9240
Date of most recent PP Review
13th
September
2016
Total number of pupils
53 (15-16)
Number of pupils eligible for PP
3 (15-16)
7(16-17)
Date for next internal review of this strategy
15th
November
117(16-17)
2. Current attainment
3 Pupils were eligible for PP
Pupils not eligible for PP (national average)
% achieving GLD
33.3 % (1 pupil)
66%
% making expected progress in reading
33.3 % (1 pupil)
76%
% making expected progress in writing
33.3 % (1 pupil)
71%
% making expected progress in maths - numbers
33.3 % (1 pupil)
77%
3. Barriers to future attainment (for pupils eligible for PP, including high ability)
In-school barriers (issues to be addressed in school, such as poor oral language skills)
A.
Social and emotional barriers to learning
B.
Poor oral language due to dual language
C.
Communication difficulties
External barriers (issues which also require action outside school, such as low attendance rates)
D.
Promotion of attendance and letters home
4. Desired outcomes
Desired outcomes and how they will be measured
Success criteria
A.
Increase in expected levels of progress during current KS1 class in maths
Evidence of progress against ELGs and in work
B.
Increase in expected levels of progress during current KS1 class in reading
Evidence of progress against ELGs s and in work
C.
Increase in expected levels of progress during current KS1 class in writing
Evidence of progress against ELGs and in work
5. Planned expenditure
Academic year
16-17
£9240 as Pupil Premium funding plus additional costs for staffing from the school budget
The three headings below enable schools to demonstrate how they are using the pupil premium to improve classroom pedagogy, provide targeted
support and support whole school strategies.
i. Quality of teaching for all - £6500+
Desired outcome
Chosen action /
approach
What is the evidence and rationale How will you ensure it is
for this choice?
implemented well?
Staff lead
When will you
review
implementation?
Smaller groupings
Use of extra adults
Increase adult to child ratio, more focussed
smaller groups
Monitoring of use of adults in the
learning environment
Asst Head/
SENDco
Half termly
Resourcing small group
interventions
Games resources, social
stories
Practice, repetition, help in school if not
given at home.
Monitoring of intervention feedback
and monitoring of books
Asst Head/
SENDco
Half termly
Total budgeted cost £6500+
ii. Targeted support £2500+
Desired outcome
Chosen
action/approach
What is the evidence and rationale How will you ensure it is
for this choice?
implemented well?
Staff lead
When will you
review
implementation?
Increase in attainment
Targeting on carpet and in
continuous provision
Focussing the children and increasing
understanding
Evidenced in observations
CT and TAs
Half termly
Focused 1 to 1
More chance of applying
and practising new skills
More practice in school of key skills that
might not happen at home
Monitoring of lessons and teaching
CT and TAs
Half termly
1 to 1 support LSA
Fund 1 to 1 support
1 individual needs 1 to 1 support and
resources
Interview and recruitment
Asst head
and Send Co
Half termly
Total budgeted cost £2500+
iii. Other approaches £500
Desired outcome
Chosen
action/approach
What is the evidence and rationale How will you ensure it is
for this choice?
implemented well?
Staff lead
When will you
review
implementation?
Uniform, additional PTA
purchases
Purchase uniform
To be inclusive- PTA pictures to be bought,
PE t shirts
Monitoring
Asst Head
Half termly
School trips
Fund school trips
Access to wider curriculum
Trips to be paid for
Asst Head
Half termly
Kids Club
Fund Kids club
socialisation
School invoiced as and when
Asst Head
Half termly
Playground equipment
Physical equipment
Not accessed outside school
Asst head to purchase extra
equipment
Asst Head
Half termly
Total budgeted cost £500+
6. Review of expenditure Total £3960
Previous Academic Year
2015-16
i. Quality of teaching for all £5000+
Desired outcome
Chosen
action/approach
Estimated impact: Did you meet the
success criteria? Include impact on
pupils not eligible for PP, if appropriate.
Lessons learned
(and whether you will continue with this approach)
Cost
Smaller groupings
Use of extra adults
Used smaller groupings with PP children.
Increased their confidence and self esteem, and
on those non PP with same needs
More daily interventions needed to help with reading and
writing and practising letter/ number formation
Staff costs
£2500+
Resourcing small group
interventions
Games resources,
social stories
Positive impact on PSE behaviour and
attainment. Black cat stories bought.
Gives children a chance to speak . Good to be the role model
sometimes, to have adult 1 to 1 more frequently boosts
confidence
Staff costs
£2500+
Desired outcome
Chosen
action/approach
Estimated impact: Did you meet the
success criteria? Include impact on
pupils not eligible for PP, if appropriate.
Lessons learned
(and whether you will continue with this approach)
Cost
Increase in attainment
Targeting on carpet
and in continuous
provision
All increased attainment. I child significantly
improved all schooling. One child got a GLD.
Targeting on the carpet builds self esteem and inclusivity.
Via Class
Teacher
Focused 1 to 1
More chance of
applying and
practising new skills
1 to 1 in continuous provision meant individuals
felt valued with adult support.
Daily reading is essential for higher attainment with less
support at home. 1 to 1 in CP is vital for self esteem
£1500+
1 to 1 support LSA
Fund 1 to 1 support
Huge impact on class and individual. Prime
objectives beginning to be met. Whole class
calmer and children feeling safer
LSA needed permanently for access to the curriculum
£1500+
Desired outcome
Chosen
action/approach
Estimated impact: Did you meet the
success criteria? Include impact on
pupils not eligible for PP, if appropriate.
Lessons learned
(and whether you will continue with this approach)
Cost
Uniform, additional PTA
purchases
Purchase uniform
Yes . Parents really pleased. Less pressure on
their finances
Yes . good impact in wider community- ie parents.
£50
ii. £3000+
iii. £250
School trips
Fund school trips
Kids Club
Fund Kids club
Playground equipment
Physical equipment
Yes . Parents really pleased. Less pressure on
their finances
-
Not needed, but available
Yes balls and bigger bikes- good impact to learn
outdoors physically with gross motor skills.
Yes. Children thoroughly enjoyed trip to the farm. First
experience for some
£50
Still available as an option
£0
Yes vital for quality outdoor learning PSE and PD
£150