Pupil premium strategy statement (primary)
1.
Summary information
School
Waddingham Primary School
Academic Year
2016-17
Total PP budget
£24, 342
Date of most recent PP Review
Feb17
Total number of pupils
77
Number of pupils eligible for PP
17
Date for next internal review of this strategy
June 17
2.
Current attainment
End of KS2 predictions July 2017
Pupils eligible for PP (2)
Pupils not eligible for PP (8)
% achieving ARE in reading, writing and maths
50%
60%
% achieving ARE in reading,
100%
80%
% achieving ARE in writing
50%
60%
% achieving ARE in maths
100%
80%
15/16 Scaled scores in reading, writing and maths
92
15/16 Scaled progress in reading, writing and maths
7.6 (1)
(1)
102.8 (5)
0.4
End of KS1 predictions July 2017
(1)
(13)
% achieving ARE in reading, writing and maths
0%
77%
100%
85%
% achieving ARE in writing
0%
77%
% achieving ARE in maths
100%
92%
15/16 Scaled progress in reading, writing and maths
-11%
-19%
% achieving ARE in reading,
(5)
3.
Barriers to future attainment (for pupils eligible for PP, including high ability)
In-school barriers (issues to be addressed in school, such as poor oral language skills)
A.
Poor listening and concentration skills
B.
Motivation and attitude to learning
C.
Gaps in learning from previous year
External barriers (issues which also require action outside school, such as low attendance rates)
D.
4.
Attendance rates for some families. (KS1) – late to school – no breakfast, time keeping of parents plus parents not taking responsibility
Desired outcomes
Desired outcomes and how they will be measured
Success criteria
A.
Children to arrive at school before 9 so they do no miss the teacher input
Attendance improved
B.
Children will have had breakfast, be awake and motivated to learn
Children will engage with the class immediately
C.
Children will be more independent listen and engage and not say ‘What are we doing?’
All children will start tasks independently and ask for reassurance after
completing part of the task
D.
Good use of data analysis to identify areas for development
Unit analysis complete and planning/ teaching addressing needs
E.
Not use previous excuses for their behaviour/ lack of interest
Children will be more confident and keen to try
5.
Planned expenditure
Academic year
2016/17
The three headings below enable schools to demonstrate how they are using the pupil premium to improve classroom pedagogy, provide targeted
support and support whole school strategies.
i. Quality of teaching for all
Desired outcome
Chosen action /
approach
What is the evidence and rationale How will you ensure it is
for this choice?
implemented well?
Staff lead
When will you
review
implementation?
To improve social needs
and attitudes to learning
Play therapy, counselling,
work with parents
Family needs and need of the children
Evidence from outside agencies
Weekly feedback sheets and
behaviour/attitudes in class
Mrs Taylor
May 17
To improve literacy skills
1 to 1, group work, in class
support
Analysis of data shows need for closing the
gap
Work scrutiny plus FOM data
collection CT feedback
Mrs Taylor
Monthly (Feb 17)
Total budgeted cost £10,615
ii. Targeted support
Desired outcome
Chosen
action/approach
What is the evidence and rationale How will you ensure it is
for this choice?
implemented well?
Staff lead
When will you
review
implementation?
To increase spelling and
word recognition
One to one- Precision
teaching
Data shows pupils with gaps
Weekly timetable for sessions
Mrs Cousins
May 17
To develop
comprehension skills
Small group
Data and class work shows gaps
Weekly timetable and folder of work
showing impact
Mrs Altoft
May 17
Total budgeted cost £11,612
iii. Other approaches
Desired outcome
Chosen
action/approach
What is the evidence and rationale How will you ensure it is
for this choice?
implemented well?
Staff lead
When will you
review
implementation?
STAPS
Assessment 1 to 1
Teacher needs more specific support for
child’s needs
Resources suggested from reports
are used
Mrs Altoft
May 17
Music service/
Curriculum enrichment/
Resources
Ensure all children have
access to all opportunities
Some missing out on opportunities as not
able to access due to costs
Discuss with the secretary if those
children in need are accessing the
opportunities
Mrs Waite
Half Termly
Total budgeted cost £2115
6.
Review of expenditure
Previous Academic Year
2015/16
i. Quality of teaching for all
Desired outcome
Chosen
action/approach
Estimated impact: Did you meet the
success criteria? Include impact on
pupils not eligible for PP, if appropriate.
Lessons learned
(and whether you will continue with this approach)
Cost
To improve social needs
and attitudes to learning
Play therapy,
counselling, work with
parents
Work with more needy PP although a lot of effort
on the social side rather than the academic needs
Consider all PP pupils to ensure progress and consider
rates of progress for all children using data more skilfully.
£14,000
Desired outcome
Chosen
action/approach
Estimated impact: Did you meet the
success criteria? Include impact on
pupils not eligible for PP, if appropriate.
Lessons learned
(and whether you will continue with this approach)
Cost
To improve maths for
FSM especially
Small group
One to One
Disadvantaged groups performed better but more
LAC and Service than all FSM
Look closely at all children and the data to close the gap
rather than just the FSM heading
£10,000
Desired outcome
Chosen
action/approach
Estimated impact: Did you meet the
success criteria? Include impact on
pupils not eligible for PP, if appropriate.
Lessons learned
(and whether you will continue with this approach)
Cost
Music service/
Curriculum enrichment/
Resources
Ensure all children
have access to all
opportunities
2 pp pupils accessed music lessons. All children
benefited from new maths and literacy resources
Continue to offer support for next year
£1050
ii. Targeted support
iii. Other approaches
7.Additional detail