The Ontario Midwifery Program Program Evaluation Proposal Summer 2002 OMP Program Overview What the Literature Shows Description of Evaluation Proposal Questions (and a Few Answers) Agenda Overview Literature Proposed Evaluation Questions OMP Program Overview History Overview Literature Midwifery became regulated in Ontario in 1994 Proposed Evaluation Questions Midwifery care existed previously but wasn’t covered by OHIP The Ontario Midwifery Program was formed as a result Other provinces followed suit by regulating midwifery services Midwifery Service Components Overview Literature Midwifery Education Midwifery Practice Midwifery Research Proposed Evaluation Questions The current study is limited in scope to midwifery practice only Program Components Overview Literature Proposed Evaluation Questions Education/Prevention Pre-natal care Labour/Birth care Post-partum care Counseling/Support Overview Literature Proposed Evaluation Questions Overview Literature Proposed Evaluation Questions What the Literature Shows In General Overview Literature Proposed Evaluation Questions No studies found evaluating funding formula/method/process Some cost-effectiveness studies Focused more on outcomes however Showed some improved outcomes for midwifery over obstetrics Quebec Pilot Overview Literature Proposed Evaluation Questions Multi-faceted evaluation “Set up for failure”, but also for success Lots of opposition to midwifery services in Quebec Midwifery regulation was adopted in the end however Outcome measures showed positive improvements over obstetric care Overview Literature Proposed Evaluation Questions Description of Evaluation Proposal Two Parts Overview Process Evaluation: Literature Outcome Evaluation: Proposed Evaluation Questions Funding methods and effectiveness Economic cost-effectiveness analysis Design Overview Literature Proposed Evaluation Questions Comparative data analysis approach Economic cost-effectiveness analysis will also be used The sample population consists of low-risk pregnant women receiving maternity care in 2000, 2001, and 2002 in Ontario, Canada Overview Outcome Measures Literature Proposed Evaluation Questions Number of prenatal visits per client Epidural use during labour Use of delivery aid devices Caesarean section required Episiotomy required Resuscitation required Length of hospital stay Limitations Overview Literature Proposed Evaluation Questions The client viewpoint is used rather than the preferred societal viewpoint. The use of TPAs is a recent addition to the OMP and therefore data availability may be limited. A cost-effectiveness analysis doesn’t give as complete a picture. Comparing obstetric care data to midwifery care data may be inherently difficult. Overview Literature Proposed Evaluation Questions Questions?
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz