Session 1 Portfolio Theory and the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) FIN 625: Corporate Finance Learning Objectives LO 1: Explain and calculate expected return and variance/standard deviation of an individual security. LO 2: Explain and calculate covariance and correlation. LO 3: Distinguish between systematic and unsystematic risks. LO 4: Explain the idea of diversification and its importance for portfolio theory. LO 5: Explain the implications of Capital Market Line (CML) LO 6: Explain the Security Market Line and the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) Outline 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Return and Risk of Individual Securities Covariance or Correlation between Two Securities Return and Risk of Portfolios Systematic versus Unsystematic Risk Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) Expected Return and Cost of Capital 1. The Return and Risk of Individual Securities We calculate the expected return We use variance or standard deviation to measure (total) risk Example Consider the following two risky-asset world. There is a 1/3 chance of each state of the economy, and the only assets are a stock fund and a bond fund. Scenario Recession Normal Boom Rate of Return Probability Stock Fund Bond Fund 33.3% -7% 17% 33.3% 12% 7% 33.3% 28% -3% Expected Return Scenario Recession Normal Boom Expected return Variance Standard Deviation Stock Fund Rate of Squared Return Deviation -7% 0.0324 12% 0.0001 28% 0.0289 11.00% 0.0205 14.3% Bond Rate of Return 17% 7% -3% 7.00% 0.0067 8.2% Fund Squared Deviation 0.0100 0.0000 0.0100 Deviation compares return in each state to the expected return. Expected Return Scenario Recession Normal Boom Expected return Variance Standard Deviation Stock Fund Rate of Squared Return Deviation -7% 0.0324 12% 0.0001 28% 0.0289 11.00% 0.0205 14.3% Bond Fund Rate of Squared Return Deviation 17% 0.0100 7% 0.0000 -3% 0.0100 7.00% 0.0067 8.2% 1 1 1 E ( rS ) ( 7%) (12%) (28%) 3 3 3 E ( rS ) 11% Variance Scenario Recession Normal Boom Expected return Variance Standard Deviation Stock Fund Rate of Squared Return Deviation -7% 0.0324 12% 0.0001 28% 0.0289 11.00% 0.0205 14.3% 2 Bond Fund Rate of Squared Return Deviation 17% 0.0100 7% 0.0000 -3% 0.0100 7.00% 0.0067 8.2% (-7%-11%) =.0324 Variance Scenario Recession Normal Boom Expected return Variance Standard Deviation Stock Fund Rate of Squared Return Deviation -7% 0.0324 12% 0.0001 28% 0.0289 11.00% 0.0205 14.3% Bond Fund Rate of Squared Return Deviation 17% 0.0100 7% 0.0000 -3% 0.0100 7.00% 0.0067 8.2% 1 0.0205 = (0.0324 + 0.0001 + 0.0289) 3 Standard Deviation Scenario Recession Normal Boom Expected return Variance Standard Deviation Stock Fund Rate of Squared Return Deviation -7% 0.0324 12% 0.0001 28% 0.0289 11.00% 0.0205 14.3% Bond Fund Rate of Squared Return Deviation 17% 0.0100 7% 0.0000 -3% 0.0100 7.00% 0.0067 8.2% 14.3% = 0.0205 Note that stocks have a higher expected return than bonds and higher risk. Risk & Return: Historical Perspective (1926-2014) 2. Covariance or Correlation Between Two Securities Covariance or correlation measure the comovement of two securities Positive covariance or correlation indicates that the two securities move in similar directions Negative covariance or correlation indicates that the two securities move in different directions Covariance Scenario Recession Normal Boom Sum Covariance Stock Bond Deviation Deviation -18% 10% 1% 0% 17% -10% Product -0.0180 0.0000 -0.0170 Weighted -0.0060 0.0000 -0.0057 -0.0117 -0.0117 Weighting takes the product of the deviations multiplied by the probability of that state. Correlation ab Cov (a, b) a b .0117 ab 0.998 (.143)(.082) 3. Return and Risk of Portfolios Scenario Recession Normal Boom Expected return Variance Standard Deviation Stock Fund Rate of Squared Return Deviation -7% 0.0324 12% 0.0001 28% 0.0289 11.00% 0.0205 14.3% Bond Fund Rate of Squared Return Deviation 17% 0.0100 7% 0.0000 -3% 0.0100 7.00% 0.0067 8.2% Let us turn now to the risk-return tradeoff of a portfolio that is 50% invested in bonds and 50% invested in stocks. Portfolios Rate of Return Stock fund Bond fund Portfolio squared deviation -7% 17% 5.0% 0.0016 12% 7% 9.5% 0.000025 28% -3% 12.5% 0.001225 Scenario Recession Normal Boom Expected return Variance Standard Deviation 11.00% 0.0205 14.31% 7.00% 0.0067 8.16% 9.0% 0.0010 3.08% The rate of return on the portfolio is a weighted average of the returns on the stocks and bonds in the portfolio: r w r w r P B B S S 5% = 50%(-7%) + 50%(17%) Portfolios Rate of Return Stock fund Bond fund Portfolio squared deviation -7% 17% 5.0% 0.0016 12% 7% 9.5% 0.000025 28% -3% 12.5% 0.001225 Scenario Recession Normal Boom Expected return Variance Standard Deviation 11.00% 0.0205 14.31% 7.00% 0.0067 8.16% 9.0% 0.0010 3.08% The expected rate of return on the portfolio is a weighted average of the expected returns on the securities in the portfolio. E ( rP ) w B E ( rB ) wS E ( rS ) 9% = 50%(11%) + 50%(7%) Portfolios Scenario Recession Normal Boom Expected return Variance Standard Deviation Rate of Return Stock fund Bond fund Portfolio squared deviation -7% 17% 5.0% 0.0016 12% 7% 9.5% 0.000025 28% -3% 12.5% 0.001225 11.00% 0.0205 14.31% 7.00% 0.0067 8.16% 9.0% 0.0010 3.08% The variance of the rate of return on the two risky assets portfolio is σ P2 (w B σ B )2 (w S σ S )2 2(w B σ B )(w S σ S )ρBS where BS is the correlation between the returns on the stock and bond funds. Portfolios Scenario Recession Normal Boom Expected return Variance Standard Deviation Rate of Return Stock fund Bond fund Portfolio squared deviation -7% 17% 5.0% 0.0016 12% 7% 9.5% 0.000025 28% -3% 12.5% 0.001225 11.00% 0.0205 14.31% 7.00% 0.0067 8.16% 9.0% 0.0010 3.08% Observe the decrease in risk that diversification offers. An equally weighted portfolio (50% in stocks and 50% in bonds) has less risk than either stocks or bonds held in isolation. Portfolios In general, as long as ρ<1, the standard deviation of portfolio returns < weighted average of the standard deviations of the securities in the portfolio. Note that the expected return of a portfolio is always equal to the weighted average of the expected returns of the securities in the portfolio. This suggests the benefit of diversification. The Efficient Set Risk Return 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50.00% 55% 60% 65% 70% 75% 80% 85% 90% 95% 100% 8.2% 7.0% 5.9% 4.8% 3.7% 2.6% 1.4% 0.4% 0.9% 2.0% 3.08% 4.2% 5.3% 6.4% 7.6% 8.7% 9.8% 10.9% 12.1% 13.2% 14.3% 7.0% 7.2% 7.4% 7.6% 7.8% 8.0% 8.2% 8.4% 8.6% 8.8% 9.00% 9.2% 9.4% 9.6% 9.8% 10.0% 10.2% 10.4% 10.6% 10.8% 11.0% Portfolio Risk and Return Combinations Portfolio Return % in stocks 100% stocks 12.0% 11.0% 10.0% 100% bonds 9.0% 8.0% 7.0% 6.0% 5.0% 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% Portfolio Risk (standard deviation) We can consider other portfolio weights besides 50% in stocks and 50% in bonds … The Efficient Set Risk Return 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% 55% 60% 65% 70% 75% 80% 85% 90% 95% 100% 8.2% 7.0% 5.9% 4.8% 3.7% 2.6% 1.4% 0.4% 0.9% 2.0% 3.1% 4.2% 5.3% 6.4% 7.6% 8.7% 9.8% 10.9% 12.1% 13.2% 14.3% 7.0% 7.2% 7.4% 7.6% 7.8% 8.0% 8.2% 8.4% 8.6% 8.8% 9.0% 9.2% 9.4% 9.6% 9.8% 10.0% 10.2% 10.4% 10.6% 10.8% 11.0% Portfolio Risk and Return Combinations Portfolio Return % in stocks 12.0% 11.0% 100% stocks 10.0% 9.0% 8.0% 100% bonds 7.0% 6.0% 5.0% 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% Portfolio Risk (standard deviation) Note that some portfolios are “better” than others. They have higher returns for the same level of risk. Portfolios with Various Correlations return 100% stocks = -1.0 100% bonds = 1.0 = 0.2 Relationship depends on correlation coefficient -1.0 < < +1.0 If = +1.0, no risk reduction is possible If = –1.0, complete risk reduction is possible return The Efficient Set for Many Securities Individual Assets P Consider a world with many risky assets; we can still identify the opportunity set of riskreturn combinations of various portfolios. return The Efficient Set for Many Securities minimum variance portfolio Individual Assets P The section of the opportunity set above the minimum variance portfolio is the efficient frontier. return Optimal Portfolio with a Risk-Free Asset 100% stocks rf 100% bonds In addition to stocks and bonds, consider a world that also has risk-free securities like treasury bills. return Riskless Borrowing and Lending rf P With a risk-free asset available and the efficient frontier identified, we choose the capital allocation line with the steepest slope. return Market Equilibrium M rf P With the capital allocation line identified, all investors choose a point along the line—some combination of the risk-free asset and the tangency (market) portfolio, M. In a world with homogeneous expectations, M is the same for all investors. return Market Equilibrium 100% stocks Balanced fund rf 100% bonds Just where the investor chooses along the Capital Market Line depends on his risk tolerance. The central point is that all investors have the same CML (Separation Principle). 4. Systematic versus Unsystematic Risk Systematic Risk Risk factors that affect a large number of assets Also known as non-diversifiable risk or market risk Includes such things as tax change, inflation, war, etc. Systematic versus Unsystematic Risk Unsystematic Risk Risk factors that affect a limited number of assets Also known as unique risk, diversifiable risk, or asset-specific risk Includes such things as CEO change, labor strike, etc. Principle of Diversification Diversification can substantially reduce the variability of returns without an equivalent reduction in expected returns. Specifically, diversification can alleviate or eliminate the unsystematic portion of the total risk. However, there is a minimum level of risk that cannot be diversified away, and that is the systematic portion. Risk for a Well-Diversified Portfolio In a large portfolio the unsystematic risk is effectively diversified away, but the systematic risk is not. Diversifiable Risk; Unsystematic Risk; Firm Specific Risk; Unique Risk Portfolio risk Nondiversifiable risk; Systematic Risk; Market Risk n Risk For an Individual Security in a Well-Diversified Portfolio Total risk = systematic risk + unsystematic risk The standard deviation of returns is a measure of total risk. For well-diversified portfolios, unsystematic risk is very small. Consequently, the risk for a single security in a well diversified portfolio that matters is essentially equivalent to the systematic risk. 5. Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) The Capital Asset Pricing Model uses beta to capture the systematic risk of an asset and then provides an equation that prices an asset with respect to its beta. Beta (b) Beta measures the responsiveness of a security to movements in the market portfolio (i.e., systematic risk). bi Cov ( Ri , RM ) ( RM ) 2 Security Returns Estimating b with Regression Slope = bi Return on market % Ri = a i + biRm + ei Proxy for Market Return Clearly, your estimate of beta will depend upon your choice of a proxy for the market portfolio. Generally, we use the return of a market index as a proxy for the market return. The market index may be Down Jones Industrial Average (DJIA), S&P 500, Russell 3000, etc. Portfolio Beta The Beta of a portfolio is the weighted average of the betas of individual securities in that portfolio. Example: Calculate the beta of a portfolio consisting of 40% of General Electric stock with beta equal to 1.22, and 60% of Walmart stock with beta equal to 0.04. Beta(portfolio) = 40%*1.22+60%*0.04=0.512 Capital Asset Pricing Model Equation Expected Return on the Market: R M RF Market Risk Premium • Expected return on an individual security: R i RF β i ( R M RF ) Market Risk Premium This applies only to individual securities held within well-diversified portfolios! Expected Return on a Security This formula is called the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM): R i RF β i ( R M RF ) Expected return on a security RiskBeta of the = + × free rate security • Assume • Assume bi 0 , then R i RF bi 1, then R i R M Market risk premium Expected return Relationship Between Risk & Return R i RF β i ( R M RF ) RM RF 1.0 b Expected return Relationship Between Risk & Return 13.5% 3% β i 1.5 RF 3% 1.5 R M 10% b 𝑅𝑖 = 3% + 1.5 10% − 3% = 13.5% 6. Expected Return and Cost of Capital If the return of a security cannot meet investors’ expectations based on its (systematic) risk, no one will buy and hold such a security. Therefore, the expected return serves as a hurdle that each security must overcome given its (systematic) risk. This is why expected return for investors becomes the cost of capital for the firm. Cost of Capital and Capital Budgeting We should use the cost of capital to discount future cash flows in capital budgeting, as we will learn in more details in Session 4. Readings Chapter 11
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz