NEW ENGLAND ASSOCIATION OF SCHOOLS AND COLLEGES, INC. Commission on Public Schools Committee on Public Secondary Schools 2020 – A VISION FOR LEARNING AN OVERVIEW OF THE RE-DESIGNED ACCREDITATION PROCESS FOR 2020 SCHOOLS Prepared for schools hosting visits in 2020 An overview of NEASC and CPSS The 2020 Accreditation Process The value to you and your school An Overview of NEASC and CPSS NEASC – is the oldest regional educational accrediting association NEASC includes 4 Commissions that accredit PreK – 16 schools NEASC accredits over 2000 schools and colleges in six New England states and around the world ◦ CPS – Commission on Public Schools (PreK-12) CPSS – Committee on Public Secondary Schools CPEMS – Committee on Public Elementary and Middle Schools CTCI – Committee on Technical and Career Institutions ◦ CIHE – Commission on Institutions of Higher Education ◦ CIE PS-12 – Commission on International Education ◦ CIS – Commission on Independent Schools CPSS is led by 26 volunteer Committee members from the six New England states ◦ Building administrators, central office administrators, classroom teacher, and public member CPSS accredits more than 630 member schools K-12, 7-12, and 9-12 in New England Uses more than 1,100 volunteers each year Professional staff ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ George Edwards, Director Alyson Geary, Deputy Director Edward Gallagher, Associate Director Kathleen Montagano, Associate Director Bruce Sievers, Associate Director William Wehrli, Associate Director Six administrative assistants George Edwards Director Ned Gallagher Associate Director Alyson Geary Deputy Director Bruce Sievers Associate Director Kathy Montagano Associate Director Bill Wehrli Associate Director CPSS Mission Statement The Committee on Public Secondary Schools in partnership with member schools ensures, through an ongoing accreditation process, that all students experience an equitable, quality education vital to the success of a democratic society. CPSS Core Values To achieve our mission CPSS commits to… • maintain relevant and dynamic Standards of Accreditation which define a quality education; • support member schools through selfevaluation, peer review, and ongoing monitoring; • support research-based practices critical to continuous school improvement; • model a culture of self-reflection, collaboration, and inquiry. CPSS Core Values To support the CPSS mission, member schools agree to… participate actively in the accreditation process; demonstrate alignment to the Standards for Accreditation which fosters academic, social, civic growth for students, professional development for faculty, and continuous improvement and growth for schools. Over the last four years, there have been regional meetings with principals and superintendents feedback solicited from members and volunteers surveys conducted of all member schools Too prescriptive Takes too much professional development time Causes the school to stop other improvement initiatives Gets the high school out of sync with the rest of the district Too expensive Redundant with other mandated processes We convened several committees comprised of representatives from member schools which met to review both the process and the Standards A new process has been developed and new Standards are in the process of being developed based on research and best practice An Overview of the 2020 A Vision for Learning Accreditation Process The new Accreditation Process will: ◦ provide opportunities for more sustained work with CPSS over time ◦ differentiate the use of faculty members ◦ use existing artifacts as evidence ◦ encourage integration of school/district priorities ◦ use smaller visiting committees ◦ provide fewer overall recommendations that focus on stated areas for growth Preparation for the decennial visit will begin 3 years before the visiting team arrives For 2020 schools, the decennial cycle will begin in the fall of 2017 Instead of an 12-18 month intensive selfstudy, schools will engage in a more sustained preparation for the decennial visit that will be aligned with their current school improvement efforts Self-Reflection 2017 Collaborative conference/visit 2018 Progress updates 2023 Development of Growth Plan 2018 New/revised Growth Plan 2021 Implementation of Growth Plan 2019 Decennial visit 2020 Summary report 2019 Step 1 Create Steering and SelfReflection Committees Guides oversight of the Accreditation process Includes 3-8 members ◦ one is the principal ◦ two are Accreditation coordinators who are chosen by the principal to oversee the process The Self-Reflection Committee(s) will be representative of multiple stakeholders in the school community engage the school’s faculty in the selfreflection process A committee comprised of multiple stakeholders Additional stakeholders that will be consulted for information and feedback ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ faculty and support staff central office administrators school board/committee students, parents, community members, business partners, college partners All faculty members will vote on the final report Step 2 The School SelfReflection The self-reflection will evaluate the school’s alignment to the Standards for Accreditation will take 2-6 months to complete A Look Back Current Conditions Capacity for Continuous Growth and Change as an Organization Goals and Vision for the Future Areas of Focus for NEASC School Growth Plan (Overview Guide p. 5) The Self-Reflection committee will collect existing artifacts and evidence to help determine the school’s alignment to Standards The school will conduct a survey for parents, students and faculty and use this data in the Self-Reflection The final Self-Reflection will be reviewed and voted on by the faculty The self-reflection process and related data collection will inform the school’s plan for growth The survey is required for parents, students and faculty members as part of the school self-reflection phase based on the Standards for Accreditation provided free of charge from NEASC and can be repeated annually or at any time the school desires For the SCHOOL Review of existing conditions For the VISITING TEAM Basis for collaborative reflection by analysis of evidence Helps draw conclusions about what the evidence shows about the school Helps determine focus areas for school growth and improvement Provides the basis for the analysis of Self-Reflection and other evidence collected during visit Helps draw conclusions about the school’s alignment to the Standards Forms the basis for the school’s priority areas for growth and creation and implementation of the school growth plan Based on the findings of the Self-Reflection Report, the school will develop priority areas for growth Priority areas should be any area the school needs to address to be more fully aligned with the Standards Priority areas can also center around school and district initiatives Three to four priorities should be identified and at least one priority must relate to teaching and learning After reviewing the elements in the SelfReflection report, what stands out about this report and the process to complete it? How does it differ from the current Self-Study process? What benefits or challenges might it bring? Who might you involve in your Self-Reflection Committee? Step 3 The Collaborative Conference Visit Gather information about current conditions in the school Review the School Self-Reflection findings and the priority areas for improvement/growth Ensure the identified priority areas reflect goals that have an impact on student learning Ensure there are no obvious omissions or other needed improvement areas to align to the Standards The Collaborative Conference Team will consist of 2 – 4 visitors The Conference takes 1-2 school days Activities will include a school tour, classroom visits, and meetings with various stakeholders The date and plans for the visit will be coordinated with the CPS liaison for the school The Collaborative Conference team will write a report reflecting upon the visit The report will include ◦ information from the Self-Reflection as well as observations from the visit ◦ comments on the identified priority areas for the school growth plan The report will be sent to the school and the Committee on Public Secondary Schools for review Step 4 The School Growth Plan The purpose is for the school to outline a vision for continuous improvement The plan includes priority areas identified by the school through the Self-Reflection can also include school or district initiatives The plan can be similar to or integrated into an existing school improvement plan (Overview Guide p. 6-7) The school leadership team is responsible for the growth plan The faculty should be provided an opportunity to give input on the proposed plan The plan goals should be aligned to the Standards for Accreditation The school has 12 – 18 months to begin implementation of their plan How will the development of a growth plan benefit your school? Does your school currently have a school improvement plan or another plan that guides the school’s improvement process? How will you integrate the Standards into this plan? Step 5 The School Summary Report In preparation for the Decennial Accreditation visit, the school will develop a Summary Report The report will include data and evidence to document the school’s achievement of the goals in the NEASC Growth Plan The report can be prepared by school leadership and the Steering Committee or a separate committee can be formed for this purpose A Look Back Progress on the Growth Plan Looking Ahead Capacity for Continuous Growth and Change as an Organization (Overview Guide p. 8) Step 6 The Decennial Accreditation Visit Assess the implementation of the school growth plan Assess the school’s alignment to Standards Ensure school has the capacity to be an effective learning organization Provide targeted recommendations related to elements of the growth plan In general, Decennial Visit teams will be 6–8 visitors for 3–4 days The size of the team and the length of the visit will be determined by the size of the school and the scope of the growth plan The visit will not include a requirement for teacher interviews on Sunday The primary purpose will be to observe teaching and learning throughout the school Focus on the implementation of the school growth plan and student impacts/outcomes Panel presentation/overview of the school Conversations with teachers Examination of student work Student shadowing Classroom visits and observations Meeting with steering committee Meetings with various stakeholders Step 7 Continuous Improvement and Growth Report Accreditation Decision Follow-Up The visiting team chair will send a draft report to the school within 6 weeks of the visit The report will ◦ be shorter and more targeted than previous decennial reports ◦ contain detailed feedback on elements of the school growth plan, the school’s capacity for continual improvement, and a brief summary of the school’s alignment to all Standards The Committee on Public Secondary Schools will review the Decennial Report and decide on Continued Accreditation for the school The school will revise the growth plan within one year of the Decennial Visit take into consideration the recommendations received in the Decennial Report submit the revised plan will be submitted to the Committee on Public Secondary Schools for review and comment The school will receive more information about the follow-up process following the Decennial Visit report on the major recommendations from the Decennial Visit and the implementation of the revised growth plan two years and five years after the submission of the plan Schools are no longer required to assign all staff to a Standard Committee The Self-Reflection process has been streamlined and will take 2 – 6 months The Collaborative Conference Visit has been added to help schools apply their SelfReflection to the development of a plan Schools are required to develop a growth plan as part of the Accreditation process Schools will write a Summary Report for the visiting team The decennial visiting teams will be tailored to meet the needs of the school The visit is designed to increase focus on observing teaching and learning Schools will develop an improved growth plan based on the recommendations from the Decennial Visit Participate in faculty discussions about alignment to the Standards Provide evidence and feedback as needed for the Steering and Self-Reflection committee(s) Review and approve the completed SelfReflection Provide input into the NEASC Growth Plan and participate in implementation Participate in the Collaborative Conference and Decennial Visits Timeline Spring of 2017 – Receive and complete an application for accreditation Fall of 2017 – Attend an Accreditation seminar, receive a visit from a CPS staff member and develop a Steering Committee and Self-Reflection Committee Fall/Winter 2017/Spring of 2018 – Write School Self-Reflection Spring/Fall 2018 – Host Collaborative Conference Visit Spring/Fall 2018 – Write Growth Plan Fall 2018, Spring/Fall 2019 – Implement Growth Plan Fall 2019/Spring 2020 – Write Summary Report Spring/Fall 2020 – Host Decennial Visit Spring/Fall 2021 – Revised Growth Plan is submitted to CPSS Timeline Spring 2020 Schools Fall 2020 Schools Fall/Winter 2017 Complete Self-Reflection Winter/Spring 2018 Host Collaborative Visit Develop Growth Plan Complete Self-Reflection Fall/Winter 2018 Implement Growth Plan Host Collaborative Visit Develop Growth Plan Winter/Spring 2019 Implement Growth Plan Implement Growth Plan Fall/Winter 2019 Implement Growth Plan Write Summary Report Implement Growth Plan Winter/Spring 2020 Host Decennial Visit Implement Growth Plan Write Summary Report Fall/Winter 2020 Update Growth Plan Host Decennial Visit Update Growth Plan Winter/Spring 2021 Accreditation Cycle Evaluation Visit SelfStudy Pre-Self Study Two-Year Report Five-Year Report Self-Reflection 2017 Collaborative conference/visit 2018 Progress updates 2023 Development of Growth Plan 2018 New/revised Growth Plan 2021 Implementation of Growth Plan 2019 Decennial visit 2020 Summary report 2019 The portal can be used as a tool throughout the Accreditation process The school can create portal accounts for as many faculty members as desired Write/upload the School Self-Reflection report and the Summary Report in the NEASC online portal Upload/link pertinent evidence electronically into the portal Generate the Self-Reflection Report and Summary Report automatically from the portal A draft will be available in late June, feedback solicited and a final copy ready by September The same concepts from the current Standards will be present in the new Standards The organization of the Standards will be revised Schools will be asked to align with overarching principles rather than individual indicators The Value of Accreditation to You and Your School Conduct and receive a rigorous analysis of present conditions so that needed changes may be carefully planned Focus on the bigger picture and the school as a whole Focus on systemic school improvement Enjoy professional pride of working in an accredited institution Assists administrators and teachers in working toward school improvement Assures students that their school has the capacity to meet their educational needs Affirms that school board educational policies and plans are guided by community values Assures the local citizen that tax dollars are supporting 21st century school programs and a 21st century facility Peer Evaluation SelfReflection School Improvement and Accountability NEW ENGLAND ASSOCIATION OF SCHOOLS AND COLLEGES, INC. COMMISSION ON PUBLIC SCHOOLS Alyson Geary, Deputy Director 781-425-7736 | [email protected]
© Copyright 2025 Paperzz