Wang and Wen Journal of Inequalities and Applications (2015) 2015:73 DOI 10.1186/s13660-015-0595-6 RESEARCH Open Access On the partial finite sums of the reciprocals of the Fibonacci numbers Andrew YZ Wang* and Peibo Wen * Correspondence: [email protected] School of Mathematical Sciences, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 611731, P.R. China Abstract In this article, we obtain two interesting families of partial finite sums of the reciprocals of the Fibonacci numbers, which substantially improve two recent results involving the reciprocal Fibonacci numbers. In addition, we present an alternative and elementary proof of a result of Wu and Wang. MSC: 11B39 Keywords: Fibonacci numbers; partial sums; reciprocal 1 Introduction The Fibonacci sequence [], Sequence A is defined by the linear recurrence relation for n ≥ , Fn = Fn– + Fn– where Fn is the nth Fibonacci number with F = and F = . There exists a simple and non-obvious formula for the Fibonacci numbers, √ √ + n – n –√ . Fn = √ The Fibonacci sequence plays an important role in the theory and applications of mathematics, and its various properties have been investigated by many authors; see [–]. In recent years, there has been an increasing interest in studying the reciprocal sums of the Fibonacci numbers. For example, Elsner et al. [–] investigated the algebraic relations for reciprocal sums of the Fibonacci numbers. In [], the partial infinite sums of the reciprocal Fibonacci numbers were studied by Ohtsuka and Nakamura. They established the following results, where · denotes the floor function. Theorem . For all n ≥ , ∞ Fk – = k=n Fn– , if n is even; Fn– – , if n is odd. (.) Theorem . For each n ≥ , ∞ F k=n k – = Fn Fn– – , if n is even; if n is odd. Fn Fn– , (.) © 2015 Wang and Wen; licensee Springer. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. Wang and Wen Journal of Inequalities and Applications (2015) 2015:73 Page 2 of 13 Further, Wu and Zhang [, ] generalized these identities to the Fibonacci polynomials and Lucas polynomials and various properties of such polynomials were obtained. Recently, Holliday and Komatsu [] considered the generalized Fibonacci numbers which are defined by Gn+ = aGn+ + Gn , n≥ with G = and G = , and a is a positive integer. They showed that – ∞ Gn – Gn– , if n is even and n ≥ ; = Gk Gn – Gn– – , if n is odd and n ≥ k=n (.) ∞ – aGn Gn– – , if n is even and n ≥ ; = G if n is odd and n ≥ . aG n Gn– , k k=n (.) and More recently, Wu and Wang [] studied the partial finite sum of the reciprocal Fibonacci numbers and deduced that, for all n ≥ , – n = Fn– . Fk (.) k=n Inspired by Wu and Wang’s work, we obtain two families of partial finite sums of the reciprocal Fibonacci numbers in this paper, which significantly improve Ohtsuka and Nakamura’s results, Theorems . and .. In addition, we present an alternative proof of (.). 2 Reciprocal sum of the Fibonacci numbers We first present several well known results on Fibonacci numbers, which will be used throughout the article. The detailed proofs can be found in []. Lemma . Let n ≥ , we have Fn – Fn– Fn+ = (–)n– (.) Fa Fb + Fa+ Fb+ = Fa+b+ (.) and if a and b are positive integers. As a consequence of (.), we have the following result. Corollary . For all n ≥ , we have Fn = Fn– Fn + Fn Fn+ , (.) Wang and Wen Journal of Inequalities and Applications (2015) 2015:73 Page 3 of 13 Fn+ = Fn + Fn+ , (.) Fn+ = Fn– Fn+ + Fn Fn+ . (.) It is easy to derive the following lemma and we leave the proof as a simple exercise. Lemma . For each n ≥ , we have Fn+ Fn+ – Fn– Fn = Fn+ . (.) We now establish two inequalities on Fibonacci numbers which will be used later. Lemma . If n ≥ , then Fn– Fn– > Fn+ . (.) Proof It is easy to see that Fn– Fn– – Fn+ = Fn– Fn– – (Fn– + Fn ) = Fn– Fn– – Fn– – (Fn– + Fn– ) = (Fn– – )Fn– – Fn– . Since n ≥ , Fn– – > . So Fn– Fn– – Fn+ > Fn– – Fn– > , which completes the proof. Lemma . For each n ≥ , we have Fn– (Fn + Fn– ) > Fn– Fn– Fn Fn+ . (.) Proof Applying (.), we get Fn– = Fn– Fn– + Fn Fn . Thus Fn– (Fn + Fn– ) ≥ (Fn– Fn– + Fn Fn )Fn > Fn Fn > Fn– Fn Fn . Employing (.), we have Fn > Fn Fn+ > Fn– Fn+ , which yields the desired equation (.). Wang and Wen Journal of Inequalities and Applications (2015) 2015:73 Page 4 of 13 The following are some inequalities on the sum of reciprocal Fibonacci numbers. Proposition . For all n ≥ , we have n . > Fk Fn– + (.) k=n Proof For all k ≥ , Fk– + – Fk – Fk– – = – – Fk Fk– + Fk (Fk– + ) Fk– + = (Fk– – )(Fk– + ) – Fk Fk– – Fk (Fk– + )(Fk– + )Fk = – Fk Fk– – – Fk Fk– . (Fk– + )(Fk– + )Fk – Fk Fk– = (–)k . Therefore, Invoking (.), we obtain Fk– Fk– + – (–)k – – Fk = – . Fk Fk– + (Fk– + )(Fk– + )Fk Now we have n n (–)k– + + Fk – + = Fk Fn– + Fn– + (Fk– + )(Fk– + )Fk k=n k=n > Fn– + – Fn– + + n k=n (Fk– + )(Fk– + ) > + – . Fn– + (Fn– + )(Fn– + ) Fn– + Because of (.), we have Fn– + – (Fn– + )(Fn– + ) = Fn– – Fn– Fn– – Fn– – Fn– = Fn– + Fn– Fn+ – Fn > . Thus, we arrive at n > . Fk Fn– + k=n This completes the proof. Proposition . Assume that m ≥ . Then, for all even integers n ≥ , we have mn < . Fk Fn– k=n (.) Wang and Wen Journal of Inequalities and Applications (2015) 2015:73 Page 5 of 13 Proof By elementary manipulations and (.), we deduce that Fk– – (–)k – = , Fk Fk– Fk– Fk– Fk k ≥ . Hence, for n ≥ , we have mn mn (–)k– = – + . Fk Fn– Fmn– Fk– Fk– Fk k=n (.) k=n Since n is even, mn k=n (–)k– < , Fk– Fk– Fk from which we conclude that mn < . Fk Fn– k=n The proof is complete. Proposition . If n ≥ is odd, then n < . Fk Fn– (.) k=n Proof It is straightforward to check that the statement is true when n = . Now we assume that n ≥ . Since n is odd, we have n k=n+ (–)k– < . Fk– Fk– Fk Applying (.) and (.) yields – < – Fn– Fn– Fn Fn– Fn Fn+ Fn– = Fn– – Fn Fn+ Fn Fn+ Fn– =– Fn– Fn– Fn Fn+ Fn– < . Employing (.) and the above two inequalities, (.) follows immediately. Proposition . Let m ≥ be given. If n ≥ is odd, we have mn > . Fk Fn– k=n (.) Wang and Wen Journal of Inequalities and Applications (2015) 2015:73 Page 6 of 13 Proof It is easy to see that m > , Fk F k= thus (.) holds for n = . Now we assume that n ≥ . Based on (.) and using the fact n is odd, we have mn mn (–)k– = + – – + . Fk Fn– Fn– Fn– Fn Fn– Fn Fn+ Fmn– Fk– Fk– Fk k=n k=n+ It is clear that mn k=n+ (–)k– > . Fk– Fk– Fk Since m ≥ and invoking (.), we obtain Fmn– (Fn– + Fn ) ≥ Fn– (Fn– + Fn ) > Fn– Fn– Fn Fn+ , which implies Fn+ – Fn– – – = – Fn– Fn– Fn Fn– Fn Fn+ Fmn– Fn– Fn– Fn Fn+ Fmn– = Fn– + Fn Fn– + Fn – Fn– Fn– Fn Fn+ Fmn– (Fn– + Fn ) > . Therefore, (.) also holds for n ≥ . Now we state our main results on the sum of reciprocal Fibonacci numbers. Theorem . For all n ≥ , we have – n = Fn– . Fk (.) k=n Proof Combining (.), (.), and (.), we conclude that, for all n ≥ , Fn– + < n < , Fk Fn– k=n from which (.) follows immediately. Remark Identity (.) was first conjectured by Professor Ohtsuka, the first author of []. Based on the formula of Fn and using analytic methods, Wu and Wang [] presented a proof of (.). In contrast to Wu and Wang’s work, the techniques we use here are more elementary. Wang and Wen Journal of Inequalities and Applications (2015) 2015:73 Page 7 of 13 Theorem . If m ≥ and n ≥ , then mn – Fn– , if n is even; = Fk Fn– – , if n is odd. k=n (.) Proof It is clear that m – = F . Fk (.) k= Combining (.) and (.), we find that, for all even integers n ≥ , Fn– + < mn < . Fk Fn– (.) k=n Thus (.) and (.) show that, for all m ≥ , mn – = Fn– , Fk k=n provided that n ≥ is even. Next we aim to prove that, for m ≥ and all odd integers n ≥ , – mn = Fn– – . Fk (.) k=n If n = , we can readily see that m > , Fk k= thus (.) holds for n = . So in the rest of the proof we assume that n ≥ . It is not hard to derive that, for all k ≥ , Fk– – – (–)k – + Fk = > . – Fk Fk– – Fk (Fk– – )(Fk– – ) Hence, we get mn – < . < Fk Fn– – Fmn– – Fn– – (.) k=n Finally, combining (.) with (.) yields (.). Remark As m → ∞, (.) becomes (.). Hence our result, Theorem ., substantially improves Theorem .. Wang and Wen Journal of Inequalities and Applications (2015) 2015:73 Page 8 of 13 3 Reciprocal square sum of the Fibonacci numbers We first give several preliminary results which will be used in our later proofs. Lemma . For all n ≥ , Fn Fn+ – Fn– Fn+ = (–)n– . (.) Proof It is easy to show that Fn Fn+ – Fn– Fn+ = Fn Fn+ – Fn– (Fn + Fn+ ) = Fn Fn+ – Fn Fn– – Fn– Fn+ = Fn (Fn+ – Fn– ) – Fn– Fn+ = Fn – Fn– Fn+ . Employing (.), the desired result follows. Proposition . Given an integer m ≥ and let n ≥ be odd, we have mn < . F F n– Fn k=n k Proof It is straightforward to check that, for each k ≥ , – – – Fk– Fk Fk Fk+ Fk+ Fk+ = Fk+ – Fk– Fk+ Fk+ – Fk– Fk Fk+ – Fk– Fk Fk+ Fk Fk+ Fk– Fk Fk+ Fk+ = + Fk ) Fk Fk+ (Fk+ Fk+ – Fk– Fk ) – Fk– Fk+ (Fk+ Fk– Fk Fk+ Fk+ = (Fk Fk+ – Fk– Fk+ )Fk+ Fk– Fk Fk+ Fk+ = (–)k– Fk+ , Fk– Fk Fk+ Fk+ where the last equality follows from (.). Since n is odd, we have – – – > . Fn– Fn Fn Fn+ Fn+ Fn+ If m is even, then mn < – < . F F F F F Fn F n– n mn mn+ n– k=n k (.) Wang and Wen Journal of Inequalities and Applications (2015) 2015:73 Page 9 of 13 If m is odd, then mn < – + < . Fn– Fn Fmn– Fmn Fmn Fn– Fn F k=n k Thus, (.) always holds. Proposition . Let n be odd, then we have n . > Fn– Fn + F k=n k (.) Proof Invoking (.), we can readily derive that ⎧ ⎨ – Fk– Fk + , if k is odd; Fk (Fk– Fk +)(Fk Fk+ +) – – = Fk Fk+ + Fk– Fk + Fk Fk Fk+ + ⎩ – , if k is even. F (F F +)(F F +) k k– k k k+ Now we have n Fn– Fn + + = Fn– Fn + Fn (Fn– Fn + )(Fn Fn+ + ) F k=n k Fn+ Fn+ + + ··· Fn+ (Fn Fn+ + )(Fn+ Fn+ + ) Fn Fn+ + – + Fn Fn+ + Fn (Fn– Fn + )(Fn Fn+ + ) + > Fn– Fn + + – . Fn– Fn + Fn (Fn– Fn + )(Fn Fn+ + ) Fn Fn+ + It is obvious that Fk– Fk ≥ Fk– Fk+ . From (.) and the fact that n is odd, we obtain Fn– Fn + Fn– Fn+ + Fn ≥ = = , Fn Fn Fn which implies that n + – . > Fn– Fn + (Fn– Fn + )(Fn Fn+ + ) Fn Fn+ + F k=n k By (.) and (.), we have Fn Fn+ + > (Fn– Fn + Fn Fn+ ) Fn + Fn+ > (Fn– Fn + )(Fn Fn+ + ), from which we conclude that n . > F F F n– n + k=n k The proof is complete. Wang and Wen Journal of Inequalities and Applications (2015) 2015:73 Page 10 of 13 Proposition . Suppose that m ≥ and n > is even. Then mn . < Fn– Fn – F k=n k (.) Proof Applying (.), we can rewrite Fk as Fk = Fk– Fk Fk+ + (–)k– Fk . (.) In addition, (Fk– Fk – )(Fk Fk+ – ) = Fk– Fk Fk+ – Fk– Fk – Fk Fk+ + = Fk– Fk Fk+ – Fk– Fk – Fk + . (.) Combining (.) and (.) yields Fk – – = – Fk– Fk – Fk Fk Fk+ – (Fk– Fk – )(Fk Fk+ – ) Fk = Fk– Fk – + Fk + (–)k– Fk (Fk– Fk – )(Fk Fk+ – )Fk ≥ Fk– Fk – (Fk– Fk – )(Fk Fk+ – )Fk > . Therefore, mn – < , < Fn– Fn – Fmn Fmn+ – Fn– Fn – F k=n k which completes the proof. Proposition . If n > is even, then n > . Fn– Fn F k=n k Proof Employing (.), we can deduce that Fk– Fk – (–)k– – = . Fk Fk Fk+ Fk– Fk Fk+ Hence, since n is even, we have n n (–)k = + – F F F F F F F F n– n n n+ k=n k k=n k– k k+ = + – – Fn– Fn Fn– Fn Fn+ Fn Fn+ Fn+ Fn Fn+ + n– (–)k + . F F F F F k– k+ n– n Fn+ k k=n+ (.) Wang and Wen Journal of Inequalities and Applications (2015) 2015:73 Page 11 of 13 It is easy to see that n– (–)k– > , F F F k=n+ k– k k+ thus n > + – – . Fn– Fn Fn+ Fn Fn+ F Fn– Fn Fn+ Fn Fn+ k=n k We claim that – – > . Fn– Fn Fn+ Fn Fn+ Fn+ Fn Fn+ First, by (.), we have Fn+ Fn+ – – = – . Fn– Fn Fn+ Fn Fn+ Fn+ Fn Fn+ Fn– Fn Fn+ Fn+ Fn Fn+ It follows from (.), (.), and (.) that Fn > Fn– Fn , Fn+ > Fn+ , Fn+ > Fn Fn+ , which implies that > Fn– Fn Fn+ Fn+ . Fn Fn+ Thus we obtain – – > , Fn– Fn Fn+ Fn Fn+ Fn+ Fn Fn+ which yields the desired (.). Now we introduce our main result on the square sum of reciprocal Fibonacci numbers. Theorem . For all n ≥ and m ≥ , we have – mn Fn Fn– , = F F n Fn– – , k=n k if n is odd; if n is even. (.) Proof We first consider the case when n is odd. If n = , the result is clearly true. So we assume that n ≥ . It follows from (.) that mn n . ≥ > F F F F n– n+ k=n k k=n k (.) Wang and Wen Journal of Inequalities and Applications (2015) 2015:73 Page 12 of 13 Employing (.) and (.) yields < < , Fn– Fn + Fk Fn– Fn mn k=n which implies that, if n > is odd, we have – mn = Fn Fn– . F k=n k We now consider the case where n > is even. It follows from (.) that mn n ≥ > . Fn– Fn F F k=n k k=n k (.) Combining (.) and (.), we arrive at Fn– Fn < mn < , Fn– Fn – F k=n k from which we find that, if n > is even, mn – = Fn Fn– – . F k=n k This completes the proof. Remark Theorem . can be regarded as the limiting case as m → ∞ in (.). Competing interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Authors’ contributions All authors contributed equally to deriving all the results of this article, and read and approved the final manuscript. Acknowledgements This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 11401080) and the Research Project of Education Teaching Reform of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China (No. 2013XJYEL032). The authors would like to thank the referees for helpful comments leading to an improvement of an earlier version. Received: 14 November 2014 Accepted: 12 February 2015 References 1. Sloane, NJA: The On-Line Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences. https://oeis.org (1991). Accessed 30 Apr 1991 2. Duncan, RL: Applications of uniform distribution to the Fibonacci numbers. Fibonacci Q. 5, 137-140 (1967) 3. Karaduman, E: An application of Fibonacci numbers in matrices. Appl. Math. Comput. 147, 903-908 (2004) 4. Ma, R, Zhang, WP: Several identities involving the Fibonacci numbers and Lucas numbers. Fibonacci Q. 45, 164-170 (2007) 5. Vorobiev, NN: Fibonacci Numbers. Springer, Basel (2002) 6. Elsner, C, Shimomura, S, Shiokawa, I: Algebraic relations for reciprocal sums of Fibonacci numbers. Acta Arith. 130, 37-60 (2007) 7. Elsner, C, Shimomura, S, Shiokawa, I: Algebraic relations for reciprocal sums of odd terms in Fibonacci numbers. Ramanujan J. 17, 429-446 (2008) 8. Elsner, C, Shimomura, S, Shiokawa, I: Algebraic independence results for reciprocal sums of Fibonacci numbers. Acta Arith. 148, 205-223 (2011) Wang and Wen Journal of Inequalities and Applications (2015) 2015:73 Page 13 of 13 9. Elsner, C, Shimomura, S, Shiokawa, I: Algebraic relations for reciprocal sums of even terms in Fibonacci numbers. J. Math. Sci. 180, 650-671 (2012) 10. Ohtsuka, H, Nakamura, S: On the sum of reciprocal Fibonacci numbers. Fibonacci Q. 46/47, 153-159 (2008/2009) 11. Wu, ZG, Zhang, WP: The sums of the reciprocals of Fibonacci polynomials and Lucas polynomials. J. Inequal. Appl. 2012, Article ID 134 (2012) 12. Wu, ZG, Zhang, WP: Several identities involving the Fibonacci polynomials and Lucas polynomials. J. Inequal. Appl. 2013, Article ID 205 (2013) 13. Holliday, SH, Komatsu, T: On the sum of reciprocal generalized Fibonacci numbers. Integers 11A, Article ID 11 (2011) 14. Wu, ZG, Wang, TT: The finite sum of reciprocal of the Fibonacci numbers. J. Inn. Mong. Norm. Univ. Nat. Sci. 40, 126-129 (2011)
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz