10 -1 CHAPTER Activity- and Strategy-Based Responsibility Accounting 10 -2 Objectives 1. Compare andAfter contrast functional-based, studying this activity-based, and strategic-based chapter, you should responsibility accounting be able to:systems. 2. Explain process value analysis. 3. Describe activity performance measurement. 4. Discuss the basic features of the Balanced Scorecard. Responsibility Accounting Model The responsibility accounting model is defined by four essential elements: Assigning responsibility Establishing performance measures or benchmarks Evaluating performance Assigning rewards 10 -3 Types of Responsibility Accounting Management accounting offers the following three types of responsibility accounting systems. Functional-based Activity-based Strategic-based 10 -4 10 -5 FunctionalBased Responsibility Accounting System A functional-based responsibility accounting system assigns responsibility to organizational units and expresses performance measures in financial terms. It is the responsibility accounting system that was developed when most firms were operating in relatively stable environments. 10 -6 Elements of a Functional-Based Responsibility Accounting System Individual in Charge Operating Efficiency Unit Budgets Static Standards Financial Efficiency Actual vs. Standard Promotions Profit Sharing Responsibility Is Defined Performance Measures Are Established Performance Is Measured Individuals Are Rewarded Based on Financial Performance 10 -7 Organizational Unit Financial Outcomes Standard Costing Currently Attainable Stds. Controllable Costs Financial Measures Bonuses Salary Increases ActivityBased Responsibility Accounting System An activity-based responsibility accounting system assigns responsibility to processes and uses both financial and nonfinancial measures of performance. It is the responsibility accounting system developed for those firms operating in continuous improvement environments. 10 -8 10 -9 Elements of an Activity-Based Responsibility Accounting System Team Value Chain Responsibility Is Defined Optimal Process Oriented Time Reductions Cost Reductions Promotions GainSharing Performance Measures Are Established Performance Is Measured Individuals Are Rewarded Based on Multidimensional Performance Process 10 -10 Financial Dynamic ValueAdded Quality Improvement Trend Measures Bonuses Salary Increases StrategyBased Responsibility Accounting System A strategic-based responsibility accounting system (Balanced Scorecard) translates the mission and strategy of an organization into operational objectives and measures for four different perspectives: The financial perspective The customer perspective The process perspective The infrastructure (learning and growth) perspective 10 -11 10 -12 Elements of a Strategy-Based Responsibility Accounting System Financial Process Communication Strategy Alignment of Objectives Financial Measures Process Measures Promotions GainSharing Responsibility Is Defined Performance Measures Are Established Performance Is Measured Individuals Are Rewarded Based on Multidimensional Performance Customer 10 -13 Infrastructure Balanced Measures Link to Strategy Customer Measures Infrastructure Measures Bonuses Salary Increases Activity-Based Management (ABM) 10 -14 Activity-based management (ABM) is a systemwide, integrated approach that focuses management’s attention on activities with the objective of improving customer value and the profit achieved by providing this value. Activity-based management encompasses both product costing and process value analysis. The activity-based management model has two dimension: a cost dimension and a process dimension. Activity-Based Management Model Cost Dimension Resources Process Dimension Driver Analysis Activities Performance Analysis Why? What? How well? Products and Customers 10 -15 10 -16 Process Value Analysis Process value analysis is fundamental to activity-based responsibility accounting, focuses on accountability for activities rather than costs, and emphasizes the maximization of systemwide performance instead of individual performance. Process value analysis is concerned with: Driver analysis Activity analysis Activity performance measurement 10 -17 Activity Analysis Activity analysis is the process of identifying, describing, and evaluating the activities an organization performs. Activity analysis should produce four outcomes: What activities are done. How many people perform the activities. The time and resources are required to perform the activities. An assessment of the value of the activities to the organization. 10 -18 Those activities necessary to remain in business are called value-added activities. ValueAdded Activities 10 -19 Activities needed to comply with the reporting requirements, such as the SEC, are value-added by a mandate. ValueAdded Activities 10 -20 A discretionary activity is classified as value-added provided it simultaneously satisfies three conditions: The activity produces a change of state. The change of state was not achievable by preceding activities. The activity enables other activities to be performed. ValueAdded Activities 10 -21 All activities other than those essential to remain in business are referred to as nonvalueadded activities. Nonvalue -Added Activities 10 -22 Scheduling NonvalueAdded Activities Moving Waiting Inspecting Storing Activity Analysis Activity Analysis Can Reduce Costs in Four Ways: Activity elimination Activity selection Activity reduction Activity sharing 10 -23 Measures of Activity Performance Efficiency Quality Time 10 -24 Measures of Activity Performance Financial measures of activity efficiency include: • Value and nonvalueadded activity cost reports • Trends in activity cost reports • Kaizen standard setting • Benchmarking • Life-cycle costing 10 -25 10 -26 Value- and Nonvalue-Added Cost Reporting Activity Activity Driver SQ AQ SP Welding Welding hours 10,000 8,000 $40 Rework Rework hours 0 10,000 9 Setups Setup hours 0 6,000 60 Inspection Number of inspections 0 4,000 15 Value-added standards call for their elimination 10 -27 Value- and Nonvalue-Added Cost Reporting Activity Activity Driver SQ AQ SP Welding Welding hours 10,000 8,000 $40 Rework Rework hours 0 10,000 9 Setups Setup hours 0 6,000 60 Inspection Number of inspections 0 4,000 15 Value-added standards call for their elimination Formulas Value-added costs = SQ x SP Nonvalue-added costs = (AQ – SQ)SP Where SQ = The value-added output level of an activity SQ = The standard price per unit of activity output measure AQ = The actual quantity used of flexible resources or the practical activity capacity acquired for committed resources 10 -28 10 -29 Value- and NonvalueAdded Cost Report Activity Value-Added NonvalueCosts Added Costs Actual Costs Welding $400,000 $ - 80,000 $320,000 Rework 0 90,000 90,000 Setups 0 360,000 360,000 Inspection 0 60,000 60,000 $400,000 $430,000 $830,000 Total 10 -30 Trend Report: Nonvalue-Added Costs Activity Welding Nonvalue-Added Costs 2003 2004 Change -$80,000 $ 50,000 $ 30,000 Rework 90,000 70,000 20,000 Setups 360,000 200,000 160,000 60,000 35,000 25,000 $430,000 $355,000 $235,000 Inspection Total The Role of Kaizen Standards Kaizen costing is concerned with reducing the costs of existing products and processes. Controlling this cost reduction process is accomplished through the repetitive use of two major subcycles: (1) the kaizen or continuous improvement cycle, and (2) the maintenance cycle. 10 -31 10 -32 Kaizen Cost Reduction Process Check Do Check Act Do Act Search Plan Kaizen Subcycle Lock in Standard Maintenance Subcycle 10 -33 Benchmarking uses best practices as the standard for evaluating activity performance. 10 -34 Activity Capacity Management Activity capacity is the number of times an activity can be performed. 10 -35 Activity Capacity Variance AQ = Activity capacity acquired (practical capacity) SQ = Activity capacity that should be used AU = Actual usage of the activity SP = Fixed activity rate SP x SQ $2,000 x 0 $0 SP x AQ SP x AU $2,000 x 60 $2000 x 40 $120,000 $80,000 Activity Unused Volume Variance Capacity Variance $120,000 U $40,000 F Life-Cycle Cost Commitment Curve Life Cycle Cost % 100 90 80 Cost Commitment Curve 70 90 percent of lifecycle costs are committed at this point 60 50 40 30 20 10 Planning Design Testing Production Logistics 10 -36 10 -37 Target Costing A target cost is the difference between the sales price needed to capture a predetermined market share and the desired per-unit profit. Example: Current product specifications and the targeted market share call for a sales price of $250,000. The required profit is $50,000 per unit. The target cost is computed as follows: $250,000 – $50,000 = $200,000 Market Share Objective Target Price Target Profit TargetCosting Model Target Cost Product and Process Design NO Target Cost Met? YES Produce Profit 10 -38 Product Functionality 10 -39 Life-Cycle Costing: Budgeted Costs and Income Unit Cost and Price Information for New Product Unit production cost Unit life-cycle cost Unit whole-life cost Budgeted unit selling price $ 6 10 12 15 10 -40 Budgeted Costs Item Development costs Production costs Logistic costs Annual subtotal Postpurchase costs Annual total Units produced 2003 $200,000 ------$200,000 --$200,000 2004 ---$240,000 80,000 $320,000 80,000 $400,000 2005 ---$360,000 120,000 $480,000 120,000 $600,000 40,000 60,000 Item Total $ 200,000 600,000 200,000 $1,000,000 200,000 $1,200,000 Note: The post purchase costs are costs incurred by the customer and are not included in the budgeted income e statement. 10 -41 Budgeted Product Income Statements Year Revenues 2003 2004 2005 ---$600,000 900,000 Costs -$200,000 -320,000 -480,000 Annual Income -$200,000 280,000 420,000 Cumulative Income -$200,000 80,000 500,000 Performance Report for Life-Cycle Costs 10 -42 Year Item Actual Costs Budgeted Costs Variance 2003 Development $190,000 $200,000 $10,000 F 2004 Production 300,000 240,000 60,000 U Logistics 75,000 80,000 5,000 F 2005 Production 435,000 360,000 75,000 U Logistics 110,000 120,000 10,000 F Analysis: Production costs were higher than expected because insertions of diodes and integrated circuits also drive costs (both production and postpurchase costs). Conclusion: The design of future products should try to minimize total insertions. 10 -43 The Balanced Scorecard translates an organization’s mission and strategy into operational objectives and performance measures for four different perspectives: The financial perspective The customer perspective The Balanced Scorecard The internal business process perspective The learning and growth perspective 10 -44 Strategy, according to Robert Kaplan and David Norton, is defined as “. . . choosing the market and customer segments the business unit intends to serve, identifying the critical internal and business processes that the unit must excel at to deliver the value propositions to customers in the targeted market segments, and selecting the individual and organizational capabilities required for the internal, customer, and financial objectives.” 10 -45 Vision and Strategy Financial Customer Process Infrastructure Objectives Measures Targets Initiatives StrategyTranslation Process 10 -46 Financial Increase Sales Increase Profits Customer Increase Market Share Increase Customer Satisfaction Process Redesign Products Reduce Defective Units Infrastructure Quality Training Testable Strategy Illustrated 10 -47 Summary of Objectives and Measures: Financial Perspective Objectives Revenue Growth: Increase the number of new products Create new applications Develop new customers and markets Adopt a new pricing strategy Measures Percentage of revenue from new products Percentage of repeat customers Percentage of revenue from new sources Product and customer profitability 10 -48 Objectives Measures Cost Reduction: Reduce unit product cost Unit product cost Reduce unit customer cost Unit customer cost Reduce distribution channel cost Cost per distribution channel Asset Utilization: Improve asset utilization Return on investment Economic value added 10 -49 Summary of Objectives and Measures: Customer Perspective Objectives Core: Increase market share Increase customer retention Increase customer acquisition Increase customer satisfaction Increase customer profitability Measures Market share (percentage of market) Percentage of repeat customers Number of new customers Ratings from customer surveys Customer profitability 10 -50 Objectives Performance Value: Decrease price Decrease postpurchase costs Improve product functionality Improve product quality Increase delivery reliability Improve product image and reputation Measures Price Postpurchase costs Ratings from customer surveys Percentage of returns On-time delivery percentage Aging schedule Ratings from customer surveys 10 -51 Actual Conversion Cost per Unit Standard costs per minute = $1,600,000/400,000 = $4 per minute Actual cycle time = 60 minutes/10 units = 6 minutes per unit Actual conversion costs = $4 x 6 = $24 per unit Theoretical Conversion Cost per Unit Theoretical cycle time Theoretical conversion costs = 60 minutes/12 units = 5 minutes per unit = $4 x 5 = $20 per unit 10 -52 Summary of Objectives and Measures: Process Perspective Objectives Innovation: Increase the number of new products Increase proprietary products Decrease new product development time Measures Number of new products vs. planned Percentage of revenue from proprietary products Time to market (from start to finish) 10 -53 Objectives Operations: Increase product quality Increase process efficiency Decrease process time Postsales Service: Increase service quality Increase service efficiency Decrease service time Measures Quality costs Output yields Percentage of defective units Unit cost trends Output/input(s) Cycle time and velocity MCE First-pass yields Cost trends Output/input(s) Cycle time 10 -54 Summary of Objectives and Measures: Learning and Growth Perspective Objectives Increase employee capabilities Measures Employee satisfaction ratings Employee turnover percentage Employee productivity (revenue/employee) Hours of training Strategic job coverage ratio (percentage of critical job requirements filled) 10 -55 Objectives Increase motivation and alignment Increase information systems capabilities Measures Suggestions per employee Suggestions implemented per employee Percentage of processes with real-time feedback capabilities Percentage of customer-facing employees with on-line access to customer and product information 10 -56 Chapter Ten The End 10 -57
© Copyright 2024 Paperzz