Number Theory Project The Interpretation of the definition Andre (JianYou) Wang Joint with JingYi Xue Definition • If f ax bxy cy with measure d b 4ac 0 and a 0 is called positive definite Observation 1: c 0 2 Observation 2: 4af 2ax by dy 2 0 f 0 2 2 2 That explained partly the etymology of positive . Definition • If there exists a linear mapping with integer coefficient between two different positive definite polynomials, these two are called equivalent to each other. i.e. there is a map x mX nY , y pX qY , mq np 1 such that it maps f g Explanation of Definition • Observation 1: this linear map can be represented as a matrix m n p q Observation 2: if the coefficient of f is a, b, c Then the new coefficient has this formula a ' am bmp cp 2 2 b ' 2amn bmq bnp 2 pqc c ' an bnq cq 2 2 • Observation 3: this definition is actually fitting into the definition of equivalence relation, namely, it meets reflex, transitive, and symmetric. That’s why we can define equivalent class, each equivalent class is disjoint, in particular, the element in the same equivalent class has same measure. • Observation 4:we may find b 0, c 0, a 0 which further explained the term: positive polynomials • Observation 5: the composition of two maps m n p q r s u v is actually the multiplication of the matrix . Observation 6: the restriction mp nq 1 is the perfect condition to ensure the map has an inverse which agrees with the law of inverse in matrix, namely: det X 1 • Claim 1: In every equivalent class, there is a polynomial with coefficients satisfy the condition 0bac • Proof: By well-ordering principle, let a ' be the minimal value represented by the equivalent class, and let a ', b ', c ' be an element in that class, 2 2 then a a ' m b ' mp c ' p gcd m, p 1 • By Bezout identity, we have a proper q, n satisfy the equality mq np 1 ,which fits our definition of being a map simultaneously. Under the map m n a ', b ', c ' a, b '', c '' p q Under another map 1 x a, b '', c '' a, b, c 0 1 • For this new a, b, c there is a proper x which will enable the tuple to satisfy the claim. The claim is proven. • Claim 2: Using Claim we can easily assume that for each measure d , there are only finitely many equivalent class, and we can actually compute the upper bound for coefficient. d d 4ac b 4a b 3a a 3 2 2 2 2 • This suggests that this sort of polynomial has finite classes. • Claim 3: The number of the equivalent class with a fixed measure, is the number of the tuples a, b, c that satisfy d b 4ac,0 b a c 2 • Proof: Using Claim 1, we know that for every class there is at least one element satisfy this condition .All I need to do is to show that two polynomials in the same class can not be in the set of tuples together • If we have f g , then f g All we’re supposed to check is that (a f , b f , c f ) (ag , bg , cg ) Without the loss of generality ,we assume a f a g By definition, there is a matrix m n ,such that, p q a f ag m 2 bg mp cg p 2 ag ag m 2 bg mp cg p 2 ag m 2 ag mp ag p 2 ag ( m p ) 2 ag mp ag mp mp 1, 0 • Clearly, mp 1 can’t work. • In the other case, a f a g , the similar argument goes to the rest entries. • Now we prove that there is one to one and onto relationship between these two sets, which boils down to the truth, the sizes are equal. Recap • These 3 Claims provide a rather efficient way to determine the equivalent classes of positive definite quadratic polynomials, in that this fact can help us classify different class with no ambiguity • In light of this, problem 3.2, and the entire problem 4 is just a simple corollary. Moreover • Conjecture 1: if f g the number sets represented by the former is not the number set represented by the latter. • Phenomenon: Different equivalent classes represents number in a distinct way, some number sets are disjoint, some are intertwined, and some are contained in the other. • Conjecture 2: If f and g represents a single different number , then they represents infinite many different number. • We are convinced that these phenomenon are closely related to the problem 5 and problem 6 • Claim1: If ax 2 bxy cy 2 kp, (k , p) 1 • then: d 1, d b2 4ac p • Pf: (2ax by )2 dy 2 4apk dy 2 (2ax by )2 (mod p) • Claim2: If p is an odd prime bigger than 7, then 2 2 p 1,9(mod 20) p x 5 y • 20 4 1 5 1 5 • Pf: " " : 1 p p p p p p 5 p If p 1(mod 4), 1, p 1, 4(mod 5) p 5 p 1,9(mod 20) • • • • • • If p 3(mod 4) p 3,7(mod 20) cannot be true " " 5 We know p 1 , so s0 , s0 2 5(mod p ) Consider the set u vs0 , where 0 u, v p , 2 Then the number in the set p 1 p So u1 v1s0 u2 v2 s0 (mod p) (u1 u2 )2 5(v1 v2 )2 0(mod p) 0 (u1 u2 )2 5(v1 v2 )2 6 p • Let u1 u2 t v1 v2 t ' t 2 2 • If t t ' 5 p ( , t ') is also a solution 5 • • • • If If If If t t' ( , ) is also a solution 2 2 t 2 t '2 3 p t 2 2,3(mod5) contradict t 2 t '2 4 p contradict t 2 t '2 p (t , t ') is a solution t 2 t '2 2 p t 2 2,3(mod5) 2 2 2 n • Claim3: Any can be represented by x 5 y • Any two number can be both represented by • x 2 5 y 2 , the product also can be represented. • Pf: The first prop is obvious • the second: let A x12 5 y12 B x22 5 y22 AB ( x1 x2 5 y1 y2 ) 2 5( x1 y2 y1 x2 ) 2 • Claim4: If p 3,7(mod 20) , then 2p , 3p can be represented. • Pf: the first part of the argument of claim3 is also valid • then t 2 t '2 p (claim 2) t 2 2 • If t t ' 5 p ( , t ') is also a solution(contradict 5 to claim 2) • If t 2 t '2 4 p ( t , t ' ) is also a solution 2 2 contradiction • Discover that the two situation both are true, they coexist. i.e. if u12 5v12 2 p there exist • u2 2 5v2 2 3 p and vice versa 2 2 u 5 v • If 1 let u1 2 x1 1, v1 2 y1 1 1 2p • If 5( y1 x1 1)2 (5 y1 x1 2)2 3 p 2 2 u1 , v1 1(mod 3) u 5 v • If 1 1 3p u1 3x1 1, v 3 y1 1 5( y1 x1 )2 (5 y1 x1 2) 2 2 p u1 3x1 1, v 3 y1 1 5( y1 x1 )2 (5 y1 x1 2) 2 2 p u1 3x1 1, v 3 y1 1 5( y1 x1 )2 (5 y1 x1 2) 2 2 p u1 3x1 1, v 3 y1 1 5( y1 x1 )2 (5 y1 x1 2) 2 2 p Since 2p,3p one of then has to be true, then the other one is true • Claim5: p 3,7(mod 20) pq can be represented • Pf: Applying claim5, there exist u12 5v12 2 p • u2 2 5v2 2 2 p (4 numbers are odd) u1u2 5v1v2 2 u1v2 u2v1 2 pq ( ) 5( ) 2 2 • Claim 6 • If p 3,7 mod 20 ,then 2 p can be represented, which is a simple corollary from Claim 5 • Theorem: Integer n can be represented in the form of 2 2 x 5 y if and only if n 2 5 a p1 p2 2 pm q1q2 Where : p1 , p2 , , pm 1,9 mod 20 q1 , q2 , , qn 3,7 mod 20 n 0 mod 2 qn , 1, 0 • First step: p1 , p2 , pm can be represented, a 2 can be represented, q1 , q2 , , qm , 2 can be evenly paired, and each pair is in the form, 5 is in the form. The product thus can be represneted. • Second step: prove the converse is also true. If the converse is not true, it suffices to say that n can be represented when n Bp where B can be represented, p 3,7, 2 mod 20 • When p 3,7 mod 20 ,3 p is in the form which means 3 x 2 y 2 u 2 5v 2 s 2 5t 2 3 x 5 y 2 2 e 2 5f 2 We now apply the infinite descend to cause contradiction 3 x 2 e 2 mod 5 x e 0 mod 5 • Likewise, the other case can be dealt with in almost the same way. Thus, there is a contradiction to our previous assumption which means the converse is alos true and the theorem is proven Problem 6.2 Proposition: A 2 x 2 7 y 2 , B 2s 2 7t 2 AB (2 xs 7 yt )2 14( xt ys)2 • Moreover, by using the method in claim2, we can give a proof to the conjecture 1: • If p is prime, p 2,7 then p x 2 14 y 2or 2 x 2 7 y 2 p 1,9,15, 23, 25,39(mod 56) these are primes p 1(mod8) 3 p x 2 14 y 2 p 3,5,13,19, 27, 45(mod 56) 14 p 1 • Pf: By using , it’s easy to know the satisfied primes above. 2 2 x 14 y p,2 p, 14 p • only to focus on • Here’s the result: • (call p 1,9,15, 23, 25,39(mod 56) A, p 3,5,13,19, 27, 45(mod 56) B) 1 x 2 14 y 2 p, A 2 x 2 14 y 2 2 p, x 2 x1 , p 2 x12 7 y 2 A 3 x 2 14 y 2 3 p, B 4 x 2 14 y 2 4 p, x 2 x1 , y 2 y1 , p x12 14 y12 A 5 x 14 y 5 p, x y (mod 5) B 2 2 2 2 (5u 1) 2 14(5v 1) 2 5 p (u 14v 3) 2 14(u v) 2 3 p (5u 1) 2 14(5v 1) 2 5 p (u 14v 3) 2 14(u v ) 2 3 p (5u 2) 2 14(5v 2) 2 5 p (u 14v 6) 2 14(u v ) 2 3 p (5u 2) 2 14(5v 2) 2 5 p (u 14v 6) 2 14(u v )2 3 p 6 x 2 14 y 2 6 p, x 2 x1 ,3 p 2 x12 7 y 2 , x12 y 2 (mod 3) B 2(3u 1) 2 7(3v 1) 2 3 p (2 x 2 y 3) 2 14( x y ) 2 3 p 2(3u 1) 2 7(3v 1) 2 3 p (2 x 2 y 3) 2 14( x y ) 2 3 p 7 x 2 14 y 2 7 p, x 7 x1 , 2 y 2 7 x12 p A 8 x 2 14 y 2 8 p, x 2 x1 , y 2 y1 , 2 p x12 14 y12 x1 2 x2 , p 2 x2 2 7 y12 A 9 x 2 14 y 2 9 p A 10 x 2 14 y 2 10 p, x 2 x1 ,5 p 2 x12 7 y 2 ,5 | ( x12 y 2 ) a 5 | x1 ,5 | y, p 5, x1 5 x2 , y 5 y1 , 2 x2 2 7 y12 1, contradiction b x1 1(mod 5) y 2(mod 5) 5 p 2(5u 1) 2 7(5v 2) 2 (4u 7v 2) 2 14(u 2v 1) 2 3 p 5 p 2(5u 1) 2 7(5v 2) 2 (4u 7v 2) 2 14( u 2v 1) 2 3 p c x1 2(mod 5) y 1(mod 5) 5 p 2(5u 2) 2 7(5v 1) 2 (4u 7v 3) 2 14(u 2v) 2 3 p 5 p 2(5u 2) 2 7(5v 1) 2 (4u 7v 3) 2 14(u 2v) 2 3 p B 11 x 2 14 y 2 11 p x 2 1,3, 4,5,9(mod11) contradiction 12 x 2 14 y 2 12 p, x 2 x1 , y 2 y1 ,3 p x12 14 y12 , B 13 x 2 14 y 2 13 p B a 13 | x,13 | y, p 13, x12 14 y12 1, x1 1, y1 0 b x 2 1, y 2 1(mod13) c x 2 3, y 2 3(mod13) d x 2 4, y 2 4(mod13) 14 x 2 14 y 2 14 p, x 14 x1 , p 14 x12 y 2 , A • Thank You!
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz