1. Hw 7 Part II: The Holder Inequality Proposition 1.1. Let a, b be positive real numbers and p, q be real numbers such that and p, q > 1 and 1/p + 1/q = 1. Then ap bq ab ≤ + . p q Proof. Let f : R → R>0 be the exponential function f (x) = ex for x ∈ R. Since f 00 (x) = ex > 0, f is a convex function, i.e. for any t ∈ [0, 1], f (tx + (1 − t)y) ≤ tf (x) + (1 − t)f (y), for any x, y ∈ R. Let x = p ln a, y = q ln b, and t = 1/p. Then 1 − t = 1/q and hence ab = eln(ab) = eln a+ln b 1 = ep = 1 1 ≤ ep ln a + eq ln b p q 1 ln bq ap bq + e = + . q p q ·p ln a+ 1q ·q ln b 1 ln ap e p Theorem 1.1. Let a1 , · · · , an and b1 , · · · , bn be real numbers. Then !1 !1 n n n p q X X X p q ak bk ≤ |ak | |bk | . k=1 k=1 k=1 Proof. By triangle inequality, n n X X ak bk ≤ |ak bk | . k=1 k=1 1 1 P P Let A = ( nk=1 |ak |p ) p and B = ( nk=1 |bk |q ) q . By proposition 2.1, we find 1 |ak | p 1 |bk | q |ak | |bk | · ≤ + . A B p A q B Therefore n n n X 1 X |ak | p 1 X |bk | q |ak | |bk | · ≤ · + · A B p A q B k=1 k=1 k=1 Pn P 1 k=1 |ak |p 1 nk=1 |bk |q + = p Ap q Bq 1 1 = + = 1, p q which implies Pn k=1 |ak bk | ≤ AB. Proposition 1.2. (Minkowski inequality). Let a1 , · · · , an and b1 , · · · , bn be real numbers. Let p ≥ 1. !1/p !1/p !1/p n n n X X X p p p |ai + bi | ≤ |ai | + |bi | . i=1 i=1 1 i=1 2 Proof. If all of ai , bj are zero, the inequality is trivial. Assume that ai , bj are not all zero. Let p = 1. Then |ai + bi | ≤ |ai | + |bi | by triangle inequality. Hence n n n n X X X X |ai + bi | ≤ (|ai | + |bi |) = |ai | + |bi |. i=1 i=1 i=1 i=1 The inequality holds when p = 1. Now assume that p > 1. For each 1 ≤ i ≤ n, |ai + bi |p = |ai + bi |p−1 |ai + bi | ≤ |ai + bi |p−1 |ai | + |ai + bi |p−1 |bi |. Let xi = |ai + bi |p−1 for 1 ≤ i ≤ n. By Holder’s inequality, !1/p n !1/q n n X X X q xi |ai | ≤ |ai |p xi i=1 i=1 i=1 where q > 1 such that 1/p + 1/q = 1. Since 1/p + 1/q = 1, (p − 1)q = pq − q = p and hence n n n X X X q (p−1)q xi = |ai + bi | = |ai + bi |p . i=1 i=1 i=1 This shows that n X xi |ai | ≤ n X i=1 i=1 n X n X !1/p p |ai | n X !1/q |ai + bi | p . i=1 Similarly, xi |bi | ≤ i=1 !1/p |bi |p i=1 n X !1/q |ai + bi |p . i=1 Combining all of these results, we find n X |ai + bi |p ≤ i=1 n X !1/q |ai + bi |p n X i=1 !1/p |ai |p + i=1 n X !1/p |bi |p . i=1 Dividing the inequality on both side by ( i=1 |ai + bi |p )1/q , we obtain that !1−1/q !1/p !1/p n n n X X X p p p ≤ + . |ai + bi | |ai | |bi | Pn i=1 i=1 i=1 Since 1/p + 1/q = 1, 1 − 1/q = 1/p. We proved the Minkowski inequality. 2. Passing to infinity Lemma 2.1. Let (an ) and (bn ) be sequence of real numbers such that an ≤ bn for any n ≥ 1. If limn→∞ an = a and limn→∞ bn = b, then a ≤ b. Proof. The proof is left to the reader. Proposition 2.1. (Holder inequality for infinite series) Let p, qPbe positive real Pnumbers ∞ p and q such that p, q > 1 and 1/p + 1/q = 1. Assume that Suppose that ∞ |a | n=1 n n=1 |bn | are both convergent infinite series. Then ∞ !1 !1 ∞ ∞ p q X X X q p |b | . a b ≤ |a | n n n n n=1 n=1 k=1 3 Pn P Proof. Let us prove that ∞ i=1 |ai bi | for n=1 an bn is absolutely convergent. Define sn = n ≥ 1. Then (sn ) is a nondecreasing sequence of nonnegative real numbers. If we can show that (sn ) is bounded above, by monotone sequence property, (sn ) is convergent. For each n ≥ 1, Holder inequality implies that !1 !1 n n p q X X sn ≤ . |ai |p |bi |q i=1 Let un = Pn p i=1 |ai | and tn = i=1 Pn q i=1 |bi | for n ≥ 1. Then 1/q 0 ≤ sn ≤ u1/p n tn for any n ≥ 1. (2.1) By assumption, (un ) and (tn ) are both convergent in R and hence they are bounded. Choose M > 0 so that 0 ≤ un , tn ≤ M for any n ≥ 1. Hence 1/q 1/p+1/q 0 ≤ u1/p =M n tn ≤ M for any n ≥ 1. This implies that 0 ≤ sn ≤ M for any n ≥ 1. Therefore (sn ) is convergent in R. Let s = limn→∞ sn and u = limn→∞ un and v = limn→∞ vn . By (3.1) and Lemma 3.1, 0 ≤ s ≤ u1/p v 1/q which is the desired inequality. P∞ Proposition 2.2. (Minkowski inequality for infinite series) Let p ≥ 1. Suppose n=1 |an |p P∞ p and n=1 |bn | are both convergent infinite series in R. Then !1/p !1/p !1/p ∞ ∞ ∞ X X X . |bn |p + ≤ |an |p |an + bn |p n=1 n=1 n=1 Pn Pn Proof. Let un = i=1 |ai |p and tn = i=1 |bi |p for any n ≥ 1. By assumption. (un ) and (tn ) are convergent P in R. Hence they are bounded in R. Choose M > 0 so that 0 ≤ un , tn ≤ M. Let sn = ni=1 |ai + bi |p for each n ≥ 1. By Minkowski inequality, 0 ≤ sn ≤ M 1/p + M 1/q for any n ≥ 1. Hence (sn ) is a bounded sequence in R. Since (sn ) is nondecreasing and bounded, by monotone sequence property, (sn ) is convergent. For n ≥ 1, 1/p 0 ≤ sn ≤ u1/p n + tn . Let s = limn→∞ sn , u = limn→∞ un and t = limn→∞ tn . By Lemma 3.1, 1/p 1/p 1/p 1/p s ≤ lim (u1/p + t1/p . n + tn ) = lim un + lim tn = u n→∞ The inequality s ≤ u1/p + n→∞ t1/p n→∞ is exactly the Minkowski inequality for infinite series.
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz