Looking back to see what’s ahead… Andy MacFarlane, RMN Director, Condition Management Partners Introduction Variation in MH presentations Aims of Condition Management Description of a CMP service Presentations of CMP customers Evaluation & typical outcomes gradients Designing transition - PtW to WP framework Marketing Operations Reflections Variation in MH presentations – drivers of service development General Prison Pop (1/4). Pop (3/4). Severe & enduring Bipolar disorder Psychosis/Schizophrenia 10% 10% 6% 36% Common Unipolar depressive disorders Anxiety related disorder Post-traumatic stress disorder 62% 15% 3% 45% 10% 3% Sources: WHO + Justice dep’t Aims of Condition Management Assist people to understand and manage their health condition via learning CBT and increasing work-related functional activity (education/training/volunteering/part-time work/full time work). Reduce psychological distress, improve mood, reduce anxiety, overcome pain and fatigue, adapt to changes in level of functioning (mental and/or physical). Improve self efficacy, shift locus-of-control from external to internal. It can be delivered as voluntary or mandatory activity under employment programmes, but is limited to those with common health conditions CMP It is not a quick-fix/cure all (3 month – 2 year improvements gradient) It is aimed at a common MH problems (and physical problems) It sees a high volume of throughput, and offers clinical expertise at greatly reduced costing by co-locating clinical specialists within existing employment services It is strictly time-limited, but it is also highly individualised for the person Requires clinical expertise and rigorous following of methodology (beware those selling snake oil…) CMP Initial contact & one-to-one engagement interview CMP programme – 5 sessions – group based Biopsychosocial approach + Therapeutic Interventions - CBT, SFBT, MI – all evidence-based interventions (RCT evidence & nice guidelines) Differ from NHS/GP/IAPT – work-related focus (and outcomes) Offer employment adviser training in dealing with people who have health problems, and also individual support with signposting and/or liaison for customers with appropriate local health services Health Conditions & Problems Common Mental health (depression, stress & anxiety) Musculoskeletal (neck, back, joint problems, RSI, arthritis, trauma) Cardiopulmonary (CHD, Asthma, COPD, Heart attack, hypertension, angina) Neurological (TIA, Stroke, Epilepsy, Parkinson's disease) Other (diabetes, chronic fatigue/ME, fibromyalgia) General lifestyle (obesity, smoking, poor exercise tolerance) Evaluation Methods - quantitative Measures completed pre and post CMP group - also at 3 month & 2year follow-up: CORE-OM (Barkham et al, 2005) Work and Social Adjustment Scale (Mundt et al, 2002) Intrinsic Motivation Scale (Hackman & Lawler, 1971) General Self-Efficacy Scale (Schwarzer & Jerusalem, 1995) Employment status at 3 months and at 2 years Psychological Distress 3 months to 2 year Greater psychological distress 24 22 CORE-OM Score 20 Remained on benefits 18 Steps to work 16 14 Returned To work Lower psychological distress 12 10 Intervention Perceived Disability and Occupational Response 3 months to 2 year Greater perceived disability 28 Perceived Disability Scores 26 Lower perceived disability 24 Remain on benefits 22 20 18 Steps to Work 16 14 Return To work 12 10 Intervention Designing the Transition of a service from NHS to WP Framework provision We put together an offer based on very stringent budgetary constraints (unit costs are roughly a quarter of same service commissioned by DWP/NHS under PtW) Total co-location model reduced costs Flexible staffing model reduced costs (both based on Australasian model of services) Marketing… Meeting #1 V. large prime, with V. deep pockets… “We need exactly what you are offering. It's a perfect fit with our delivery model, and we’d be only too happy to have you aboard…” “All you need to do is find a way deliver it at no cost to us whatsoever.” Marketing… Meeting #2 Smaller prime, much shallower pockets. We need exactly what you are offering it's a perfect fit with our delivery model, and we’d be happy to have you aboard… Here is an annual budget for the service… Now please tell us how you can use it to deliver whatever you think will work… Operations… Meeting #1 Costs double what we are used to paying front line staff!! Tell you what… You train our staff up, then they can just do whatever it is you do for half the price… (took a good year to train many of them to just differentiate common MH condition customers – then high attrition of staff meant we had to start again almost from scratch) Cost of experienced well trained health professional staff who are qualified and experienced enough able to actually deliver this stuff is what it is. Just the going rate we have to pay to get staff. Operations… Delivery Initial belief.. For those with health conditions, we can just continue to do what we have always done with other customer groups and it will work just as well for them, as it always does for everyone else… CMP know that’s not how it works… Barriers related to health are complex and multi-faceted - and CMP say so. 3 years later, everyone is beginning to realise that’s not how it works (Separate health provision framework for employment related services, anyone?) Framework doesn’t actually matter - outcomes can be achieved what matters is provision of right service for particular grouping of needs, and getting the right mix of people in to do it. Reflections on Framework/Services There are genuine opportunities to put together innovative packages of outcome-based assistance and support using partnership models of delivery. We need to access and pull together the pockets of existing expertise (these models are not generally available in mainstream health). We need to stick to replicating the evidence-based methodologies – utility already tested, and proven. It can be done cost effectively, results can be achieved, but it’s not that easy, and it cannot be done for nothing.
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz