Tertiary education enrolment trends and projections in Latvia Zane Cunska Baltic International Centre for Economic Policy Studies / University of Latvia Presentation in Eurostat/UNECE Work Session April 29 2010 / Lisbon Content Tertiary education in Latvia: facts and situation Projection methods Scenarios Stable enrollment ratio scenario Global education trend scenario Crisis scenario Results Conclusions Population (15-24y) projections, LV 40000 35000 15 30000 16 17 18 19 25000 20 21 22 20000 23 24 15000 10000 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026 2028 2030 2032 2034 2036 2038 2040 2042 2044 2046 2048 2050 2052 2054 2056 2058 2060 Source: EUROPOP2008, Eutostat Student population in LV In 2009 for the first time Latvia has experienced significant fall In total enrolment: : minus 10,2%; In first year undergraduate: minus 26% in comparison to previous year Number of students Number of Students per 10000 Inhabitants 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 227 264 172 173 158 138 152 183 386 314 342 Year 539 556 562 566 552 545 496 492 453 Age-specific student ratios in LV (1998-2010) Methods Enrolment-ratio method Age-specific enrolment ratio Ext=rxt Txt , based on Eurostat population projections Txt Ratio development trends rxt Three development scenarios Stable enrollment ratio Global education trend Crisis Scenarios – Stable enrolment ratio Tertiary education developing smoothly into the future, only changes arise from the differences in cohort size. Assumes: proportion of students in the respective overall age cohort will continue to change in the same average speed and direction as over the previous period (1998-2010) Transition rates and dropout rates will change at an average annual rate of change experienced in the observation period ln(Y/Y(t-1)) = alpha/trend i.e., extrapolate the observed trends over the years 1998-2010, using the OLS and putting a constraint that the growth converges to zero when time converges to infinity Scenarios – Stable enrolment ratio All trends positive or virtually constant Growth in ratio of younger students (20-23) and nontraditional student age group (29-39) Proportions of students in 24-28 and 40-plus age groups remain stable at 2010 level Observed (1998-2010) and projected (20112020) age-year specific enrolment ratios Scenarios – Stable enrolment ratio Total number of students in tertiary education will decrease from 113 thousands in 2010 to 92 thousands in 2020 (minus 20%) Most severe decline in the 1824 years student groups – by 44% Proportion of “traditional” age students will decrease from 64% in 2010 to 44% in 2020, Size of older age student groups (29-39 and 40 plus) will remain stable Share of older age students (over 29) will increase from 24% to 44% Observed (1998-2010) and projected (2011-2020) number of students in the tertiary education Scenarios – Global education trend Takes into account the schooling pattern across European countries and assumes that the lifestyle and study patterns in Latvia and EU converge. Assumes: The 2011-2020 enrolment ratio structure for Latvia is converge to that of EU-27 ln(Y/Tt-1) = B(Yt-1-Yav) i.e., the age-specific enrolment rates Y will converge to the EU27 average, the speed being dependent on the size of the difference between the rate at t-1 and Yav Scenarios – Global education trend The enrolment ratios in EU-27 have been gradually raising in period 1998-2005, and stabilized since 2005 They are generally lower that Latvian 2010 rates Consequently, all but 25 and 26 year-old rate trends are negative Observed (1998-2010) and projected (20112100) age-year specific enrolment ratios Scenarios – Global education trend Decline in enrolment at all ages - minus 38% compared to 2010 Total enrolment in 2020 fall to 1998 level (70 thousand students) More than 50% reduction in traditional age student numbers (from 72 to 35 thousands). 13% fall (from 17 to 15 thousands) in the older age (29 plus) students Student population will be older and the proportion of nontraditional students (older than 25) in the total student population will increase to 50% in contrast to 36% in 2010 Observed (1998-2010) and projected (2011-2020) number of students in the tertiary education Scenarios - Crisis Designed to capture the effects, that do not follow from statistics, but can be concluded from literature on historical development in other countries, Subjective - author’s and expert opinions based scenario Broad age groups Assumes: Age Assumption 17-24 Enrolment rate is at the pre-crisis level (2008) for 3 years, converges to EU27 average after 2013. 25-28 Enrolment rate increases by 15% compared to 2008 for following 3 years, converges to EU-27 average after 2013. 29 plus Enrolment rate remains constant over following 3 years, converges to EU27 average after 2013. Scenarios - Crisis Crisis would have a shortterm positive impact on enrolment rates that will slightly increase above the 2010 level and stay there between 2011 and 2013 Rise in the 25-28 age student enrolment After the 2013 enrolment rates fall approaching the EU-27 level Observed (1998-2010) and projected (2011-2020) age-year specific enrolment ratios Scenarios - Crisis Total number of students in the period 2011-2013 would increase compared to 2009 and 2010 level The total number of young students would not be as high as before The 25-28 years and 29 plus student group is expected to remain roughly the same size throughout the entire period 2000-2020 Total number of students in 2020 will fall to 81 thousands, less than half (47%) of the students being in the “traditional” age Observed (1998-2010) and projected (2011-2020) number of students in the tertiary education Summary 1998 2010 Actual enrolment Total 70233 112555 2020 SER GET CRI 92152 69434 80841 Proportions of age groups in total number of students 17-24 73% 64% 44% 50% 47% 25-28 16% 13% 12% 16% 17% 29 plus 11% 24% 44% 33% 36% Total number of students in tertiary education according to three alternative scenarios Conclusions HE system in front of big changes Inexperienced situation Under any development scenario the total enrolment is very likely to fall (decrease by 18-38%) The big number of higher education institutions cannot be sustained Foreign students are unlikely to fully compensate for decrease of cohorts Thank you!
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz