Finite Difference Methods - Approximate the derivatives in the governing PDE using difference equations. - They are useful in solving heat transfer and fluid mechanics problems. The methods work well for 2-D regions with boundaries parallel to the coordinate axes. - However, they are cumbersome on curved and irregular shaped boundaries. -It is difficult to write a general purpose computer program for the finite difference methods. The Finite Element Method (FEM) - Easily applied to irregular shaped objects - Multiple materials (composites) are treated without difficulty. -Mixed BCs can be applied - General purpose codes for whole classes of problems can be written. The FEM combines several mathematical concepts to produce a system of linear or non-linear equations. It has little value without a computer since equations range from 20 20K or more. There are 2 standard FEM treatment techniques: a.) The Variational Method, and b.) Weighted Residual Methods Prof. J.M. Sullivan, Jr. ME 515 Finite Element Lecture - 1 1 Using Calculus of Variation it can be shown that if: 1.) U = g(x) yields the lowest integration value of: 2 D dU [ 0 2 dx QU]dx L then 2.) U is the solution of the D.E. d 2U D 2 Q 0 dx with BCs U(0) = U0 and U(L) = UL 2 The term: D dU [ QU] 2 dx is the approximate functional. This solution strategy is NOT applicable for any D.E. containing first derivative terms. The variational approach originated in stress analysis which involved even order derivatives only. (Fluid mechanics traditionally use FDM for their solutions since the variational formulation was not valid for the NavierStokes set of equations.) Prof. J.M. Sullivan, Jr. ME 515 Finite Element Lecture - 1 2 The Method of Weighted Residuals Takes the governing equations d 2U D 2 Q 0 , for example. dx It approximates U with Û . Since Û does not satisfy the D.E. an error or residual results, i.e., d 2Uˆ D 2 Q R 0, necessaril y dx The method of WR requires that this residual, when multiplied by a Weighting function, W, and summed over the region be zero. WR dx = 0 What we use for Û and W distinguishes the various forms of MWR b Recall: f g f ( x) g ( x)dx a is the definition of an inner product Hence, if WR dx = 0, it implies that R is orthogonal to W L The R( x)W ( x)dx has i weight functions (1 for each node, i 0 in our case, or degree of freedom in system, formally) Prof. J.M. Sullivan, Jr. ME 515 Finite Element Lecture - 1 3 The common WR methods are: i Collocation ii Subdomain iii Least Squares iv Galerkin i.) Collocation => let Wi (x) = ( x- xi) L Then R (x) δ (x x ) 0 for all x x i i 0 = R(x) for x = xi This requires that R(x) = 0 at specific points and The number of points = number of undetermined coefficients a solution is available. d 2U D 2 Q0 dx Ex: Let D = EI ( resistance of the beam to deflection) Q = - M (the moment) M L Prof. J.M. Sullivan, Jr. M B.C.’s U ( 0 ) =0 U(L)=0 ME 515 Finite Element Lecture - 1 4 The solution of U = y displacement; 2 EI d U M(x) 0 dx 2 F.E.M. Replace U with a guessed function, say 2Û d EI M(x) R(x) 0 2 dx N U(x) Û(x) U N j1 j j Where Uj are undetermined coefficients and Let Nj = basis function = sin π jΔ or many other possible basis fxns L Ex. Lagrange Polynomials applied locally on each element n (x x i ) Nj i j; n # nodes in element i 1 (x j x i ) N j 0 for all nodes not in element Exact Solution = Prof. J.M. Sullivan, Jr. U(x) Mo 2EI XX L ME 515 Finite Element Lecture - 1 5 Collocation: Trial fxn: U Û =Uj Nj (implied summation) πX j where X = j*x = Uj sin j L Plug into O.D.E. EIU j π L 2 πX sin L j - M x = R(Xj) Multiply by weighting fxn and integrate over Domain L R X j δ X Xi 0 0 Let Xi = L/2; Then EIU j π L 2 sin π - M0 = 0 2 Solve for the unknown coefficient Uj M0L2 Uj EIπ 2 which multiplies the basis function for the final approximation of Û Prof. J.M. Sullivan, Jr. ME 515 Finite Element Lecture - 1 6 M 0L2 πX j Û sin 2 L EIπ ii) Subdomain - Assume only 1 domain i.e. Wi 1 L 0 etc. 2 1 Same R(Xj) as with collocation L L R jWidx R jdx 0 0 0 πX L EI j 2 2 U jπ sin L M dx 0 0 L x πX L L j EI 2 U π sin dx - Mdx 0 j L 2 L 0 0 Prof. J.M. Sullivan, Jr. ME 515 Finite Element Lecture - 1 7 Cos(X / L) L j (1 1) 2 /L 0 2 EIπ U j M0L 0 L M0L2 Uj 2EI M L2 πX j Û 0 sin 2EI L Prof. J.M. Sullivan, Jr. ME 515 Finite Element Lecture - 1 8 iii) Galerkin: Let Wi=Nj L L πx R jWidx R jsin L i dx 0 0 πX π Xj L EI (i j) 2 dx = 0 U π sin M0 sin = L2 j L L 0 M0L2 Solving , U j 4 3EI Prof. J.M. Sullivan, Jr. same as Variational Method ME 515 Finite Element Lecture - 1 9 iv) Least Squares: 2 π Xj L EI L L 2 R jWidx R jR idx 2 U jπ sin L M0 dx 0 0 L 0 0 Error= U j2 2 EIπ 2 L 2 L 2 4M0EIπ U j M02L L Minimize 2 Error U L EIπ 2 4M0EIπ 0 j L2 L U j M0L2 ; U j 4 3 EI Prof. J.M. Sullivan, Jr. πX Û U j sin L ME 515 Finite Element Lecture - 1 j 10 Variational Method: L EI du 2 = M0U dx 0 2 dx N approximate U(x) Û(x) U N j1 j j 2 πX πX L EI π j j = j U cos M0 j U j sin dX j L L L 0 2 L πX j cos 2 L U π πX j j EI L 1 X 1 sin 2 M U π L π 0 j 2 L 2 j 4 L 0 EI U 2π 2L 4L2 j 2M LU 0 j π Minimize: EI π 2 U 2M 0L 0 π j U 2L j Prof. J.M. Sullivan, Jr. ME 515 Finite Element Lecture - 1 11 4M0L2 Uj π 3EI 4M0L2 πX j Û sin 3 L π EI Prof. J.M. Sullivan, Jr. ME 515 Finite Element Lecture - 1 12 FEM SOLUTION STRATEGY Variational Approach Method of Weighted Residuals Conservative Systems Use PDE Potential Energy of system Stationary Guess a solution to U Apply a weighting fxn PE 0 k 1, N U k Integrate Functional Require residual to be zero globally Integrate Algebraic set of Equations Apply B. C.s Matrix Solver Solution Prof. J.M. Sullivan, Jr. ME 515 Finite Element Lecture - 1 13
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz