The AstraZeneca Research Grant Nigeria
2014 - 2016
Introduction
The AstraZeneca Research Grant seeks medical research proposals
from researchers affiliated to accredited Nigerian medical schools and
research institutions who show promise of delivering medical research of
high scientific merit
The Grant seeks to enhance health research capacity in Nigeria by
supporting local research that will advance knowledge and improve
practice in various specialties
The said researchers will have to meet the eligibility criteria in order to be
considered.
1 Following the Call for proposals, applicants will be required to submit their Letter
of Intent (LOI) to:
[email protected]
2. Expert review of the LOIs will be carried out by the Scientific Review
Committee(SRC). The SRC members may recommend external reviewers to
review the LOIs if relevant expertise is required.
3. Following the review and recommendations by the SRC, successful applicants will
be informed of the outcome of their submissions and will be asked to submit their
Study Proposal.
Eligibility Criteria
Applicants should be Nigerian citizens or permanent residents in Nigeria and affiliated to a Nigerian medical
school or recognized institution. Each proposal must be accompanied with a letter of Institutional support and
ethical approval or evidence of submission to an Institutional review board (IRB).
Research Proposals should focus on non-communicable and infectious diseases with a bias to epidemiology
and health outcome studies.
The research must be carried out in Nigeria.
Researchers must provide required supporting documentation.
The proposal may be submitted in the same format presented to the relevant Ethics committee.
Budget must be stated in Naira.
The project must be completed within 2 years with 6 monthly progress reports.
Funding will be in tranches and dependent on progress report.
Each project must have a Gantt chart with milestones.
The funding will be disbursed to the successful applicant’s Institution which will subsequently avail the funding
to the researcher.
Joint funding with other funding organizations is acceptable but this would need to be declared in the
application.
Documentation required
ID/Passport
Current CV and proof of academic qualifications
Proof of institutional affiliation
Letter of Intent (LOI)
Research proposal document (for Applicants successful in the 1st round)
Medical and Dental Board Registration (where applicable)
Evidence of submission to Ethics Committee must be available on application. Final
Ethics approval for the proposed research must be made available prior to
disbursement of grants
Successful applicant may forfeit the funding and the funding reallocated if Ethics
approval is not received within 3 months of award announcement
Grading criteria
Proposals that meet the eligibility criteria will be assigned points by the Scientific Review
Committee
Points will be awarded as follows:
Item
No of points awarded
Title
5
Introduction
5
Literature review
10
Justification
10
Hypothesis
10
Methods(includes objectives)
35
Literature cited
5
Budget
5
General presentation
(presentation includes formatting,
spacing, sequence of sub-titles etc)
10
Error free bonus
5
Total Maximum Points
100
As guidance , the Scientific Review Committee will consider specific aspects of the
proposals as follows:
Title: 5 points
•
•
Is the title informative and does it clearly describe the subject of the research?
Is the research authentic?
Introduction: 10 points
•
•
•
•
•
Does the research address an important problem or critical barrier to progress in the
field?
Does the introduction clearly develop the context on the subject of the research?
Is the literature quoted in the introduction relevant to the subject of the research?
Is the order of information logical and does it flow smoothly from one idea to another?
Is the introduction written such that a reviewer, not necessarily a specialist in the field can
clearly understand the importance of the research?
Literature review: 10 points
Does the literature review provide a critical evaluation of a body of
literature relating to the research topic?
Does the review show that the researcher is familiar with previous,
relevant research?
Does the review determine remaining questions or aspects of the topic in
need of research?
Justification: 10 points
What is the rationale for the research or the reason why the research is
being conducted
Justification should include an explanation for the design and methods
employed in the research
Hypothesis: 10 points
Clear and concise
Correctly reflect the research
Stated correctly in the form of hypothesis statements (not as
questions)
Written such that a reviewer, not necessarily a specialist in the
field, can clearly understand the importance of the research?
Methods (including Objective): 35 points
Clear and concise
Sufficient to understand how the hypotheses will be addressed by the research
Not overly burdened with minute details
Uses references where necessary
Written such that a reviewer, not necessarily a specialist in the field,can clearly
understand the importance of the research?
Literature cited : 10 points
All references are consistently formatted and the numbers correspond
correctly to numbers within the text.
There are a minimum of 10 references.
Budget : 5 points
Is the costing of various elements of the research prudent and well
thought out?
• General presentation : 10 points
• Correct sequence of sub-titles
• Consistent and legible font
• Neat spacing
• Pages numbered correctly
• Error Free bonus: 5 points
• Paper free of spelling and grammatical errors will be awarded 5 points.
Timelines:
 03 March – Applications opened
 01 May – LOI (Letter of Intent) submission deadline
 29 May – SRC to complete LOI Reviews and submit the
list of short listed applicants
 01 June – AZ to notify the shortlisted applicants that
they are through to the 2nd round and request for them
to submit their Study Proposals
 31 July – Study Proposals submission deadline
 30 September – Decision of successful Recipients
 02 October – AZ will notify the successful Recipients
 04 November – Projected date for Awards Ceremony
References
Grading Criteria for Proposed Research Essays (Grant Proposals)
Availablefromhttp://rydberg.biology.colostate.edu/eharp/NR495/docs/Grading%2
0Criteria%20for%20Proposed%20Research%20Essays.pdf accessed
11/04/2014
14
Izabella du Preez | January 2015
AstraZeneca Research Trust - Nigeria