Wellbeing in Two Nova Scotia Communities CPHA June 2008 Mike Pennock Martha Pennock Ronald Colman GPI Atlantic GPI Community Surveys 2002/2003 Glace Bay (1,708) Kings County (1,898) Wellbeing in two contrasting communities in same political jurisdiction Wide range of variables Contrasting Communities Glace Bay Older industrial area Mining and primary industries History of economic instability Kings County Diversified economy Agriculture Manufacturing Government Economic Stability Economic Determinants Glace-Bay Kings Unemployment 26.4 12.7 Part-time 16.6 15.4 Discouraged 40.9 16.3 Long-term 62.3 52.5 Multiple Jobs 5.1 11.0 % Households <$20,000 28 14 Life-Satisfaction GB Kings ChiSqaure Very Satisfied 40.3 39.4 Somewhat Satisfied 50.3 53.41 2.24 df=2 P<.32 Dissatisfied 9.3 8.2 Potential for Improved Satisfaction % who would be more satisfied if: Glace Bay Kings p More time with family and friends 29.1 23.2 P<.001 Less stress 39.0 31.2 P<.001 Make a difference to community 11.7 8.7 P<.001 More money 24.7 14.5 P<.001 More Possessions 8.7 3.3 P<.001 Financially secure 38.8 25.5 P<.001 Wellbeing Despite pronounced economic differences Glace Bay and Kings respondents equally satisfied with life But Glace Bay felt there was more room for improvement Importance of Core Values % rating 8+ on 10 pt. scale Self Others p Family 94.9 55.9 P<.000 Responsibility 93.3 50.8 P<.000 Freedom 88.4 80.6 P<.000 Friendship 87.3 54.2 P<.000 Financial Security 76.3 76.9 NS Generosity 75.8 36.6 P<.000 Pleasure 69.6 76.1 P<.000 Spiritual 59.5 29.4 P<.000 Career Success 62.8 92.4 P<.000 Material Wealth 27.4 67.8 P<.000 Importance of Own Values % rating 8+ on 10 pt. scale GB Kings p Family 95.2 94.4 NS Responsibility 93.2 93.2 NS Freedom 87.5 89.1 NS Friendship 88.4 86.4 NS Financial Security 80.6 72.4 P<.000 Generosity 78.4 73.4 P<.000 Pleasure 70.8 68.6 NS Spiritual 67.2 52.5 P<.000 Career Success 68 58.3 P<.000 Material Wealth 32.4 22.8 P<.000 Factor Analysis of Values Scales Social factor (family life, friendship, generosity, spiritual) Materialistic factor (material wealth, financial security, career, pleasure) Factor scores Values and Life Satisfaction % Describing Self as Very Satisfied With Life Quartile Value Score Low Score on Value Factor 2 3 High Score on Value Factor Social Values 30.1 36.2 45.4 46.5 P<.000 Material Values 38.6 37.4 38.7 43.4 ns Distribution of Material value Scores 30 25 20 % 15 respondents 10 GB Kings 5 0 Low 2 3 High Wellbeing and Values Majority in both communities reported that they were motivated by pro-social values but living in a materialistic society Pro-social values associated with higher levels of life-satisfaction Glace Bay slightly more materialistic Self-Reported Stress 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 GB Kings Very Somewhat Not very Not At All Sources of Stress Kings Too many demands Too many hours Insufficient autonomy Interpersonal conflict Glace Bay Too few hours Risk Fear of layoffs Activity and Stress 80 70 60 50 GB Kings 40 30 20 10 0 Employed Unemployed Students Homemakers Retired Stress and Employment More two-income families in Kings (contributes to higher incomes) Two-income families much more highly stressed than one income families Two income families on Kings more highly stressed than in Glace Bay No differences between one-income families Stress and household income 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 70,000+ 5069,999 3549,999 2034,999 -20 GB Kings The Downside of Success Greater prosperity and financial security of Kings comes at a cost with respect to higher levels of stress. Wellbeing is more inequitable in Glace Bay 60 % Very Satisfed 50 40 30 20 10 0 -20,000 2034,999 3549,999 5069,999 70,000 Glace Bay 25.5 43 35.4 50.2 57.8 Kings 33.2 36.5 34.4 39.3 49.3 Glace Bay Kings Wellbeing and Economy No significant difference in lifesatisfaction between GB and Kings, despite differences in income and economic security But GB more likely to believe that there life-satisfaction could be improved by improved material circumstances Therefore- more materialistic values Great Expectations Already have rates of lifesatisfaction that are similar to Kings Yet they expect a greater increase from improved determinants Does GB expect more from income gains than can be delivered? Example of “focusing illusion” “When people consider the impact of any single factor on their wellbeing- not only income- they are prone to exaggerate its importance. We refer to this tendency as the focusing illusion… Despite the weak relation between income and global life satisfaction or experienced happiness, many people are highly motivated to increase their income.” Daniel Kahneman- Economist, Princeton University Daniel Gilbert: Stumbling on Happiness (2006) “Economies thrive when individuals strive, but because individuals will only strive for their own happiness, it is essential that they mistakenly believe that producing and consuming are routes to personal wellbeing” Higher Inequities in Glace Bay Is the greater emphasis on material values in Glace Bay linked to the greater reported inequities High income GB are more satisfied and low income are less satisfied than their counterparts in Kings Stresses reflect local realities Kings Higher stress • Too much work • Two-income families (more of them and more highly stressed than GB) • 25% would trade increases for less time • Unemployment more stressful Glace Bay • Too little work • Job insecurity • 14% would trade increases for less time • Both employment and unemployment are less stressful Catch 22 Higher incomes in Kings are associated with higher stress levels but their lifesatisfaction is no higher than the lower income, less stressed Glace Bay residents Less likely to expect improvements in lifesatisfaction due to material improvements than Glace bay residents “Been there, done that” Value Alienation? Large majority of respondents in both communities believe they are socially motivated individuals living in a materialistic society. Wellbeing and Values Positive social values intrinsically related to wellbeing while materialistic values are not Consistent with growing research literature demonstrating that positive social action is associated with higher levels of wellbeing
© Copyright 2024 Paperzz