The Achievement of Disadvantaged Children at Queenborough School and Nursery. End of Key Stage 1 The data below summaries how our disadvantaged children have achieved in comparison to both our non-disadvantaged children (NPP) and the National nondisadvantaged children at the end of Key Stage 1 in 2014-15. This data is the unvalidated data from RAISE Online 2015. Average Points Score at Key Stage 1 GROUP All Reading Writing Maths QB disadvantaged (25 pupils) 15.4 16.2 13.5 16.4 National disadvantaged 14.8 15.2 14.0 15.1 Summary Disadvantaged children at Queenborough School and Nursery achieve a higher Average Points Score for All Subjects, Reading and Maths than their counterparts Nationally. In Writing, the APS of our disadvantaged children is broadly in line with their counterparts nationally. % of Pupils to Achieve Level 2 or Above Reading Writing Maths Summary QB disadvantaged (25 pupils) 91% 74% 96% While there is a slight gap of 9% between our disadvantaged and non-disadvantaged children in QB non-disadvantaged (30 pupils) 100% 100% 100% National nondisadvantaged 93% GROUP Reading and Maths, our disadvantaged children continue to achieve in-line with National nondisadvantaged children. The % of disadvantaged achieving L2+ in Writing was lower that non-disadvantaged. This is also lower 91% 95% than the National non-disadvantaged figure. However, if we remove children with any form of SEN support from the disadvantaged, this rises to 88% which is broadly in line with National nondisadvantaged children. End of Key Stage 2 The data below summaries how our disadvantaged children have achieved in comparison to both our non-disadvantaged children and the National non-disadvantaged children at the end of Key Stage 2 in 2014-15. This data is the unvalidated data from RAISE Online 2015. Average Points Score at Key Stage 2 GROUP All Reading Writing Maths SPAG QB disadvantaged (21 pupils) 28.5 28.1 28.6 28.6 30.0 National disadvantaged 27.2 27.6 26.6 27.3 27.5 Summary Disadvantaged children at Queenborough School and Nursery achieve a higher Average Points Score for All Subjects, Reading, Maths and SPAG than their counterparts Nationally. In Writing, the APS of our disadvantaged children is broadly in line with their counterparts nationally. % of Pupils to Achieve Level 4 or Above GROUP Reading Writing Maths RWM SPAG Summary Queenborough disadvantaged children out-perform National disadvantaged children in all QB disadvantaged (21 pupils) 91% 86% 100% 82% 91% National disadvantaged 83% 79% 80% 70% 71% National nondisadvantaged 92% 90% 90% 85% 84% areas. In the Reading, Writing and the RWM Combined score, our disadvantaged children perform in line with National non-disadvantaged children. In Maths and SPAG, our disadvantaged children outperform National non-disadvantaged children. A Comparison with Similar Schools End of Key Stage 1 The data below summarises how Queenborough School and Nursery compares to schools with a similar proportion of children entitled to Free School Meals (FSM) at the end of Key Stage 1 and compared to other Swale Schools. This data is from Making Figures Speak 2015. School Schools with >40% FSM in Year 2 Swale Schools Summary Reading Level 2+ 96% 85 (QB above) 90 (QB above) Writing Level 2+ 87% 81 (QB above) 86 (QB in line) Maths Level 2+ 96% 90 (QB above) 93 (QB above) Reading Level 2b+ 93% 76 (QB above) 82 (QB above) The school surpasses other schools with a similar proportion of FSM in all areas at the end of Key Stage 1. The school also surpasses the average for Swale Schools in all areas, with the exception of three areas, in which we are in line with local schools. Please note, Writing at Key Stage 1 is a whole school priority for the academic year 2015-16. Writing Level 2b+ 73% 63 (QB above) 72 (QB in line) Maths Level 2b+ 95% 76 (QB above) 82 (QB above) Reading Level 3 38% 24 (QB above) 32 (QB above) Writing Level 3 16% 11 (QB above) 18 (QB in line) Maths Level 3+ 33% 14 (QB above) 27 (QB above) End of Key Stage 2 The data below summarises how Queenborough School and Nursery compares to schools with a similar proportion of children entitled to Free School Meals (FSM) at the end of Key Stage 2 and compared to other Swale Schools. This data is from Making Figures Speak 2015. School Schools with >40% FSM in Year 6 Swale Schools Combined R,W M Level 4 89 70 (QB above) 79 (QB above) Combined R, W, M Level 5 22 14 (QB above) 20 (QB in line) Reading 2+ Levels Progress 96 88 (QB above) 91 (QB above) Writing 2+ Levels Progress 100 82 (QB above) 94 (QB above) Maths 2+ Levels Progress 100 85 (QB above) 88 (QB above) Reading 3 Levels Progress 34 36 (QB in line) 35 (QB in line) Writing 3 Levels Progress 57 37 (QB above) 35 (QB above) Summary As you can see, we surpass the scores for schools with similar proportions of FSM in most areas but are in line for the rest. Compared to Swale, we predominantly surpass the scores for the district and are in line for the rest. Although we are below the average for Swale in the proportion of children to achieve 3 flat levels of progress of Reading, we are in line with the average of schools with a similar proportion of FSM. Maths 3 Levels Progress 28 29 (QB in line) 29 (QB in line) Reading Level 4+ 93 82 (QB above) 89 (QB above) Writing Level 4+ 94 79 (QB above) 87 (QB above) Maths Level 4+ 100 79 (QB above) 86(QB above) SPaG Level 4+ 91 69 (QB above) 78 (QB above) Reading Level 5 35 36 (QB in line) 48 QB below) Writing Level 5 52 24 (QB above) 33 (QB above) Maths Level 5 33 29 (QB above) 35 (QB in line) SPaG Level 5 65 39 (QB above) 50 (QB above)
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz