International Action Plan
Follow Up
New York May 04, 2006
1. Mandate and Preparation
•
•
The conveners of renewables 2004 (the
German Federal Ministries BMU and BMZ)
invited REN21, to co-ordinate the follow-up
and carry out the reporting on the
implementation of IAP Actions.
IAP Follow Up activity was adopted by REN21
SC meeting in Beijing November 2005.
IAP Follow-Up
Status April 27, 2006
2
3. Disclosure and Publication Policy
• REN21 Secretariat is making the (edited) reports
received available on-line continuously on the website
www.ren21.net
• Secretariat has prepared a first Interim Report in print for
the occasion of the 14th Session of the United Nations
Conference on Sustainable Development (CSD), 1-12
May 2006, in New York (first distributed to SC members)
• Updated on-line Interim Report to be prepared for June
2006, two years after renewables 2004
IAP Follow-Up
Status April 27, 2006
3
4. Status of Reporting April 27, 2006.
Response Rate
• Continued effort in reminding is successful
• Sent first contact in early March. By 27 April
2006, Partners for 83 Actions had responded,
bringing the response rate to 42 percent.
• Should guarantee that by June 2006, two years
after the Bonn conference, significantly more
than half of the Actions will be reported on.
• Will consider further steps to increase
effectiveness of this process
IAP Follow-Up
Status April 27, 2006
4
4. Status of Reporting April 27, 2006.
Structure of response:
• Most regions of origin (of the leading Partner) and target (where the
Action is implemented) are represented in the current sample,
except North America, from where reports have been announced
• All categories of actor types, i.e. governments (including regional
and local governments), international organisations (including
international financial institutions), non-governmental organisations,
research bodies, and the private sector have shown strong
participation in this reporting initiative.
• Responses are also relatively evenly distributed among the different
types of Actions.
 All categories have been covered, though unevenly. The
sample of responses received can be considered fairly
representative for all of the Actions put forward in the IAP.
IAP Follow-Up
Status April 27, 2006
5
Structure of response:
Regional
Middle East
100%
Pacific
80%
Asia
60%
40%
20%
Transcontinental
0%
Latin America
Europe
Africa
North America
Report Rate
IAP Follow-Up
Status April 27, 2006
6
Structure of response:
Actor type
Intergovernmental
100%
80%
60%
Private sector
Bilateral or
multilateral
development
40%
20%
0%
Governments
(national or local)
NGO
Report Rate
IAP Follow-Up
Status April 27, 2006
7
Structure of response:
Type of Action
Financing
100%
80%
R&D
60%
Capacity-bld.
40%
20%
0%
Deployment
Policies
Combined
Aw areness-bld.
Report Rate
IAP Follow-Up
Status April 27, 2006
8
Structure of response:
Type of Action
Absolute numbers of responses and committed Actions
Research and Development
19 out of 35
Information and Awareness
12 out of 33
Policies
12 out of 41
Financing
11 out of 17
Capacity Building
11 out of 25
Deployment
10 out of 26
Multiple categories
IAP Follow-Up
Status April 27, 2006
8 out of 20
9
5. Status of Implementation
According to Reports
Implementation status reported
• Most (75%) reports show that the commitments
are being or have been implemented. They are
either completed (18%) or underway (57%).
• Others are still under preparation (23%)
• Only 2 percent of IAP commitments reported on
have been abandoned.
IAP Follow-Up
Status April 27, 2006
10
5. Status of Implementation
According to Reports
Within the Actions
• More than average (75%) implementation rate is
reported for Actions in the categories financing
and R&D,
• Average in policy, awareness building and
multiple (combined)
• Sub average in capacity building and
deployment
• Projects with wind or biomass component higher
reporting percentage, and often exceeding
projections
IAP Follow-Up
Status April 27, 2006
11
Implementation status reported:
Type of Action
Financing
100%
80%
R&D
60%
Policies
40%
20%
0%
Aw areness-bld.
Capacity-bld.
Combined
Underw ay Rate
IAP Follow-Up
Status April 27, 2006
Deployment
Complete Rate
12
5. Status of Implementation
According to Reports
Policy
• Reporting is advanced on policies which include targets (5 out of 9):
China, France, Japan, UK and Northern Ireland (2 different
commitments), Australia announced report
• all are in implementation, 3 already approved
• Reporting is slower on other policy Actions (7 of 32): China,
Ethiopia, Germany, Iran, Turkey, Uganda, Pacific Islands
• here also implementation is general; however completion rate is
lower.
 Note: in category Multiple, reports were received from countries like
Pakistan and Egypt which also include policy targets and measures
IAP Follow-Up
Status April 27, 2006
13
5. Status of Implementation
According to Reports
Finance
• 11 out of 17 Action (set up financing schemes) s have
been reported on (65%)
• 10 of them are in implementation; one under preparation
• Significant new programmes by EIB, KfW,
• WB commitment accomplished
• Private sector financing
IAP Follow-Up
Status April 27, 2006
14
5. Status of Implementation
According to Reports
Example: Pakistan Alternative Energy Development Board
Goal: Target of 10% RE electricity by 2015, via implementing policies, fiscal
incentives, public awareness, strengthening institutions;
Rural electrification target: 50,000 villages electrified
Results so far:
- Legislation enacted
- 104 MW going on line in the next six months – interim target of 800
MW (5%) by 2010
- 8,000 rural people with modern energy services via installation of
182KW micro RE
Key Lessons: 1) Governments must lead the way in order to attract private capital;
2) Off-grid rural RE needs proper training and awareness to achieve acceptance
and proper implementation
IAP Follow-Up
Status April 27, 2006
15
7. Integration in UN CSD Process
REN21 activities during UN CSD
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
•
•
Partnership presentation (May 04, 2006), with Rajendra Pachauri and
Stephen Sawyer
Participation in JREC side event (May 08), Secretariat
REN21 stand (May 09)
Partnerships in Practice Interactive Discussion Session: Working in
Collaboration: Partnership networking and relationship building May 09
(3:00 – 4:30 PM)
Joint side event with REEEP (May 10), with Ministers UK DEFRA;
Germany BMU; Egypt; Mexico;
Distribution of print version of First Interim Report
Updated flyer informing on issue papers …
IAP Follow-Up
Status April 27, 2006
16
• Thank you for your attention
IAP Follow-Up
Status April 27, 2006
17