• Think about needs and wants in a society • Why can Free Markets better provide needs and wants than a Command Economy? • Incentives? • What if the Free Market fails? • What if a want is NOT filled by private ownership/business? Let’s play a game • Goal: “to accumulate as many points as possible without helping or hindering the other player” • Each player will hold up a red or blue card • Several rounds, keep score as we go Choice Result Player 1 Player 2 Player 1 Player 2 Blue Blue +4 +4 Blue Red -7 +7 Red Blue +7 -7 Red Red -4 -4 • Reflection: – What did you predict would happen? – What would have resulted in the optimal benefit to both players? – What happened? – What prevented the best outcome for all from happening? • Why do you think this happened? • • • • Consider another scenario: IF ¾ of the class contributes, then: 25pts extra credit to EACH student Contribution = – “I voluntarily offer this contribution towards the provision of this public good, even though I know that if the good is provided, I will enjoy its benefits whether I made a contribution or not” x 100 • What is the nature of this scenario and public good? When and why Free Markets may fail • Public Good = – Non-excludable (open to all) – Cooperation needed – Benefits don’t diminish as more enjoy them • What is the problem? What would you do? • Your best cost/benefit? • Your best incentive? Free Rider Problem • Private business/individuals lack incentive to produce something • But, society wants something • Examples: Private Sector Public Sector Business Owner Benefit: Cost: Decision? City Council Benefit: Decision: Cost: Total Benefit vs. Cost? Externalities (Side Effects) • Positive Externalities • Negative Externalities
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz